Barr: Trump using 'extortion' to control GOP

You're going to be disappointed when no charges are brought.
That’s not what you posted. You posted liberals want to jail political opponents. Make up you Trumptastic mind.

J-Mac logic: Dems are putting their enemies in jail and you’re gonna be disappointed when Trump doesn’t even get charged!!

WTF? Righties chant “lock her up”. All I’ve seen is that Trump has been more than fairly treated by the government for either being stupid or participating in espionage.
 
That’s not what you posted. You posted liberals want to jail political opponents. Make up you Trumptastic mind.

J-Mac logic: Dems are putting their enemies in jail and you’re gonna be disappointed when Trump doesn’t even get charged!!

WTF? Righties chant “lock her up”. All I’ve seen is that Trump has been more than fairly treated by the government for either being stupid or participating in espionage.
I can speak for myself gator....thanks...

Look, it is the very fact that Ms. Clinton was let off the hook, when we knew that hacking of her email, and server was not only probable, but likely, her home wasn't raided, she was treated with kid gloves in FBI questioning, and ultimately let off with the weak as hell excuse that no prosecutor would move that case forward...But somehow, Trump isn't afforded the same level of deference? Give me a break...

As for regular people, you have elderly women that never breached the Capitol sitting in solitary for tresspassing....really? Wanna tell me some more about equal justice, as felons with rap sheets as long as your arm get out to attack more people?
 
I can speak for myself gator....thanks...

Look, it is the very fact that Ms. Clinton was let off the hook, when we knew that hacking of her email, and server was not only probable, but likely, her home wasn't raided, she was treated with kid gloves in FBI questioning, and ultimately let off with the weak as hell excuse that no prosecutor would move that case forward...But somehow, Trump isn't afforded the same level of deference? Give me a break...

As for regular people, you have elderly women that never breached the Capitol sitting in solitary for tresspassing....really? Wanna tell me some more about equal justice, as felons with rap sheets as long as your arm get out to attack more people?

Name some of these elderly women.
 
I can speak for myself gator....thanks...

Look, it is the very fact that Ms. Clinton was let off the hook, when we knew that hacking of her email, and server was not only probable, but likely, her home wasn't raided, she was treated with kid gloves in FBI questioning, and ultimately let off with the weak as hell excuse that no prosecutor would move that case forward...But somehow, Trump isn't afforded the same level of deference? Give me a break...

As for regular people, you have elderly women that never breached the Capitol sitting in solitary for tresspassing....really? Wanna tell me some more about equal justice, as felons with rap sheets as long as your arm get out to attack more people?
the difference is the quantity of classified material, and the level of classification of that material. Its also espionage, aka theft of documents.
 
Just from my years of living on this planet, usually a search warrant that retrieves what they say they did, charges would have already been brought....Why do you suppose they haven't?
Because the matter requires a full investigation so all the facts can be ascertained. After all, there are multiple charges under consideration.
 
Love the humor.
who was it that signed the 1st Step Act? Hmmm?

not Obama, not MLK, but Donald J Trump

there are some people like Trump who actually DID SOMETHING to help black people, there were others like Obama and MLK...who took a hike!
 
Just from my years of living on this planet, usually a search warrant that retrieves what they say they did, charges would have already been brought....Why do you suppose they haven't?
Because Garland isn't like Durham. He doesn't rush to charge people like Sussmann, and then work up a case against them.

You know what going into court before the case is fully prepared means.

MICHAEL SUSSMANN FOUND NOT GUILTY OF CHARGES BROUGHT BY SPECIAL PROSECUTOR JOHN DURHAM

 
Because the matter requires a full investigation so all the facts can be ascertained. After all, there are multiple charges under consideration.
So, you're saying that they did the search before they had a case built?

Excuse me if it sounds like "Bring me the man, and I'll find the crime"....
 
I can speak for myself gator....thanks...

Look, it is the very fact that Ms. Clinton was let off the hook, when we knew that hacking of her email, and server was not only probable, but likely, her home wasn't raided, she was treated with kid gloves in FBI questioning, and ultimately let off with the weak as hell excuse that no prosecutor would move that case forward...But somehow, Trump isn't afforded the same level of deference? Give me a break...

As for regular people, you have elderly women that never breached the Capitol sitting in solitary for tresspassing....really? Wanna tell me some more about equal justice, as felons with rap sheets as long as your arm get out to attack more people?
Nothing you post about Hillary’s server or Hunter’s laptop will change the fact that the former President of the US stole confidential documents, refused to return them, had a lawyer lie about not having them, and was served a warrant which discovered copious amounts of top secret documents illegally possessed and poorly stored.

If you want to “get Hilary” or “get Huter” go for it. Just don’t sell out the US protecting a former president who has no regard for the law.
 
But DBA seems very confident that he'll prove what a commie I am.
No offense but you are 100% a commie if you can’t produce a photo of your lips on Trump’s ass. Sometimes I wonder if you even know how this whole communist, Marxist, socialist thing works?
 
Nothing you post about Hillary’s server or Hunter’s laptop will change the fact that the former President of the US stole confidential documents, refused to return them, had a lawyer lie about not having them, and was served a warrant which discovered copious amounts of top secret documents illegally possessed and poorly stored.

If you want to “get Hilary” or “get Huter” go for it. Just don’t sell out the US protecting a former president who has no regard for the law.
Get back to me when he is charged.
 

Forum List

Back
Top