Bill Taylor's opening statement- quid pro quo

[jc456]

Demofks are afraid of 2020 elections.

 

[OKTexas]

Read it, why should I? John Ratcliffe had him reversing his position is less than 2 minutes. No quid pro quo. See both sides can leak

How is that possible when the CON$ervoFascist lie is Republicans were threatened with "deadly physical force" if they attended!!!!

Here's the deal: the democrat congressional majority threatens assault (deadly physical force?) if a republican lawmaker seeks admittance to the "impeachment hearings"

You'll have to ask the member that posted it. I do know a republican member of the judiciary committee wanted to sit in on testimony last week and wasn't allowed to.

Because he WASN'T a member of the committee he tried to crash, and you knew it already!

He's a member of congress and a member of the committee that will ultimately have to craft articles of impeachment, if it gets that far. There was nothing classified being discussed, there was no reason, other than just being assholes, not to let him sit in. But what's worse, they won't even allow the members of the committees conducting the witch hunt to have access to the transcripts or tapes without commies looking over their shoulders.

As you well know, because the Right claim to know everything, Gaetz was NOT a member of the committee, he was a member of 2 SUBcommittees and neither party's subcommittee members were allowed in the hearings, but of course, the Republicans demand special privileges they do not allow the other party.
And the rules they are following are the rules the Republicans set up for the Clinton lynching.

You're a liar, the minority and Clinton was given rights during his impeachment proceeding. But hey, no reason to let facts get in the way of good propaganda, hey comrade.

.

 

[jc456]

How is that possible when the CON$ervoFascist lie is Republicans were threatened with "deadly physical force" if they attended!!!!

You'll have to ask the member that posted it. I do know a republican member of the judiciary committee wanted to sit in on testimony last week and wasn't allowed to.

Because he WASN'T a member of the committee he tried to crash, and you knew it already!

He's a member of congress and a member of the committee that will ultimately have to craft articles of impeachment, if it gets that far. There was nothing classified being discussed, there was no reason, other than just being assholes, not to let him sit in. But what's worse, they won't even allow the members of the committees conducting the witch hunt to have access to the transcripts or tapes without commies looking over their shoulders.

As you well know, because the Right claim to know everything, Gaetz was NOT a member of the committee, he was a member of 2 SUBcommittees and neither party's subcommittee members were allowed in the hearings, but of course, the Republicans demand special privileges they do not allow the other party.
And the rules they are following are the rules the Republicans set up for the Clinton lynching.

You're a liar, the minority and Clinton was given rights during his impeachment proceeding. But hey, no reason to let facts get in the way of good propaganda, hey comrade.

.

only the kremlin and third world Venezuela behave as the demoks are.

 

[OKTexas]

You'll have to ask the member that posted it. I do know a republican member of the judiciary committee wanted to sit in on testimony last week and wasn't allowed to.

Because he WASN'T a member of the committee he tried to crash, and you knew it already!

He's a member of congress and a member of the committee that will ultimately have to craft articles of impeachment, if it gets that far. There was nothing classified being discussed, there was no reason, other than just being assholes, not to let him sit in. But what's worse, they won't even allow the members of the committees conducting the witch hunt to have access to the transcripts or tapes without commies looking over their shoulders.

As you well know, because the Right claim to know everything, Gaetz was NOT a member of the committee, he was a member of 2 SUBcommittees and neither party's subcommittee members were allowed in the hearings, but of course, the Republicans demand special privileges they do not allow the other party.
And the rules they are following are the rules the Republicans set up for the Clinton lynching.

You're a liar, the minority and Clinton was given rights during his impeachment proceeding. But hey, no reason to let facts get in the way of good propaganda, hey comrade.

.

only the kremlin and third world Venezuela behave as the demoks are.

I think the chicoms would fall in that category as well.

.

 

[edthecynic]

How is that possible when the CON$ervoFascist lie is Republicans were threatened with "deadly physical force" if they attended!!!!

You'll have to ask the member that posted it. I do know a republican member of the judiciary committee wanted to sit in on testimony last week and wasn't allowed to.

Because he WASN'T a member of the committee he tried to crash, and you knew it already!

He's a member of congress and a member of the committee that will ultimately have to craft articles of impeachment, if it gets that far. There was nothing classified being discussed, there was no reason, other than just being assholes, not to let him sit in. But what's worse, they won't even allow the members of the committees conducting the witch hunt to have access to the transcripts or tapes without commies looking over their shoulders.

As you well know, because the Right claim to know everything, Gaetz was NOT a member of the committee, he was a member of 2 SUBcommittees and neither party's subcommittee members were allowed in the hearings, but of course, the Republicans demand special privileges they do not allow the other party.
And the rules they are following are the rules the Republicans set up for the Clinton lynching.

You're a liar, the minority and Clinton was given rights during his impeachment proceeding. But hey, no reason to let facts get in the way of good propaganda, hey comrade.

.

Impeachment "proceedings" but not the impeachment INQUIRY!

 

[jc456]

You'll have to ask the member that posted it. I do know a republican member of the judiciary committee wanted to sit in on testimony last week and wasn't allowed to.

Because he WASN'T a member of the committee he tried to crash, and you knew it already!

He's a member of congress and a member of the committee that will ultimately have to craft articles of impeachment, if it gets that far. There was nothing classified being discussed, there was no reason, other than just being assholes, not to let him sit in. But what's worse, they won't even allow the members of the committees conducting the witch hunt to have access to the transcripts or tapes without commies looking over their shoulders.

As you well know, because the Right claim to know everything, Gaetz was NOT a member of the committee, he was a member of 2 SUBcommittees and neither party's subcommittee members were allowed in the hearings, but of course, the Republicans demand special privileges they do not allow the other party.
And the rules they are following are the rules the Republicans set up for the Clinton lynching.

You're a liar, the minority and Clinton was given rights during his impeachment proceeding. But hey, no reason to let facts get in the way of good propaganda, hey comrade.

.

Impeachment "proceedings" but not the impeachment INQUIRY!

what's the difference exactly? let's hear your spin.

 

[OKTexas]

You'll have to ask the member that posted it. I do know a republican member of the judiciary committee wanted to sit in on testimony last week and wasn't allowed to.

Because he WASN'T a member of the committee he tried to crash, and you knew it already!

He's a member of congress and a member of the committee that will ultimately have to craft articles of impeachment, if it gets that far. There was nothing classified being discussed, there was no reason, other than just being assholes, not to let him sit in. But what's worse, they won't even allow the members of the committees conducting the witch hunt to have access to the transcripts or tapes without commies looking over their shoulders.

As you well know, because the Right claim to know everything, Gaetz was NOT a member of the committee, he was a member of 2 SUBcommittees and neither party's subcommittee members were allowed in the hearings, but of course, the Republicans demand special privileges they do not allow the other party.
And the rules they are following are the rules the Republicans set up for the Clinton lynching.

You're a liar, the minority and Clinton was given rights during his impeachment proceeding. But hey, no reason to let facts get in the way of good propaganda, hey comrade.

.

Impeachment "proceedings" but not the impeachment INQUIRY!

.

 

[edthecynic]

Because he WASN'T a member of the committee he tried to crash, and you knew it already!

He's a member of congress and a member of the committee that will ultimately have to craft articles of impeachment, if it gets that far. There was nothing classified being discussed, there was no reason, other than just being assholes, not to let him sit in. But what's worse, they won't even allow the members of the committees conducting the witch hunt to have access to the transcripts or tapes without commies looking over their shoulders.

As you well know, because the Right claim to know everything, Gaetz was NOT a member of the committee, he was a member of 2 SUBcommittees and neither party's subcommittee members were allowed in the hearings, but of course, the Republicans demand special privileges they do not allow the other party.
And the rules they are following are the rules the Republicans set up for the Clinton lynching.

You're a liar, the minority and Clinton was given rights during his impeachment proceeding. But hey, no reason to let facts get in the way of good propaganda, hey comrade.

.

Impeachment "proceedings" but not the impeachment INQUIRY!

what's the difference exactly? let's hear your spin.

If there wasn't a difference the liar would have used the words impeachment inquiry.
The Clinton inquiry was essentially just a decision about whether to impeach the president based on the findings of independent counsel Ken Starr’s report in which Clinton had no rights.

 

[jc456]

He's a member of congress and a member of the committee that will ultimately have to craft articles of impeachment, if it gets that far. There was nothing classified being discussed, there was no reason, other than just being assholes, not to let him sit in. But what's worse, they won't even allow the members of the committees conducting the witch hunt to have access to the transcripts or tapes without commies looking over their shoulders.

As you well know, because the Right claim to know everything, Gaetz was NOT a member of the committee, he was a member of 2 SUBcommittees and neither party's subcommittee members were allowed in the hearings, but of course, the Republicans demand special privileges they do not allow the other party.
And the rules they are following are the rules the Republicans set up for the Clinton lynching.

You're a liar, the minority and Clinton was given rights during his impeachment proceeding. But hey, no reason to let facts get in the way of good propaganda, hey comrade.

.

Impeachment "proceedings" but not the impeachment INQUIRY!

what's the difference exactly? let's hear your spin.

If there wasn't a difference the liar would have used the words impeachment inquiry.
The Clinton inquiry was essentially just a decision about whether to impeach the president based on the findings of independent counsel Ken Starr’s report in which Clinton had no rights.

why are you afraid of the people allowing them to vote?

 

[joaquinmiller]

As you well know, because the Right claim to know everything, Gaetz was NOT a member of the committee, he was a member of 2 SUBcommittees and neither party's subcommittee members were allowed in the hearings, but of course, the Republicans demand special privileges they do not allow the other party.
And the rules they are following are the rules the Republicans set up for the Clinton lynching.

You're a liar, the minority and Clinton was given rights during his impeachment proceeding. But hey, no reason to let facts get in the way of good propaganda, hey comrade.

.

Impeachment "proceedings" but not the impeachment INQUIRY!

what's the difference exactly? let's hear your spin.

If there wasn't a difference the liar would have used the words impeachment inquiry.
The Clinton inquiry was essentially just a decision about whether to impeach the president based on the findings of independent counsel Ken Starr’s report in which Clinton had no rights.

why are you afraid of the people allowing them to vote?

I don't think it's fear. It's the thought the more evidence comes out, the more pressure there will be on Repubbies to support an inquiry. Careful what you wish for.

 

[OKTexas]

He's a member of congress and a member of the committee that will ultimately have to craft articles of impeachment, if it gets that far. There was nothing classified being discussed, there was no reason, other than just being assholes, not to let him sit in. But what's worse, they won't even allow the members of the committees conducting the witch hunt to have access to the transcripts or tapes without commies looking over their shoulders.

As you well know, because the Right claim to know everything, Gaetz was NOT a member of the committee, he was a member of 2 SUBcommittees and neither party's subcommittee members were allowed in the hearings, but of course, the Republicans demand special privileges they do not allow the other party.
And the rules they are following are the rules the Republicans set up for the Clinton lynching.

You're a liar, the minority and Clinton was given rights during his impeachment proceeding. But hey, no reason to let facts get in the way of good propaganda, hey comrade.

.

Impeachment "proceedings" but not the impeachment INQUIRY!

what's the difference exactly? let's hear your spin.

If there wasn't a difference the liar would have used the words impeachment inquiry.
The Clinton inquiry was essentially just a decision about whether to impeach the president based on the findings of independent counsel Ken Starr’s report in which Clinton had no rights.

Hey commie, we're talking about the actions of the house, not Starr. Do try to keep up.

.

 

[jc456]

You're a liar, the minority and Clinton was given rights during his impeachment proceeding. But hey, no reason to let facts get in the way of good propaganda, hey comrade.

.

Impeachment "proceedings" but not the impeachment INQUIRY!

what's the difference exactly? let's hear your spin.

If there wasn't a difference the liar would have used the words impeachment inquiry.
The Clinton inquiry was essentially just a decision about whether to impeach the president based on the findings of independent counsel Ken Starr’s report in which Clinton had no rights.

why are you afraid of the people allowing them to vote?

I don't think it's fear. It's the thought the more evidence comes out, the more pressure there will be on Repubbies to support an inquiry. Careful what you wish for.

why are you afraid of the people that the demofks can't let us see the evidence they have? why are you afraid of us? come on commie guy what the fk you got.

 

[joaquinmiller]

Dear Vet:

Yesterday afternoon, Bill Taylor – a West Point graduate, Vietnam War veteran with the 101st Airborne Division, and the top American diplomat in Ukraine – testified for 10 hours that Donald Trump held security aid as leverage to dig up dirt on a political opponent.

The White House’s response? They called it a coordinated smear campaign from “radical unelected bureaucrats waging war on the Constitution” — the very Constitution Bill Taylor swore to defend when he joined the military.

It is a shameful attack on an honorable man, but nothing is below this administration.

We are gearing up to enter this fight in a big way, but we need your help to get it done. So we’re asking:

Can you contribute?

Thank you for chipping in to support us in this work. I think you’re going to proud of the role we play in this fight, and your help making it happen.

All our best,

The team at VoteVets

 

[jc456]

As you well know, because the Right claim to know everything, Gaetz was NOT a member of the committee, he was a member of 2 SUBcommittees and neither party's subcommittee members were allowed in the hearings, but of course, the Republicans demand special privileges they do not allow the other party.
And the rules they are following are the rules the Republicans set up for the Clinton lynching.

You're a liar, the minority and Clinton was given rights during his impeachment proceeding. But hey, no reason to let facts get in the way of good propaganda, hey comrade.

.

Impeachment "proceedings" but not the impeachment INQUIRY!

what's the difference exactly? let's hear your spin.

If there wasn't a difference the liar would have used the words impeachment inquiry.
The Clinton inquiry was essentially just a decision about whether to impeach the president based on the findings of independent counsel Ken Starr’s report in which Clinton had no rights.

Hey commie, we're talking about the actions of the house, not Starr. Do try to keep up.

.

if the facts don't fit you must invent them.

 

[joaquinmiller]

Impeachment "proceedings" but not the impeachment INQUIRY!

what's the difference exactly? let's hear your spin.

If there wasn't a difference the liar would have used the words impeachment inquiry.
The Clinton inquiry was essentially just a decision about whether to impeach the president based on the findings of independent counsel Ken Starr’s report in which Clinton had no rights.

why are you afraid of the people allowing them to vote?

I don't think it's fear. It's the thought the more evidence comes out, the more pressure there will be on Repubbies to support an inquiry. Careful what you wish for.

why are you afraid of the people that the demofks can't let us see the evidence they have? why are you afraid of us? come on commie guy what the fk you got.

Lose the emotion, gomer.

 

[jc456]

what's the difference exactly? let's hear your spin.

If there wasn't a difference the liar would have used the words impeachment inquiry.
The Clinton inquiry was essentially just a decision about whether to impeach the president based on the findings of independent counsel Ken Starr’s report in which Clinton had no rights.

why are you afraid of the people allowing them to vote?

I don't think it's fear. It's the thought the more evidence comes out, the more pressure there will be on Repubbies to support an inquiry. Careful what you wish for.

why are you afraid of the people that the demofks can't let us see the evidence they have? why are you afraid of us? come on commie guy what the fk you got.

Lose the emotion, gomer.

I'm full of emotion jack. You want to take my vote man up and present your facts ass hat. not double secret kremlin inquiries. why are you afraid of our vote? 64 million. why? explain it bozo!!!

 

[joaquinmiller]

If there wasn't a difference the liar would have used the words impeachment inquiry.
The Clinton inquiry was essentially just a decision about whether to impeach the president based on the findings of independent counsel Ken Starr’s report in which Clinton had no rights.

why are you afraid of the people allowing them to vote?

I don't think it's fear. It's the thought the more evidence comes out, the more pressure there will be on Repubbies to support an inquiry. Careful what you wish for.

why are you afraid of the people that the demofks can't let us see the evidence they have? why are you afraid of us? come on commie guy what the fk you got.

Lose the emotion, gomer.

I'm full of emotion jack. You want to take my vote man up and present your facts ass hat. not double secret kremlin inquiries. why are you afraid of our vote? 64 million. why? explain it bozo!!!

You're triggered, nutball.

 

[jc456]

why are you afraid of the people allowing them to vote?

I don't think it's fear. It's the thought the more evidence comes out, the more pressure there will be on Repubbies to support an inquiry. Careful what you wish for.

why are you afraid of the people that the demofks can't let us see the evidence they have? why are you afraid of us? come on commie guy what the fk you got.

Lose the emotion, gomer.

I'm full of emotion jack. You want to take my vote man up and present your facts ass hat. not double secret kremlin inquiries. why are you afraid of our vote? 64 million. why? explain it bozo!!!

You're triggered, nutball.

I call out traitors. It's my country and I'm not giving it to you. you want it, you justify it numbnuts. if you got nothing go home back to your basement in mommy's house.

 

[Syriusly]

Fake news from the fake news media and fake American Dems.

Ah the loyal Trumpettes- anything that anyone says that might be construed to make their orange Messiah look bad must be 'Fake News!'

And in this case you are saying that the actual words by the acting Ambassador to Ukraine is 'Fake'

Can't get more Trump/Orwellian than that.

Do something about it snowflakes grow a pair you clowns.

I keep pointing out what ball-less liars you Trumpettes are. Not sure what else you think I should be doing other than exposing your lies, and the lies and corruption of your ball-less Orange Messiah.

 

[OKTexas]

Dear Vet:

Yesterday afternoon, Bill Taylor – a West Point graduate, Vietnam War veteran with the 101st Airborne Division, and the top American diplomat in Ukraine – testified for 10 hours that Donald Trump held security aid as leverage to dig up dirt on a political opponent.

The White House’s response? They called it a coordinated smear campaign from “radical unelected bureaucrats waging war on the Constitution” — the very Constitution Bill Taylor swore to defend when he joined the military.

It is a shameful attack on an honorable man, but nothing is below this administration.

We are gearing up to enter this fight in a big way, but we need your help to get it done. So we’re asking:

Can you contribute?

Thank you for chipping in to support us in this work. I think you’re going to proud of the role we play in this fight, and your help making it happen.

All our best,

The team at VoteVets

Give me a fucking break. Taylor is a career state dept lackey, that disagrees with the way Trump conducts foreign policy. Guess what, it's not Taylor's job to second guess the president, his job is to carry out the policy of the administration. If he can't do that, as a supposedly honorable man, he should resign, not try to back stab his boss.

.