A Logical Question

[S.J.]

Trumpybear personally put the funds on hold and he sent his personal representative to Kiev to ensure that the new president understood what he had to do to "Play Ball".

Prove this to be true.

It's called propaganda.

Read the unclassified version of the whistleblower complaint against Trump

• I learned from U.S. officials that, on or around 14 May, the President instructed Vice President Pence to cancel his planned travel to Ukraine to attend President Zelenskyy's inauguration on 20 May; Secretary of Energy Rick Perry led the delegation instead. According to these officials, it was also "made clear" to them that the President did not want to meet with Mr. Zelenskyy until he saw how Zelenskyy "chose to act" in office. I do not know how this guidance was communicated, or by whom. I also do not know whether this action was connected with the broader understanding, described in the unclassified letter, that a meeting or phone call between the President and President Zelenskyy would depend on whether Zelenskyy showed willingness to "play ball" on the issues that had been publicly aired by Mr. Lutsenko and Mr. Giuliani.

• On 18 July, an Office of Management and Budget (OMB) official informed Departments and Agencies that the President "earlier that month" had issued instructions to suspend all U.S. security assistance to Ukraine.

Hearsay doesn't cut it, BooBoo.

 

[S.J.]

He didn't brag about withholding a billion dollars if the prosecutor who was investigating the company his son was receiving $50,000 a month for doing nothing wasn't fired?

The prosecutor who was not investigating the company his son worked for, this is a lie.

Biden was implementing US policy. The current government in the Ukraine is in power due in no small part our interference in their election. The US, the EU and other entities wanted the prosecutor gone as he was seen as weak on corruption,tough in all likelihood it was due to him not being on broad with doing what we wanted them to do.

Biden's son was not being paid for doing nothing, he was a member of the companies Board of Directors helping them gain access to western markets. This company has a history of putting such people on their board, to include the former President of Poland and a former CIA officer under GH Bush as well as the daughter to a former Ukrainian Minister of Ecology and Natural Resources.

If you would do just a couple minutes of resources instead of just brainlessly parroting your talking points, you would know all of this

Maybe YOU should spend a couple of minutes of "resources" (or research...lol).
Burisma Timeline Just Leads To More Questions About Hunter Biden

 

[S.J.]

He didn't brag about withholding a billion dollars if the prosecutor who was investigating the company his son was receiving $50,000 a month for doing nothing wasn't fired?

The prosecutor who was not investigating the company his son worked for, this is a lie.

Biden was implementing US policy. The current government in the Ukraine is in power due in no small part our interference in their election. The US, the EU and other entities wanted the prosecutor gone as he was seen as weak on corruption,tough in all likelihood it was due to him not being on broad with doing what we wanted them to do.

Biden's son was not being paid for doing nothing, he was a member of the companies Board of Directors helping them gain access to western markets. This company has a history of putting such people on their board, to include the former President of Poland and a former CIA officer under GH Bush as well as the daughter to a former Ukrainian Minister of Ecology and Natural Resources.

If you would do just a couple minutes of resources instead of just brainlessly parroting your talking points, you would know all of this

Maybe YOU should spend a couple of minutes of "resources" (or research...lol).
Burisma Timeline Just Leads To More Questions About Hunter Biden

You are the second Trump worshiper tonight that provided a link proving me correct.

Thanks!

This is what you said (as jumbled as it was):

"The prosecutor who was not investigating the company his son worked for, this is a lie."
I provided a link that proves the prosecutor investigated the company Biden's drug addict son worked for. Not really sure wtf you were saying in your 3rd grade sentence structure but I suspect you were trying to say Burisma was not being investigated (since that's the company that employed Hunter for doing nothing). You might also try learning how to put a simple sentence together, moron.​

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

If Joe Biden had admitted to having someone murdered in a foreign country should Trump be impeached for wanting the crime investigated?

The political elite always use their own position to justify their own bad behavior.

 

[Crepitus]

If Joe Biden had admitted to having someone murdered in a foreign country should Trump be impeached for wanting the crime investigated?

There was no crime. He's already been investigated. No wrongdoing was found.

Hey, remember when tRump said "no one who is the subject of a federal investigation should be allowed to.run for president" while he was the subject of a federal investigation and running for president?

Deja Vu all over again huh?

 

[alang1216]

If Trump was guilty of any of the many things the left has accused him of, why hasn't the Dem controlled House voted on impeachment?

Careful what you wish for. They appear to be headed that way.

I hope you're right but they won't, because they know it'll fail and they'll lose the election and we'll take back the House. No, this is all about trying to create the appearance of corruption where there is none, for the purpose of swaying public opinion because you know you can't beat him at the polls. If you thought you could, you would just concentrate on that instead of engaging in smears and slander. But that's always been how you people operate.

I think:

1. Dems will investigate as best they can and will be stonewalled by the Trump administration
2. The Dems will impeach so they can subpoena administration officials under oath
3. They will find plenty dirt on Trump, in addition to Mueller's obstruction finding, but will probably not send the articles to the Senate (they might just to see what the GOP will do on the record)
4. They will release their findings before the election so the voters can decide what to do.

 

[alang1216]

Really? Why are Hillary and Biden still running around free? Trump started with a GOP House and Senate and now has the Senate and SCOTUS. If they're criminals, Trump's the most incompetent President ever.

They are freaking out right now. Barr is in Europe as we speak, investigating the Russian collsion crap.

They are? What makes you think so?

Why is the AG investigating? Did new evidence just surface or is he just following Trump's orders? Can you say "witch hunt"?

After investigating the Russian "collsion crap" I hope Barr goes on to Benghazi, DC (suicide of Vince Foster), and Georgia (Whitewater).

 

[jknowgood]

Really? Why are Hillary and Biden still running around free? Trump started with a GOP House and Senate and now has the Senate and SCOTUS. If they're criminals, Trump's the most incompetent President ever.

They are freaking out right now. Barr is in Europe as we speak, investigating the Russian collsion crap.

They are? What makes you think so?

Why is the AG investigating? Did new evidence just surface or is he just following Trump's orders? Can you say "witch hunt"?

After investigating the Russian "collsion crap" I hope Barr goes on to Benghazi, DC (suicide of Vince Foster), and Georgia (Whitewater).

Oh no, he is going to prove Obama is a traitor.

 

[S.J.]

There was no crime. He's already been investigated. No wrongdoing was found.

Because daddy got the prosecutor fired.

Hey, remember when tRump said "no one who is the subject of a federal investigation should be allowed to.run for president" while he was the subject of a federal investigation and running for president?

Yeah, secretly and illegally.

 

[S.J.]

Dems will investigate as best they can and will be stonewalled by the Trump administration

No doubt they will investigate. It's all they've been doing for 3 years, accusing and investigating. It's all they have since they can't beat him at the polls.

The Dems will impeach so they can subpoena administration officials under oath

I don't think they will because if they actually do, Republicans will be able to subpoena Democrats and Democrats don't want to go there.

They will find plenty dirt on Trump, in addition to Mueller's obstruction finding

Mueller found nothing. If he had, they would have started their impeachment then. They don't have a case for impeachment, it's all a show for public consumption.

They will release their findings before the election so the voters can decide what to do.

Translation: They will continue their smear campaign right up until the election and hope something sticks.

 

[whitehall]

Thanks to the left wing zombies in the media who never saw a democrat they didn't like, the world remains upside down in the liberal mind.

 

[alang1216]

Really? Why are Hillary and Biden still running around free? Trump started with a GOP House and Senate and now has the Senate and SCOTUS. If they're criminals, Trump's the most incompetent President ever.

They are freaking out right now. Barr is in Europe as we speak, investigating the Russian collsion crap.

They are? What makes you think so?

Why is the AG investigating? Did new evidence just surface or is he just following Trump's orders? Can you say "witch hunt"?

After investigating the Russian "collsion crap" I hope Barr goes on to Benghazi, DC (suicide of Vince Foster), and Georgia (Whitewater).

Oh no, he is going to prove Obama is a traitor.

You're living in a fantasy world. Trump had a GOP AG, House, and Senate. If it wasn't proven then, it never will be.

Hillary was never locked up as promised. Charges against Biden will never happen since it was Obama calling the shots. Trump has his own problems with obstruction of justice.

 

[Rambunctious]

You can't rob a bank and get away with it by running for office.....

 

[jwoodie]

Should Biden be off limits because he's a political opponent?

No, for two reasons:

1. This is a continuation of an investigation (instigated by the Democrats) into the 2016 election.

2. Biden has not been nominated by his own party to be their candidate for President; therefore, he is not entitled to any special considerations.

 

[alang1216]

Dems will investigate as best they can and will be stonewalled by the Trump administration

No doubt they will investigate. It's all they've been doing for 3 years, accusing and investigating. It's all they have since they can't beat him at the polls.

The Dems will impeach so they can subpoena administration officials under oath

I don't think they will because if they actually do, Republicans will be able to subpoena Democrats and Democrats don't want to go there.

They will find plenty dirt on Trump, in addition to Mueller's obstruction finding

Mueller found nothing. If he had, they would have started their impeachment then. They don't have a case for impeachment, it's all a show for public consumption.

They will release their findings before the election so the voters can decide what to do.

Translation: They will continue their smear campaign right up until the election and hope something sticks.

• The Dems still have another year before they catch up with the duration of Ken Starr's investigation of Whitewater. I think it was all they had since they couldn't beat Clinton at the polls.
  
• Don't know, maybe, but Pelosi has a lot of options.
• Mueller found nothing that cleared Trump of obstruction.
• Sounds a lot like the endless Benghazi and email hearings leading up to the 2016 election. They found nothing but gave Trump plenty of innuendo to use against Hillary.

 

[alang1216]

You can't rob a bank and get away with it by running for office.....

Please tell that to Trump and Deuche Bank.

 

[Rambunctious]

You can't rob a bank and get away with it by running for office.....

Please tell that to Trump and Deuche Bank.

Did Trump rob Deuche Bank?....

 

[alang1216]

You can't rob a bank and get away with it by running for office.....

Please tell that to Trump and Deuche Bank.

Did Trump rob Deuche Bank?....

I don't know, do you? Isn't that what investigations are for?

2019: Dealings with Donald Trump
The US Congress issues subpoenas to Deutsche for documents related to the bank’s dealings with Donald Trump. The New York Times reports that senior Deutsche executives blocked employees from alerting the federal government about suspicious activity alerts linked to Trump and Jared Kusher in 2016 and 2017.

Deutsche was one of Trump’s biggest lenders, sticking by the real estate mogul when other US banks refused to lend after he went through a series of bankruptcies. Trump is thought to have borrowed at least $2bn from Deutsche with about $300m outstanding.

The bank’s entanglement with the Trump family dates back to the 1990s when Bankers Trust continued to lend to him when others had pulled out. In 2008 Trump claimed the financial crisis was an unforeseen event and refused to repay $330m to Deutsche, countersuing for $3bn compensation for Deutsche’s role in the crisis.

Trump and Deutsche’s commercial real estate division settled in 2010 but Deutsche’s private banking business continued to lend to Trump.​

 

[Rambunctious]

You can't rob a bank and get away with it by running for office.....

Please tell that to Trump and Deuche Bank.

Did Trump rob Deuche Bank?....

I don't know, do you? Isn't that what investigations are for?

2019: Dealings with Donald Trump
The US Congress issues subpoenas to Deutsche for documents related to the bank’s dealings with Donald Trump. The New York Times reports that senior Deutsche executives blocked employees from alerting the federal government about suspicious activity alerts linked to Trump and Jared Kusher in 2016 and 2017.

Deutsche was one of Trump’s biggest lenders, sticking by the real estate mogul when other US banks refused to lend after he went through a series of bankruptcies. Trump is thought to have borrowed at least $2bn from Deutsche with about $300m outstanding.

The bank’s entanglement with the Trump family dates back to the 1990s when Bankers Trust continued to lend to him when others had pulled out. In 2008 Trump claimed the financial crisis was an unforeseen event and refused to repay $330m to Deutsche, countersuing for $3bn compensation for Deutsche’s role in the crisis.

Trump and Deutsche’s commercial real estate division settled in 2010 but Deutsche’s private banking business continued to lend to Trump.​

I do know that Trump didn't rob a bank...LOL...piling on will only hurt your wanted goal...you had better be sure there is a there there or it will cloud your attempts and Trump will win in a landslide....

 

[S.J.]

The Dems still have another year before they catch up with the duration of Ken Starr's investigation of Whitewater. I think it was all they had since they couldn't beat Clinton at the polls.

Thanks for admitting my first point.

Don't know, maybe, but Pelosi has a lot of options.

She has two options. She's being pressured by both sides of her own party, those who don't want impeachment because it might cost them their re-election, and those who hate Trump so much they don't care what it costs them.

Mueller found nothing that cleared Trump of obstruction.

It wasn't his job to exonerate, his job was to prove guilt and he failed to do that.

Sounds a lot like the endless Benghazi and email hearings leading up to the 2016 election. They found nothing but gave Trump plenty of innuendo to use against Hillary.

Republicans found plenty on Clinton but Obama's Justice Dept. was never going to act on it. Dems have found nothing on Trump, that's why they have to keep inventing things. But you're right in that the objective is to provide plenty of innuendo to use against him.