OldLady
Diamond Member
- Nov 16, 2015
- 69,568
- 19,607
- 2,220
To argue against the person as the basis for not agreeing with their points is NOT intellectually honest.I won't argue that Trump is ignorant, pompous or venal (I had to look this word up...I had no clue what it meant). However, one of the first fallacies of an argument is to base your counter argument on the personality of a person versus the logical points that they bring up.I don't think you quite understand. A man as ignorant,pompous and venal as Donald Trump doesn't merit having his so called ideas posed as any kind of equivalency with actual thought.
For example, if a serial murderer were to state, "2 + 2 = 4". It doesn't mean that he is wrong because he is a serial murderer...in fact, in this case he's right. What he is or is not as a person has nothing to do with the point that they bring up. To argue against the person as the basis for not agreeing with their points is NOT intellectually honest.
Edit: As an aside you could point towards Trump's personality as an argument against his being president since, in being a figurehead for the US, world perception is a key component to that office. However, you cannot use his personality to dismiss points that he brings up nor as a discrimination against the people who support him.
That is pretty much all Trump does, though. Maybe he learned it from Twitter, because it is the highly preferred mode of argument on this board.