Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
His SCIF was removed when he left office so those documents could not be protected by being in SCIF after he left office. It doesn't sound they were well protected at all since one group were found in his office and another group was found in a storage closet.Every president has a SCIF in their home. Even Biden has one.
You just refuse to believe it.
Some of the issues with the search warrant are:Federal Search warrants are very rarely thrown out. And this one won't be since the AG was involved. There will almost certainly be a pretrial hearing in which the defense will attempt to block as many documents as possible. The primary reason items are disallowed is that the recovery was outside the bounds of the warrant. However the bounds of this warrant is very wide.
You need to provide evidence of this or else I have to consider this a lie.His SCIF was removed when he left office so those documents could not be protected by being in SCIF after he left office. It doesn't sound they were well protected at all since one group were found in his office and another group was found in a storage closet.
Any deference to rule of law will be met with calls like this...It's a hallmark of totalitarian regimes throughout history...ANY push back to total state control will be a call to jail their opponents to their plans and deeds....Democrats have accused Aileen Cannon of obstruction of justice by appointing a special master. Democrats have called her unfit for the bench and are demanding she gets impeached.
Experts accuse Trump judge of “obstruction of justice” over ruling
Critics say Judge Aileen Cannon is "one of the most corrupt" judges appointed by Trump.www.salon.com
Enemy democrats are not willing to accept any election they didn't rig or the decisions of any judge they don't agree with.
This can't be settled by peaceful means.
A Democrat in Las Vegas murdered a reporter because the reporter told the truth. That civil war isn't so cold any more.Any deference to rule of law will be met with calls like this...It's a hallmark of totalitarian regimes throughout history...ANY push back to total state control will be a call to jail their opponents to their plans and deeds....
Realize we are already in a civil war. A cold one.
It's no where near the scale the the WokeComm's need it to be at this point if they are to retain their power...A Democrat in Las Vegas murdered a reporter because the reporter told the truth. That civil war isn't so cold any more.
I certainly hope so.It will go the the Atlanta court of appeals if they do appeal, and 6 of the 11 judges there were appointed by Trump. We are seeing a servitude to Trump along legal, as well as political lines, by his cult.
They are working at it.It's no where near the scale the the WokeComm's need it to be at this point if they are to retain their power...
Dont let your mouth overload your assholeTrump had classified documents. Top Secret nuclear codes
Sometimes they're willing to just come right out and say stuff.Reading your posts, it's not surprising that you would want to see a nuclear war.
Just like Biden flying Hunter into China on Air Force 2 to negotiate financial deals with government owned companies had nothing to do with corruption either.Dude. We’ve been all through that.
It has nothing to do with anything
This can't be settled by peaceful means.
Has nothing to do with this instance.All FBI agents are required to have top secret clearance. Some are cleared for SCI documents.
Lets see, most of the food in the country comes from red states, most of the military and veterans come from red states, at least half the military bases are in red states. In a civil war, the blue states look a lot like the Confederacy and the red states look like the Union.What if there is a "revolution" and Democrats win? Just because there is a revolution doesn't mean the right will win.
It should be thrown out because if you read the US codes it was an illegal search warrant.
Search Warrant Requirements
Key Fact
A judge or magistrate will issue a search warrant only if an affidavit establishes probable cause,
and the search warrant is sufficiently limited in scope.
The Fourth Amendment itself identifies the criteria for obtaining a lawful search warrant. A police officer, or other official seeking a warrant, must establish probable cause to the satisfaction of a judge, must make an “[o]ath or affirmation” as to the truth of the matters supporting probable cause, and must “particularly describ[e] the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” A search warrant is invalid if it covers too broad an area or does not identify specific items or persons.
The Search Warrant Requirement in Criminal Investigations & Legal Exceptions
What types of searches and seizures are prohibited under the Fourth Amendment, and when may exceptions to the warrant requirement apply?www.justia.com
www.nolo.com
But what if the FBI knows the warrant isn't valid?The area that it covers depends on evidence presented in the warrant and most of that has been redacted.
However,
In U.S. v. Leon (1984), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that if the police conduct a search in good-faith reliance on a warrant, the search is valid and the evidence is admissible, even if the warrant was in fact invalid through no fault of the police. Thus if the FBI reasonably relied on a warrant that was later deemed invalid for lack of probable cause or whatever, any evidence they recover is nevertheless admissible in court. As I have said, getting a search warrant thrown out is very difficult, because the FBI would had screwup the search. However, individual items can be thrown out for a number reasons such as attorney client privilege, executive privilege, etc..
https://www.usmessageboard.com/javascript:StartNgageChatWithTracking('chatWindowLink');
I can't think of a legitimate reason why they should have been could be taken out of the government, away from the government if they're classified. I frankly am skeptical of this claim that "I declassified everything," you know.
If, in fact, he sort of stood over scores of boxes, not really knowing what was in them, and said, "I hereby declassify everything in here" — that would be such an abuse, and that shows such recklessness that it's almost worse than taking the documents.
The whole idea of a special master is a bit of a red herring. The only documents that have been taken, it seems to me, that there's a legitimate concern about keeping away from the government and insulating the government from, would be documents relating to his private lawyer communications, him as an individual and as outside lawyers[.]
Methinks you are taking way too much for granted. Both superpowers (Russia and the US) couldn't even beat a little rag tag army of Taliban.Lets see, most of the food in the country comes from red states, most of the military and veterans come from red states, at least half the military bases are in red states. In a civil war, the blue states look a lot like the Confederacy and the red states look like the Union.
A president doing a mass declassification of highly classified documents he has not seen, nor without consulting his security advisors would certainly invite charges under the espionage act.Trump simply said whatever he had he de-classifed before he left office.
Biden's communist administration is just trying to reclassify them and make them sensitive so they can frame him again.
