para bellum
Platinum Member
Oh, Bakhmut is super-duper important. Second only to Kiev maybe.Russia is claiming that taking Badmuht will be a big advantage for conducting the war deep into the Ukraine.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh, Bakhmut is super-duper important. Second only to Kiev maybe.Russia is claiming that taking Badmuht will be a big advantage for conducting the war deep into the Ukraine.
Kiev is important for different reasons.Oh, Bakhmut is super-duper important. Second only to Kiev maybe.
Russia is claiming that taking Badmuht will be a big advantage for conducting the war deep into the Ukraine. Others say it's just a symbolic loss for the Ukraine.
Does anyone have any reliable information of the facts?
Natural resources are not of any importance to the Russians at this point..
Bakhmut is a "mining town" ... Ukraine is also rich in titanium, iron ore, and zirconium.
Russia has already captured the salt mines in or around Bakhmut.
Some articles suggest the salt mines around Bakhmut are also where the Ukrainians stored their arsenal of weapons ...
After the fall of the Soviet Union ... And where all the weapons they were passing out to Ukrainians came from.
As recent as January the Wall Street Journal indicated the Wagner Group considered the salt mines at Bakhmut as "Center Stage" in the War.
.
Natural resources are not of any importance to the Russians at this point.
You've offered a perhaps valid point if there are arms and ammunition at risk of Russia taking Bakmuht.
Do you have any explanation for why Russia is not destroying Kiev? It could also be because it would have no strategic gain, and of course would be an attack on civilians.
Yes, Russia has been unsuccessful in its current efforts to capture Bakhmut, and because Russian casualties are running so high and Russian ammunition supplies are running so low, Ukraine has decided to reinforce its positions in and around Bakhmut in order to bleed the Russian forces dry.Russia is claiming that taking Badmuht will be a big advantage for conducting the war deep into the Ukraine. Others say it's just a symbolic loss for the Ukraine.
Does anyone have any reliable information of the facts?
Did they? You could be misinterpreting their motives and Russia's motive? Pursue the question further if you like?.
Well ... You can pretend resources don't mean anything ... The Wagner Group disagrees with you ...
Said so ... And are spending resources fighting and dying for it.
.
Both you and utopa have a new and fresh spin on the situation, and so thanks for that!Yes, Russia has been unsuccessful in its current efforts to capture Bakhmut, and because Russian casualties are running so high and Russian ammunition supplies are running so low, Ukraine has decided to reinforce its positions in and around Bakhmut in order to bleed the Russian forces dry.
Did they? You could be misinterpreting their motives and Russia's motive? Pursue the question further if you like?
I'll just make the point that natural resources are not the immediate cause in the heat of battle, but are a consideration.
We can safely say that natural resources are the entire reason for the war overall.
If you have nothing to say about the 'strategic' value of Bakmuht then I'm going to leave this discussion..
You didn't ask about the entire war.
You commented on the Battle for Bakhmut ... It's strategic value ... And specifically asked for facts in that matter.
Sorry if you don't like them ...
.
If you have nothing to say about the 'strategic' value of Bakmuht then I'm going to leave this discussion.
Bakmuht is not important to either side for strategic reasons. Are you aware of what 'strategic' means?
If you have nothing more to offer then we can be finished with each other..
I already posted more about the strategic value of Bakhmut than you have offered ...
Carry your ass ... And quit talking shit that amounts to nothing ...
.
If you have nothing more to offer then we can be finished with each other.
Here's Russia's opinion on the strategic importance in case anybody wants to know?
Russian defense minister outlines importance of key Donbass city
Russian Minister of Defense Shoigu has outlined the importance of controlling Donbass city and offered an update on Ukrainian losseswww.rt.com
They said that about Lysychansk too...