Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You guys fall for any canard that Trump gives you. Democrats are not anti Police, that's a trope of divisive identity politics you've been fed on tWatter.
I didn't imply that, I asked you a question...several, actually, and all you could pick out was some dipshit potshot because of the hate in your heart.Those numbers are meaningless out of context.The defund the Police movement was a mixed message, that's the truth that folks who are having an honest/casual conversation can learn. The origin of the idea was to reallocate resources toward mental health professionals to assist the Police when someone is acting erratic but not yet becoming dangerous...so that the situation can be de-escalated by a professional before a life needs to be lost.You guys fall for any canard that Trump gives you. Democrats are not anti Police, that's a trope of divisive identity politics you've been fed on tWatter.
Well Biden is on tape wanting to defund the police.
At the debate he denied it but there he is right on tape.
At the debate he said he wanted social workers to travel with police on every call. Just shows how bat shit crazy he is.
But everyone in partisan political sphere of course advances the most dire, evil take possible so that they can continue to demonize each other as sub human cockroaches and you all fall for it.
Our President is the worst, most divisive President maybe in History, but I've no in depth experience with the super early days.
Here's a portion of results from your honest/casual mixed message.
Austin, Texas, $150 million cut
Seattle, $3.5 million cut
New York, $1 billion cut
Los Angeles, $1 billion cut
San Francisco, $120 million cut
Oakland, $14.6 million cut
Washington D.C., $15 million cut
Baltimore $22 million cut
Portland, Oregon, $16 million cut
Philadelphia $33 million cut
Hartford, Conn. $1 million cut
Missing context #1: Reason for the cuts.
Missing context #2: % of the whole of each cut.
Missing context #3: Were the funds reallocated, or truly cut. Was the reallocation or the cut empirically needed, or not...
Along with several other missing contexts that make merely posting those numbers as a fly by meaningless
Of course the funds were reallocated. For some dumbass reason you feel any of these cities will return the funds to taxpayers.
No - your Cult leader in Chief has directed you to malign the Democrats with the Riots, and the Democrats empathized with the peaceful protesters while denouncing the violence...not accounting for any fringe nutter retards...but your Boss took the fringe nutter retards as evidence that you should amp up your hatred of "Dems" and "the left," even though if you used your real fuckin brain as opposed to your Cult-speak, you'd realize "da skary dems" are just some neighbors, postmen, police, managers, etc etc. About 47% of Registered Voters.You guys fall for any canard that Trump gives you. Democrats are not anti Police, that's a trope of divisive identity politics you've been fed on tWatter.
In 2020, Democrats have either talked about defunding the police, denied or justified the violence in the streets. This has nothing to do with what Trump says. The Democrats’ voices or silence has been on display for Americans to see.
It is like 2016 because we are electing a president, and the MSM and polls are all in the tank for democrats, just like 2016.A presidential election year, just like 2016.Polls!! Polls! Those 1,500 random calls! Place your bets! I remember 2016. We've seen this movie before:
What year is this?
How is it just like 2016?
I have never been polled. Neither have any of my relatives, friends or even friends of friends. I do not know one person who has been polled. Does it mean the polls are incorrect? Not necessarily but I am not sure we can take them as gospel. My only point.Yes, I've been polled by Siena College.I need more data on who was polled, what questions were asked, etc. Have you ever been polled?Instead of being 'not sure' about the Polls, why don't you instead study their rate of accuracy and make an informed decision on how much weight you give them, in predicting the reality of things?Would you mind proving that via a link? Specifically: FL, AZ, PA, MN, NH, NV and MI. Not sure about the polls as I have never been polled. Have you? Anyone you know?So now we decide based on a popular vote? How do the swing states look?
Not any better.
Everyone rags on polls, the polls have been WAY more accurate at predicting races then these partisans on messageboards screaming "but but but 2016 polls!!" before, yannow, they actually do some digging into the issue.
Those are rhetorical questions. Don't even need 2 bother.
Why do you ask the questions that are published in the methodology and then advertise your ignorance as though they're not answered?I have never been polled. Neither have any of my relatives, friends or even friends of friends. I do not know one person who has been polled. Does it mean the polls are incorrect? Not necessarily but I am not sure we can take them as gospel. My only point.Yes, I've been polled by Siena College.I need more data on who was polled, what questions were asked, etc. Have you ever been polled?Instead of being 'not sure' about the Polls, why don't you instead study their rate of accuracy and make an informed decision on how much weight you give them, in predicting the reality of things?Would you mind proving that via a link? Specifically: FL, AZ, PA, MN, NH, NV and MI. Not sure about the polls as I have never been polled. Have you? Anyone you know?So now we decide based on a popular vote? How do the swing states look?
Not any better.
Everyone rags on polls, the polls have been WAY more accurate at predicting races then these partisans on messageboards screaming "but but but 2016 polls!!" before, yannow, they actually do some digging into the issue.
Those are rhetorical questions. Don't even need 2 bother.
Polls aren't reliable. To many variables.
Like who is asking the questions.
Where are they asking the questions.
Who's being asked the questions.
Way to many variables to take them seriously.
Why do you ask the questions that are published in the methodology and then advertise your ignorance as though they're not answered?I have never been polled. Neither have any of my relatives, friends or even friends of friends. I do not know one person who has been polled. Does it mean the polls are incorrect? Not necessarily but I am not sure we can take them as gospel. My only point.Yes, I've been polled by Siena College.I need more data on who was polled, what questions were asked, etc. Have you ever been polled?Instead of being 'not sure' about the Polls, why don't you instead study their rate of accuracy and make an informed decision on how much weight you give them, in predicting the reality of things?Would you mind proving that via a link? Specifically: FL, AZ, PA, MN, NH, NV and MI. Not sure about the polls as I have never been polled. Have you? Anyone you know?So now we decide based on a popular vote? How do the swing states look?
Not any better.
Everyone rags on polls, the polls have been WAY more accurate at predicting races then these partisans on messageboards screaming "but but but 2016 polls!!" before, yannow, they actually do some digging into the issue.
Those are rhetorical questions. Don't even need 2 bother.
Polls aren't reliable. To many variables.
Like who is asking the questions.
Where are they asking the questions.
Who's being asked the questions.
Way to many variables to take them seriously.
What you're doing - on the level of psychology, is coddling yourself. The polls are bad news for Trump and so you're sowing doubt in your brain about the polls - - - when there's studies that will tell you, if you cared to look, the % accuracy in each and every single one of them. They have a track record, they've sort of been doing this.
Cult worship rules out rational thinking.
You can't even do to, too and two right...that's two posts straight.Why do you ask the questions that are published in the methodology and then advertise your ignorance as though they're not answered?I have never been polled. Neither have any of my relatives, friends or even friends of friends. I do not know one person who has been polled. Does it mean the polls are incorrect? Not necessarily but I am not sure we can take them as gospel. My only point.Yes, I've been polled by Siena College.I need more data on who was polled, what questions were asked, etc. Have you ever been polled?Instead of being 'not sure' about the Polls, why don't you instead study their rate of accuracy and make an informed decision on how much weight you give them, in predicting the reality of things?Would you mind proving that via a link? Specifically: FL, AZ, PA, MN, NH, NV and MI. Not sure about the polls as I have never been polled. Have you? Anyone you know?So now we decide based on a popular vote? How do the swing states look?
Not any better.
Everyone rags on polls, the polls have been WAY more accurate at predicting races then these partisans on messageboards screaming "but but but 2016 polls!!" before, yannow, they actually do some digging into the issue.
Those are rhetorical questions. Don't even need 2 bother.
Polls aren't reliable. To many variables.
Like who is asking the questions.
Where are they asking the questions.
Who's being asked the questions.
Way to many variables to take them seriously.
What you're doing - on the level of psychology, is coddling yourself. The polls are bad news for Trump and so you're sowing doubt in your brain about the polls - - - when there's studies that will tell you, if you cared to look, the % accuracy in each and every single one of them. They have a track record, they've sort of been doing this.
Cult worship rules out rational thinking.
Nothing cult about my thinking. If honesty doesn't suit you to fucking bad.
After all you believe in polls. I'd bet you believed the 2016 polls. Surprise.
Polls are for idiots and you fit that bill.
And? Not sure what you are getting at in your biased post LOL.Defunding the police today involves not only cutting money from police budgets, which often constitute up to a third of a city’s entire budget, but reinvesting it into transformative justice programs that emphasize community-building efforts, like mental health services, over policing. For context, programs like affordable housing and health care have been gradually defunded over the last 50 years, while police budgets have remained unchanged and even enlarged. In New York City, for example, the funding for law enforcement grew nearly 30 percent over the last decade and is bigger than the Departments of Health, Homeless Services, Housing Preservation and Development, and Youth and Community Development combined. This gap between supporting the roots of a community’s well-being and the forces that punish marginalization are at the heart of calls to defund police.
Biased post? It was a Journalist's research into the history of the defund the police movement...someone challenged that the funds aren't reallocated (see the underline).And? Not sure what you are getting at in your biased post LOL.Defunding the police today involves not only cutting money from police budgets, which often constitute up to a third of a city’s entire budget, but reinvesting it into transformative justice programs that emphasize community-building efforts, like mental health services, over policing. For context, programs like affordable housing and health care have been gradually defunded over the last 50 years, while police budgets have remained unchanged and even enlarged. In New York City, for example, the funding for law enforcement grew nearly 30 percent over the last decade and is bigger than the Departments of Health, Homeless Services, Housing Preservation and Development, and Youth and Community Development combined. This gap between supporting the roots of a community’s well-being and the forces that punish marginalization are at the heart of calls to defund police.
Pretty sure data, that you love so much illustrates that places that "defunded the police" have seen an increase in crime. Or is that a myth or an idea like Antifa?
Journalist's spin as the journalist failed to state that not funding the police results in more crime. Sorry. That is a fact. Want to reduce crime? Have fewer single parent households.Biased post? It was a Journalist's research into the history of the defund the police movement...someone challenged that the funds aren't reallocated (see the underline).And? Not sure what you are getting at in your biased post LOL.Defunding the police today involves not only cutting money from police budgets, which often constitute up to a third of a city’s entire budget, but reinvesting it into transformative justice programs that emphasize community-building efforts, like mental health services, over policing. For context, programs like affordable housing and health care have been gradually defunded over the last 50 years, while police budgets have remained unchanged and even enlarged. In New York City, for example, the funding for law enforcement grew nearly 30 percent over the last decade and is bigger than the Departments of Health, Homeless Services, Housing Preservation and Development, and Youth and Community Development combined. This gap between supporting the roots of a community’s well-being and the forces that punish marginalization are at the heart of calls to defund police.
Pretty sure data, that you love so much illustrates that places that "defunded the police" have seen an increase in crime. Or is that a myth or an idea like Antifa?
Reducing single parent households is a part of the goal of the programs the funds were proposed to be reallocated.Journalist's spin as the journalist failed to state that not funding the police results in more crime. Sorry. That is a fact. Defunding the police today involves not only cutting money from police budgets, which often constitute up to a third of a city’s entire budget, but reinvesting it into transformative justice programs that emphasize community-building efforts, like mental health services, over policing. For context, programs like affordable housing and health care have been gradually defunded over the last 50 years, while police budgets have remained unchanged and even enlarged. In New York City, for example, the funding for law enforcement grew nearly 30 percent over the last decade and is bigger than the Departments of Health, Homeless Services, Housing Preservation and Development, and Youth and Community Development combined. This gap between supporting the roots of a community’s well-being and the forces that punish marginalization are at the heart of calls to defund police.Biased post? It was a Journalist's research into the history of the defund the police movement...someone challenged that the funds aren't reallocated (see the underline).And? Not sure what you are getting at in your biased post LOL.Defunding the police today involves not only cutting money from police budgets, which often constitute up to a third of a city’s entire budget, but reinvesting it into transformative justice programs that emphasize community-building efforts, like mental health services, over policing. For context, programs like affordable housing and health care have been gradually defunded over the last 50 years, while police budgets have remained unchanged and even enlarged. In New York City, for example, the funding for law enforcement grew nearly 30 percent over the last decade and is bigger than the Departments of Health, Homeless Services, Housing Preservation and Development, and Youth and Community Development combined. This gap between supporting the roots of a community’s well-being and the forces that punish marginalization are at the heart of calls to defund police.
Pretty sure data, that you love so much illustrates that places that "defunded the police" have seen an increase in crime. Or is that a myth or an idea like Antifa?
You guys fall for any canard that Trump gives you. Democrats are not anti Police, that's a trope of divisive identity politics you've been fed on tWatter.
In 2020, Democrats have either talked about defunding the police, denied or justified the violence in the streets. This has nothing to do with what Trump says. The Democrats’ voices or silence has been on display for Americans to see.
You guys fall for any canard that Trump gives you. Democrats are not anti Police, that's a trope of divisive identity politics you've been fed on tWatter.
In 2020, Democrats have either talked about defunding the police, denied or justified the violence in the streets. This has nothing to do with what Trump says. The Democrats’ voices or silence has been on display for Americans to see.
SOME Democrats have talked about defunding the police. SOME! Very few people justify violence, vandalism and arson. You're posting another BIG LIE, the same shit supporters of Donald Trump do all the time.
No - your Cult leader in Chief has directed you to malign the Democrats with the Riots, and the Democrats empathized with the peaceful protesters while denouncing the violence...not accounting for any fringe nutter retards...but your Boss took the fringe nutter retards as evidence that you should amp up your hatred of "Dems" and "the left," even though if you used your real fuckin brain as opposed to your Cult-speak, you'd realize "da skary dems" are just some neighbors, postmen, police, managers, etc etc. About 47% of Registered Voters.You guys fall for any canard that Trump gives you. Democrats are not anti Police, that's a trope of divisive identity politics you've been fed on tWatter.
In 2020, Democrats have either talked about defunding the police, denied or justified the violence in the streets. This has nothing to do with what Trump says. The Democrats’ voices or silence has been on display for Americans to see.
You've been socially engineered to hate.
Didn’t take long for you to get nasty and personal. Coward. Don’t say stuff on a message board that you would not say to someone’s face. Disagreements are fine but acting like you just did is cowardly. Makes you a pussy.Reducing single parent households is a part of the goal of the programs the funds were proposed to be reallocated.Journalist's spin as the journalist failed to state that not funding the police results in more crime. Sorry. That is a fact. Defunding the police today involves not only cutting money from police budgets, which often constitute up to a third of a city’s entire budget, but reinvesting it into transformative justice programs that emphasize community-building efforts, like mental health services, over policing. For context, programs like affordable housing and health care have been gradually defunded over the last 50 years, while police budgets have remained unchanged and even enlarged. In New York City, for example, the funding for law enforcement grew nearly 30 percent over the last decade and is bigger than the Departments of Health, Homeless Services, Housing Preservation and Development, and Youth and Community Development combined. This gap between supporting the roots of a community’s well-being and the forces that punish marginalization are at the heart of calls to defund police.Biased post? It was a Journalist's research into the history of the defund the police movement...someone challenged that the funds aren't reallocated (see the underline).And? Not sure what you are getting at in your biased post LOL.Defunding the police today involves not only cutting money from police budgets, which often constitute up to a third of a city’s entire budget, but reinvesting it into transformative justice programs that emphasize community-building efforts, like mental health services, over policing. For context, programs like affordable housing and health care have been gradually defunded over the last 50 years, while police budgets have remained unchanged and even enlarged. In New York City, for example, the funding for law enforcement grew nearly 30 percent over the last decade and is bigger than the Departments of Health, Homeless Services, Housing Preservation and Development, and Youth and Community Development combined. This gap between supporting the roots of a community’s well-being and the forces that punish marginalization are at the heart of calls to defund police.
Pretty sure data, that you love so much illustrates that places that "defunded the police" have seen an increase in crime. Or is that a myth or an idea like Antifa?
Just shut up - nobody WANTS more crime. Fucking OBVIOUSLY. That part of the discussion is the poisoned well that your President created for you. If you say it out loud, "democrats want more crime!"...you might have a millisecond of humility and realize how pathetically fucking stupid that sounds and you should be ashamed of being led like a sheep into believing such a stupid fucking thing about 47% of registered voters.
Moms, daughters...Dads..professionals....Cops!!?!?! military, all of those have plenty of these people you're saying want higher crime.
Like a dummy. You've been used by an orange clown.
I'm not afraid of message board warriors...that was super dorky. Sorry...when you bite dumb narratives I'll say it with my chest. Here, there and anywhere...thinking the "Dems" are anti law and order is a retarded trope.Didn’t take long for you to get nasty and personal. Coward. Don’t say stuff on a message board that you would not say to someone’s face. Disagreements are fine but acting like you just did is cowardly. Makes you a pussy.Reducing single parent households is a part of the goal of the programs the funds were proposed to be reallocated.Journalist's spin as the journalist failed to state that not funding the police results in more crime. Sorry. That is a fact. Defunding the police today involves not only cutting money from police budgets, which often constitute up to a third of a city’s entire budget, but reinvesting it into transformative justice programs that emphasize community-building efforts, like mental health services, over policing. For context, programs like affordable housing and health care have been gradually defunded over the last 50 years, while police budgets have remained unchanged and even enlarged. In New York City, for example, the funding for law enforcement grew nearly 30 percent over the last decade and is bigger than the Departments of Health, Homeless Services, Housing Preservation and Development, and Youth and Community Development combined. This gap between supporting the roots of a community’s well-being and the forces that punish marginalization are at the heart of calls to defund police.Biased post? It was a Journalist's research into the history of the defund the police movement...someone challenged that the funds aren't reallocated (see the underline).And? Not sure what you are getting at in your biased post LOL.Defunding the police today involves not only cutting money from police budgets, which often constitute up to a third of a city’s entire budget, but reinvesting it into transformative justice programs that emphasize community-building efforts, like mental health services, over policing. For context, programs like affordable housing and health care have been gradually defunded over the last 50 years, while police budgets have remained unchanged and even enlarged. In New York City, for example, the funding for law enforcement grew nearly 30 percent over the last decade and is bigger than the Departments of Health, Homeless Services, Housing Preservation and Development, and Youth and Community Development combined. This gap between supporting the roots of a community’s well-being and the forces that punish marginalization are at the heart of calls to defund police.
Pretty sure data, that you love so much illustrates that places that "defunded the police" have seen an increase in crime. Or is that a myth or an idea like Antifa?
Just shut up - nobody WANTS more crime. Fucking OBVIOUSLY. That part of the discussion is the poisoned well that your President created for you. If you say it out loud, "democrats want more crime!"...you might have a millisecond of humility and realize how pathetically fucking stupid that sounds and you should be ashamed of being led like a sheep into believing such a stupid fucking thing about 47% of registered voters.
Moms, daughters...Dads..professionals....Cops!!?!?! military, all of those have plenty of these people you're saying want higher crime.
Like a dummy. You've been used by an orange clown.
Democrats are 47% of registered Voters.No - your Cult leader in Chief has directed you to malign the Democrats with the Riots, and the Democrats empathized with the peaceful protesters while denouncing the violence...not accounting for any fringe nutter retards...but your Boss took the fringe nutter retards as evidence that you should amp up your hatred of "Dems" and "the left," even though if you used your real fuckin brain as opposed to your Cult-speak, you'd realize "da skary dems" are just some neighbors, postmen, police, managers, etc etc. About 47% of Registered Voters.You guys fall for any canard that Trump gives you. Democrats are not anti Police, that's a trope of divisive identity politics you've been fed on tWatter.
In 2020, Democrats have either talked about defunding the police, denied or justified the violence in the streets. This has nothing to do with what Trump says. The Democrats’ voices or silence has been on display for Americans to see.
You've been socially engineered to hate.
Social engineered my ass. The skary Dems are not neighbors, etc. They are the likes of Congressmen like Jerry Nadler or Senators like Mazie Hirono or Presidential Candidates like Joe Biden who deny the existence and role of ANTIFA in these acts of violence. The only social engineering at play here are Democrat leaders who deny extistebce of a terrorist movement. The “peaceful” protestors they empathize with are those that stop traffic and attack cars.
