WinterBorn
Diamond Member
I want to address this directly and separately. You have used loving vs Virginia numerous times and expect me to think it's not your intent to equate mixed marriages with gay marriages? I call bullshit.
What I posted was: "Nah, I'm not bitter. I'll just keep fighting for change in the laws. And one day, hopefully soon, gays will be able to marry. And a decade or so after that, people will look back and be amazed that people fought against it. Like we do when we look back at the days before and just after Loving v. Virginia. "
Now, since you seem incapable of comprehending, I will break it down for you.
"Nah, I'm not bitter" I have no emotional investment in your opinion or your issues. I am a happy, well adjusted man. I am not bitter.
"I'll just keep fighting for change in the laws." I think gays should be able to marry and have their marriages (or civil unions if semantics is the real issue) be recognized like straight marriages are. I will continue to put whatever pressure I can on law makers to change the laws.
"And one day, hopefully soon, gays will be able to marry." My wish that my work will be successful, and that it will happen sooner rather than later.
"And a decade or so after that, people will look back and be amazed that people fought against it." I think after a while people will no longer see it as an issue and will wonder why people fought against it so hard.
" Like we do when we look back at the days before and just after Loving v. Virginia." The key part is is "Like we do when we look back". In other words, the way we look at the issue of interracial marriage today will be the way we look at gay marriage in the future. I am not comparing the two issues. I am comparing the way people view issues that were once controversial and are now commonplace.
Did that help?
But you have used loving vs Virginia as a reference for gay marriage true or false?
False