Where_r_my_Keys
Gold Member
- Jan 19, 2014
- 15,272
- 1,848
- 280
- Banned
- #701
Obama being elected has nothing to do with you...
So true.
obama being elected has nothing to do with reason, on any level.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Obama being elected has nothing to do with you...
... Obama released a copy of his birth record while running for office. There's nothing about that to indicate caginess or secrecy.
what makes you say that ? you know i'm an equal gander kind of guy. the strangest thing of all is the continued hysteria about obama's documents and overall constitutional eligibility.i know, the birther thing again, doesn't seem to want to go away
I think it's hysterical that you think cruz can legally run.
what makes you say that ?i know, the birther thing again, doesn't seem to want to go away
I think it's hysterical that you think cruz can legally run.
what makes you say that ?i know, the birther thing again, doesn't seem to want to go away
I think it's hysterical that you think cruz can legally run.
he was born in canada
... Obama released a copy of his birth record while running for office. There's nothing about that to indicate caginess or secrecy.
LOL! So what? (He released the Certificate of Live Birth COLB in 08. Such is not a valid Birth Certificate and can't be used, EVEN IN HAWAII as such.).
OK none of that is in the constitution. There are only natural born and naturalized citizens. There is no 3rd category.Where does the US COnstiutution say Cruz is not eligible?
Come on Rabbi... we're 70 pages in.
Section 1 of Article Two of the United States Constitution sets forth the eligibility requirements for serving as president of the United States, under clause 5:
No person except a natural born Citizen...
A natural born citizen is a term which speaks to the NATURE OF CITIZENSHIP... which simply is that a citizen is the consequence of birth, where the birth is the result of the joining of TWO CITIZENS.
The Nature of Humanity is that where two humans join, it results in a human.
The Nature of Citizenship is the same... when two citizens join, it naturally results in a citizen.
No one can reasonably argue otherwise, which is why no one HAS ARGUED OTHERWISE...
Understand: In now 70 PAGES and nearly 700 posts... NOT ONE CONTRIBUTOR has even attempted to show that reasoning to be flawed. They simply cite it, DENY IT OUT OF HAND AND CHANGE THE SUBJECT.
... Obama released a copy of his birth record while running for office. There's nothing about that to indicate caginess or secrecy.
obama was born to a foreign national father, thus he is NOT a Natural Born Citizen.
Obama being elected has nothing to do with you...
So true.
obama being elected has nothing to do with reason, on any level.
OMG, the Right keeps trying.Unless you're Barack Obama.That's true. They were naturalized citizens of the U.S. when they became president; for which, the Constitution made provisions. There are, only two classifications of U.S. citizens, natural or naturalized.
Yes, and the law covers this situation, as well, by stating that the children of US citizens are US citizens, regardless of whether their moms drop them here or elsewhere.
Yes, or anyone else whose mother hated the US and spent as little of her adult life here as she could.
Trust me, we realize how futile trying to educate leftists is, but we just can't restrain our generous, giving nature.
He is not wrong. You're just a conservative. No one expects you to know any better. Cruz was born with dual citizenship, so yes, he was born a Canadian citizen just as that poster claimed. Need more proof, forum jester ?wrong.Canada.What country was Cruz a citizen of when he was born?
Next question: When and where was Cruz naturalized as a US citizen?
I pointed out - accurately ... FACTUALLY - that Obama has Repeatedly violated the CONSTITUTION, has been CAUGHT doing so, and has been STOPPED by Federal Courts AND the SCOTUS!Why are you lying again?
You called me a liar....
I'm quaking in my boots.Saved so that I can throw this in your face every chance I get.Cruz will be nominated. Cruz will be elected.
Speaking about Conservatives loving to generalize and blame everyone(Liberals)
Yeah, but unlike with you and your liberal co-horts, YOU keep proving ME right!
OK none of that is in the constitution. There are only natural born and naturalized citizens. There is no 3rd category.
So, when and where was Cruz naturalized as a US citizen?
You're completely demented. Short firm certificates are just as official as long form certificates. Especially in terms of proving age and place of birth, since both pieces of information are included in such documents.... Obama released a copy of his birth record while running for office. There's nothing about that to indicate caginess or secrecy.
LOL! So what? (He released the Certificate of Live Birth COLB in 08. Such is not a valid Birth Certificate and can't be used, EVEN IN HAWAII as such.)
obama was born to a foreign national father, thus he is NOT a Natural Born Citizen.
The answer "Canadian" is wrong. He was born with dual citizenship, as you say.He is not wrong. You're just a conservative. No one expects you to know any better. Cruz was born with dual citizenship, so yes, he was born a Canadian citizen just as that poster claimed. Need more proof, forum jester ?wrong.Canada.What country was Cruz a citizen of when he was born?
Next question: When and where was Cruz naturalized as a US citizen?
Here's Cruz renouncing his Canadian citizenship ... something which obviously baffles you since you don't think he was a citizen of Canada...
Ted Cruz renounces Canadian citizenship | Fox News
I keep pointing out that you are a liar....
So you admit that the Constitution contains no such verbiage about mixed marriages and leabves the term undefined, right?OK none of that is in the constitution. There are only natural born and naturalized citizens. There is no 3rd category.Where does the US COnstiutution say Cruz is not eligible?
Come on Rabbi... we're 70 pages in.
Section 1 of Article Two of the United States Constitution sets forth the eligibility requirements for serving as president of the United States, under clause 5:
No person except a natural born Citizen...
A natural born citizen is a term which speaks to the NATURE OF CITIZENSHIP... which simply is that a citizen is the consequence of birth, where the birth is the result of the joining of TWO CITIZENS.
The Nature of Humanity is that where two humans join, it results in a human.
The Nature of Citizenship is the same... when two citizens join, it naturally results in a citizen.
No one can reasonably argue otherwise, which is why no one HAS ARGUED OTHERWISE...
Understand: In now 70 PAGES and nearly 700 posts... NOT ONE CONTRIBUTOR has even attempted to show that reasoning to be flawed. They simply cite it, DENY IT OUT OF HAND AND CHANGE THE SUBJECT.
So, when and where was Cruz naturalized as a US citizen?
So you're denying that Section 1 of Article Two of the United States Constitution sets forth the eligibility requirements for serving as president of the United States, under clause 5:
No person except a natural born Citizen...?
Seems fairly short cited, given the irrefutable nature of such, but its your reputation.
wrong again Sy.OMG, the Right keeps trying.Unless you're Barack Obama.Yes, and the law covers this situation, as well, by stating that the children of US citizens are US citizens, regardless of whether their moms drop them here or elsewhere.
Yes, or anyone else whose mother hated the US and spent as little of her adult life here as she could.
Trust me, we realize how futile trying to educate leftists is, but we just can't restrain our generous, giving nature.
Expressing your false opinion is not 'education' its just Conservative propaganda.