ScienceRocks
Democrat all the way!
- Banned
- #261
Who ever that would destroy their own child is a monster. One that I wouldn't want anything to do with.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
She's an Australian National. She has no standing here.
Who ever that would destroy their own child is a monster. One that I wouldn't want anything to do with.
And? The same holds true for anything.
What are you trying to say? We should have no laws if abortion is legal?
No. People try to trot out the fact that even if abortions are illegal they'll still happen. Well, that's not a "no, shit" kind of thing. There isn't any activity that has had its incidence reduced to zero by making it illegal. That doesn't mean those activities shouldn't be illegal.
You aren't married are you?
Wrong......28 years......
Time to stop the insanity and the Wussification of Males in this country...ya think?
I feel sorry for your wife, married to someone who says things like this: "the Wussification of Males." Must be absolute misery.
You sound like someone who reads, and believes, Ayn Rand. You do realize, as a philosopher she is 3rd rate? As a major intellect among major intellects, she's a pygmy? And she was a bigot and a hypocrite. She's a fairly good story teller, that's about all. Of course, I'm assuming you even know the source of your accusation: Intellectual Statist. It is just as likely you've never read anything but parts of the Bible, those that serve your own purposes, and right wing blogs.wihosa said:Essie,
Great, You sound like and "Intellectual Statist"...Are you?
Government Rules/Regs/Legislation.....yea that will work....
Oh well...are you just another Big Government Rep who thinks Government works....get a clue ....
Sister, if we had to live in your world of "what if" and "but what about", we'd all be living in plastic bubbles. Our only human interactions would be with plaintiff's attorneys.
Abortion should not be for birth control. Period.
That WILL be the law here sooner or later.
North Dakota ha already passed a law that states a fetus is not eligible for abortion if a heart beat can be detected.
Having not read the entire text of the law, no doubt there are contingencies for health of the mother and viability of the child and of course rape.
Again, you have no standing here. It's none of your business. Worry about Australia.
(My bold)
Why do we want to reject certain ideas? Isn't this a political message board? Noomi expresses an opinion, & we're all big boys & girls, we can evaluate that opinion on its own merits. We don't need - & I don't want - a gatekeeper.
I say, the more opinions, the merrier. The more opinions, the less likely we are to miss something that could have been valuable, or insightful, or even just amusing. (& believe me, with some of the Scheiss on TV, I'm all for anything that's amusing, even in a light-hearted way.)
She's an Australian National. She has no standing here.
Of course thats the same reasoning youll find from advocates of gun control, that because restrictions and bans wont work doesnt mean they shouldnt be implemented, even if it saves only one life.
And if you believe abortion should be illegal, perhaps you have the courage to at least explain the mechanics of arresting, prosecuting, and imprisoning women and their doctors for the crime of abortion.
Who ever that would destroy their own child is a monster. One that I wouldn't want anything to do with.
It is not a child. It is potentially a child. One third of all potential children don't make it. It's called "spontaneous abortion".
What gives YOU the right to tell ME what to do?
Who ever that would destroy their own child is a monster. One that I wouldn't want anything to do with.
It is not a child. It is potentially a child. One third of all potential children don't make it. It's called "spontaneous abortion".
What gives YOU the right to tell ME what to do?
Nope. The man's sperm is responsible for initiating the cell division, his half of the genetic code plays an equal part to the formation of the child as hers does. His genetic material is right alongside during gestation. I didn't miss anything. I paid attention in Biology class. Apparently all you have are your political biases.
Guy, I was very right wing until about six years ago, when I realized the only real divisions are not based on sex, race, class or religion, but on the haves and the have nots.
Male ego aside, a baby only happens if a woman decides she wants it to happen. Getting the sperm is the easy part.
Even the ugliest woman can get sperm if she wants it bad enough.
But the reality is, no matter what the laws are, if women want abortions, they are going to get abortions.
Oh really? What kind of logic is that? If you are married, the choice belongs to both of you. Not just the woman? Where do you get off thinking that this world should be one sided?
You're lost in your own political world. A baby happens when either the couple (yes couple, not just the woman) agree to have children, or when the the sperm breaches the outer membrane of the egg. A baby can happen when the woman doesn't want it to. Life is uncontrollable, unpredictable. But does the woman have the right to take out her pain on an innocent life?
People like you have no path in life, except for what it shown you through politics and infighting.![]()
Who ever that would destroy their own child is a monster. One that I wouldn't want anything to do with.
It is not a child. It is potentially a child. One third of all potential children don't make it. It's called "spontaneous abortion".
What gives YOU the right to tell ME what to do?
I have the right to tell you not to kill children, and to prevent you from doing so, should you show an indication that you might.
Anything else?
Sure you are. Just because you call it something else doesn't change what it is.
That's what totalitarians through the ages have always said. They have always passed laws to make their depraved slaughters "legal".
Doesn't change a thing, in the long run. History still views them as monsters, and they are still called murderers, and in the event they are captured, they are still tried as murderers as well.
So the legality of it really doesn't hold any water, when it comes to human rights violations.
Married to a lucky woman I'm sure. Me? Married 33 years. By the way, I'm a man, a general contractor and I could still twist you like a pretzel. Be careful about the assumptions you make.
Careful now......we southern rednecks do like challenges...but let that pass.....
How is the GC work in your area?.....Sucks really bad in Fl.....no money for development of any kind except RFP gov't crap....
Also...am Corp Intel guy......you give me your name and town and in 3 minutes will give you your SS, Bank acct number, Cars by Vin, net worth, and your wife, parents, kids, and all cell numbers....more than one way to kick a butt,,,,lol
Married to a lucky woman I'm sure. Me? Married 33 years. By the way, I'm a man, a general contractor and I could still twist you like a pretzel. Be careful about the assumptions you make.
Careful now......we southern rednecks do like challenges...but let that pass.....
How is the GC work in your area?.....Sucks really bad in Fl.....no money for development of any kind except RFP gov't crap....
Also...am Corp Intel guy......you give me your name and town and in 3 minutes will give you your SS, Bank acct number, Cars by Vin, net worth, and your wife, parents, kids, and all cell numbers....more than one way to kick a butt,,,,lol
Fair enough.
For me personally the last year was great. Worked for a widower with a large life insurance policy payout who wanted her whole house inside and out remodeled. I only have one crew anymore so it was enough to keep us busy all year. Overall it's picking up slowly.
[
Nope. The man's sperm is responsible for initiating the cell division, his half of the genetic code plays an equal part to the formation of the child as hers does. His genetic material is right alongside during gestation. I didn't miss anything. I paid attention in Biology class. Apparently all you have are your political biases.
Guy, I was very right wing until about six years ago, when I realized the only real divisions are not based on sex, race, class or religion, but on the haves and the have nots.
Male ego aside, a baby only happens if a woman decides she wants it to happen. Getting the sperm is the easy part.
Even the ugliest woman can get sperm if she wants it bad enough.
But the reality is, no matter what the laws are, if women want abortions, they are going to get abortions.
And? The same holds true for anything.
Careful now......we southern rednecks do like challenges...but let that pass.....
How is the GC work in your area?.....Sucks really bad in Fl.....no money for development of any kind except RFP gov't crap....
Also...am Corp Intel guy......you give me your name and town and in 3 minutes will give you your SS, Bank acct number, Cars by Vin, net worth, and your wife, parents, kids, and all cell numbers....more than one way to kick a butt,,,,lol
Fair enough.
For me personally the last year was great. Worked for a widower with a large life insurance policy payout who wanted her whole house inside and out remodeled. I only have one crew anymore so it was enough to keep us busy all year. Overall it's picking up slowly.
I service several GC's in Florida. Business is up over last Spring.