Czernobog
Gold Member
See? That's an attack. And unfounded. This would be why I either mock you or ignore you. Because every time I give you the benefit of a respectful answer, you can't help being a dick. Do feel free to fuck off.How would someone like you even begin to know what honesty is when you are so clearly self deluded?Interesting read. However, since I have never attempted to tell anyone else that they should abandon their theistic beliefs, or that being a theist was morally inferior, or, in any other way tried to "convert" anyone to atheism, I don't really see what the article has to do with me.Documentation of what? Anecdotal philosophy?Post 414. You made an assertion. I challenged you to provide documentation. You keep skirting it. Now put on your big boy pants and provide me with examples of your assertion. Back up your statement. You keep telling me that I didn't back mine up but my statement is for you to provide evidence of yours. How can I argue something when I have no idea what you are referring to?You haven't actually challenged anything with anything.Move along. If you want to diffuse discourse and debate then do it somewhere else. Your assertions have been challenged. You balked. You're done.
Are the "New Atheists" As Bad as Christian Fundamentalists?
Every post I have made on this forum has been to defend myself against an attack on my choice to be an atheist.
And whether you want to acknowledge it, or not to tell an entire group that they are intellectually inferior (dead end) is an attack. So, don't bother insisting that you have not attacked anyone. Because the fact is you have. You refusing to acknowledge that doesn't make you innocent; it just makes you dishonest.
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk