Act Like A Man ...

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

Don't run your trap if you're looking for beef unless you want the beef, ever curious

 

[Billo_Really]

... get treated like a man.

Video of woman getting punched at Berkeley protest sparks outrage

She wasn't "acting" like man. The video clearly shows her standing there and this prick walks up to her and punches her in the mouth. If I ever run into that guy, I'm gonna beat his ass! That dude deserves a major beat down.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

That's not much to admit to. She came there for a fight....her own words say so. So why do you think this is some kind of "gotchya" question?

Because you don't defend yourself against someone's stated intention. And because there's been 13 pages of posts attempting to convince everyone that her arms outstretched was a "punch," and that the bottle held in front of her chest was "about to be thrown." Obviously, some people felt really invested in supposing that she already committed assault against the guy who punched her.

Arms outstretched is a pretty tame way to say closed fist connecting to someone else's throat. She ran AT him, not away from him, with a closed fist aimed at him. That is NOT defensive. It is clearly offensive. She was fighting, not trying to avoid fighting. In fights like this (mutual combat), the other side gets to hit back.

Not how I see it. What I see is him running toward her, and she puts her hands up defensively.

Was she innocent of any intent? No. Was she caught being violent on camera? No.

She's shown in multiple pics that she had a bottle in her hand.
The last pic where she got her clocked cleaned she doesn't.
What do you suppose she did with them?

I don't know. It is not my job to know things for which there's no evidence.

What I can do is speculate. That's what you're doing.

Well sure,but given the circumstances I think we can safely say she threw them.
I highly doubt she took the time to load them in her backpack if she wasnt going to use them. And the fact she said she was going to collect some nazi scalps proves intent.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

... get treated like a man.

Video of woman getting punched at Berkeley protest sparks outrage

She wasn't "acting" like man. The video clearly shows her standing there and this prick walks up to her and punches her in the mouth. If I ever run into that guy, I'm gonna beat his ass! That dude deserves a major beat down.

She was there for funk. Quit acting like she wasn't asking for it.

 

[Tresha91203]

The video shows her with a bottle in her hand, just because she is an unprepared pussy who doesn't know what to do in a melee means squat

Are you admitting that it doesn't matter to you after all whether or not she actually hit someone or threw a bottle at them?

That's not much to admit to. She came there for a fight....her own words say so. So why do you think this is some kind of "gotchya" question?

Because you don't defend yourself against someone's stated intention. And because there's been 13 pages of posts attempting to convince everyone that her arms outstretched was a "punch," and that the bottle held in front of her chest was "about to be thrown." Obviously, some people felt really invested in supposing that she already committed assault against the guy who punched her.

Arms outstretched is a pretty tame way to say closed fist connecting to someone else's throat. She ran AT him, not away from him, with a closed fist aimed at him. That is NOT defensive. It is clearly offensive. She was fighting, not trying to avoid fighting. In fights like this (mutual combat), the other side gets to hit back.

Not how I see it. What I see is him running toward her, and she puts her hands up defensively.

Was she innocent of any intent? No. Was she caught being violent on camera? No.

Was she running towards him or away from him? Was her fist closed (offensive) or open (as in defensively pushing him away)? Again, why do you suppose she and her team conceal their faces and protect their knuckles? Did she or did she not admit she was going there to kick some butt? Why are you twisting so hard to make her an innocent victim?

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

Because you don't defend yourself against someone's stated intention. And because there's been 13 pages of posts attempting to convince everyone that her arms outstretched was a "punch," and that the bottle held in front of her chest was "about to be thrown." Obviously, some people felt really invested in supposing that she already committed assault against the guy who punched her.

Arms outstretched is a pretty tame way to say closed fist connecting to someone else's throat. She ran AT him, not away from him, with a closed fist aimed at him. That is NOT defensive. It is clearly offensive. She was fighting, not trying to avoid fighting. In fights like this (mutual combat), the other side gets to hit back.

Not how I see it. What I see is him running toward her, and she puts her hands up defensively.

Was she innocent of any intent? No. Was she caught being violent on camera? No.

She's shown in multiple pics that she had a bottle in her hand.
The last pic where she got her clocked cleaned she doesn't.
What do you suppose she did with them?

I don't know. It is not my job to know things for which there's no evidence.

What I can do is speculate. That's what you're doing.

Well sure,but given the circumstances I think we can safely say she threw them.
I highly doubt she took the time to load them in her backpack if she wasnt going to use them. And the fact she said she was going to collect some nazi scalps proves intent.

She did throw them.

 

[Billo_Really]

"determined to bring back 100 nazi scalps"

It doesn't matter what she said in her email, the dude walked up to her and hit her with his fist.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

Are you admitting that it doesn't matter to you after all whether or not she actually hit someone or threw a bottle at them?

That's not much to admit to. She came there for a fight....her own words say so. So why do you think this is some kind of "gotchya" question?

Because you don't defend yourself against someone's stated intention. And because there's been 13 pages of posts attempting to convince everyone that her arms outstretched was a "punch," and that the bottle held in front of her chest was "about to be thrown." Obviously, some people felt really invested in supposing that she already committed assault against the guy who punched her.

Arms outstretched is a pretty tame way to say closed fist connecting to someone else's throat. She ran AT him, not away from him, with a closed fist aimed at him. That is NOT defensive. It is clearly offensive. She was fighting, not trying to avoid fighting. In fights like this (mutual combat), the other side gets to hit back.

Not how I see it. What I see is him running toward her, and she puts her hands up defensively.

Was she innocent of any intent? No. Was she caught being violent on camera? No.

Was she running towards him or away from him? Was her fist closed (offensive) or open (as in defensively pushing him away)? Again, why do you suppose she and her team conceal their faces and protect their knuckles? Did she or did she not admit she was going there to kick some butt? Why are you twisting so hard to make her an innocent victim?

She was facing him....the whole time. She knew what she was doing.

 

[Billo_Really]

Was she running towards him or away from him? Was her fist closed (offensive) or open (as in defensively pushing him away)? Again, why do you suppose she and her team conceal their faces and protect their knuckles? Did she or did she not admit she was going there to kick some butt? Why are you twisting so hard to make her an innocent victim?

She was backing up and he was the aggressor.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

Only a moron would deny she was there for trouble.

 

[Billo_Really]

She was facing him....the whole time. She knew what she was doing.

So what! How many people do you beat up for just standing around?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Was she running towards him or away from him? Was her fist closed (offensive) or open (as in defensively pushing him away)? Again, why do you suppose she and her team conceal their faces and protect their knuckles? Did she or did she not admit she was going there to kick some butt? Why are you twisting so hard to make her an innocent victim?

She was backing up and he was the aggressor.

So what was she doing in the thick of an antifag riot with bottles?

 

[Billo_Really]

Only a moron would deny she was there for trouble.

I don't give shit what she was there for. You don't hit a woman, asshole!

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

She was facing him....the whole time. She knew what she was doing.

So what! How many people do you beat up for just standing around?

You're a retard. Obviously.

 

[Billo_Really]

So what was she doing in the thick of an antifag riot with bottles?

Hydrating.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

Only a moron would deny she was there for trouble.

I don't give shit what she was there for. You don't hit a woman, asshole!

Of course you don't, fucktard. You're stupid.

 

[Billo_Really]

You're a retard. Obviously.

And you watch too much TV.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

You're a retard. Obviously.

And you watch too much TV.

I don't even own a TV, dipshit.

 

[Billo_Really]

Of course you don't, fucktard. You're stupid.

You think its smart to hit a woman, junior?

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

Stupid people need to be offed. Let's do it. How long do we have to wait?