Arrest made in Ohio 10 year old rape case

[Correll]

Www.clevescene.com/news/ohios-heartbeat-bill-abortion-ban-is-now-law-heres-what-that-means-39213398



Less than an hour after it was announced that the U.S. Supreme Court had ruled to overturn Roe v. Wade, Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost filed a motion to lift an injunction against Ohio's "heartbeat bill."

And by last Friday evening, the bill — officially called the "Human Rights and Heartbeat Protection Act" — became law.

The law bans abortions in Ohio after six weeks of gestation. It is called the "Heartbeat Protection Act" because physicians are required to determine if there is a detectable fetal heartbeat before conducting an abortion. If there is, the procedure cannot move forward.


The law does provide two exceptions, however. An abortion can be conducted after the six-week mark if a physician finds the procedure "necessary to prevent the death of the pregnant woman or to prevent a serious risk of the substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function of the pregnant woman." It can also be conducted if there is no fetal heartbeat.

The state defines conditions that pose a serious risk to a pregnant person as:

• Pre-eclampsia
• Inevitable abortion
• Premature rupture of the membranes

It does not include:

• "A condition related to the woman's mental health"

The law contains no exceptions for rape or incest. It also only applies to what the state describes as "intrauterine pregnancies."

Physicians are required to record and report the medical condition necessitating each patient's abortion and the "medical rationale" behind their decision. That documentation must be kept by the doctor for at least seven years.

Pregnant people are also required to sign a form acknowledging the presence of a fetal heartbeat and the statistical probability the fetus could be carried to term, as told to them by their physician.

Doctors who perform an abortion in violation of the law can be charged with a fifth-degree felony.

Thank you.


And of course BEING TEN, means that there was a very good chance of "a serious risk of the substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function of the pregnant woman."
.

 

[Lesh]

we just reported what the AG stated at the time. The fact he was r aware was because the dem abortion doctor was attempting to help protect the illegal

And of course you didn't question what turned out to be his dishonesty

You not only accepted it...bur SPREAD his lies...

Because YOU folks...like he...want to hide the effect of overturning Roe

 

[Lesh]

Not one iota of shame from me.

Of course not. You're a cynical idealogue

DISGUSTING

 

[SweetSue92]

Of course not. You're a cynical idealogue

DISGUSTING

Need some smelling salts with your fainting couch? geez

 

[Lesh]

Need some smelling salts with your fainting couch? geez

The amazing thing is that you REVEL in your disgusting behavior.

Did you piss yourself when Roe was over turned?

 

[Care4all]

Thank you.


And of course BEING TEN, means that there was a very good chance of "a serious risk of the substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function of the pregnant woman."
.

No there is not a certain risk of severely damaging bodily function for a 10 year old....there is a slightly higher risk.....

Same with black women.... They have a 300% higher risk of dying or harm in pregnancy than a white pregnant woman.

Black women are given no exception for their higher risk either, in the law.

The law does not give any exceptions for 10 to 15 year o!ds.

Risking being charged with a felony under the law as written, Gynecologists will not take that risk.

The law needs amendment, to make it clear.


Most 10 year olds having a child, will not have physical damage....only some will, and it is a hit or miss.... There are no exceptions for a hit or miss in Ohio law, the way it is written.

You will die if pregnancy continues is an exception....not you might die.

And you will permanently damage your bodily functions, your organs if pregnancy continues....NOT that you MIGHT be harmed.


The law is not written in a way that could cover the 10 year old, there also is no mental health excuse allowed, with no exception for a 10 year old....the way the law is written.

 

[Correll]

No there is not a certain risk of severely damaging bodily function for a 10 year old....there is a slightly higher risk.....

Same with black women.... They have a 300% higher risk of dying or harm in pregnancy than a white pregnant woman.

Black women are given no exception for their higher risk either, in the law.

The law does not give any exceptions for 10 to 15 year o!ds.

Risking being charged with a felony under the law as written, Gynecologists will not take that risk.

The law needs amendment, to make it clear.


Most 10 year olds having a child, will not have physical damage....only some will, and it is a hit or miss.... There are no exceptions for a hit or miss in Ohio law, the way it is written.

You will die if pregnancy continues is an exception....not you might die.

And you will permanently damage your bodily functions, your organs if pregnancy continues....NOT that you MIGHT be harmed.


The law is not written in a way that could cover the 10 year old, there also is no mental health excuse allowed, with no exception for a 10 year old....the way the law is written.

Doctors Appalled By 10-Year-Old Giving Birth

A 10-year-old child in Colombia recently gave birth to a baby daughter, highlighting the dangers of early pregnancy.

www.livescience.com

"
But the risks are physical, as well.


"The placenta preferentially will take nutrition from the mother, who really is a child," said Sherry Thomas, an ob/gyn at Mission Community Hospital in Panorama City, Calif. That means that the developing fetus will leach calcium and other nutrients from a child who should still be growing herself. Likewise, pregnancy puts a major strain on the cardiovascular system, according to Wall. Pregnant women have about 50 percent more blood circulating through their bodies compared with non-pregnant women"


Sounds like permanent effects to me. I would be happy to argue that in front of a judge, if anyone was mad enough to press charges. Which the state ag has already said he would NOT have done.

 

[Lesh]

Doctors Appalled By 10-Year-Old Giving Birth

A 10-year-old child in Colombia recently gave birth to a baby daughter, highlighting the dangers of early pregnancy.

www.livescience.com

"
But the risks are physical, as well.


"The placenta preferentially will take nutrition from the mother, who really is a child," said Sherry Thomas, an ob/gyn at Mission Community Hospital in Panorama City, Calif. That means that the developing fetus will leach calcium and other nutrients from a child who should still be growing herself. Likewise, pregnancy puts a major strain on the cardiovascular system, according to Wall. Pregnant women have about 50 percent more blood circulating through their bodies compared with non-pregnant women"


Sounds like permanent effects to me. I would be happy to argue that in front of a judge, if anyone was mad enough to press charges. Which the state ag has already said he would NOT have done.

There is absolutely a risk to the health of the mother...but the law in Ohio makes no allowance for that

At best it is vague. At BEST

So absent a lengthy and expensive court fight...no doctor in Ohio is going to provide that abortion and risk being prosecuted.

So no. She could NOT get an abortion in Ohio...and in a short time the same looks like it will be true in Indiana as well

 

[Nostra]

Www.clevescene.com/news/ohios-heartbeat-bill-abortion-ban-is-now-law-heres-what-that-means-39213398



Less than an hour after it was announced that the U.S. Supreme Court had ruled to overturn Roe v. Wade, Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost filed a motion to lift an injunction against Ohio's "heartbeat bill."

And by last Friday evening, the bill — officially called the "Human Rights and Heartbeat Protection Act" — became law.

The law bans abortions in Ohio after six weeks of gestation. It is called the "Heartbeat Protection Act" because physicians are required to determine if there is a detectable fetal heartbeat before conducting an abortion. If there is, the procedure cannot move forward.


The law does provide two exceptions, however. An abortion can be conducted after the six-week mark if a physician finds the procedure "necessary to prevent the death of the pregnant woman or to prevent a serious risk of the substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function of the pregnant woman." It can also be conducted if there is no fetal heartbeat.

The state defines conditions that pose a serious risk to a pregnant person as:

• Pre-eclampsia
• Inevitable abortion
• Premature rupture of the membranes

It does not include:

• "A condition related to the woman's mental health"

The law contains no exceptions for rape or incest. It also only applies to what the state describes as "intrauterine pregnancies."

Physicians are required to record and report the medical condition necessitating each patient's abortion and the "medical rationale" behind their decision. That documentation must be kept by the doctor for at least seven years.

Pregnant people are also required to sign a form acknowledging the presence of a fetal heartbeat and the statistical probability the fetus could be carried to term, as told to them by their physician.

Doctors who perform an abortion in violation of the law can be charged with a fifth-degree felony.

I don't care about your leftist spin. It has an exception for when the mother's health is in jeopardy. A 10 year old would be in jeopardy. There is a reason your lefty opinion writer didn't link to the actual bill.

 

[Correll]

There is absolutely a risk to the health of the mother...but the law in Ohio makes no allowance for that

At best it is vague. At BEST

So absent a lengthy and expensive court fight...no doctor in Ohio is going to provide that abortion and risk being prosecuted.

So no. She could NOT get an abortion in Ohio...and in a short time the same looks like it will be true in Indiana as well

Vague? You telling me that you would hesitate to argue that a ten year would face serious and permanent health issues if carrying to teerm?

LOL!!

I do not believe you. The libs in question did not ask, not because they were afraid they would be told NO, but because they were afraid they would be told YES.


A COURT case of a doctor or social worker, arguing for hte ten year old? OMG, that networks would have kicked the 1/6 hears to the side to give that constant 24 hour a day coverage.


Hollywood would have had multiple movies out about it, NEXT YEAR.

You people would have LOVED that shit.


They knew. That is why they went across state lines. To at least have that b.s. story to milk.

 

[Lesh]

I don't care about your leftist spin. It has an exception for when the mother's health is in jeopardy. A 10 year old would be in jeopardy. There is a reason your lefty opinion writer didn't link to the actual bill.

It is vague at best. Intentionally so in fact in order to intimidate doctors from using those "exceptions"

So how do we fix this?

We elect more Dems to the Senate and expand the Court.

It will be a long fight but THEY fought for 50 years to end abortion rights. Remember that

 

[Lesh]

You telling me that you would hesitate to argue that a ten year would face serious and permanent health issues if carrying to teerm?

Me? Hell no

But the anti-abortion freaks that had this trigger law waiting in the wings for Roe to be overturned?

That's a different story

 

[Nostra]

It is vague at best. Intentionally so in fact in order to intimidate doctors from using those "exceptions"

So how do we fix this?

We elect more Dems to the Senate and expand the Court.

It will be a long fight but THEY fought for 50 years to end abortion rights. Remember that

No, it isn't.

You have been unhinged since Roe went down.

 

[Lesh]

I don't care about your leftist spin.

What you "care about" matters not at all.

Here is what Doctors say (and THEY are the ones who are tasked with performing the procedure and suffering the consequences if they see things differently than a radical Attorney General like Yost)

Docs dispute AG's claim that Ohio law allows 10-year-olds to get abortions • Ohio Capital Journal

Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost has claimed that if a 10-year-old gets pregnant in Ohio, she can still get an abortion under exceptions regarding the health of the mother. Two Ohio OB-GYNs — doctors who are required to follow the new law — disputed that analysis on Thursday.

ohiocapitaljournal.com

 

[Nostra]

What you "care about" matters not at all.

Here is what Doctors say (and THEY are the ones who are tasked with performing the procedure and suffering the consequences if they see things differently than a radical Attorney General like Yost)

Docs dispute AG's claim that Ohio law allows 10-year-olds to get abortions • Ohio Capital Journal

Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost has claimed that if a 10-year-old gets pregnant in Ohio, she can still get an abortion under exceptions regarding the health of the mother. Two Ohio OB-GYNs — doctors who are required to follow the new law — disputed that analysis on Thursday.

ohiocapitaljournal.com

2 abortionists? Link us up to their law degrees, Simp.

 

[toobfreak]

You are an idiot

Sure beats being a douche nozzle.

 

[laferia52]

Such the illiterate or just one plain dumb and stupid troll.

you do know the rapist is an illegal alien

 

[okfine]

you do know the rapist is an illegal alien

I probably know more about this story than you. I hope you catch up and become informed. It's not hard.

 

[jc456]

The Ohio agency, child protective service I believe, where the mother first went to, was responsible for filing a sexual abuse report in Ohio

Have you seen that report?

 

[jc456]

He did not point it out, he lied.

It is not in the bill. There is no exception for rape or incest.

And also no mental health excuse allowed.

And this child was not guaranteed to die, if she went through gestation.

And the child was not guaranteed to damage her organs, permanent physical harm if she went through pregnancy.

Those conditions are not present.

The risk is a little higher for 10 to 15 year old girls to have problems, but they are no guarantee that they would happen.....



The law does provide two exceptions, however. An abortion can be conducted after the six-week mark if a physician finds the procedure "necessary to prevent the death of the pregnant woman or to prevent a serious risk of the substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function of the pregnant woman." It can also be conducted if there is no fetal heartbeat.

The state defines conditions that pose a serious risk to a pregnant person as:

• Pre-eclampsia
• Inevitable abortion
• Premature rupture of the membranes

It does not include:

• "A condition related to the woman's mental health"

The law contains no exceptions for rape or incest. It also only applies to what the state describes as "intrauterine pregnancies."

Physicians are required to record and report the medical condition necessitating each patient's abortion and the "medical rationale" behind their decision. That documentation must be kept by the doctor for at least seven years.

Pregnant people are also required to sign a form acknowledging the presence of a fetal heartbeat and the statistical probability the fetus could be carried to term, as told to them by their physician.

Doctors who perform an abortion in violation of the law can be charged with a fifth-degree felony.


Therefore the abortion in Ohio is illegal.

Don’t believe conmen