Ravi
Diamond Member
Given my record of comments that you find intelligent you might want to consider something beyond the same tired ole arguement that your body includes the fetus. It's simply not the case. This will become the next phase in the abortion argument and you'll find that your "but they just want to control women" rebuttal pretty insignificant this far beyond the 50s than what it once was. You are not preserving your sexual perogative.. You are trying to validate wanton killing of a human being without any regard for any input outside of ye who has a vagina... and im telling you that just as abortion was once CRIMINAL activity so too will it be again, without the benefit of the range of options I offer, when the pro life crowd, MEN AND WOMEN, let you know what they think about your lilith fair opinion.
To be honest, at this point, I can't say that I'm not looking forward to a time when equality and the preservation of life trumps the blank check in the after math of radical feminism replacing the idea of equality.
It really, really has nothing to do with controlling women, it has to do with the state deciding what one does with one's body. In this instance, it just happens to be a woman's body. Who knows where the state will turn next.
I've never stated that the man in the equation has no right to work out an arrangement if he wants the child and the woman doesn't. He is certainly welcome to plead his case and if you can find me a few men like that that actually are that eager to be single fathers I will be happy to help them try to convince the woman in question.