Are There Any Intelligent Trump Followers?

[PredFan]

Apparently you aren't smart enough to have your own opinions, you have to cut and paste other crap you find on the Internet.

You don't have the intelligence to be criticizing anyone. I answered your question, you have failed to show that I'm not an intelligent Trump supporter.

Now tuck in your tail and run off like a good boy.

More to the point, you've completely failed to establish that you are in any way intelligent.

View attachment 66253

Luminal: "There aren't any intelligent Trump supporters!"
Trump supporters smarter than Liminal: "Yes, we are right here."
Liminal: "You aren't smart."
Liminal: "See, there aren't any intelligent Trump supporters!"
Liminal: "Derp Derp Derp."

And this is exactly the level of response that helps to substantiate the premise of the OP.

Your premise is retarded.. right up there with "I know you are but what am I?".

We get it, you're smarter than everyone.... typical liberal jerk-off.

He's not. His entire intellectual argument is "I'm smart, you are not." That is as far as his 3rd grade intellect can take him.

 

[longknife]

If so where are they? They certainly haven't shown themselves in the news media or on this forum.

One whole hell of a lot more smart Trump supporters than the teat-sucking socialists running after everything free Sanders or the lying, two-faced, money-grubbing man-hater Shrillary!!!

 

[Liminal]

More to the point, you've completely failed to establish that you are in any way intelligent.

View attachment 66253

Luminal: "There aren't any intelligent Trump supporters!"
Trump supporters smarter than Liminal: "Yes, we are right here."
Liminal: "You aren't smart."
Liminal: "See, there aren't any intelligent Trump supporters!"
Liminal: "Derp Derp Derp."

And this is exactly the level of response that helps to substantiate the premise of the OP.

Your premise is retarded.. right up there with "I know you are but what am I?".

We get it, you're smarter than everyone.... typical liberal jerk-off.

He's not. His entire intellectual argument is "I'm smart, you are not." That is as far as his 3rd grade intellect can take him.

That's not an intellectual argument, it's just a fact which you keep validating every time you post.

 

[Correll]

View attachment 66253

Luminal: "There aren't any intelligent Trump supporters!"
Trump supporters smarter than Liminal: "Yes, we are right here."
Liminal: "You aren't smart."
Liminal: "See, there aren't any intelligent Trump supporters!"
Liminal: "Derp Derp Derp."

And this is exactly the level of response that helps to substantiate the premise of the OP.

Your premise is retarded.. right up there with "I know you are but what am I?".

We get it, you're smarter than everyone.... typical liberal jerk-off.

He's not. His entire intellectual argument is "I'm smart, you are not." That is as far as his 3rd grade intellect can take him.

That's not an intellectual argument, it's just a fact which you keep validating every time you post.

 

[Liminal]

 

[Liminal]

"Are There Any Intelligent Trump Followers?"

As far as USMB is concerned - no.

Maybe that's what the problem is, there just aren't any intelligent Trump followers posting on this forum. I wonder where they're hiding?

 

[Liminal]

Begs the question: How stupid is Donald Trump? And by extension, how stupid must his followers be?

 

[Liminal]

first of all he didn't call SOME Mexican immegrants those names. He called MOST of them those names but he was so nice to add after that. Some I ASUME are good ppl. That is blatently racist. Second the correct response when someone sais you have a small penis when you're running for president is .... nothing. You don't indulge something like that with a response it's demeaning and you perpetuate a story that shouldn't be one. Third I don't support any of the republican candidates.

Since I don't have a penis I wouldn't know. But men do seem to be sensitive about that.

But if yours is not operating at peak, perhaps that's why you aren't sensitive.

You're absolutly right I'm not sensitive about it. You haven't replied to the first part tough. You know, the part where he is being blatently racist. That doesn't disturb you?

How is stating that some illegal aliens who are Mexican are criminals, racist?

I seriously do not understand that.

Good luck getting a straight answer.

I'm used to this. I post regularly on the Badlands Obama thread. It's nastier and more personal there.

And as devoid of substance in the insults.

Devoid of substance.....perfect for you.

 

[Correll]

"Are There Any Intelligent Trump Followers?"

As far as USMB is concerned - no.

Maybe that's what the problem is, there just aren't any intelligent Trump followers posting on this forum. I wonder where they're hiding?

 

[bendog]

Trump supporters will, however, be in for a shocking "education" when they finally (maybe) figure out that Trump is a hell of a lot more liberal than even a Hillary Clinton....and that they.....once again....have been had.

That's the thing. They may want a more progressive econ message. The problem with the Donald is his rhetoric can be so over the top, but then again he's sort of running an 19th century campaign, where without television where a candidate can speak directly, he pretty much had to be an entertainer. The Trumpeters who say "he'll spend a billion of his own on this" are stupid, or at least emotional.

But maybe it's not so stupid if someone things free trade with Mexico and China are hurting more than helping, as the Mexicans and Chinese are NOW allowed to trade, and that the "class" of people who control the gop don't have their economic interests at heart because what they really are about is cutting their own taxes to dump debt on our kids, and all this theocrat social issues is just window dressing to cover up the massive economic rape they're engaging in, and that regardless how one feels about immigration, it's not really in OUR interests to have workers sending money back to support families in other countries.

 

[Liminal]

 

[Liminal]

Trump supporters will, however, be in for a shocking "education" when they finally (maybe) figure out that Trump is a hell of a lot more liberal than even a Hillary Clinton....and that they.....once again....have been had.

That's the thing. They may want a more progressive econ message. The problem with the Donald is his rhetoric can be so over the top, but then again he's sort of running an 19th century campaign, where without television where a candidate can speak directly, he pretty much had to be an entertainer. The Trumpeters who say "he'll spend a billion of his own on this" are stupid, or at least emotional.

But maybe it's not so stupid if someone things free trade with Mexico and China are hurting more than helping, as the Mexicans and Chinese are NOW allowed to trade, and that the "class" of people who control the gop don't have their economic interests at heart because what they really are about is cutting their own taxes to dump debt on our kids, and all this theocrat social issues is just window dressing to cover up the massive economic rape they're engaging in, and that regardless how one feels about immigration, it's not really in OUR interests to have workers sending money back to support families in other countries.

Based on his history we can only assume that a Trump Presidency would open the gates and encourage the importation of as much cheap foreign labor as possible.

 

[Correll]

Trump supporters will, however, be in for a shocking "education" when they finally (maybe) figure out that Trump is a hell of a lot more liberal than even a Hillary Clinton....and that they.....once again....have been had.

That's the thing. They may want a more progressive econ message. The problem with the Donald is his rhetoric can be so over the top, but then again he's sort of running an 19th century campaign, where without television where a candidate can speak directly, he pretty much had to be an entertainer. The Trumpeters who say "he'll spend a billion of his own on this" are stupid, or at least emotional.

But maybe it's not so stupid if someone things free trade with Mexico and China are hurting more than helping, as the Mexicans and Chinese are NOW allowed to trade, and that the "class" of people who control the gop don't have their economic interests at heart because what they really are about is cutting their own taxes to dump debt on our kids, and all this theocrat social issues is just window dressing to cover up the massive economic rape they're engaging in, and that regardless how one feels about immigration, it's not really in OUR interests to have workers sending money back to support families in other countries.

Based on his history we can only assume that a Trump Presidency would open the gates and encourage the importation of as much cheap foreign labor as possible.

REally? YOu really gave that some thought? You want to stick with that?

Moron.

 

[Liminal]

Trump supporters will, however, be in for a shocking "education" when they finally (maybe) figure out that Trump is a hell of a lot more liberal than even a Hillary Clinton....and that they.....once again....have been had.

That's the thing. They may want a more progressive econ message. The problem with the Donald is his rhetoric can be so over the top, but then again he's sort of running an 19th century campaign, where without television where a candidate can speak directly, he pretty much had to be an entertainer. The Trumpeters who say "he'll spend a billion of his own on this" are stupid, or at least emotional.

But maybe it's not so stupid if someone things free trade with Mexico and China are hurting more than helping, as the Mexicans and Chinese are NOW allowed to trade, and that the "class" of people who control the gop don't have their economic interests at heart because what they really are about is cutting their own taxes to dump debt on our kids, and all this theocrat social issues is just window dressing to cover up the massive economic rape they're engaging in, and that regardless how one feels about immigration, it's not really in OUR interests to have workers sending money back to support families in other countries.

Based on his history we can only assume that a Trump Presidency would open the gates and encourage the importation of as much cheap foreign labor as possible.

REally? YOu really gave that some thought? You want to stick with that?

Moron.

Another compelling rebuttal.

 

[Correll]

Trump supporters will, however, be in for a shocking "education" when they finally (maybe) figure out that Trump is a hell of a lot more liberal than even a Hillary Clinton....and that they.....once again....have been had.

That's the thing. They may want a more progressive econ message. The problem with the Donald is his rhetoric can be so over the top, but then again he's sort of running an 19th century campaign, where without television where a candidate can speak directly, he pretty much had to be an entertainer. The Trumpeters who say "he'll spend a billion of his own on this" are stupid, or at least emotional.

But maybe it's not so stupid if someone things free trade with Mexico and China are hurting more than helping, as the Mexicans and Chinese are NOW allowed to trade, and that the "class" of people who control the gop don't have their economic interests at heart because what they really are about is cutting their own taxes to dump debt on our kids, and all this theocrat social issues is just window dressing to cover up the massive economic rape they're engaging in, and that regardless how one feels about immigration, it's not really in OUR interests to have workers sending money back to support families in other countries.

Based on his history we can only assume that a Trump Presidency would open the gates and encourage the importation of as much cheap foreign labor as possible.

REally? YOu really gave that some thought? You want to stick with that?

Moron.

Another compelling rebuttal.

Do you understand that his job description will be different as President than as Real Estate Developer?

 

[Freewill]

Are there any honest Mrs. Tuluza Clinton followers?

 

[Liminal]

Trump supporters will, however, be in for a shocking "education" when they finally (maybe) figure out that Trump is a hell of a lot more liberal than even a Hillary Clinton....and that they.....once again....have been had.

That's the thing. They may want a more progressive econ message. The problem with the Donald is his rhetoric can be so over the top, but then again he's sort of running an 19th century campaign, where without television where a candidate can speak directly, he pretty much had to be an entertainer. The Trumpeters who say "he'll spend a billion of his own on this" are stupid, or at least emotional.

But maybe it's not so stupid if someone things free trade with Mexico and China are hurting more than helping, as the Mexicans and Chinese are NOW allowed to trade, and that the "class" of people who control the gop don't have their economic interests at heart because what they really are about is cutting their own taxes to dump debt on our kids, and all this theocrat social issues is just window dressing to cover up the massive economic rape they're engaging in, and that regardless how one feels about immigration, it's not really in OUR interests to have workers sending money back to support families in other countries.

Based on his history we can only assume that a Trump Presidency would open the gates and encourage the importation of as much cheap foreign labor as possible.

REally? YOu really gave that some thought? You want to stick with that?

Moron.

Another compelling rebuttal.

Do you understand that his job description will be different as President than as Real Estate Developer?

Yes, but does he?

 

[Correll]

That's the thing. They may want a more progressive econ message. The problem with the Donald is his rhetoric can be so over the top, but then again he's sort of running an 19th century campaign, where without television where a candidate can speak directly, he pretty much had to be an entertainer. The Trumpeters who say "he'll spend a billion of his own on this" are stupid, or at least emotional.

But maybe it's not so stupid if someone things free trade with Mexico and China are hurting more than helping, as the Mexicans and Chinese are NOW allowed to trade, and that the "class" of people who control the gop don't have their economic interests at heart because what they really are about is cutting their own taxes to dump debt on our kids, and all this theocrat social issues is just window dressing to cover up the massive economic rape they're engaging in, and that regardless how one feels about immigration, it's not really in OUR interests to have workers sending money back to support families in other countries.

Based on his history we can only assume that a Trump Presidency would open the gates and encourage the importation of as much cheap foreign labor as possible.

REally? YOu really gave that some thought? You want to stick with that?

Moron.

Another compelling rebuttal.

Do you understand that his job description will be different as President than as Real Estate Developer?

Yes, but does he?

I only ask, because you are ASSuming that his actions will be the same as you claim there were in his old job.

That clashes with your claim to understand that his job will be different.

Unless you were just lying?

 

[Liminal]

Based on his history we can only assume that a Trump Presidency would open the gates and encourage the importation of as much cheap foreign labor as possible.

REally? YOu really gave that some thought? You want to stick with that?

Moron.

Another compelling rebuttal.

Do you understand that his job description will be different as President than as Real Estate Developer?

Yes, but does he?

I only ask, because you are ASSuming that his actions will be the same as you claim there were in his old job.

That clashes with your claim to understand that his job will be different.

Unless you were just lying?

And you base your conclusion on what? Donald Trumps words?

 

[eddiew]

Trump supporters will, however, be in for a shocking "education" when they finally (maybe) figure out that Trump is a hell of a lot more liberal than even a Hillary Clinton....and that they.....once again....have been had.

That's the thing. They may want a more progressive econ message. The problem with the Donald is his rhetoric can be so over the top, but then again he's sort of running an 19th century campaign, where without television where a candidate can speak directly, he pretty much had to be an entertainer. The Trumpeters who say "he'll spend a billion of his own on this" are stupid, or at least emotional.

But maybe it's not so stupid if someone things free trade with Mexico and China are hurting more than helping, as the Mexicans and Chinese are NOW allowed to trade, and that the "class" of people who control the gop don't have their economic interests at heart because what they really are about is cutting their own taxes to dump debt on our kids, and all this theocrat social issues is just window dressing to cover up the massive economic rape they're engaging in, and that regardless how one feels about immigration, it's not really in OUR interests to have workers sending money back to support families in other countries.

Based on his history we can only assume that a Trump Presidency would open the gates and encourage the importation of as much cheap foreign labor as possible.

REally? YOu really gave that some thought? You want to stick with that?

Moron.

Another compelling rebuttal.

you have to take everything they say with a grain of salt ,,after all they supported what probably was the biggest FU as president we ever had GWB