Sure they can.
Unyil they run out of lead and powder and can't buy more.
Wouldn't it just be easier to put people that misuse firearms in jail for a really long time?
.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sure they can.
Unyil they run out of lead and powder and can't buy more.
Do you mean wait until after the school or mall or restaurant is shot up and the kids are dead?Wouldn't it just be easier to put people that misuse firearms in jail for a really long time?
.
That’s just your dumbass not knowing what words mean or being able to read a sentence in English.There is nothing anti-2nd Amendment about wanting gun ownership to be WELL REGULATED.
But any regulations will not effect criminals. Instead of making it harder for law abiding citizens to exercise their Constitution right make the punishment for using a firearm to commit a crime harsher. The 2nd Amendment also literally states "shall not be infringed".There is nothing anti-2nd Amendment about wanting gun ownership to be WELL REGULATED.
It is....literally what the 2A says.
It appears to be those opposed to the actual language who are the REAL "anti-2A- ers.
You know, those that oppose strict regulation on firearms.
I see Greg Abbott is lying about Beto defunding the police. Abbott is a failure and must be voted OUT. Vote Beto O’Rourke for Governor on November 8...Make Texas Big Again!
i hope he raises your taxes
Bullshit!That’s just your dumbass not knowing what words mean or being able to read a sentence in English.
You’re wrong because of both, but even if your misinterpretation of a common use phrase from the 1700s was somehow correct, it wouldn’t matter due to the sentence structure.
Fine.Bullshit!
The Second Amendment was written for flintlock and blunderbuss!
It actually has ZERO application to 21st century weaponry.
It wasn't even until 2008 when a few conservative judges deviated from the actual intent of the Constitution and legislated from the bench deciding that the 2A applies to private citizens outside the context of a militia.
So don't confuse what a bunch of conservative justices in 2008 thought for what the framers of the Constitution intended.
Liar 1939 Supreme Court Case established that the 2nd protected military style firearms,Bullshit!
The Second Amendment was written for flintlock and blunderbuss!
It actually has ZERO application to 21st century weaponry.
It wasn't even until 2008 when a few conservative judges deviated from the actual intent of the Constitution and legislated from the bench deciding that the 2A applies to private citizens outside the context of a militia.
So don't confuse what a bunch of conservative justices in 2008 thought for what the framers of the Constitution intended.
Do you mean wait until after the school or mall or restaurant is shot up and the kids are dead?
I didn't realize that anyone has ever been shot with a telephone.Fine.
Then the first amendment cannot possibly protect any speech using telegram, telephone, or internet, Luddite moron.
Which case?Liar 1939 Supreme Court Case established that the 2nd protected military style firearms,
you did claim that the 2nd didn't apply to modern firearmsI didn't realize that anyone has ever been shot with a telephone.
Or that the First Amendment contains any clause specifying that telophone ownership and use must be "well regulated."
Hmmm.....
I believe it was white Vs Texas.Which case?
i hope he raises your taxes
Bullshit!
The Second Amendment was written for flintlock and blunderbuss!
It actually has ZERO application to 21st century weaponry.
It wasn't even until 2008 when a few conservative judges deviated from the actual intent of the Constitution and legislated from the bench deciding that the 2A applies to private citizens outside the context of a militia.
So don't confuse what a bunch of conservative justices in 2008 thought for what the framers of the Constitution intended.
I also stated that the 2A provides a very specific set of circumstances, or parameters for gun ownership.you did claim that the 2nd didn't apply to modern firearms
wrong well regulated in the 1700's meant that it worked properly.I also stated that the 2A provides a very specific set of circumstances, or parameters for gun ownership.
The First A separation of church and state and the free press is not the same as the Second Amendment.
Apples and oranges.