there4eyeM
unlicensed metaphysician
- Jul 5, 2012
- 20,539
- 5,217
- 280
One hopes, and none too soon.A national health care system would be cheaper, more inclusive, and result in better national health.
This is going to happen.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
One hopes, and none too soon.A national health care system would be cheaper, more inclusive, and result in better national health.
This is going to happen.
A national health care system would be cheaper, more inclusive, and result in better national health.
ABC says $32.6 TThe entire federal budget for 18' is about $4 trillion. Can you imagine adding another $3.2 trillion? No doubt those costs would rise dramatically in the years to come and I bet quality of care would actually diminish.
https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Health/wireSt...ssion=true
Study: 'Medicare for all' projected to cost $32.6 trillion
The continuing obfuscation about cost is total bovine fertilizer. The proposal to make health care universal will cost no more than is presently spent. This has been made abundantly clear. The only potential losers are the bloated, greedy insurance companies. Evidently, some posters think poor people are less important than useless companies.
How's government healthcare working out for vets?A national health care system would be cheaper, more inclusive, and result in better national health.
This is going to happen.
VA health care is as good as or better than the average private outpatient and hospital care in America.
Very, very few vets in the system want out of it.
Private operators are looking for profit, HUGE profitsVA health care is as good as or better than the average private outpatient and hospital care in America.
Very, very few vets in the system want out of it.
They'd get out if the government would cover their costs to obtain private care. You don't seem to understand that government involvement REDUCES quality of care. Additionally, government is virtually never as cost efficient as private operators. You must work in government or academia. Which is it?
Private operators are looking for profit, HUGE profitsVA health care is as good as or better than the average private outpatient and hospital care in America.
Very, very few vets in the system want out of it.
They'd get out if the government would cover their costs to obtain private care. You don't seem to understand that government involvement REDUCES quality of care. Additionally, government is virtually never as cost efficient as private operators. You must work in government or academia. Which is it?
The government has relatively low overhead
So long as one continuously forgets that "A free market" has always been one-man-island fantasy and that every other developed nation already guarantees healthcare for less cost than ours.A free market engenders competition, which keeps costs to the consumer down and requires standard of care. A government monopoly eliminates competition and drives up costs and reduces quality of care.
If only they were some wary to merge the two ...Private operators are looking for profit, HUGE profitsVA health care is as good as or better than the average private outpatient and hospital care in America.
Very, very few vets in the system want out of it.
They'd get out if the government would cover their costs to obtain private care. You don't seem to understand that government involvement REDUCES quality of care. Additionally, government is virtually never as cost efficient as private operators. You must work in government or academia. Which is it?
The government has relatively low overhead