Backwards…

Rustic

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2015
58,769
5,895
1,940
Basically what Obama care is.
It forces millions of people into a program that want nothing to do with it and will never use it and certainly can not afford it - so that millions will be covered by people Who cannot afford it, want nothing to do with it, and will never use it…
 
Last edited:
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #2
Like I said socialism/progressivism is a cancer which targets individuality and freedom…
 
As bad as the ACA this Republican bill is worse. All it does is shift monies around in a different manner. It cuts some from Medicaid,, adds some to the insurance companies, lowers the threshold FOR Medicaid enrollees and frankly is nothing more than a poison pill for those who may vote for.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #4
As bad as the ACA this Republican bill is worse. All it does is shift monies around in a different manner. It cuts some from Medicaid,, adds some to the insurance companies, lowers the threshold FOR Medicaid enrollees and frankly is nothing more than a poison pill for those who may vote for.
Like I said, socialism/progressivism targets individuality and freedom. These socialist entitlement programs are a cancer...
 
Rustic uses terms the definition of which he would fail in an exam.

Twenty million have insurance that did not have it.

Government health insurance is not going away and may not look much difference than ACA.

You were told that and went "nuh uh."
 
Let's be clear about something: Obamacare was never about health care; it was about pursuing a "social Justice" agenda to end the stigma of distinctions between social classes in the U.S. Just as the "food stamp" program was changed to a debit card system for this purpose, so was national health "insurance" used to erase any distinction between those who paid for their care and those who relied on government assistance.

A worthy goal, perhaps, but it has little to do with actual health care.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
Rustic uses terms the definition of which he would fail in an exam.

Twenty million have insurance that did not have it.

Government health insurance is not going away and may not look much difference than ACA.

You were told that and went "nuh uh."
Basically it is forcing people to take care of other people who cannot take care of themselves… Communism
 
Rustic uses terms the definition of which he would fail in an exam.

Twenty million have insurance that did not have it.

Government health insurance is not going away and may not look much difference than ACA.

You were told that and went "nuh uh."
Basically it is forcing people to take care of other people who cannot take care of themselves… Communism
Americanism over the last 130 years. You believe in "me only-ism" and screw that.
 
Weird, then, that the GOP won't present the repeal bill they voted for 50 times under Obama now that they can actually pass it
 
Rustic uses terms the definition of which he would fail in an exam.

Twenty million have insurance that did not have it.

Government health insurance is not going away and may not look much difference than ACA.

You were told that and went "nuh uh."
Basically it is forcing people to take care of other people who cannot take care of themselves… Communism
Americanism over the last 130 years. You believe in "me only-ism" and screw that.
People really ought to pay for their own shit...
 
As bad as the ACA this Republican bill is worse. All it does is shift monies around in a different manner. It cuts some from Medicaid,, adds some to the insurance companies, lowers the threshold FOR Medicaid enrollees and frankly is nothing more than a poison pill for those who may vote for.
Like I said, socialism/progressivism targets individuality and freedom. These socialist entitlement programs are a cancer...

Like I said, as bad as the ACA is, this Pub plan is worse. ALL insurance is "socialist".
 
Rustic uses terms the definition of which he would fail in an exam.

Twenty million have insurance that did not have it.

Government health insurance is not going away and may not look much difference than ACA.

You were told that and went "nuh uh."
But the only insurance written under ACA have such high deductibles that it does the insured no good. If you are unfortunate enough to have a policy with subsidized premiums, and a $6k deductible, then it does not matter if they incur $5k in out of pocket medical expenses or $50K. Either amount will bankrupt them.
 
Rustic uses terms the definition of which he would fail in an exam.

Twenty million have insurance that did not have it.

Government health insurance is not going away and may not look much difference than ACA.

You were told that and went "nuh uh."
But the only insurance written under ACA have such high deductibles that it does the insured no good. If you are unfortunate enough to have a policy with subsidized premiums, and a $6k deductible, then it does not matter if they incur $5k in out of pocket medical expenses or $50K. Either amount will bankrupt them.

I've been saying this since 2013. Nobody will listen.
 
Not only backwards but upside down. Democrats agree that the flawed ACA was imploding but democrat elected officials think they can behave like bystanders rather than try to make the system better. Democrats are still playing by the old 60's playbook as if Americans are as stupid as they hope but Americans are better informed than any time in history and it seems that the democrat party is fading into oblivion.
 
Rustic uses terms the definition of which he would fail in an exam.

Twenty million have insurance that did not have it.

Government health insurance is not going away and may not look much difference than ACA.

You were told that and went "nuh uh."

/--- They could have set up a separate program for those without insurance leaving the majority of us alone. But Nooooooo Obozo insisted on one size fits all
 

Forum List

Back
Top