A Challenge For Unbelievers (Impossible Challenge)

[AntonToo]

Do you even realize how stupid you sound? That would make him the winner LOL

Just a slight side note - it didn't make Clinton the winner.

BTW whats up with your half-a-page sig?

 

[dblack]

Do you even realize how stupid you sound?

Do tell! You a big fan of majority rule?

 

[Road Runner]

Do tell! You a big fan of majority rule?

In a fair election that's usually how it works lol

 

[Road Runner]

BTW whats up with your half-a-page sig?

I wouldn't expect you to even begin to understand.

 

[dblack]

In a fair election that's usually how it works lol

That doesn't answer my question. I'll try again, from a different angle: do you think the will of the majority should always prevail? I don't.

 

[Road Runner]

That doesn't answer my question. I'll try again, from a different angle: do you think the will of the majority should always prevail? I don't.

Yes and I am answering your question. You're just not listening.

 

[dblack]

Yes and I am answering your question. You're just not listening.

I was listening. Just hoping I was "hearing" wrong. Sounds like you're every bit the 'majoritarian' that Democrats are. Too bad.

 

[Road Runner]

I was listening. Just hoping I was "hearing" wrong. Sounds like you're every bit the 'majoritarian' that Democrats are. Too bad.

Whatever. Obviously you don't know how an election works. (Or how it's supposed to work anyways.)

 

[dblack]

Whatever. Obviously you don't know how an election works. (Or how it's supposed to work anyways.)

I just realized I'm not actually talking about this on your level. I was referring to the general nature of majority rule and how it fits into our Constitutional republic. Apologies.

 

[BlindBoo]

You don't elect a team to win a ballgame it's entirely based upon skill

You don't win court challenges based on hearsay or the number of people who believe a particular statement.

 

[Road Runner]

I just realized I'm not actually talking about this on your level. I was referring to the general nature of majority rule and how it fits into our Constitutional republic. Apologies.

Like I said before,.. whatever.

 

[Road Runner]

You don't win court challenges based on hearsay or the number of people who believe a particular statement.

True, but just because people don't want to hear the evidence doesn't mean it isn't there.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

If you believe that the 2020 election wasn't stolen. Prove it. Prove there wasn't any fraud,.. but the answer because they said there wasn't any isn't an answer. I doubt anybody is going to be able to do this let alone listen to me. (I was inspired by another thread to make this topic.)

Proof is we have 81mil stupid people. You really believe that Lesh Otis Mayfield Moonglow IM2 are an anomaly? LOL

I wish that were the case

 

[AntonToo]

True, but just because people don't want to hear the evidence doesn't mean it isn't there.

Can you explain why Republican, and even Trump's own appointed judges don't want to hear evidence?

 

[Road Runner]

Can you explain why Republican, and even Trump's own appointed judges don't want to hear evidence?

Nope!

 

[BlindBoo]

True, but just because people don't want to hear the evidence doesn't mean it isn't there.

Litigation in the 2020 Election

This resource tracks litigation surrounding election administration in the 2020 election, an unprecedented election in which numerous changes were made to the voting process in response to the Coronavirus pandemic.

www.americanbar.org

 

[BlindBoo]

Can you explain why Republican, and even Trump's own appointed judges don't want to hear evidence?

Some of the judges were practically begging for Trumps lawyer to come up with real evidence.

 

[AntonToo]

Nope!

Well that is because it is not actually explainable.

There was no standing and/or merrit to the cases Trump's lawyers brought, thats why they lost.

Not because of some giant conspiracy against Trump among the entire judicial system.

 

[AntonToo]

Some of the judges were practically begging for Trumps lawyer to come up with real evidence.

This is what their cases looked like:

Trump Lawyer to Pennsylvania Judge: Nope, I've Got No Evidence of Voter Fraud

President Donald J Trump has been aggressively pursuing voter fraud in the courts - but in Montgomery County, even his own lawyers admit there's no grand conspiracy afoot.

www.phillymag.com

 

[danielpalos]

If you believe that the 2020 election wasn't stolen. Prove it. Prove there wasn't any fraud,.. but the answer because they said there wasn't any isn't an answer. I doubt anybody is going to be able to do this let alone listen to me. (I was inspired by another thread to make this topic.)

Simply because right-wingers are known false-witness bearing practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy (unto God with a McCarthy era phrase in our pledge). Y'all can't prove it happened in the first place. Simply proclaiming it doesn't make it true.