Acosta has pass revoked

Bottom line is Fake News Acosta is willing to assault women interns in his effort to express his hatred for the USA. IMO Acosta is in the Harvey Weinstein category of potential rapists and needs a full background check.
 
"What separates the winners from the losers is how a person reacts to each new twist of fate."-DJT

POTUS should take his own advice instead of lashing out like a sulking 6 year old over losing the house. No doubt he'll jet off this weekend to another cracker rally and will be right back to his repellent tweeting self.
 
He acosta a white house staffer who tried to get the microphone away from him.

Looks like she went in for the kill first.
Not necessarily. A parliamentarian acts as necessary to ensure that the meeting has a purpose other than character assassination by a charlatan, which a reporter is when he or she tries to override the main speaker abusing his privilege of obtaining information and trying to insert character assassination of the speaker as an alternative to people hearing the truth the speaker has to say. The woman who tried to remove the speaker from Acosta's hands was doing her job of protecting the President from Press bullying, which has never been accepted as a means to establish strange rule over the people. That particular man doesn't want the truth to be told, he wants only his partisan beliefs pushed out, and he had a script furnished by the enemies of the United States who do not accept the result of promising smaller states a voice in government in order to have access to cheap gas and other natural benefits over the large area of their borders. People from large states are well-represented with the best people from tens of millions of people. Small states are limited who sometimes live in wastelands that furnish everybody else with reasonably-priced commodities to make life good for the larger groups of people. That is how we got their sign-on to Statehood with few exceptions, except for the Equality State that insisted before signing on that women would have the right to vote, as they often were equal to or stronger than their thin-skinned male counterparts who couldn't survive the sudden winter conditions in subzero weather without sufficient layering and outerwear. If you outlaw the College of Electors you have broken your pledge to small states who otherwise would be as unrepresented as the colonists were under King George the Arrogant. You want a country like that? I wouldn't care for such a place. If America cannot keep its promises to its own people, it will be no different than living in a monarchy in other ways, too, because once promises are broken, it's easy for perpetrators to habituate themselves into breaking promises to vast majorities of citizens. I don'[t view that as a direction towards this this nation should forage by removing people's voice from the government, and believe me, it's a small price to pay with justice for all. The little guys make up this nation, and they're taxed for it. We of the larger states must not take away people's voices of the smaller states right in Congress. Never being heard is intolerable.
 
Jim Acosta no longer has access to the White House.

CNN's Jim Acosta has press pass suspended by White House, Sarah Sanders announces

Was he rude enough to deserve this? Share.

Imagine if they banned all rude people, Trump would be kicked out. Funny how there's one rule for one lot of people, and another for others.

Also funny that asking questions of presidential policy is deemed rude.
funny how you mischaracterize what happened.
 
trump-1984.jpg
 
White house bans a reporter.

And the press lies about it.

S9Xozh.jpg


Maybe it's time to ban any access for the enemy of the people.
I saw this live from my computer yesterday. Acosta was forcing his agenda in public by trying to assassinate the character of the President. He was there by invitation, having understood the parliamentarian there would throw him out if he cared to disrupt the conference. The White House should have banned him long ago, and anyone else that wants to smarm the public with nasty, filthy mudslinging and hatefulness. The President has information no one else does, and he speaks for the people. Nobody has the right to make sure the people are misinformed by silencing the President with salacious, irrelevant, and hateful speechmaking. Their job is to listen at the conference to which they are invited to ask the President questions, and not to insert his opponents' evilest thoughts as a motive for being there, and that motive alone. Acosta was way out of control, imho. Nobody has the right to take over the short time the President has to inform the American public of decisions they hired him to make when they voted him into office.
 
Jim Acosta no longer has access to the White House.

CNN's Jim Acosta has press pass suspended by White House, Sarah Sanders announces

Was he rude enough to deserve this? Share.
“White House Bans Rude Reporter”

Wrong.

WH fears a free press.
No, were that true there’d be no press passes. Only one has been revoked and that over behavior not the questions asked. The wormy little turd was grandstanding and if this any other administration you vermin would be decrying the assault on that child.
 
If they had any integrity his fellow reporters would boycott these sessions until he is reinstated.

Why? Acosta stepped out of line, as he often does, and now has paid a price.

Just because you agree with his politics doesn't give him a pass. He's not special.

Do you think a boycott would change Trump's mind?
I watched the clip and his questioning seemed quite mild by British standards. Trump must see himself as an Emperor of some sort. Above questioning.

Perhaps, but thankfully this isn’t bloody fucking britain.
 
If they had any integrity his fellow reporters would boycott these sessions until he is reinstated.

Why? Acosta stepped out of line, as he often does, and now has paid a price.

Just because you agree with his politics doesn't give him a pass. He's not special.

Do you think a boycott would change Trump's mind?
A boycott would relieve the American public of having to listen to a bag of negative un-truisms from character assassins instead of the United States President, whom the people elected.

Well, "the people" didn't elected the president, did they? The system elected the president. Seeing how people in Puerto Rico can't vote in the election, or other places that aren't in states like DC, or how only 12 states get to actually decide, and seeing that the majority of people didn't even vote in the election, it kind of makes democracy looks like the turd a dog just freshly made.

"character assassins", well Trump is one too. Don't forget that. He started it too. Started on the Mexicans if you remember.
 
I watched the clip and his questioning seemed quite mild by British standards.

Well yeah, British standards (since it has been destroyed by 3rd world invaders) nowadays are basically Islamic in that men can mildly assault women. As far as "questioning," a press conference is not a court of law you idiot.

It sounds like you know nothing about the UK.
 
this jackasses have been jackasses for a long time
FINALLY Trump is putting them in their place
they screw people over all the time by writing whatever they want [ LIES/bullshit ]

Trump has been a jackass for ages too. Kind of hypocritical, right?
We're not talking about your opinion, we're talking about a President's right to inform the people of the US what objectives he has as our leader. This thread is about fairness of the people's listening to the President of the United States v. hatemongers in the Press. Acosta crossed the line and tried to turn his question into an indictment. The President and any Parliamentarian that needs to remove the hatemonger from the discussion is correct to remove the microphone from such a prejudicial, sick man who was not elected by the people to insert his character assassination in this venue as a shill for other hatemongers of his ilk..
 
If they had any integrity his fellow reporters would boycott these sessions until he is reinstated.

Why? Acosta stepped out of line, as he often does, and now has paid a price.

Just because you agree with his politics doesn't give him a pass. He's not special.

Do you think a boycott would change Trump's mind?
A boycott would relieve the American public of having to listen to a bag of negative un-truisms from character assassins instead of the United States President, whom the people elected.

Well, "the people" didn't elected the president, did they? The system elected the president. Seeing how people in Puerto Rico can't vote in the election, or other places that aren't in states like DC, or how only 12 states get to actually decide, and seeing that the majority of people didn't even vote in the election, it kind of makes democracy looks like the turd a dog just freshly made.

"character assassins", well Trump is one too. Don't forget that. He started it too. Started on the Mexicans if you remember.
More whining about the EC? For fuck's sake. Go Amend if you don't lile it. Don't just whine and bellyache like a pussy.
 

Forum List

Back
Top