Ain't that the truth!

[RDD_1210]

Fair enough, but that's way to specific a statement that can't be lumped in to generalizations which is what this thread is all about and my point that generalizations are often inaccurate.

You don't even know what the fuck generalization means. Generalization means a proposition asserting something to be true either of all members of a certain class or of an indefinite part of that class. Therefore if one democrat has this viewpoint then the generalization is very accurate. Damn you get dumber with each post. You might want to consider taking a break.

OMIGOD!

I know! One of the best statements of the year. Stunningly dumb.

 

[LibocalypseNow]

Well said. No need to add anything. Thanks.

 

[uscitizen]

All those bankers must be democrats.

 

[LibocalypseNow]

Socialists/Progressives do not stand for Freedom & Liberty. I think more Americans are catching on and realizing this. Don't be a Goose Stepper. Vote all D's out of office on Nov. 2nd.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

This stupid fucking spam again?

Seriously, here's a rule. If you get a conservo-spam email, chances are some other idiot already made a thread about it.

 

[LibocalypseNow]

This post really is so Spot-On. This is very rare for Message Boards. Socialists/Progressives really are lame. Vote em all out on Nov. 2nd.

 

[bodecea]

This stupid fucking spam again?

Seriously, here's a rule. If you get a conservo-spam email, chances are some other idiot already made a thread about it.

Some OTHER idiot indeed.

 

[shintao]

Got this in an email and I think it sums up the democrats pretty well.

Any thoughts?

I have rarely seen a republican that would express that behavior, or not be able to provide an opposite example. While I agree some Democrats would act that way, it is usually some group that has power to make changes. For example would you say Mothers Against Drunk Drivers (MADD) is a Liberal only group? Of course not. Same with Abortion, or guns. I am an extremist on the 2nd Amendment, and would want more than any of you lilly retards would ask for in restoring the 2nd.

 

[shintao]

This post really is so Spot-On. This is very rare for Message Boards. Socialists/Progressives really are lame. Vote em all out on Nov. 2nd.

Nah, just shit can the right and the world will turn to milk and honey for everybody, not just the top 1% of dicks the right suck on.

Hmm, makes me wonder why some of these vigilantes haven't organized and took all those rich bastards out across the nation. Maybe the next batch of 1%ers would humble themselves. They could start with the Crotch (Koch) Brothers..............LOL!

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Ahhh, so it's PETA that wants that and not "democrats" like your original post stated. Who's being dishonest now? C'mon now, be fair.

Are you sugggeting that there are no democrats in PETA? What are they Republicans?

I never suggested such a thing. Are you suggesting that a majority of Democrats are involved with PETA?

Serious question now - what is your highest level of education? And what do you do for a living?

I'm saying the vast majority of PETA members are liberals. Four years of college and you? I am a consultant for an engineeering/construction firm based in Little Rock, but I work out of the Houston office, I also co-own two businesses. I've already retired (after 20 years) from one career that started with Red Adair and contininued with Boots Hansen.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Yeah, too many generalizations.

But not untrue.

So, in your logic, generalizations are true?

Yes they generally are.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Fair enough, but that's way to specific a statement that can't be lumped in to generalizations which is what this thread is all about and my point that generalizations are often inaccurate.

You don't even know what the fuck generalization means. Generalization means a proposition asserting something to be true either of all members of a certain class or of an indefinite part of that class. Therefore if one democrat has this viewpoint then the generalization is very accurate. Damn you get dumber with each post. You might want to consider taking a break.

Oh really? Is that how it works now. So I guess all republicans are in favor of bombing government buildings, since Timothy McVeigh was ok with it.

Show me where I stated anything about ALL democrats.


You liberals get dumber everyday and more dishonest.

I doubt McVeigh was a Republican, you will have to prove that to me.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

LOL, angry much? So a majority of Democrat vegetarians want to ban everyone from eating meat? When did I miss that study?

I don't get angry. You may have missed it because your head is planted firmly up your ass. I guess you've never heard of groups like PETA. And I don't believe the word "majority" was used you dishonest puke!

PETA is only made up of Democrats and all Democrats are members of PETA, eh?

Did Isay that? Noooooooo you stupid fuck!

 

[Lonestar_logic]

This stupid fucking spam again?

Seriously, here's a rule. If you get a conservo-spam email, chances are some other idiot already made a thread about it.

Fuck you and your rule.

 

[bodecea]

I don't get angry. You may have missed it because your head is planted firmly up your ass. I guess you've never heard of groups like PETA. And I don't believe the word "majority" was used you dishonest puke!

PETA is only made up of Democrats and all Democrats are members of PETA, eh?

Did Isay that? Noooooooo you stupid fuck!

Actually, you did. But that's ok...we don't expect you to really say intelligent things...or even things that make sense. That may be a generalization, but it is true.

 

[kwc57]

But not untrue.

Not in my experience. As a conservative, I've known plenty of Democrats who don't even come close to resembling your email chain post.

Sure.

You know, you're the kind of "conservative" that makes the rest of us cringe.

 

[bodecea]

I do not see a fertilized egg as potential life.
I see it as the beginning of life.
I do not agree with aborting a fertilized egg....but I will never vote against a woma's right to choose.
But I WILL vote aganst my being forced by the government to pay for it.

Fair enough, but that's way to specific a statement that can't be lumped in to generalizations which is what this thread is all about and my point that generalizations are often inaccurate.

You don't even know what the fuck generalization means. Generalization means a proposition asserting something to be true either of all members of a certain class or of an indefinite part of that class. Therefore if one democrat has this viewpoint then the generalization is very accurate. Damn you get dumber with each post. You might want to consider taking a break.

These are the kinds of posts that need to be bumped daily.

 

[LibocalypseNow]

Did i already mention that this is possibly the most accurate & honest post i've ever seen on a Political Message Board? If i haven't,i should have. Such fantastic posts really are truly rare occurrences on message boards. So thanks again Lonestar.

 

[bodecea]

Did i already mention that this is possibly the most accurate & honest post i've ever seen on a Political Message Board? If i haven't,i should have. Such fantastic posts really are truly rare occurrences on message boards. So thanks again Lonestar.

Oh look. The Republican definition of Accurate. The Republican definition of Honest. It may be a Generalization....but that makes it very accurate.

 

[LibocalypseNow]

Socialists/Progressives do not believe in Freedom & Liberty. I would think that would be pretty obvious to most Americans by now. Get out and vote. Make 2010 count people.