Biden to campaign on “restoring” ROE V WADE.

[M14 Shooter]

And it overturned Roe which said the opposite.
Which means whenever the make up of the Court is changed Dobbs can be overturned as well

Let us know when the court overturns Dobbs.
Until then, it stands.

 

[Rawley]

if the constitution does not give the federal government the power to do something, that power lies with the states.
Dobbs is quite clear on the issue - the Constitution is silent on the issue of abortion.

LOL Quaint concept.

Where is the Constitutional power given to Congress to regulate drivers licenses, guns, drugs ...?

 

[M14 Shooter]

LOL Quaint concept.

Established 1791, first ruled on in 1816.
How do you not know this?

 

[Lesh]

So you want all states to have the exact same abortion laws?

What is your cut off? 15 weeks? 24? Up until birth? What should it be for all states?

What was Roe?

 

[M14 Shooter]

What was Roe?

A ruling form the USSC which held women do not have an absolute right to bodily autonomy , and that states have the power to regulate abortions, even to the point of prohibition.

 

[Rawley]

Established 1791, first ruled on in 1816.
How do you not know this?

LOL You've had six posts defending this theory and still haven't cited the court in Dobbs declaring Congress cannot pass an abortion law. You can't. Because they didn't.

 

[M14 Shooter]

LOL You've had six posts defending this theory and still haven't cited the court in Dobbs declaring Congress cannot pass an abortion law. You can't. Because they didn't.

Clearly, you choose to not understand Dobbs.
Feel free to wallow in your intentional ignorance.

 

[Lesh]

A ruling form the USSC which held women do not have an absolute right to bodily autonomy , and that states have the power to regulate abortions, even to the point of prohibition.

You got that from Roe?

 

[Rawley]

Clearly, you choose to not understand Dobbs.

And yet you cannot cite the Court to support your theory.

Feel free to wallow in your intentional ignorance.

You poopyhead. I win

 

[Orangecat]

You can’t restore an overturned court decision. This is just a Hail Mary intended for the unquestioning useful idiots.

 

[M14 Shooter]

And yet you cannot cite the Court to support your theory.

(e) Abortion presents a profound moral question. The Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each State from regulating or prohibiting abortion. Roe and Casey arrogated that authority. The Court overrules those decisions and returns that authority to the people and their elected representatives. Pp. 78–79.

There you go.
The power belongs to the states, and thus, not the federal government.
Thus, a federal law regarding constitution violates the 10th amendment.

Please feel free to further demonstrate your willful ignorance.

 

[Lesh]

You can’t restore an overturned court decision. This is just a Hail Mary intended for the unquestioning useful idiots.

Of course you can.

Who told you that?

 

[M14 Shooter]

You got that from Roe?

You didn't?
Have you read the case?
No?
Explains everything.

 

[Lesh]

You didn't?
Have you read the case?
No?
Explains everything.

Then you should have no problem re-instating it right?

 

[M14 Shooter]

Of course you can.
Who told you that?

You can.
But the court won't. That's not how the court does things.
Never ever will there be a ruling from the court that says "We reinstate roe v wade"
If the court overturns Dobbs, it will do so with new terms and specifications.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Then you should have no problem re-instating it right?

I have no idea why you think this is a meaningful response.
The fact you have neither read nor understand Roe v Wade is not my problem.

 

[Orangecat]

Of course you can.

No, only a court can, not the Biden administration.

Who told you that?

Logic.

 

[Lesh]

You can.
But the court won't. That's not how the court does things.
Never ever will there be a ruling from the court that says "We reinstate roe v wade"
If the court overturns Dobbs, it will do so with new terms and specifications.

That mimic Roe. Thanks for the distinction without a difference

 

[Lesh]

I have no idea why you think this is a meaningful response.
The fact you have neither read nor understand Roe v Wade is not my problem.

If Roe does what you say why would you be against it?

Simple question

 

[Orangecat]

Something trol-lesh is going on here.