Accidentally overheard some of the democrat debate... REPARATIONS?

[pknopp]

So simply helping people is bad but boosting big business is good.

Helping people is great...helping people with public funds must have return potential..No bank or automaker would have received a “bail out” had there not been potential returns for taxpayers.
American taxpayers should never be FORCED into the charity business nor should their cash be stolen in the name of compassion and nobility. “SHOW ME THE MONEY”

I disagree. The "greatest" country in the world should simply help people because it's the right thing to do.

We still have people who pretend this is a Christian nation that argues the same as you.

It's sad.

In the greatest country in the world, people should help themselves, not depend on government to do it for them. You're not doing anybody a favor.

Tell that to the banks.

If you are unable to stick to the topic, I will be reporting you. This thread is not about banks, MAKE YOUR OWN THREAD.

I'm trying to figure out why people support some bail outs and not others?

Is it actually all about the color of ones skin?

 

[imawhosure]

After the calls for reparations, the dems rooted for black criminals over the regular blacks. Bernie Sanders said he would end bail or something in that direction.

Legitimately crazy people.

Politics is not an interesting subject for many black people. They vote Democrat because they've been brainwashed to believe the Democrats are for them. Reparations are unrealistic, and the party once again is trying to pull the wool over their eyes. Why don't they do something realistic; something that would actually help blacks, like side with Republicans who want to stop invaders from coming here and taking jobs black people should be working at?

Because for the Left; it is not really about helping Black Americans, it is about keeping their vote.

Let me tell you something Ray----------------->if EVER 51% of Black America votes GOP in 2 consecutive elections, they will join the ranks of evil white guys in the press.

Hell, if the Republicans got 30% of the black vote, the Democrats are finished. Blacks vote 95 plus percent for Democrats in every presidential election, and look how close some of those races were.

If more blacks would open their eyes to politics and history, they would see that being treated like that slow kid in class is not the answer. Trump's philosophy is that a rising tide lifts all boats. Because of that, blacks are enjoying the lowest unemployment for their race since statistics began, and higher wages for working. Trump never made any special policy for blacks. They just benefited equally like any other group in the country.

Point of order------------>My daughter is going out with a Black guy. He was a Democrat, lol! We pushed him, gave him confidence as much as we could, and now he a finance manager for a Honda dealer in NW Indiana.

He is making 6 figures, but that is NOT the end of the story, lol.

The guy is paying more in taxes than he ever made before, and didn't understand the situation. I explained to him, that he is now the EVIL WEALTHY since he and my daughter together make in the low 200,000 dollar range.

Low and behold, he and my daughter went to a Trump rally! That was it, he is now a Trumper! But his extended family, many, disown him. They blame his WHITE family for his losing his way.

I am proud of the guy; not because he is now a Trumper, but because he made a choice--------------->if you like Leftists policies, give up more of your money. He said, "no, hell no!" I work 55 to 60hrs a week to make this, and I deserve to keep as much as possible of it.

Now you know why the Left really do not want Black people moving up the economic ladder. For if they do, the money the Left wants to steal, partially comes from them!

Rush Limbaugh loves sports and stays in contact with VIP's in the industry. Many of the owners told him of stories of stars that went from rags to riches. The look on their faces when they tell a black guy who grew up poor how much they are going to make, they nearly shit themselves. Then they tell them how much taxes they would have to pay, and the huge smile sinks down to a look of confusion. They are in disbelief of how much the government is going to take away from them in spite of their climb up the ladder.

Exactly Ray. Doesn't mean they become conservatives, but they get more of the "flavor" that THEY are now part of the problem.

More and more Black Americans are moving up the ladder, and they don't like the landscape as they are being BLAMED for Americas woes.

Trump has seized upon this, and the rest of the GOP should too. I am personally proud when I see more and more Blacks joining us and leaving racial politics behind. We are ALL Americans, and the color of ones skin makes them no less of an American than I am, nor me less than them.

The key is--------->to help regions like inner cities, regardless of what color resides there. If they are Black, white, Hispanic, who cares. Get them on the economic train, and get them a leg up!

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

My thing is that the US did not invade Africa and take slaves. Africans were sold against their will by Africans to Westerners. It was a practice that westerners quickly ceased in comparison to the many cultures that have practiced it for centuries and continue to this day.

In a sense, it's still going on. The sellers are organizations like the NAACP, and the buyers are the Democrat party.

 

[BrokeLoser]

(CAUTION: those scared of truth as it relates to dark folks will piss their panties if they read any further.)
Not sure what “bail outs” you speak of but I’d guess bail outs often offer the American public a potential ROi whereas investing in black people has never returned shit.

So simply helping people is bad but boosting big business is good.

Helping people is great...helping people with public funds must have return potential..No bank or automaker would have received a “bail out” had there not been potential returns for taxpayers.
American taxpayers should never be FORCED into the charity business nor should their cash be stolen in the name of compassion and nobility. “SHOW ME THE MONEY”

I disagree. The "greatest" country in the world should simply help people because it's the right thing to do.

We still have people who pretend this is a Christian nation that argues the same as you.

It's sad.

In the greatest country in the world, people should help themselves, not depend on government to do it for them. You're not doing anybody a favor.

Tell that to the banks.

Helping people is great...helping people with public funds must have return potential..No bank or automaker would have received a “bail out” had there not been potential returns for taxpayers.
American taxpayers should never be FORCED into the charity business nor should their cash be stolen in the name of compassion and nobility. “SHOW ME THE MONEY”

I disagree. The "greatest" country in the world should simply help people because it's the right thing to do.

We still have people who pretend this is a Christian nation that argues the same as you.

It's sad.

Reparations, giving out benefits based on skin color, is RACIST you idiot.

And not the right thing to do. Teaching people how to live on the backs of others is wrong.

How is that different than bail outs? Look at what it has done to the banks.

As soon as we taper the welfare they start throwing a tantrum.

That is my original question.

Go make your own thread with your socialist nonsense.

With bailouts the deal was not if your CEO is black, you get a bail-out, otherwise go eat dick. There was no racial element to the bailouts.

Reparations on the other hand, are racist from the get go.

So you have come up with one way they differ but yet you condemn me for socialism while defending socialist bail outs.

Why are you trying NOT to understand the difference between investment and giveaways?
Let’s dumb this way down for you...”Bail outs” are viewed as public investment...GIVING black people money is viewed as a giveaway. Let me know if you’re still confused.

 

[Norman]

Helping people is great...helping people with public funds must have return potential..No bank or automaker would have received a “bail out” had there not been potential returns for taxpayers.
American taxpayers should never be FORCED into the charity business nor should their cash be stolen in the name of compassion and nobility. “SHOW ME THE MONEY”

I disagree. The "greatest" country in the world should simply help people because it's the right thing to do.

We still have people who pretend this is a Christian nation that argues the same as you.

It's sad.

In the greatest country in the world, people should help themselves, not depend on government to do it for them. You're not doing anybody a favor.

Tell that to the banks.

If you are unable to stick to the topic, I will be reporting you. This thread is not about banks, MAKE YOUR OWN THREAD.

I'm trying to figure out why people support some bail outs and not others?

Is it actually all about the color of ones skin?

Reparations are NOT bail outs you idiot.

Are you pursuing a leftist gender studies degree or what has destroyed your thinking process to a degree that you believe we are talking about the same thing?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

So simply helping people is bad but boosting big business is good.

Helping people is great...helping people with public funds must have return potential..No bank or automaker would have received a “bail out” had there not been potential returns for taxpayers.
American taxpayers should never be FORCED into the charity business nor should their cash be stolen in the name of compassion and nobility. “SHOW ME THE MONEY”

I disagree. The "greatest" country in the world should simply help people because it's the right thing to do.

We still have people who pretend this is a Christian nation that argues the same as you.

It's sad.

In the greatest country in the world, people should help themselves, not depend on government to do it for them. You're not doing anybody a favor.

Tell that to the banks.

I disagree. The "greatest" country in the world should simply help people because it's the right thing to do.

We still have people who pretend this is a Christian nation that argues the same as you.

It's sad.

Reparations, giving out benefits based on skin color, is RACIST you idiot.

And not the right thing to do. Teaching people how to live on the backs of others is wrong.

How is that different than bail outs? Look at what it has done to the banks.

As soon as we taper the welfare they start throwing a tantrum.

That is my original question.

Go make your own thread with your socialist nonsense.

With bailouts the deal was not if your CEO is black, you get a bail-out, otherwise go eat dick. There was no racial element to the bailouts.

Reparations on the other hand, are racist from the get go.

So you have come up with one way they differ but yet you condemn me for socialism while defending socialist bail outs.

Why are trying NOT to understand the difference between investment and giveaways?
Let’s dumb this way down for you...”Bail outs” are viewed as public investment...GIVING black people money is viewed as a giveaway. Let me know if you’re still confused.

Actually giving money to blacks is vote buying. Just like free college and free medical care.

 

[pknopp]

So simply helping people is bad but boosting big business is good.

Helping people is great...helping people with public funds must have return potential..No bank or automaker would have received a “bail out” had there not been potential returns for taxpayers.
American taxpayers should never be FORCED into the charity business nor should their cash be stolen in the name of compassion and nobility. “SHOW ME THE MONEY”

I disagree. The "greatest" country in the world should simply help people because it's the right thing to do.

We still have people who pretend this is a Christian nation that argues the same as you.

It's sad.

In the greatest country in the world, people should help themselves, not depend on government to do it for them. You're not doing anybody a favor.

Tell that to the banks.

I disagree. The "greatest" country in the world should simply help people because it's the right thing to do.

We still have people who pretend this is a Christian nation that argues the same as you.

It's sad.

Reparations, giving out benefits based on skin color, is RACIST you idiot.

And not the right thing to do. Teaching people how to live on the backs of others is wrong.

How is that different than bail outs? Look at what it has done to the banks.

As soon as we taper the welfare they start throwing a tantrum.

That is my original question.

Go make your own thread with your socialist nonsense.

With bailouts the deal was not if your CEO is black, you get a bail-out, otherwise go eat dick. There was no racial element to the bailouts.

Reparations on the other hand, are racist from the get go.

So you have come up with one way they differ but yet you condemn me for socialism while defending socialist bail outs.

Why are trying NOT to understand the difference between investment and giveaways?
Let’s dumb this way down for you...”Bail outs” are viewed as public investment...GIVING black people money is viewed as a giveaway. Let me know if you’re still confused.

I am.

To bail out some, one has to take from another. I thought that was wrong. No?

 

[pknopp]

I disagree. The "greatest" country in the world should simply help people because it's the right thing to do.

We still have people who pretend this is a Christian nation that argues the same as you.

It's sad.

In the greatest country in the world, people should help themselves, not depend on government to do it for them. You're not doing anybody a favor.

Tell that to the banks.

If you are unable to stick to the topic, I will be reporting you. This thread is not about banks, MAKE YOUR OWN THREAD.

I'm trying to figure out why people support some bail outs and not others?

Is it actually all about the color of ones skin?

Reparations are NOT bail outs you idiot.

Are you pursuing a leftist gender studies degree or what has destroyed your thinking process to a degree that you believe we are talking about the same thing?

They are both giving people other people's money. I thought that was wrong.

I thought that was "theft".

No?

 

[Norman]

Helping people is great...helping people with public funds must have return potential..No bank or automaker would have received a “bail out” had there not been potential returns for taxpayers.
American taxpayers should never be FORCED into the charity business nor should their cash be stolen in the name of compassion and nobility. “SHOW ME THE MONEY”

I disagree. The "greatest" country in the world should simply help people because it's the right thing to do.

We still have people who pretend this is a Christian nation that argues the same as you.

It's sad.

In the greatest country in the world, people should help themselves, not depend on government to do it for them. You're not doing anybody a favor.

Tell that to the banks.

Reparations, giving out benefits based on skin color, is RACIST you idiot.

And not the right thing to do. Teaching people how to live on the backs of others is wrong.

How is that different than bail outs? Look at what it has done to the banks.

As soon as we taper the welfare they start throwing a tantrum.

That is my original question.

Go make your own thread with your socialist nonsense.

With bailouts the deal was not if your CEO is black, you get a bail-out, otherwise go eat dick. There was no racial element to the bailouts.

Reparations on the other hand, are racist from the get go.

So you have come up with one way they differ but yet you condemn me for socialism while defending socialist bail outs.

Why are trying NOT to understand the difference between investment and giveaways?
Let’s dumb this way down for you...”Bail outs” are viewed as public investment...GIVING black people money is viewed as a giveaway. Let me know if you’re still confused.

I am.

To bail out some, one has to take from another. I thought that was wrong. No?

So you believe ALL government spending is the same thing.

Oh great... a total moron.

Go preach somewhere else, here people can tell the difference between different things.

 

[pknopp]

Helping people is great...helping people with public funds must have return potential..No bank or automaker would have received a “bail out” had there not been potential returns for taxpayers.
American taxpayers should never be FORCED into the charity business nor should their cash be stolen in the name of compassion and nobility. “SHOW ME THE MONEY”

I disagree. The "greatest" country in the world should simply help people because it's the right thing to do.

We still have people who pretend this is a Christian nation that argues the same as you.

It's sad.

In the greatest country in the world, people should help themselves, not depend on government to do it for them. You're not doing anybody a favor.

Tell that to the banks.

Reparations, giving out benefits based on skin color, is RACIST you idiot.

And not the right thing to do. Teaching people how to live on the backs of others is wrong.

How is that different than bail outs? Look at what it has done to the banks.

As soon as we taper the welfare they start throwing a tantrum.

That is my original question.

Go make your own thread with your socialist nonsense.

With bailouts the deal was not if your CEO is black, you get a bail-out, otherwise go eat dick. There was no racial element to the bailouts.

Reparations on the other hand, are racist from the get go.

So you have come up with one way they differ but yet you condemn me for socialism while defending socialist bail outs.

Why are trying NOT to understand the difference between investment and giveaways?
Let’s dumb this way down for you...”Bail outs” are viewed as public investment...GIVING black people money is viewed as a giveaway. Let me know if you’re still confused.

Actually giving money to blacks is vote buying. Just like free college and free medical care.

So is giving money to farmers.

If it's wrong, it's wrong.

 

[BrokeLoser]

I disagree. The "greatest" country in the world should simply help people because it's the right thing to do.

We still have people who pretend this is a Christian nation that argues the same as you.

It's sad.

In the greatest country in the world, people should help themselves, not depend on government to do it for them. You're not doing anybody a favor.

Tell that to the banks.

How is that different than bail outs? Look at what it has done to the banks.

As soon as we taper the welfare they start throwing a tantrum.

That is my original question.

Go make your own thread with your socialist nonsense.

With bailouts the deal was not if your CEO is black, you get a bail-out, otherwise go eat dick. There was no racial element to the bailouts.

Reparations on the other hand, are racist from the get go.

So you have come up with one way they differ but yet you condemn me for socialism while defending socialist bail outs.

Why are trying NOT to understand the difference between investment and giveaways?
Let’s dumb this way down for you...”Bail outs” are viewed as public investment...GIVING black people money is viewed as a giveaway. Let me know if you’re still confused.

I am.

To bail out some, one has to take from another. I thought that was wrong. No?

So you believe ALL government spending is the same thing.

Oh great... a total moron.

Go preach somewhere else, here people can tell the difference between different things.

Pretending to be stupid is considered to be an impactful refutation by stupid people.

 

[pknopp]

I disagree. The "greatest" country in the world should simply help people because it's the right thing to do.

We still have people who pretend this is a Christian nation that argues the same as you.

It's sad.

In the greatest country in the world, people should help themselves, not depend on government to do it for them. You're not doing anybody a favor.

Tell that to the banks.

How is that different than bail outs? Look at what it has done to the banks.

As soon as we taper the welfare they start throwing a tantrum.

That is my original question.

Go make your own thread with your socialist nonsense.

With bailouts the deal was not if your CEO is black, you get a bail-out, otherwise go eat dick. There was no racial element to the bailouts.

Reparations on the other hand, are racist from the get go.

So you have come up with one way they differ but yet you condemn me for socialism while defending socialist bail outs.

Why are trying NOT to understand the difference between investment and giveaways?
Let’s dumb this way down for you...”Bail outs” are viewed as public investment...GIVING black people money is viewed as a giveaway. Let me know if you’re still confused.

I am.

To bail out some, one has to take from another. I thought that was wrong. No?

So you believe ALL government spending is the same thing.

Oh great... a total moron.

Go preach somewhere else, here people can tell the difference between different things.

You can avoid my question by calling me names if you wish. It's quite common and cowardly.

 

[Norman]

In the greatest country in the world, people should help themselves, not depend on government to do it for them. You're not doing anybody a favor.

Tell that to the banks.

If you are unable to stick to the topic, I will be reporting you. This thread is not about banks, MAKE YOUR OWN THREAD.

I'm trying to figure out why people support some bail outs and not others?

Is it actually all about the color of ones skin?

Reparations are NOT bail outs you idiot.

Are you pursuing a leftist gender studies degree or what has destroyed your thinking process to a degree that you believe we are talking about the same thing?

They are both giving people other people's money. I thought that was wrong.

I thought that was "theft".

No?

I thought this thread was about the democrat debates and reparations... you have turned into something completely different. Most people here do not even agree with the bail outs so your point was stupid to begin with.

Reported.

 

[pknopp]

Tell that to the banks.

If you are unable to stick to the topic, I will be reporting you. This thread is not about banks, MAKE YOUR OWN THREAD.

I'm trying to figure out why people support some bail outs and not others?

Is it actually all about the color of ones skin?

Reparations are NOT bail outs you idiot.

Are you pursuing a leftist gender studies degree or what has destroyed your thinking process to a degree that you believe we are talking about the same thing?

They are both giving people other people's money. I thought that was wrong.

I thought that was "theft".

No?

I thought this thread was about the democrat debates and reparations... what do you know, you have turned into something completely different.

Reported.

Just because my take on reperations exposes the hypocrisy around government give aways?

Conversation on a subject is only legit when you agree with it?

Reparations are a government give away (which btw I don't support) so I want to know why some are OK and some are not.

That is on topic.

 

[BrokeLoser]

I disagree. The "greatest" country in the world should simply help people because it's the right thing to do.

We still have people who pretend this is a Christian nation that argues the same as you.

It's sad.

In the greatest country in the world, people should help themselves, not depend on government to do it for them. You're not doing anybody a favor.

Tell that to the banks.

How is that different than bail outs? Look at what it has done to the banks.

As soon as we taper the welfare they start throwing a tantrum.

That is my original question.

Go make your own thread with your socialist nonsense.

With bailouts the deal was not if your CEO is black, you get a bail-out, otherwise go eat dick. There was no racial element to the bailouts.

Reparations on the other hand, are racist from the get go.

So you have come up with one way they differ but yet you condemn me for socialism while defending socialist bail outs.

Why are trying NOT to understand the difference between investment and giveaways?
Let’s dumb this way down for you...”Bail outs” are viewed as public investment...GIVING black people money is viewed as a giveaway. Let me know if you’re still confused.

Actually giving money to blacks is vote buying. Just like free college and free medical care.

So is giving money to farmers.

If it's wrong, it's wrong.

Oh boy!
Yes, public investment in our food sources is the same as paying DaShawn, ShaQuita and Guadalupe to smoke weed, drink 40’s and make babies.
(listen to how stupid I sound)

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Tell that to the banks.

If you are unable to stick to the topic, I will be reporting you. This thread is not about banks, MAKE YOUR OWN THREAD.

I'm trying to figure out why people support some bail outs and not others?

Is it actually all about the color of ones skin?

Reparations are NOT bail outs you idiot.

Are you pursuing a leftist gender studies degree or what has destroyed your thinking process to a degree that you believe we are talking about the same thing?

They are both giving people other people's money. I thought that was wrong.

I thought that was "theft".

No?

I thought this thread was about the democrat debates and reparations... you have turned into something completely different. Most people here do not even agree with the bail outs so your point was stupid to begin with.

Reported.

He does this in every topic whether it's related or not to the subject. HIs big bug-a-boo is bailouts.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

This conversation is getting off course. Please keep it related to the subject of reparations.

 

[pknopp]

In the greatest country in the world, people should help themselves, not depend on government to do it for them. You're not doing anybody a favor.

Tell that to the banks.

Go make your own thread with your socialist nonsense.

With bailouts the deal was not if your CEO is black, you get a bail-out, otherwise go eat dick. There was no racial element to the bailouts.

Reparations on the other hand, are racist from the get go.

So you have come up with one way they differ but yet you condemn me for socialism while defending socialist bail outs.

Why are trying NOT to understand the difference between investment and giveaways?
Let’s dumb this way down for you...”Bail outs” are viewed as public investment...GIVING black people money is viewed as a giveaway. Let me know if you’re still confused.

Actually giving money to blacks is vote buying. Just like free college and free medical care.

So is giving money to farmers.

If it's wrong, it's wrong.

Oh boy!
Yes, public investment in our food sources is the same as paying DaShawn, ShaQuita and Guadalupe to smoke weed, drink 40’s and make babies.
(listen to how stupid I sound)

You sound like what I expected.

 

[pknopp]

This conversation is getting off course. Please keep it related to the subject of reparations.

Watch.....that won't go any better. (not commenting on your moderation)

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

This conversation is getting off course. Please keep it related to the subject of reparations.

Watch.....that won't go any better. (not commenting on your moderation)

My point is that this thread is eight pages long and seven of them are talking about something other than reparations. What started off as a Devil's Advocate retort unintentionally turned into a red herring.