Accidentally overheard some of the democrat debate... REPARATIONS?

[Ray From Cleveland]

Do you know the origin of that flag?

Ben Franklin wrote a cartoon with snakes in the gardens of the British nobility. His point was they need to watch themselves or we'll plant a bunch of snakes in your grass. It originated from the Colonies desire to free themselves from British Rule. It was used to support our freedom from the British and supported the birth of our nation. The 2nd amendment is the amendment the forefathers supported and wrote into the constitution because the people in the future could/would need to have a means to protect themselves from an oppressive government. It's the 2nd because that's how fucking important it was. It has absolutely nothing to do with the color of someone's skin (which is just one variable of many that people may or may not have and is completely irrelevant as to the makeup of their character. Additionally it is meaningless)


You seem to pass on bad information quite a bit, don't you? Much like a lemming.

I agree it should not have anything to do with the color of ones skin but when the NRA is asked to defend a black man carrying they fall silent.

Links please

At least 3 of them

Dana Loesch explains why the NRA didn't defend Philando Castile

I'll get to the rest shortly. We should note that NO he was not breaking the law when pulled over. He was pulled over for having a "wide set nose".

Every CCW holder is trained what to do when pulled over while carrying a firearm, or otherwise in the presence of a police officer. In my state, if you have one swig of beer, that's enough to make it illegal to carry a firearm even if you are well below the .08 limit where you are legally considered drunk.

The officer reported that the car smelled of marijuana. The suspect reached into his waistband when told not to. The officer defended his life. What do you expect the NRA to do with a guy loaded on pot, reaching for his gun when an officer didn't give him permission to do so?

I'm not going to rehash this. He was pulled over for having a wide set nose. That is an unexusable reason to pull someone over.

Not when that was a characteristic of a recent robbery suspect. All he really pulled him over was to see if that was the man police were looking for.

 

[MarathonMike]

I seem to recall about a year ago that ALL of the Democratic leading candidates lined up and kissed Al Sharpton's ass when he asked the question "Are you for reparations for Black people?"

 

[Dick Foster]

The crazy train just keeps getting crazier. I could have sworn that I heard democrats on the debate stage vouching for reparations trying to out-crazy each other. They have gone full regressive.

What is wrong with these people?

The proper question to ask these days seems to be what ISN'T wrong with the idiots.

 

[pknopp]

I agree it should not have anything to do with the color of ones skin but when the NRA is asked to defend a black man carrying they fall silent.

Links please

At least 3 of them

Dana Loesch explains why the NRA didn't defend Philando Castile

I'll get to the rest shortly. We should note that NO he was not breaking the law when pulled over. He was pulled over for having a "wide set nose".

Every CCW holder is trained what to do when pulled over while carrying a firearm, or otherwise in the presence of a police officer. In my state, if you have one swig of beer, that's enough to make it illegal to carry a firearm even if you are well below the .08 limit where you are legally considered drunk.

The officer reported that the car smelled of marijuana. The suspect reached into his waistband when told not to. The officer defended his life. What do you expect the NRA to do with a guy loaded on pot, reaching for his gun when an officer didn't give him permission to do so?

I'm not going to rehash this. He was pulled over for having a wide set nose. That is an unexusable reason to pull someone over.

Not when that was a characteristic of a recent robbery suspect. All he really pulled him over was to see if that was the man police were looking for.

He had no reason to pull him over. It was a made up B.S. excuse to harass a black man. As noted above the "wide set nose" in itself shows the racism.

 

[Ken Mac]

The crazy train just keeps getting crazier. I could have sworn that I heard democrats on the debate stage vouching for reparations trying to out-crazy each other. They have gone full regressive.

What is wrong with these people?

The proper question to ask these days seems to be what ISN'T wrong with the idiots.

That list would be the empty set. Null. Void. Without substance. Vacuous. etc...

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Links please

At least 3 of them

Dana Loesch explains why the NRA didn't defend Philando Castile

I'll get to the rest shortly. We should note that NO he was not breaking the law when pulled over. He was pulled over for having a "wide set nose".

Every CCW holder is trained what to do when pulled over while carrying a firearm, or otherwise in the presence of a police officer. In my state, if you have one swig of beer, that's enough to make it illegal to carry a firearm even if you are well below the .08 limit where you are legally considered drunk.

The officer reported that the car smelled of marijuana. The suspect reached into his waistband when told not to. The officer defended his life. What do you expect the NRA to do with a guy loaded on pot, reaching for his gun when an officer didn't give him permission to do so?

I'm not going to rehash this. He was pulled over for having a wide set nose. That is an unexusable reason to pull someone over.

Not when that was a characteristic of a recent robbery suspect. All he really pulled him over was to see if that was the man police were looking for.

He had no reason to pull him over. It was a made up B.S. excuse to harass a black man. As noted above the "wide set nose" in itself shows the racism.

Why, because you think every black person has a wide nose? It would have been the same thing if the suspect was wearing a grey shirt and a green hat. Police are trained to do exactly that. I've been in black neighborhoods where I was questioned simply because I was white a couple of times.

 

[San Souci]

To the NRA it seems to mean to make sure you are armed unless you are black.

Do you know the origin of that flag?

Ben Franklin wrote a cartoon with snakes in the gardens of the British nobility. His point was they need to watch themselves or we'll plant a bunch of snakes in your grass. It originated from the Colonies desire to free themselves from British Rule. It was used to support our freedom from the British and supported the birth of our nation. The 2nd amendment is the amendment the forefathers supported and wrote into the constitution because the people in the future could/would need to have a means to protect themselves from an oppressive government. It's the 2nd because that's how fucking important it was. It has absolutely nothing to do with the color of someone's skin (which is just one variable of many that people may or may not have and is completely irrelevant as to the makeup of their character. Additionally it is meaningless)


You seem to pass on bad information quite a bit, don't you? Much like a lemming.

I agree it should not have anything to do with the color of ones skin but when the NRA is asked to defend a black man carrying they fall silent.

Links please

At least 3 of them

Dana Loesch explains why the NRA didn't defend Philando Castile

I'll get to the rest shortly. We should note that NO he was not breaking the law when pulled over. He was pulled over for having a "wide set nose".

2015:
NRA-ILA | Gov. Chris Christie Pardons Shaneen Allen; National Reciprocity Needed to Protect Others

Here are some NRA members:

Whoopi Goldberg
Karl Malone
James Earl Jones

Wonder if they know how racist the NRA is (according to you they are racist)

You're just listening in your bubble to the talking points of liberals. NRA Bad.

Are you a supporter of the 2nd amendment?

Yes. Especially the FIRST part about forming militias. Maybe it is time to do that and help out ICE.

 

[pknopp]

Dana Loesch explains why the NRA didn't defend Philando Castile

I'll get to the rest shortly. We should note that NO he was not breaking the law when pulled over. He was pulled over for having a "wide set nose".

Every CCW holder is trained what to do when pulled over while carrying a firearm, or otherwise in the presence of a police officer. In my state, if you have one swig of beer, that's enough to make it illegal to carry a firearm even if you are well below the .08 limit where you are legally considered drunk.

The officer reported that the car smelled of marijuana. The suspect reached into his waistband when told not to. The officer defended his life. What do you expect the NRA to do with a guy loaded on pot, reaching for his gun when an officer didn't give him permission to do so?

I'm not going to rehash this. He was pulled over for having a wide set nose. That is an unexusable reason to pull someone over.

Not when that was a characteristic of a recent robbery suspect. All he really pulled him over was to see if that was the man police were looking for.

He had no reason to pull him over. It was a made up B.S. excuse to harass a black man. As noted above the "wide set nose" in itself shows the racism.

Why, because you think every black person has a wide nose? It would have been the same thing if the suspect was wearing a grey shirt and a green hat. Police are trained to do exactly that. I've been in black neighborhoods where I was questioned simply because I was white a couple of times.

No you haven't. You are always full of made up B.S. anecdotal examples which are irrelevant to anything.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

How are reparations actually any different than bail outs?

Which bailouts are equivalent to reparations? Be specific.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Every CCW holder is trained what to do when pulled over while carrying a firearm, or otherwise in the presence of a police officer. In my state, if you have one swig of beer, that's enough to make it illegal to carry a firearm even if you are well below the .08 limit where you are legally considered drunk.

The officer reported that the car smelled of marijuana. The suspect reached into his waistband when told not to. The officer defended his life. What do you expect the NRA to do with a guy loaded on pot, reaching for his gun when an officer didn't give him permission to do so?

I'm not going to rehash this. He was pulled over for having a wide set nose. That is an unexusable reason to pull someone over.

Not when that was a characteristic of a recent robbery suspect. All he really pulled him over was to see if that was the man police were looking for.

He had no reason to pull him over. It was a made up B.S. excuse to harass a black man. As noted above the "wide set nose" in itself shows the racism.

Why, because you think every black person has a wide nose? It would have been the same thing if the suspect was wearing a grey shirt and a green hat. Police are trained to do exactly that. I've been in black neighborhoods where I was questioned simply because I was white a couple of times.

No you haven't. You are always full of made up B.S. anecdotal examples which are irrelevant to anything.

Oh yes, I have. Years ago I used to deliver medical equipment. At times, the job took me to very dangerous places. A couple of times when I was by my marked van, in uniform, a police officer stopped me for questioning. After all, the only reason a white guy would be in the projects in that part of town was to buy drugs. I understood it was suspicious to the officer.

I gave them my drivers license, the phone number to my company (it was on the van, but they were trying to see if what I gave them was the same number) and after about five or six questions, I was released and thanked for my cooperation. One time, the officer stated it was very dangerous for me to be there, so he escorted me to the apartment I was making a delivery to, and escorted me back to my van.

Years ago, we didn't have cell phones, and not legally allowed to carry a firearm.

 

[j-mac]

Links please

At least 3 of them

Dana Loesch explains why the NRA didn't defend Philando Castile

I'll get to the rest shortly. We should note that NO he was not breaking the law when pulled over. He was pulled over for having a "wide set nose".

Every CCW holder is trained what to do when pulled over while carrying a firearm, or otherwise in the presence of a police officer. In my state, if you have one swig of beer, that's enough to make it illegal to carry a firearm even if you are well below the .08 limit where you are legally considered drunk.

The officer reported that the car smelled of marijuana. The suspect reached into his waistband when told not to. The officer defended his life. What do you expect the NRA to do with a guy loaded on pot, reaching for his gun when an officer didn't give him permission to do so?

I'm not going to rehash this. He was pulled over for having a wide set nose. That is an unexusable reason to pull someone over.

Most if not all towns I know of have noise laws....What's unexcusable about it?

No idea what you are going on about.

It's not "going on about", it's a question....One that you refuse obviously to address in light of your indefensible statement....

 

[j-mac]

Dana Loesch explains why the NRA didn't defend Philando Castile

I'll get to the rest shortly. We should note that NO he was not breaking the law when pulled over. He was pulled over for having a "wide set nose".

Every CCW holder is trained what to do when pulled over while carrying a firearm, or otherwise in the presence of a police officer. In my state, if you have one swig of beer, that's enough to make it illegal to carry a firearm even if you are well below the .08 limit where you are legally considered drunk.

The officer reported that the car smelled of marijuana. The suspect reached into his waistband when told not to. The officer defended his life. What do you expect the NRA to do with a guy loaded on pot, reaching for his gun when an officer didn't give him permission to do so?

I'm not going to rehash this. He was pulled over for having a wide set nose. That is an unexusable reason to pull someone over.

Most if not all towns I know of have noise laws....What's unexcusable about it?

No idea what you are going on about.

It's not "going on about", it's a question....One that you refuse obviously to address in light of your indefensible statement....

Bwhaaaa....I just realized that I misread the whole thing...Sorry....haha...I thought it was noise, not nose....Oh my....That's funny.

 

[Theowl32]

The crazy train just keeps getting crazier. I could have sworn that I heard democrats on the debate stage vouching for reparations trying to out-crazy each other. They have gone full regressive.

What is wrong with these people?

Buying their stupid people again and their stupid people will believe every word of it.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Every CCW holder is trained what to do when pulled over while carrying a firearm, or otherwise in the presence of a police officer. In my state, if you have one swig of beer, that's enough to make it illegal to carry a firearm even if you are well below the .08 limit where you are legally considered drunk.

The officer reported that the car smelled of marijuana. The suspect reached into his waistband when told not to. The officer defended his life. What do you expect the NRA to do with a guy loaded on pot, reaching for his gun when an officer didn't give him permission to do so?

I'm not going to rehash this. He was pulled over for having a wide set nose. That is an unexusable reason to pull someone over.

Most if not all towns I know of have noise laws....What's unexcusable about it?

No idea what you are going on about.

It's not "going on about", it's a question....One that you refuse obviously to address in light of your indefensible statement....

Bwhaaaa....I just realized that I misread the whole thing...Sorry....haha...I thought it was noise, not nose....Oh my....That's funny.

Now that's racist. You must think all blacks are noisy.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Punish them how?

Deporting them.

Currently we have birthright citizenship.

But once it is removed, yes those people get deported, for being in the country illegally.

Because you want to punish people for the sins of their fathers?

Which part of BEING IN THE COUNTRY ILLEGALLY do you have trouble understanding?

The part where they aren't. You want to make it that way because of the sins of their fathers.

If we end birth right citizenship, then they will be in the country illegally, instead of democrat voters.

 

[San Souci]

How are reparations actually any different than bail outs?

Which bailouts are equivalent to reparations? Be specific.

Any Taxpayer money given away to freeloaders . Now matter what the cause.

 

[Theowl32]

How are reparations actually any different than bail outs?

Your race is sad. You should be embarrassed but you aren't.


Couldn't say it better if I tried.

 

[Shawnee_b]

Reperate this. (as I grab my dik) I didn't own any slaves, no Af/Ams have ever been slaves. Just suk it and get on with your lives without gloming onto dem freebies.

 

[Lastamender]

Does that mean we can give IM2 40 acres and a mule in Kenya???

No mule.

 

[pknopp]

How are reparations actually any different than bail outs?

Which bailouts are equivalent to reparations? Be specific.

Its been discussed.