Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
.In fact, you are incorrect. That is the point.The same goes for you. What's your point?So many of the worlds evil men believed just as you do.Can you describe the ways believers are forcing non-believers to become believers?I care that people like you try to FORCE your religion and beliefs on us throughout society.
"Can you describe the ways believers are forcing non-believers to become believers?"
That isn't what I said so I will not defend it.
What I said was; "I care that people like you try to FORCE your religion and beliefs on us throughout society."
and THAT I can prove....
First and foremost just by demanding that MY kids be FORCED to be subjected to YOUR religion in public schools!
keep your religion OUT OF schools, government, the military
Evil men disavow God because it gives them justification for the fulfillment of whatever desire and power they want over men.
Pretty basic psychology here.
Evil men disavow God because it gives them justification for the fulfillment of whatever desire and power they want over men.
Unfortunately, one will find exactly no scientific proof of an intelligent designer in that book.Stephen Meyer...Return of the God Hypothesis if you like scientific proof of an intelligent designer.
Hmm, no, and if you think so,you're absolutely delusional. You cant read a newspaper without seeing someone killing for their god.In fact, you are incorrect
And as a noted bloviating numb skull how do you know that exactly? Don't you have to actually read a book to know what is inside that book?Unfortunately, one will find exactly no scientific proof of an intelligent designer in that book.
Well, prima facie, there is no scientific evidence of magic. That's what magic is. Second, that would be big news. Instead nobody gives a shit, except some people who already believe in gods. That's a another good reason to strongly suspect it's just a steaming pile of bullshit that incorrectly conflates argument with evidence. Third, good scientific evidence brings scientists to the same conclusion, whether it is what they want to be true or not. Science is not like religion, Where you are first authoritatively told what the answer is, then you seek ways to align with it. It is quite the opposite.And as a noted bloviating numb skull how do you know that exactly?
I agree. Buying you any sort of book would probably be a waste of money. Even a coloring book of moderate difficulty.Well, prima facie, there is no scientific evidence of magic. That's what magic is. Second, that would be big news. Instead nobody gives a shit, except some people who already believe in gods. That's a another good reason to strongly suspect it's just a steaming pile of bullshit that incorrectly conflates argument with evidence. Third, good scientific evidence brings scientists to the same conclusion, whether it is what they want to be true or not. Science is not like religion, Where you are first authoritatively told what the answer is, then you seek ways to align with it. It is quite the opposite.
Add these up, and I can confidently say that buying that book for a dollar would be a waste of a dollar.
Haha.... suuuuure it is. Sure.The book is grounded in good solid universally recognized science! Science.
....and one person. So, if I produce 10 scientists who think what he presents as "evidence" is not evidence, does that mean I am ahead 10 to 1?Stephen C. Meyer - Wikipedia
An academic, Cambridge scholar and best selling author.
You are justifiably proud of being so stupid, it seems.
Nope. It means you have found someone who disagrees with scientific evidence. Find someone who disagrees with Stephen Meyer on scientific grounds...and one person. So, if I produce 10 scientists who think what he presents as "evidence" is not evidence, does that mean I am ahead 10 to 1?
Not at all. One of the trademarks of super stupid people is they think their biases and presumptions constitute fact.10 to 1 would mean your one disagrees with what is scientific evidence.
Hmm, no, i think it would be fairly easy to fond 10 scientists who think your conman's claimed "proof" is not good scientific evidence. I also think you agree that would be easy. So what's the problem? You presented one man's credentials, and now you know that means squat. Move on.You have invented a scenario and treat it like it is fact.
This man's thought does not represent his and only his view of intelligent creation, which is not the same thing as intelligent design. But you know nothing about it at all so how could you know that?Hmm, no, i think it would be fairly easy to fond 10 scientists who think your conman's claimed "proof" is not good scientific evidence. I also think you agree that would be easy. So what's the problem? You presented one man's credentials, and now you know that means squat. Move on.
Nonsense. They are the same thing. Rebranding it doesn't matter. That's part of the con.This man's thought does not represent his and only his view of intelligent creation, which is not the same thing as intelligent design.
You call this scientist's work
Watch the video. You are too lazy and stupid to even do that. When you've put even a scintilla of work into yourhaha... work? And what peer reviewed research did he perform and publish to prove his hypothesis, or , as important, try to disprove it?? None. "Work"... please...
Hmm, naw, I'm good. But you could present, in your own words, one bit of scientific evidence for intelligent design. And then we can inspect it.Watch the video.
That's what the video is for, asshole. Quit dancing around. We both know you want nothing to do with it. My original post was not directed at you so just move on.Hmm, naw, I'm good. But you could present, in your own words, one bit of scientific evidence for intelligent design. And then we can inspect it.
