🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Another lie debunked-Africans did nothing before the white man

It's 2019 and in 2 months it will be 2020. It's time to end beliefs from the 1700's.This is from Henry Louis Gates. You know, the guy you racists love to quote in order to talk about black slaveowners.

Almost all of the sub-Saharan continent was in the paleolithic age before colonization.

The designation sub Saharan is racist, therefore insignificant. Perhaps you would like to show evidence that refutes what Gates is going to show. Your racist opinion has no merit.



"Sub Saharan" is a geographic designation - It also suggests a cultural distinction - It's not racist
To their minds it is racist because it eliminates any claim blacks have to Mediterranean civilizations of Northern Africa and thus any civilization at all. The sub-Saharan jungle bunny "civilizations" just doesn't cut it I guess.
 
if your claim are correct , well disease is a very cheap and practical solution to eradicating Enemies ACE .
They didnt do it on purpose. Whites were just infected with all kinds of diseases that came into being because of how dirty they were. Even if they did do it on purpose it would only point to a lack of a backbone. Real men physically dominate. They dont sneak around using diseases like a physically weaker being would have to do.
---------------------------------------------- MISSION Accomplished due to sheer Good Luck then eh . And who said that GOD wasn't on the White Mans side ACE ??
If god were on your side the sun wouldnt be actively trying to kill you. Whites are the weakest humans on the planet. They are recessive and will be absorbed by those with dominant genes.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
It's 2019 and in 2 months it will be 2020. It's time to end beliefs from the 1700's.This is from Henry Louis Gates. You know, the guy you racists love to quote in order to talk about black slaveowners.

Almost all of the sub-Saharan continent was in the paleolithic age before colonization.

When the Europeans were in the Dark Ages - sub Saharan Africa hosted several Great Empires Mali, Songhay and Ghana all of which rivaled any of the great European Empires. At one point, long before Columbus 'sailed the ocean blue' the West African Empire of Mali even made attempts at colonizing the New World - Africans in Ancient America
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
Yeah, we know.....

We



wuz



KANGS


an' sheeeeeit.

we-wuz-kings-n-shiet-3btfo-d-how-does-this-17508619.png
There still are Kangz and shit in Africa. You just mad the best your people could do is infect other cultures and wipe them out with diseases. :laugh:
--------------------------------------- even if True , why would that make a WHITE Man mad. Disease from dirty blanket and dirty underwear is cheaper than lead bullets ACE ,
It would make white men mad because the narrative is that they stronger and smarter. Turns out white people are just disease carriers.
--------------------------------------------------- and the infected disease recipients are dead losers ACE .
If it makes you proud your ancestors were weak disease carriers it kind of establishes my case. You cant physically dominant so you are reduced to the tools of cowardly weaklings.
--------------------------------------------- MY possible White Ancestors made better Weapons with their hand and brains and capacity to Adapt . Plus modes of travel to inferior areas of the world ACE .
 
It's 2019 and in 2 months it will be 2020. It's time to end beliefs from the 1700's.This is from Henry Louis Gates. You know, the guy you racists love to quote in order to talk about black slaveowners.

Almost all of the sub-Saharan continent was in the paleolithic age before colonization.

When the Europeans were in the Dark Ages - sub Saharan Africa hosted several Great Empires Mali, Songhay and Ghana all of which rivaled any of the great European Empires. At one point, long before Columbus 'sailed the ocean blue' the West African Empire of Mali even made attempts at colonizing the New World - Africans in Ancient America

This is true. All except the part about colonizing. Only white people colonize.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
There still are Kangz and shit in Africa. You just mad the best your people could do is infect other cultures and wipe them out with diseases. :laugh:
--------------------------------------- even if True , why would that make a WHITE Man mad. Disease from dirty blanket and dirty underwear is cheaper than lead bullets ACE ,
It would make white men mad because the narrative is that they stronger and smarter. Turns out white people are just disease carriers.
--------------------------------------------------- and the infected disease recipients are dead losers ACE .
If it makes you proud your ancestors were weak disease carriers it kind of establishes my case. You cant physically dominant so you are reduced to the tools of cowardly weaklings.
--------------------------------------------- MY Ancestors made better Weapons and modes of travel to inferior areas of the world ACE .
Long before whites were self aware MY ancestors traveled peacefully to all corners of the globe. There was no need for weapons because only weak people excel at weapon making.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
looks like YOUSE guys / anceastors made 'pointy sticks' though ACE when they weren't distorting their lips , earlobes . See the 'ubangis' for some pictures before they are gone ACE . [chuckle]
 
It's 2019 and in 2 months it will be 2020. It's time to end beliefs from the 1700's.This is from Henry Louis Gates. You know, the guy you racists love to quote in order to talk about black slaveowners.

Almost all of the sub-Saharan continent was in the paleolithic age before colonization.

The designation sub Saharan is racist, therefore insignificant. Perhaps you would like to show evidence that refutes what Gates is going to show. Your racist opinion has no merit.



"Sub Saharan" is a geographic designation - It also suggests a cultural distinction - It's not racist
To their minds it is racist because it eliminates any claim blacks have to Mediterranean civilizations of Northern Africa and thus any civilization at all. The sub-Saharan jungle bunny "civilizations" just doesn't cut it I guess.

Here's a Warner Brothers Classic they don't show no more - The African Elmer Fudd. That and tribesmen with bones in their noses dancing around pot of boiling water with their favorite animation being the main course. That's the extent of many educations re Sub Saharan Africa

a8.jpg
 
looks like YOUSE guys made 'pointy sticks' though ACE .
Lots of people made pointy sticks. Even your people. Of course they made their sticks later than everyone else. However, because they were weak they concentrated all their efforts into making better weapons. They were afraid of their own shadows. Their concentration was on defense and later offense once they got brave because they were sure they had better weapons. :laugh:
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
It's 2019 and in 2 months it will be 2020. It's time to end beliefs from the 1700's.This is from Henry Louis Gates. You know, the guy you racists love to quote in order to talk about black slaveowners.

Almost all of the sub-Saharan continent was in the paleolithic age before colonization.

The designation sub Saharan is racist, therefore insignificant. Perhaps you would like to show evidence that refutes what Gates is going to show. Your racist opinion has no merit.



"Sub Saharan" is a geographic designation - It also suggests a cultural distinction - It's not racist
To their minds it is racist because it eliminates any claim blacks have to Mediterranean civilizations of Northern Africa and thus any civilization at all. The sub-Saharan jungle bunny "civilizations" just doesn't cut it I guess.

Here's a Warner Brothers Classic they don't show no more - The African Elmer Fudd. That and tribesmen with bones in their noses dancing around pot of boiling water with their favorite animation being the main course. That's the extent of many educations re Sub Saharan Africa

View attachment 292670

So what do they call the Kushites? They definitely were not below the Sahara.
 
Last edited:
It's 2019 and in 2 months it will be 2020. It's time to end beliefs from the 1700's.This is from Henry Louis Gates. You know, the guy you racists love to quote in order to talk about black slaveowners.

Almost all of the sub-Saharan continent was in the paleolithic age before colonization.

The designation sub Saharan is racist, therefore insignificant. Perhaps you would like to show evidence that refutes what Gates is going to show. Your racist opinion has no merit.



"Sub Saharan" is a geographic designation - It also suggests a cultural distinction - It's not racist
To their minds it is racist because it eliminates any claim blacks have to Mediterranean civilizations of Northern Africa and thus any civilization at all. The sub-Saharan jungle bunny "civilizations" just doesn't cut it I guess.

It's racist because blacks live and have lived above the sahara.
 
For all the great claims of civilization by Africans they have nothing but dreams to this very day. The only reason they make claims of ancient and lost civilizations is because they have absolutely nothing that reflects even the most primitive civilization today. They kill. That's all they know. Killing and stealing until they get put in a cage.

Look at this stellar example of black manhood. He was successful in persuading some animal to shit on his head. What kind of animal was so persuaded? If he had a claim to continued existence he lost that when he shot a cop. Scrape the shit off his head and put him in a cage. Preferably in a zoo.
Man faces 4 felonies, including murder, after deputy was fatally shot in Augusta
 
It's 2019 and in 2 months it will be 2020. It's time to end beliefs from the 1700's.This is from Henry Louis Gates. You know, the guy you racists love to quote in order to talk about black slaveowners.

Almost all of the sub-Saharan continent was in the paleolithic age before colonization.

The designation sub Saharan is racist, therefore insignificant. Perhaps you would like to show evidence that refutes what Gates is going to show. Your racist opinion has no merit.



"Sub Saharan" is a geographic designation - It also suggests a cultural distinction - It's not racist
To their minds it is racist because it eliminates any claim blacks have to Mediterranean civilizations of Northern Africa and thus any civilization at all. The sub-Saharan jungle bunny "civilizations" just doesn't cut it I guess.

It's racist because blacks live and have lived above the sahara.

Sub Saharan Africa is a geographical description not a racial classification. Why don't you know this?
 
to heck with the 'kusites' as you bring up some obscure tribal group that ended up being Losers that have no relation to 2019 . Did the ''kites' travel to the moon and take a stroll on the moon . Did the 'kites' travel to the depths of the ocean ACE .
 
Yeah, we know.....

We



wuz



KANGS


an' sheeeeeit.

we-wuz-kings-n-shiet-3btfo-d-how-does-this-17508619.png
There still are Kangz and shit in Africa. You just mad the best your people could do is infect other cultures and wipe them out with diseases. :laugh:
--------------------------------------- even if True , why would that make a WHITE Man mad. Disease from dirty blanket and dirty underwear is cheaper than lead bullets ACE ,
It would make white men mad because the narrative is that they stronger and smarter. Turns out white people are just disease carriers.
--------------------------------------------------- and the infected disease recipients are dead losers ACE .
If it makes you proud your ancestors were weak disease carriers it kind of establishes my case. You cant physically dominant so you are reduced to the tools of cowardly weaklings.


Your "ancestors" are still savages today....All anyone needs to demonstrate this is the deplorable way y'all treat one another -let alone whites- in places like Angola, Sudan, Somalia, Rwanda, Uganda, etcetera.

Africa.jpg
 
looks like YOUSE guys made 'pointy sticks' though ACE .
Lots of people made pointy sticks. Even your people. Of course they made their sticks later than everyone else. However, because they were weak they concentrated all their efforts into making better weapons. They were afraid of their own shadows. Their concentration was on defense and later offense once they got brave because they were sure they had better weapons. :laugh:
------------------------------------------ my possible WHITE Ancestors simply made better Weapons because they had brains and they saw better weapons as being practical with better Enemy killing capability ACE ,
 
been that way all through History . 'african ubangis concern' them selves with ' lip elongation' techniques and looks like WHITES concern themselves with techniques for killing enemies ACE .
 
and WHITES did pretty good at killing enemies throughout their History ACE .
 

Forum List

Back
Top