Are there same-sex marriages in the United States?

[flan327]

Why should anyone agree to have lesser rights?
Why should Government get involved in who you love?

How do you handle the situation when married gays move between states?

I agree with your second statement

EXCEPT in the case of pedophiles

 

[flan327]

I did show you. You're just too stupid to know it. You are a hopelss case I will fuck off now. You are not worth my time

Promise you will FUCK OFF?

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Promise you will FUCK OFF?

What's you problem, Bud?

 

[WinterBorn]

Show me it or fuck off

Ok, I told you exactly where to find the info. And now you abandon the thread because you were wrong? No admission of your error. Typical.

 

[Jarlaxle]

This is not a joke

Yes, it is.

 

[rupol2000]

Ok, I told you exactly where to find the info. And now you abandon the thread because you were wrong? No admission of your error. Typical.

It's not there. Laws can only be changed by Congress or a plebiscite

 

[WinterBorn]

It's not there. Laws can only be changed by Congress or a plebiscite

A quick search for Article VI of the US Constitution gave me this website with this info:

Article VI

www.law.cornell.edu

"This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding." (I added the Bold and increased the size, since you seem to have trouble finding things on your own)

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

It's not there. Laws can only be changed by Congress or a plebiscite

Can laws be overturned as unconstitutional by SCOTUS? Yes or No?

 

[rupol2000]

Can laws be overturned as unconstitutional by SCOTUS? Yes or No?

ok they can If it finds it unconstitutional. They have to proof it. When was the resolution on cancellation published? Where I can read it?

 

[rupol2000]

They believe that the law on marriage as a union of different-sex people violates the provision on equality.

Will they consider the ban on murder a violation of equality, guided by the same feminine logic?

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

ok they can If it finds it unconstitutional. They have to proof it. When was the resolution on cancellation published? Where I can read it?

What the fuck are you blathering about now. You have been schooled on the concept of judicial review. The fact that you appear to be uneducable is not my problem. You are either very stupid or just playing a very sick game

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

They believe that the law on marriage as a union of different-sex people violates the provision on equality.

Will they consider the ban on murder a violation of equality, guided by the same feminine logic?

You are exceedingly bizarre!

 

[rupol2000]

What the fuck are you blathering about now. You have been schooled on the concept of judicial review. The fact that you appear to be uneducable is not my problem. You are either very stupid or just playing a very sick game

Yes, it looks like I was wrong here, I admit. But I still do not see a resolution on the abolition of the definition of marriage as a union of a man and a woman, and I still do not see the logic in this decision

 

[rupol2000]

You are exceedingly bizarre!

Could I declare in the USA that I have the right to eat American children for breakfast because the ban on eating children violates my rights to equal protection?

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Yes, it looks like I was wrong here, I admit. But I still do not see a resolution on the abolition of the definition of marriage as a union of a man and a woman, and I still do not see the logic in this decision

You are still not making any sense! Read the Obergefell opinion! It establishes marriage as being between two consenting adults regardless of their respective genders . THAT is you resolution

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Could I declare in the USA that I have the right to eat American children for breakfast because the ban on eating children violates my rights to equal protection?

You are really are going out of your way to be bizarre and stupid. Or maybe you just are bizarre and stupid

 

[rupol2000]

You are still not making any sense! Read the Obergefell opinion! It establishes marriage as being between two consenting adults regardless of their respective genders . THAT is you resolution

Why do I need your fucking Oberhweil's opinion?

 

[rupol2000]

You are really are going out of your way to be bizarre and stupid. Or maybe you just are bizarre and stupid

Answer the question you were asked. Does your feminine logic allow eating children for breakfast?

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Answer the question you were asked. Does your feminine logic allow eating children for breakfast?

NO! You crazy fuck!

 

[rupol2000]

NO! You crazy fuck!

You've admitted defeat. Therefore, the court's decision is illegal