eflatminor
Classical Liberal
- May 24, 2011
- 10,643
- 1,669
- 245
I mean Bain invests 401k for the government employees that aren't connected with any Bain company at all. Might for a lot of other companies too... I don't know. Although I will be honest and say that I got that information from an news article that I can't remember where I got it from. It may very well be suspect. I'll look for it again tomorrow.Because they are making money from a failed company by investing money that is not their own. They risk nothing of themselves, and get paid. Or more to the point they risk other peoples money, and they get paid either way.Oh... See... You are under the assumption that the company isn't basically controlled by Bain. Why?
No, I do not make that assumption. But let's assume that Bain acquires a company and controls it. Why do you care?
This is the same thing as a woman marrying a rich man... Indirectly killing him with food or alcohol, and taking his money. Hell... Maybe she just marries and divorces them and takes half... And then doing it again. And again... And Again... Well it wasn't MY money... So why should I care? Is it legal? Sure it is. Is it right? Fuck no. Not unless everyone knows what they are getting into about her.
No. The company does the bankrupts. Not Bain. Bain still got paid as if it was a separate company. And it inflated it's services to the child company to make damn sure it got it's money.
And there is the loophole that allows the Rich to get Richer even if they are fuck nuggets.
This is the same thing as a woman marrying a rich man... Indirectly killing him with food or alcohol, and taking his money. Hell... Maybe she just marries and divorces them and takes half... And then doing it again. And again... And Again... Well it wasn't MY money... So why should I care? Is it legal? Sure it is. Is it right? Fuck no. Not unless everyone knows what they are getting into about her.If Bain performs services for the company, they are entitled to seek compensation, which is purely a contractual matter with the company that took their capital and/or sought their services. Again, I don't see why anyone who didn't own stock in the company would care.
Make no mistake... I'm one of those people who won't beat around the bush. "Go way you stupid fuck'n gold digger, I know what you're up to" rather than whispers in back rooms. I want to say it... And I want anyone and everyone to call me an asshole, or a saint for doing it... Just as long as they look. Make up your own damn mind... But LOOK for the truth.
But Bain does do 401k's...And they do invest them.
What do you mean by this?
Tired now. Shelzin sleep.[/QUOTE]
What I think you miss is the voluntary aspect of the parties involved. Nobody is forcing a company to accept Bain's capital or their terms for investing. If you don't like the company's decision, don't buy their stock or their products. PLENTY of companies thrived after partnering with Bain, others didn't work out.
Your gold digging wife analogy is not applicable because one party deceived the other. That is not the case with Bain. Both parties entered into their contract freely and no company is claiming Bain "indirectly killed" them.
Still don't know why borrowing money has anything to do with it.