Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 96,134
- 71,609
- 3,645
It already is being paid for. Do you think foreigners pay our medical costs? You're not following.It can’t be paid for period.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It already is being paid for. Do you think foreigners pay our medical costs? You're not following.It can’t be paid for period.
It isn’t absurd. Costs go up it’s no surprise he cost of this plan will go up also. Don’t be naive. The baseline isn’t even correct. How are you going to pay for it?No it isn't, what a patently absurd thing to say. And add to that it is 5% of 3.4 trillion, and over ten years it is a huge, huge number.5% is pretty small in the scheme of things.
No thanksLong way to go to hit the 33 tril Bernie the nutbag wants. Let’s not forget all the other free crap he wants.Bernie’s "Medicare for All" predicted to cost nearly $33 trillion
So about 90% of the federal budget would go towards this single entitlement
Americans paid 3.4 trillion last year for healthcare. That number is expected to rise each year by at least 5%.
Didn't read my link did you?
The study was funded by the Koch brothers Libertarian think tank, and the number is $32.6 trillion.
A $2 trillion savings of what we are currently spending.
So if we put the plan into place, everyone has healthcare, and $2 trillion can be used as an infrastructure stimulus that would create millions of good paying jobs rebuilding the country to boot.
Or we can stick with your way, that costs more money, and is a proven failure.
I follow fine. It is you that doesn’t get it. Double iut tax rate doesn’t pay for it. Take the socks out of your ears.It already is being paid for. Do you think foreigners pay our medical costs? You're not following.It can’t be paid for period.
Medicare only works if it’s voluntary, make it an opt in and it will be fine but for those that want nothing to do with it So be ita conservative think-tanker accidentally argued that medicare for all would save 2 trillion dollars. you cant make it up!
To think 5% is not significant in exponential growth is absurd.It isn’t absurd.
Which is a stupid way of looking at it, considering we will be replacing exhorbitant, existing health insurance premiums.Double iut tax rate doesn’t pay for it.
No one should be taxed more than in the teens... topsWhat is the top rate in Canada?Let’s not.Let’s start with $1 million a year at 50 percentI'm sure Cortez will support it.Bernie’s "Medicare for All" predicted to cost nearly $33 trillion
So about 90% of the federal budget would go towards this single entitlement
of course she is already on board
she says "tax the rich" to pay for it
however she neglected to mention at what level income is "the rich"
We aren’t behind every industrialized country. The weighting system is screed. Why is it that the WHO ranks quality of care as only 10%. That is insane.To think 5% is not significant in exponential growth is absurd.It isn’t absurd.
Do you think the number one cost of bankruptcy is significant? How about the number one per capita spending in the world, despite being behind every industrialization nation on health outcomes? Is that significant?
Like I said, this is all pissing in the wind, without price controls.
Well, thank goodness we don't decide such things on the gut feelings of the unwashed, uneducated peasants...No one should be taxed more than in the teens... tops
The premiums are still less than the oppresive tax rate needed to pay for this. People still have responsibility for their own lives. Big brother can’t alwasy be there. The problem with all of this is eventually you run out of other people’s money.Which is a stupid way of looking at it, considering we will be replacing exhorbitant, existing health insurance premiums.Double iut tax rate doesn’t pay for it.
We absolutely are behind them all, by every objective measure available. I am unmoved by your emotions, which are not a good substitute for empirical evidence.We aren’t behind every industrialized country. The weighting system is screed. Why is it that the WHO ranks quality of care as only 10%. That is insane.To think 5% is not significant in exponential growth is absurd.It isn’t absurd.
Do you think the number one cost of bankruptcy is significant? How about the number one per capita spending in the world, despite being behind every industrialization nation on health outcomes? Is that significant?
Like I said, this is all pissing in the wind, without price controls.
Anyway sitting down to eat and have no more time.
Wrong, obviously. for that to be true, you would have to say that Health Care would suddenly cost more than it does paid for with private dollars.The premiums are still less than the oppresive tax rate needed to pay for this.
You go ahead and have your socialize medicine, the rest of us want nothing to do with it it does not require our participation....Wrong, obviously. for that to be true, you would have to say that Health Care would suddenly cost more than it does paid for with private dollars.The premiums are still less than the oppresive tax rate needed to pay for this.
But again...price ccontrolsare in order, regardless of whether or not we implement Universal Health Care.
My statements are factually correct. Look it up. It is you applying emotion. I’m done with this. Dinner and a nice bottle of Petrus awaits.We absolutely are behind them all, by every objective measure available. I am unmoved by your emotions, which are not a good substitute for empirical evidence.We aren’t behind every industrialized country. The weighting system is screed. Why is it that the WHO ranks quality of care as only 10%. That is insane.To think 5% is not significant in exponential growth is absurd.It isn’t absurd.
Do you think the number one cost of bankruptcy is significant? How about the number one per capita spending in the world, despite being behind every industrialization nation on health outcomes? Is that significant?
Like I said, this is all pissing in the wind, without price controls.
Anyway sitting down to eat and have no more time.
It does if we decide it does ...welcome to America, enjoy your stay.it does not require our participation....
Try using math. I’m correct and you are simply incorrect. It’s very plain. Phone is now off. I’ve wasted too much time with you. It was fun at first now you just boar the hell out of me.Wrong, obviously. for that to be true, you would have to say that Health Care would suddenly cost more than it does paid for with private dollars.The premiums are still less than the oppresive tax rate needed to pay for this.
But again...price ccontrolsare in order, regardless of whether or not we implement Universal Health Care.
Yes, and stupid, in this context, for exactly the reasons I statedMy statements are factually correct.
See, that’s why Social entitlement programs will never work for the good of the people. Anything like that, that’s forced is destined for failureIt does if we decide it does ...welcome to America, enjoy your stay.it does not require our participation....
Says the guy who didn't understand 1 does not equal ten. Says the guy who clearly does not understand exponential growth.Try using math.