Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You love the White House lied?LMAO! Just heard it on Fox News...looking for link...LOVE IT!
Depends on what video you saw. The original or the doctored?There is no "if". We saw it on LIVE TV, on numerous videos, and here it is again > is hand/wrist on her arm, pushing it down, and knocking her off balance. The photo in Post 210 shows it.Putting his hands on a female? Perhaps IF he had done that, punching him would be warranted. But I have to laugh at a Trump supporter trying to make that claim.
But Acosta didn't put his hands on a female. He simply refused to comply with the order to cease asking questions.
Absolutely not. EVERY video shows the same thing. Acosta's hand/wrist on her arm, pushing it down about 10 inches, and knocking her off balance. What some people are calling "doctored" tape, is merely one that shows the arm push repetitively, just for demonstrative purpose, but that has no effect on what occurred.Depends on what video you saw. The original or the doctored?
You're insane. Or a baldfaced liar. Acosta's hand and wrist came down on the woman's arm, pushing it down about 10 inches, to keep her from taking the microphone, as it is her job to do. No doubt. No question. It's 100% clear.You love the White House lied?
The White House sent out doctored video. It's already been examined by experts.
They removed a couple of frames to make it look as if Acosta chopped the Intern's arm.
When you see the altered and unaltered videos side by side, you realize what disgusting people Republicans are. They are criminals.
Nope, she grabbed him first, trying to pry the mic from his hands.There is no "if". We saw it on LIVE TV, on numerous videos, and here it is again > is hand/wrist on her arm, pushing it down, and knocking her off balance. The photo in Post 210 shows it.Putting his hands on a female? Perhaps IF he had done that, punching him would be warranted. But I have to laugh at a Trump supporter trying to make that claim.
But Acosta didn't put his hands on a female. He simply refused to comply with the order to cease asking questions.
Trump-Acosta Press Conference Clip
Yes they did, and those videos show Acosta's hand/wrist on her arm, pushing it down, and knocking her off balance. Democrats are insane to believe they can contradict CLEAR video evidence and get away with it. They get courage by listening to each others lunacies, and then go around mindlessly blabbering the same ridiculous fallacy.Maybe your dumb ass needs to go back and watch the video. He didn't slam her fucking arm, that is the right wing lie that has been debunked. See the problem is simpleton a lot of folks in the room actually recorded what happened.
1. She DID NOT grab him at all.Nope, she grabbed him first, trying to pry the mic from his hands.
Doctored or undoctored, ALL tapes show Acosta assaulting the woman by pushing down her arm. The so-called doctored tapes just show the assault repeatedly, so as to have a better look at it. Doesn't change what happened, one iota.Various experts have stated the White House used a doctored video to justify taking away Acosta's press credentials . No surprise there, it's pretty much documented to be the most dishonest White House in modern history,
Expert: Acosta video distributed by White House was doctored
You’re as blind as you are senile. She grabbed the mic while he was in the middle of asking a question and before he touched her... which only happened when she reached across him to get to the mic. He then politely said, ”pardon me, ma’am...” He also handed her the mic when he was done, as all journalists do. No one has a mic ripped from them.1. She DID NOT grab him at all.Nope, she grabbed him first, trying to pry the mic from his hands.
2. She attempted to properly take the microphone, which is her job.
3. He assaulted her, pushing down her arm.
All of this is a continuation of the absurd Democrat deceit of the Kavanaugh hearing, and more display of Democrat crazy dishonesty.
LOLOLDoctored or undoctored, ALL tapes show Acosta assaulting the woman by pushing down her arm. The so-called doctored tapes just show the assault repeatedly, so as to have a better look at it. Doesn't change what happened, one iota.Various experts have stated the White House used a doctored video to justify taking away Acosta's press credentials . No surprise there, it's pretty much documented to be the most dishonest White House in modern history,
Expert: Acosta video distributed by White House was doctored
And going into denial mode is what YOU are doing.
Trump-Acosta Press Conference Clip
She is SUPPOSED to take the microphone, you bozo, and she did it when she was supposed to do it, when Trump was already calling on a new reporter to speak, and Acosta rudely and improperly kept on talking. If the whole thing would have been done right, she would have taken the microphone, and slapped him in the face as well.You’re as blind as you are senile. She grabbed the mic while he was in the middle of asking a question and before he touched her... which only happened when she reached across him to get to the mic. He then politely said, ”pardon me, ma’am...” He also handed her the mic when he was done, as all journalists do. No one has a mic ripped from them.
The only thing that was edited was the assault part, and the editing only was a REPETITION OF THE ASSUALT, so people could see it more easily. it wasn't needed, and it didn't change WHAT occurred, which was a crime. Wouldn't matter if there was one push or 100. The editing is irrelevant.Had he “assaulted” her as you moronically claim, rightwingnuts would not have needed to make up their own edited version.
Stop lyin, gramps. She’s supposed to take it when it’s handed to her — just as she did for every other journalist who handed her the mic during that press conference. Then with Acosta, rather than wait for him to hand her the mic, she twice stabbed for it unsuccessfully before trying a third time, at which time, she grabbed the mic while he was still asking a question. She grabbed him first. It’s on video so your nonsense is easily proven false.She is SUPPOSED to take the microphone, you bozo, and she did it when she was supposed to do it, when Trump was already calling on a new reporter to speak, and Acosta rudely and improperly kept on talking. If the whole thing would have been done right, she would have taken the microphone, and slapped him in the face as well.You’re as blind as you are senile. She grabbed the mic while he was in the middle of asking a question and before he touched her... which only happened when she reached across him to get to the mic. He then politely said, ”pardon me, ma’am...” He also handed her the mic when he was done, as all journalists do. No one has a mic ripped from them.
And you admit that he touched her. That is a crime >>
DC Assault Laws
General Assault is typically defined as the unwanted touching of another person.
You don’t have to hit or even push them. Merely putting your hands on them can get you charged with this misdemeanor offense, punishable by up to 180 days in jail and $1,000 in fines.
Ref: DC Code §22-404
His "pardon me ma'm" was a ruse to try to appear innocent after commiting a crime.
And yes, he handed her the mic, but not when he was done. He cowardly handed it to her when Trump left the podium and started going after him.
Thanks so much for explaining it all to us, like I guess you think we're all blind and never saw the videos ( and on live TV), is that it ?
Stop lying, gramps. That wasn’t the only edit. Frames were added for emphasis.The only thing that was edited was the assault part, and the editing only was a REPETITION OF THE ASSUALT, so people could see it more easily. it wasn't needed, and it didn't change WHAT occurred, which was a crime. Wouldn't matter if there was one push or 100. The editing is irrelevant.Had he “assaulted” her as you moronically claim, rightwingnuts would not have needed to make up their own edited version.
It’s not a crime when someone touches you first.She is SUPPOSED to take the microphone, you bozo, and she did it when she was supposed to do it, when Trump was already calling on a new reporter to speak, and Acosta rudely and improperly kept on talking. If the whole thing would have been done right, she would have taken the microphone, and slapped him in the face as well.You’re as blind as you are senile. She grabbed the mic while he was in the middle of asking a question and before he touched her... which only happened when she reached across him to get to the mic. He then politely said, ”pardon me, ma’am...” He also handed her the mic when he was done, as all journalists do. No one has a mic ripped from them.
And you admit that he touched her. That is a crime >>
DC Assault Laws
General Assault is typically defined as the unwanted touching of another person.
You don’t have to hit or even push them. Merely putting your hands on them can get you charged with this misdemeanor offense, punishable by up to 180 days in jail and $1,000 in fines.
Ref: DC Code §22-404
His "pardon me ma'm" was a ruse to try to appear innocent after commiting a crime.
And yes, he handed her the mic, but not when he was done. He cowardly handed it to her when Trump left the podium and started going after him.
Thanks so much for explaining it all to us, like I guess you think we're all blind and never saw the videos ( and on live TV), is that it ?
LMAO! Just heard it on Fox News...looking for link...LOVE IT!
No toddler, she's supposed to take it when Trump tells her do, and he did. And POS Acosta is supposed to hand it to her then.Stop lyin, gramps. She’s supposed to take it when it’s handed to her — just as she did for every other journalist who handed her the mic during that press conference. Then with Acosta, rather than wait for him to hand her the mic, she twice stabbed for it unsuccessfully before trying a third time, at which time, she grabbed the mic while he was still asking a question. She grabbed him first. It’s on video so your nonsense is easily proven false.
Yeah, but they don't change WHAT happened, infant > a General Assault by Acosta- the unwanted touching of another person. DC Code §22-404 Lock him up!Stop lying, gramps. That wasn’t the only edit. Frames were added for emphasis.
Irrelevant, She didn't touch him AT ALL. She only touched the microphone, which she had the proper right and duty to do.It’s not a crime when someone touches you first.
