Big freaking ruh roh: Intel Chair pretty sure FBI had no warrant to record Flynn

[Care4all]

Officials say the communications were intercepted during routine intelligence collection targeting Russians known to U.S. intelligence. And among those who regularly communicated with Russian nationals, then-campaign chairman Paul Manafort and Michael Flynn, who resigned his post as Trump’s National Security Advisor Monday night after news reports about a call with Russia’s ambassador regarding U.S. sanctions.

Trump aides were in ‘constant’ contact with Russians

there's your link...

 

[usmbguest5318]

Hmmm...could U.S. intel personnel have listened in on the Russian side of the call?

There is no legitimate reason for the NSA to monitor diplomatic communcations involving OFFICIALS of an Administration. Even an INCOMING administration. It might have been automatically collected. But it only gets a transcript and attention if someone is TASKED to analyze it. And the kicker is --- it was publicly LEAKED. That's how rotten this situation is. How many OTHER incoming admin communications have been tasked for analysis? Who is DOING this?

Sitting on a MOUNTAIN of DECADES worth of stashed compromising information in the Intel records. AND NOW -- it appears that the blackmail begins. This "war" was in stalemate because of the number of current/past leadership that can be embarrassed, even prosecuted if this mountain of blackmail evidence starts to emerge from where it should remain. There should BE NO politics in the Intel Comm. But I'm certain now -- that an organized resistance is threatening to release Armageddon on this country...

Two thoughts:

• I had in mind U.S. intel folks eavesdropping from overseas on the calls under discussion.
• The thrust of your point seems thematically to be that of "if a tree falls in the forest and only one person is there to see it, the rest of us should not question whether that person felled it and we who where there should ignore both the damage done by the fall and whether it was deliberately toppled." Maybe that's not what you mean thematically, but it sure looks that way.

 

[tinydancer]

Officials say the communications were intercepted during routine intelligence collection targeting Russians known to U.S. intelligence. And among those who regularly communicated with Russian nationals, then-campaign chairman Paul Manafort and Michael Flynn, who resigned his post as Trump’s National Security Advisor Monday night after news reports about a call with Russia’s ambassador regarding U.S. sanctions.

Trump aides were in ‘constant’ contact with Russians

there's your link...

Gee. Somethings missing. Could it be that the officials who were quoted also said there was no fucking collusion. NONE. Zip fucking nada?


"Current and former officials that spoke with the Times would not give many details, and it's not clear exactly who, both from the U.S. and Russia, were part of the conversations or what they talked about, including if discussions centered on Trump himself.

Officials told the publication that they have seen no evidence of collusion in regards to hacking or the election."


Report: Trump campaign aides were in contact with Russian intel officials

 

[Pop23]

It looks like we are going to get our own Capitol Hill version of Swamp people. Aaaaayeeeeee! It's not only time to drain the swamp but to hook every leaking low down critter and drag em out.

There's got to be a political version Troy Landry in Washington who can finally nail the leakers in the Intelligence community.

Laissez les bons temps rouler baby!




“Any intelligence agency cannot listen to Americans’ phone calls,” Nunes told reporters Tuesday night. “If there’s inadvertent collection that you know is overseas there’s a whole process in place for that.”

He explained, “It’s pretty clear that’s not the case, so then they could have been listening to someone else and inadvertently picked up an American.

If that happens, there’s a whole process in place to where they have to immediately get rid of the information unless it’s like high level national security issue and then someone would have to unmask the name — someone at the highest levels.”

“So in this case it would be General Flynn and then how did that happen. T

hen if they did that, then how does all that get out to the public which is another leak of classified information,” Nunes added.

“I’m pretty sure the FBI didn’t have a warrant on Michael Flynn.”

GOP Intel Chair: ‘Pretty Sure FBI Didn’t Have Warrant’ To Record Flynn



Read more: GOP Intel Chair: ‘Pretty Sure FBI Didn’t Have Warrant’ To Record Flynn

Tinydancer is a stinking commie agent sent to the USA to support Trump.
We need Joseph McCarthy back to root out the stinking Commies and send them back to Russia.
We cannot be fooled by these people posing as right wing, white nationalists.
THEY ARE COMMIES.Send them back where they belong.

You sound like that guy that farts, then blames the dog.

Sick commie doing what sick commies do I guess.

You learned well from your Ruskie trainers.

BRAVO.

You American patriot fraud.
You are obviously excuse maker for the communist if you are not a communist yourself

Ohhhhhh, your soviet handlers did a fine job with you.

 

[pillars]

The top democrat sez: "we have bigger fish to fry" (than go after criminal behavior in the intelligence agencies). If nobody alleges that Flynn engaged in illegal activity what the hell are democrats trying to "fry"?

He lied to the FBI and the VP. What was he trying to hide. Why not tell the truth.
Don't prosecute him. Pull his security clearance and kick his sorry ass out of government.
It is sad. He has been a great soldier in the past and done much for our country. H E WENT OFF THE DEEP END AT SOME POINT.

What are you talking about that he lied to the freaking FBI? If he did he'd be charged right now.

Bullshit on that. And he did serve his country honorably for 33 years. He committed no crime. As NSA on the transition team it was his JOB to talk to many Ambassadors and security reps from all over the world.

It is not a crime to deal with Russia.

HE was fired for incompetence from DIA

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Be very SPECIFIC and cite for us ANY law Flynn broke.

he broke
the logan act

The Logan act does NOT apply to an incoming administration you retard.

and it says that WHERE in the Logan Act?

We have ONE President at a time in this Nation.

It says it where is it specifically applies to private citizens, the new admin is not private citizens dumb ass.

They had not been sworn in, they were private citizens. I'm a fervent Conservative and supporter of President Donald Trump. These discussions took place before General Flynn was sworn into office. As I said, we have only one president at a time.

It also requires a fairly large stretch of the imagination to believe that Flynn, an adviser to and member of the Trump campaign staff who knew he would have a role in the new administration, acted alone without consent from Trump himself.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

well, set your personal fears aside, and let us have an open, independent, investigation. Tell your representative!

It APPEARS that partisans in the Intel Community are actually running a covert operation to destabilize and delegitimize the election. That's the only way that all these "leaks" and daily disinformation is stoking the news cycle.

What you see publicly is that this is a DOMESTIC INSURGENCY and not necessarily a foreign one because of the # of agencies COOPERATING in these leaks and disinformation. And the fear I personally have is that the public is YET to see is the YEARS and MOUNTAINS of comprising, embarrassing, and bomb-making material that the 2 corrupt parties have bottled up in the Intel agencies. They've used this blackmail against EACH OTHER to hobble the operation, honesty and efficiency of our govt. And in EFFECT -- most of the current leadership and past party leadership would be collateral damage if this mountain of shit ever got released.

Leadership in America is now compromised in a way that any normal official in a position of power would LOSE their clearances instantaneously. Not just Gen Flynn..

And if by CHANCE -- Russia decided to STOKE an all-out destabilization, my opinion is, their PREFERRED outcome would be to contribute to the rise of a true "socialist friendly" party. One that continues to lurch farther left and is friendly to the idea of re-creating the OLD Soviet Union that Putin desires.

But that's just me talking.. We might yet find out why Saddam was REALLY hated by both BillyJeff Clinton and the Bushes. Or who was behind those anthrax attacks or even ---- who killed JFK..

I'm not sure I see it in that way...quite.

For one thing, I am absolutely convinced Russia was behind the hacks and their purpose was to attempt to influence the election. I don't think you you can get all our diverse intelligence communities on the same page if it wasn't - too much turf fighting and more competition than cooperation.

I think there is another way of looking at what is happening, and that is by the precedents that have been set and the questions they lead to.

Pre-Election
1. Why did Comey do what he did, at those exact times?
2. Why was most of the disinformation and the hacks and leaks pre-election directed towards Clinton?
3. Why did non-political, and traditionally non-partisan agencies/individuals such as military and intelligence come out in favor of Clinton or against Trump?
4. Trump repeatedly insults, dismisses, negates reports from the Intelligence communities.
5. Trump talks about a briefing in a manner which suggests he might lie to politicize it and he might not respect sensitive material in an impulse.
6. Leading figures in Trump's campaign with strong Russian ties.


Post-Election
1. Trump continues to degrade and insult the intelligence community when presented with evidence of Russia's involvement.
2. Trump surrounds himself with a close inner-circle of non-traditional outsider advisors: conspiracy theorists such as Flynn and Bannon, for example.
3. Trump's campaign staff, current advisors and cabinet include a number of people with strong Russian links.
4. Trump's Administration is in crisis mode - he has picked people who are competitive with each other, information is not shared along traditional chanels, if at all, there is internal fighting and a profound lack of trust inside.
5. Anomolies are showing up. Flynn talking with Russia - telling them not to worry about the sanctions - before Trump was even sworn into office.
6. Putin's highly unusual decision to not retaliate tit for tat in typical fashion over the expulsion of Russian spies and diplomats. It was this which flagged the Intelligence services to look over tapes of the wiretapping of Russian diplomats.
7. Flynn had lied to the VP, and the VP had defended him, and the VP was kept IN THE DARK for two weeks about this - a highly unusual lack of communication (and respect for) the man who is supposed to be closest to the President, and the #2 person in charge.

Resulting chaos
1. Leaks leaks leaks
2. Flynn resigns.

How to interpret it?
1. There is a deep distrust and unease of the President and his staff coming from the Intelligence community both civilian and military...and other agencies and a President who doesn't take it seriously. I don't ever recall such a situation before.
2. What if there are people in the Intelligence Agencies who are deeply and sincerely afraid that Trump and/or members of his staff are compromised?

It was a disturbing precedent to see key figures in Intelligence and the Military come out against Trump during the election campaign. They have traditionally been non-partisan. It's disturbing to see the amount of leaking, as well as the involvement of wikileaks (essentially a Russian proxy) and to see now, what could possibly be independent internal actions, like the leaking of this material. It's disturbing to see so many ties to Russia - a autocratic oligarchic regime, who has destabilzied a neighboring country, supported an uprising and is now suffering under sanctions that we have to power to ease.

Is it partisanship or fear for our country that is driving this?


Motive for Russia is easy - the sanctions are hurting.

If comey was ethical he would have recommended an indictment of hillary. He had to contort the law to come up with a reason to not do so. If the russki's were helping anyone it was her. As far as the intel leadership being partisan, there is NO doubt that they did. They were all obama appointments, and they all had a vested interest in hillary being elected. ALL of them.

I don't agree - and here's why.

When the FBI is investigating, they do not release info other then the bare minimum. When it's concluded - then either criminal indictment is handed down or the person is cleared. They never NEVER publically lambaste, go into detail or discuss any part of the investigation before it is concluded. Compare the way Comey handled and publicized Clinton's investigation to how they handled their investigation into Trump's Russian connections and you will see the absolute stark difference.

I also don't buy that because they were "Obama appointments" they would have a vested interest in Clinton's election. Appointments know it's for a term and many, in fact, don't last the whole term or resign in the second term. If this were the case we would have seen a whole lot of this behavior in prior transitions. The other thing is - Comey is a Republican. He is currently serving under Trump. He previously served under G.W. Bush. There is no guarantee he would have served under Clinton. What he did - that last minute email fiasco SHORTLY before the election itself - was in no way favorable to Clinton.

This is, in my opinion, why there are leaks.

Government workers shun Trump, give big money to Clinton
BY JONATHAN SWAN - 10/26/16 06:01 AM EDT

Federal government employees are opening their wallets to help Hillary Clinton beat Donald Trump on Nov. 8.

Of the roughly $2 million that federal workers from 14 agencies spent on presidential politics by the end of September, about $1.9 million, or 95 percent, went to the Democratic nominee’s campaign, according to an analysis by The Hill.

Employees at all the agencies analyzed, without exception, are sending their campaign contributions overwhelmingly to Clinton over her Republican counterpart. Several agencies, such as the State Department, which Clinton once led, saw more than 99 percent of contributions going to Clinton.

Employees of the Department of Justice, which investigated Clinton’s use of a private email server while she was secretary of State, gave Clinton 97 percent of their donations. Trump received $8,756 from DOJ employees compared with $286,797 for Clinton. From IRS employees, Clinton received 94 percent of donations.

[...]

Government workers shun Trump, give big money to Clinton

Anyone found guilty of leaking the contents of those tapes should be made an example of with the most severe sentence possible.

There are leaks because intelligence officials knew Trump and his people were not being truthful about the nature of their relationships with Russian officials.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The top democrat sez: "we have bigger fish to fry" (than go after criminal behavior in the intelligence agencies). If nobody alleges that Flynn engaged in illegal activity what the hell are democrats trying to "fry"?

He lied to the FBI and the VP. What was he trying to hide. Why not tell the truth.
Don't prosecute him. Pull his security clearance and kick his sorry ass out of government.
It is sad. He has been a great soldier in the past and done much for our country. H E WENT OFF THE DEEP END AT SOME POINT.

What are you talking about that he lied to the freaking FBI? If he did he'd be charged right now.

Bullshit on that. And he did serve his country honorably for 33 years. He committed no crime. As NSA on the transition team it was his JOB to talk to many Ambassadors and security reps from all over the world.

It is not a crime to deal with Russia.

It is a crime if he discussed the sanctions.

Especially since there were multiple calls on the very day that Obama imposed further sanctions and expelled diplomats over election influence.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

read or reread the Logan Act. Rodman didn't break it.

The allegation, is Flynn discussed with the Russian Ambassador, the sanctions put on the Russians by President Obama for interfering in our election process, and Flynn advised the Ambassador to tell Putin that when Trump is president, he would take the sanctions off or be easier on them, and to NOT over react to the sanctions....

When Putin did not retaliate, the intel community was suspicious, because Russia always retaliated when we punished them....and could not figure out why the Russians reacted so differently than the norm...they pulled the eaves dropping records on the Russian envoy to see what they could find out.... in these recordings, there were conversations with Flynn.

Nothing of that sort has been made public. So we'll never know. It's convenient isn't it? Obama leaned over on a hot mic to a Russian Ambassador before he was elected and told him "I'll have more flexible on this issue AFTER the election".. Did you cry and wimper about that "violation"?

PERSONALLY -- I dont trust Putin. Sanctions of SOME SORT seem to be required to keep him out of the Ukraine. The rest of this fairy tale seems more easily explainable as a distraction from the REAL WAR and insurrection going in the Intel community.

The Russians are our ONLY ride to the Space Station. They are NOT a "hot" enemy. And they have SAVED our sorry asses from yet another major MidEast FUBAR in Syria multiple times. Make up your freaking minds. You ridiculed Romney when he said the Russians were the greatest strategic threat to US interests. Changed 180degrees with the "reset button" and NOW --- you've changed again????

Of course you have a LINK to that claim--right?

What claim? I never lie. I never fabricate anything. Not on USMB. Go look it up..

You stated that Obama leaned over an open mic before he was in office and said something to the Russians. I am asking for a link to that.

He was president at the time. Not in any way comparable.

 

[easyt65]

No warrant?

Give Comey a taste of his own medicine - investigate him, maybe indict...

 

[Hutch Starskey]

What claim? I never lie. I never fabricate anything. Not on USMB. Go look it up..

You stated that Obama leaned over an open mic before he was in office and said something to the Russians. I am asking for a link to that.

As you saw, that was in 2012, petulant former President Barack Hussein Obama was discussing his RE-ELECTION.

That's right. Lame duck ought to play by the same rules as the challenger RIGHT????

of course not!

as president, Obama CAN NOT UNDERMINE himself...

Ridiculous that you even need to point out that very obvious fact.

 

[Seawytch]

I would love that. I fear that the progressives heads would explode when it was revealed who was actually behind the leaks however.

well, set your personal fears aside, and let us have an open, independent, investigation. Tell your representative!

It APPEARS that partisans in the Intel Community are actually running a covert operation to destabilize and delegitimize the election. That's the only way that all these "leaks" and daily disinformation is stoking the news cycle.

What you see publicly is that this is a DOMESTIC INSURGENCY and not necessarily a foreign one because of the # of agencies COOPERATING in these leaks and disinformation. And the fear I personally have is that the public is YET to see is the YEARS and MOUNTAINS of comprising, embarrassing, and bomb-making material that the 2 corrupt parties have bottled up in the Intel agencies. They've used this blackmail against EACH OTHER to hobble the operation, honesty and efficiency of our govt. And in EFFECT -- most of the current leadership and past party leadership would be collateral damage if this mountain of shit ever got released.

Leadership in America is now compromised in a way that any normal official in a position of power would LOSE their clearances instantaneously. Not just Gen Flynn..

And if by CHANCE -- Russia decided to STOKE an all-out destabilization, my opinion is, their PREFERRED outcome would be to contribute to the rise of a true "socialist friendly" party. One that continues to lurch farther left and is friendly to the idea of re-creating the OLD Soviet Union that Putin desires.

But that's just me talking.. We might yet find out why Saddam was REALLY hated by both BillyJeff Clinton and the Bushes. Or who was behind those anthrax attacks or even ---- who killed JFK..

we just don't know everything that is going on here....look at coyote's response, I agree with all that she said.

it's weird that early on, all the clinton investigation intel leaks, and comey's actions, they truly did NOT want Clinton....and something changed....what happened?

I disagree. They did everything they could to protect her. The media were complicit as well. I would love to see a legit, non partisan investigation into what she did.

The FBI still has a full blown investigation going on concerning the scam aka the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Foundation.

Diversify your news sources.

NBC News’ Pete Williams Reports FBI ‘Really Isn’t’ Conducting Clinton Foundation Investigation

 

[Seawytch]

The leaks are absolutely a concern... a secondary concern to what is being leaked.

 

[Faun]

The obvious answer is that they were monitoring the Russian ambassador's calls, and Flynn got caught.

And then they couldn't wait to damage Trump by publicizing it which tipped off the Russians to our surveillance.

Dumb

All over a call that very likely happens with different world leaders by every incoming administration.

Yeah, because Russia didn't already know we monitor them.

 

[Markle]

he broke
the logan act

The Logan act does NOT apply to an incoming administration you retard.

and it says that WHERE in the Logan Act?

We have ONE President at a time in this Nation.

It says it where is it specifically applies to private citizens, the new admin is not private citizens dumb ass.

They had not been sworn in, they were private citizens. I'm a fervent Conservative and supporter of President Donald Trump. These discussions took place before General Flynn was sworn into office. As I said, we have only one president at a time.

It also requires a fairly large stretch of the imagination to believe that Flynn, an adviser to and member of the Trump campaign staff who knew he would have a role in the new administration, acted alone without consent from Trump himself.

Doesn't matter if President Donald Trump knew General Flynn was in contact with Russia. There would be an issue if they were discussing the sanctions. Otherwise, it is only common sense to begin establishing contact with your new counterpart.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

The obvious answer is that they were monitoring the Russian ambassador's calls, and Flynn got caught.

And then they couldn't wait to damage Trump by publicizing it which tipped off the Russians to our surveillance.

Dumb

All over a call that very likely happens with different world leaders by every incoming administration.

Yep, it's so routine that most incoming administrations routinely fire key officials within the first month over something routine.

My post is not a judgement on Trump or Flynn. I have no idea what the truth is and neither do any of you.
What I do know is the left appears to be willing to burn the country to the ground if that's what it takes to make Trump look bad.

So it's something that, " very likely happens with different world leaders by every incoming administration"?

Don't you think you'd have to be incredibly naive to think otherwise?

 

[Faun]

Or maybe our intelligencies are composed of heroes who have risked their lives to protect this country from enemies, both foreign and domestic, and know a dangerous autocrat when they see one.

KremlinGate Enters Uncharted Waters as Russian Links Overwhelm DC

Evan McMullin: President Donald Trump Is a 'Domestic Enemy'

Heroes dont leak intel intercepts on incoming admins to the public. Heroes don't leak DAILY propaganda obtained by intel sources and methods to keep the "russian threat" in the news cycle.

leak or arrest him for breaking federal law, the Logan Act....maybe they thought leaking 'something's up', without leaking the actual conversation, after giving the President 2 weeks to do something, would be better than arresting the president's national security adviser on national tv.?

REMEMBER, the intel community KNOWS what is on these recordings of flynn's and the russian ambassador's....

They take an oath to protect us from foreign and DOMESTIC threats...

and the senate intelligence community or an independent committee investigating, will know as well, hopefully, and can sort this all out....

I DO NOT LIKE all of these leaks at all....I've NEVER seen anything like it!!! HOWEVER, this only sets the alarm off in my head that this is more, MUCH MORE than sour grapes on Obama being gone or Hillary losing...

C'mon. I'm here to learn and discuss reality. What the hell were they gonna "ARREST him for the Logan Act"??

You fucking jerking my chain? Dennis Rodman goes to N. Fucking Korea to chum with Kim Jung Insane and that's NOT Logan act? Has ANYONE ever been prosecuted under the Logan act?

Gen Flynn was RECENTLY the TOP SPY for the Pentagon as head of the DIAgency. You think he's a pawn of Putin? Get real...

read or reread the Logan Act. Rodman didn't break it.

The allegation, is Flynn discussed with the Russian Ambassador, the sanctions put on the Russians by President Obama for interfering in our election process, and Flynn advised the Ambassador to tell Putin that when Trump is president, he would take the sanctions off or be easier on them, and to NOT over react to the sanctions....

When Putin did not retaliate, the intel community was suspicious, because Russia always retaliated when we punished them....and could not figure out why the Russians reacted so differently than the norm...they pulled the eaves dropping records on the Russian envoy to see what they could find out.... in these recordings, there were conversations with Flynn.

Obama leaned over on a hot mic to a Russian Ambassador before he was elected and told him "I'll have more flexible on this issue AFTER the election".. Did you cry and wimper about that "violation"?

Oh? What violation was that?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The Logan act does NOT apply to an incoming administration you retard.

and it says that WHERE in the Logan Act?

We have ONE President at a time in this Nation.

It says it where is it specifically applies to private citizens, the new admin is not private citizens dumb ass.

They had not been sworn in, they were private citizens. I'm a fervent Conservative and supporter of President Donald Trump. These discussions took place before General Flynn was sworn into office. As I said, we have only one president at a time.

It also requires a fairly large stretch of the imagination to believe that Flynn, an adviser to and member of the Trump campaign staff who knew he would have a role in the new administration, acted alone without consent from Trump himself.

Doesn't matter if President Donald Trump knew General Flynn was in contact with Russia. There would be an issue if they were discussing the sanctions. Otherwise, it is only common sense to begin establishing contact with your new counterpart.

Flynn did discuss sanctions. That has been established and was what he lied and later fired for.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The obvious answer is that they were monitoring the Russian ambassador's calls, and Flynn got caught.

And then they couldn't wait to damage Trump by publicizing it which tipped off the Russians to our surveillance.

Dumb

All over a call that very likely happens with different world leaders by every incoming administration.

Yep, it's so routine that most incoming administrations routinely fire key officials within the first month over something routine.

My post is not a judgement on Trump or Flynn. I have no idea what the truth is and neither do any of you.
What I do know is the left appears to be willing to burn the country to the ground if that's what it takes to make Trump look bad.

So it's something that, " very likely happens with different world leaders by every incoming administration"?

Don't you think you'd have to be incredibly naive to think otherwise?

I suppose it matters how it was done and for what reason. It's apparent that Trump people were in contact with Russian officials. So why can't the admin just admit and explain what and why was discussed if it were simply routine?

 

[Markle]

well, set your personal fears aside, and let us have an open, independent, investigation. Tell your representative!

It APPEARS that partisans in the Intel Community are actually running a covert operation to destabilize and delegitimize the election. That's the only way that all these "leaks" and daily disinformation is stoking the news cycle.

What you see publicly is that this is a DOMESTIC INSURGENCY and not necessarily a foreign one because of the # of agencies COOPERATING in these leaks and disinformation. And the fear I personally have is that the public is YET to see is the YEARS and MOUNTAINS of comprising, embarrassing, and bomb-making material that the 2 corrupt parties have bottled up in the Intel agencies. They've used this blackmail against EACH OTHER to hobble the operation, honesty and efficiency of our govt. And in EFFECT -- most of the current leadership and past party leadership would be collateral damage if this mountain of shit ever got released.

Leadership in America is now compromised in a way that any normal official in a position of power would LOSE their clearances instantaneously. Not just Gen Flynn..

And if by CHANCE -- Russia decided to STOKE an all-out destabilization, my opinion is, their PREFERRED outcome would be to contribute to the rise of a true "socialist friendly" party. One that continues to lurch farther left and is friendly to the idea of re-creating the OLD Soviet Union that Putin desires.

But that's just me talking.. We might yet find out why Saddam was REALLY hated by both BillyJeff Clinton and the Bushes. Or who was behind those anthrax attacks or even ---- who killed JFK..

we just don't know everything that is going on here....look at coyote's response, I agree with all that she said.

it's weird that early on, all the clinton investigation intel leaks, and comey's actions, they truly did NOT want Clinton....and something changed....what happened?

I disagree. They did everything they could to protect her. The media were complicit as well. I would love to see a legit, non partisan investigation into what she did.

The FBI still has a full blown investigation going on concerning the scam aka the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Foundation.

Diversify your news sources.

NBC News’ Pete Williams Reports FBI ‘Really Isn’t’ Conducting Clinton Foundation Investigation

Guess we'll find out won't we?