Conservative65
Gold Member
- Oct 14, 2014
- 26,127
- 2,208
- 265
- Banned
- #361
I wouldn't lump people together like that, and I have no issue with people's sexuality, my concern is solely governmental overreach.
I don't think a State setting minimum standards of conduct for public business is overreach...or unreasonable.
Because you agree with the side doing the punishing, not the side being punished. It's easy to support government thuggery when you agree with it.
I don't consider PA laws to be 'government thuggery'. But well within the State's unquestioned authority over intra-state commerce.
We've done this whole dance before.
One can always question authority, and how that authority is used.
Sure. But not every application of authority is overreach, wrong, or even inappropriate. And applying minimum codes of conduct like PA laws for public business definitely fall into the category of reasonable and appropriate.
At least to me and the Oregon legislature.
That's because in this case you agree with the perverts demanding a yes answer.