gipper
Diamond Member
- Jan 8, 2011
- 66,949
- 35,648
- 2,605
You are ignorantly and unknowingly cheering for WWIII. Your mind is not your own.I never thought Russians are idiots only because they are idiots.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are ignorantly and unknowingly cheering for WWIII. Your mind is not your own.I never thought Russians are idiots only because they are idiots.
I'll try.....
Nato is seen as 'defensive' as the Russian Federation is
it's all just a matter of where one resides on this rock fork
~S~
i hand you a hammer, and you hit yourself on the head Zaang....~S~The Russian federation is Putin and his KGB. The rest are idiots who have the human right to die for them.
What's stupid nonsense: The NATO is only a defence alliance and it gave not any lousy real reason why Putin attacked Europe in the Ukraine. Russia is the biggest country of the world with a very low population density. All Russians could live in wealth and peace. It was Russia that dissolved the Soviet Union - no one else.
Post #121Where I claimed that? Point specifically that place.
i hand you a hammer, and you hit yourself on the head Zaang....~S~
It was not my post.Post #121
This politician actually speaks the truth. LISTEN!The Russian federation is Putin and his KGB. The rest are idiots who have the human right to die for them.
What's stupid nonsense: The NATO is only a defence alliance and it gave not any lousy real reason why Putin attacked Europe in the Ukraine. Russia is the biggest country of the world with a very low population density. All Russians could live in wealth and peace. It was Russia that dissolved the Soviet Union - no one else.
Sorry simply not true. Or at least very selective about your facts.
First off. NATO had and has weapons on the border with Russia for a long time, and vice-versa. Saying that's somehow a causus belli, is simply wrong. You mentioned Cuba. Cuba was already armed by the Soviets. What caused the US to threaten to attack was the placement of NUCLEAR WEAPONS, big difference. And even that was selective because NATO had nuclear weapons in Turkey at the time, without causing a war.
Second, UKRAINE wasn't and had no hope of being a member of NATO. So how exactly is a war justified to prevent something that isn't happening?
Third, and most importantly. You are JUSTIFYING the invasion of a sovereign country. Using the same talking points, and that's what they are, simply talking points, of the invader. Claiming the invaded deserve their fate.
You said you understand history? Maybe you should apply that knowledge to the treaty of Munich, and this current situation. If you know what I'm talking about you should understand you're playing Chamberlain in this drama. And history has judged him harshly.
Here is another politician warning your dumb ass. PAY ATTENTION!Lol. Still not interested. Maybe if you ask real nicely.
It has been stated that when the elite become frightened they push for war. It appears to be happening before our eyes.
The defensive nature of NATO is established by it's articles. It's not some subjective thing. It's also demonstrated by it's history. NATO as an entity has only operated ones on a war footing. After 9/11. Besides that it was always outside NATO.I'll try.....
Nato is seen as 'defensive' as the Russian Federation is
it's all just a matter of where one resides on this rock fork
~S~
This politician actually speaks the truth ...
Check the date. After they were invaded. Find me an article or even a statement that entertained the idea of Ukraine joining NATO before the invasion and you might, and I say might have some point.
I'm supposed to be scared of a threat, when there's just as much danger that sitting by will do the same thing?Here is another politician warning your dumb ass. PAY ATTENTION!
View attachment 967630
Serbian President Warns of a Third World War - IDN-InDepthNews
You’ve learned nothing from history. The elite are pushing for war just as they did in the prior two world wars and so many others throughout history.I'm supposed to be scared of a threat, when there's just as much danger that sitting by will do the same thing?
You were talking about empathy? Let me tell you how I look at it.
Putin at the moment has invaded and annexed territory 4 times since 2010. Until the last time only getting a slap on the wrist for his troubles.
You expect me to let him have his way this time on the presumption that after this he'll be done. I don't believe he will be. And if he figures NATO is a paper tiger. Which he will if we let him do whatever he wants to Ukraine. He will simply continue until WW3 finally will break out or the West capitulates.
Threats only work, if the person being threatened is more afraid of the consequences of not giving in than they are of those of giving in.
Actually it's historical knowledge that informs my position. Hitler invaded the Rheinland, annexed Austria, bullied the allies to let him have Sudetenland, only to have him invade the rest of the country until finally WW2 broke out over Poland.You’ve learned nothing from history. The elite are pushing for war just as they did in the prior two world wars and so many others throughout history.
SHUT OFF THE TV!
The attack on the beach in Sevastopol is painfully reminiscent of the tragedy in Zugres in Donbas in August 2014, when Ukrainian aircraft bombarded the beach with people with cluster munitions.
Lol, all blow and no show. You Russian twats invaded and are now getting what ya deserved. So quit crying.