AOC goes BERSERK on Clarence Thomas: RESIGN or face IMPEACHMENT


Clarence Thomas should resign. If not, his failure to disclose income from right-wing organizations, recuse himself from matters involving his wife, and his vote to block the Jan 6th commission from key information must be investigated and could serve as grounds for impeachment.


What are your thoughts? Should Clarence Thomas resign in shame, or should he protect his traitor wife?

Bezerk? I think the phrase you were looking for is stark, raving mad.
 
Far-left Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said Tuesday that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas should resign in the wake of revelations that his wife sent texts that pushed for the overturn of the 2020 presidential election results.
“Clarence Thomas should resign,” Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) tweeted.
“If not, his failure to disclose income from right-wing organizations, recuse himself from matters involving his wife, and his vote to block the Jan 6th commission from key information must be investigated and could serve as grounds for impeachment,”

Comment:
AOC can't make Judge Thomas resign.
 
AOC, whether or not we like her, performs a vital function for The DNC.

By allowing her and other members of 'The Squad' to rant uninterrupted, Democrats can convince the more extreme members of the party the Democrats take them seriously.

By totally failing to act on anything she says, they can convince the more moderate members of the party that she has no actual power.

In addition, she is a very effective Republican fund raiser.
 

Clarence Thomas should resign. If not, his failure to disclose income from right-wing organizations, recuse himself from matters involving his wife, and his vote to block the Jan 6th commission from key information must be investigated and could serve as grounds for impeachment.


What are your thoughts? Should Clarence Thomas resign in shame, or should he protect his traitor wife?
If it can be proven to be so, he should resign immediately. But let's not start blaming AOC because we hate her. She could well be right.
But odd you gently ask the question because Thomas is one of yours.
You wouldn't be making those inquisitive remarks if he we a democrat.
No sir. Guilty immediately. Straight to the firing range
You hypocrite.
 
Thomas was hoping other con justices would follow suit with his dissent. His conflict of interest is a huge problem. He knew everything that nutbag wife of his was doing.
You making shit up about what ANYBODY was “thinking” is obviously baseless. Otherwise, feel obliged to support your claim. You won’t though because you can’t and we all already know it.

According to your absurd theory, it would have been smarter cover to go along with the majority since his sole vote want going to prevail anyway. Instead, he ruled as he clearly thought was proper not giving a shit about whatever his wife may have emailed (if he even knew about the emails).

There is zero evidence of any conflict of interest. His wife isn’t a nut job just because a dope like you disagrees with her views. And of course you have no way of knowing whether or not he even knew of everything his wife was doing.

Every bit of your post is stupid and baseless.
 

Clarence Thomas should resign. If not, his failure to disclose income from right-wing organizations, recuse himself from matters involving his wife, and his vote to block the Jan 6th commission from key information must be investigated and could serve as grounds for impeachment.


What are your thoughts? Should Clarence Thomas resign in shame, or should he protect his traitor wife?
Neither of which will happen and the silly twat’s following will be disappointed again. How’s that student loan debt forgiveness coming along?
 
Thomas was hoping other con justices would follow suit with his dissent. His conflict of interest is a huge problem. He knew everything that nutbag wife of his was doing.


If you commies didn't have your assumptions and speculation you have no reason to be here. Specifically what did you disagree with in his dissent?

.
 
You making shit up about what ANYBODY was “thinking” is obviously baseless. Otherwise, feel obliged to support your claim. You won’t though because you can’t and we all already know it.

According to your absurd theory, it would have been smarter cover to go along with the majority since his sole vote want going to prevail anyway. Instead, he ruled as he clearly thought was proper not giving a shit about whatever his wife may have emailed (if he even knew about the emails).

There is zero evidence of any conflict of interest. His wife isn’t a nut job just because a dope like you disagrees with her views. And of course you have no way of knowing whether or not he even knew of everything his wife was doing.

Every bit of your post is stupid and baseless.
You can't see past the end of your nose.
 

Forum List

Back
Top