TroglocratsRdumb
Diamond Member
- Aug 11, 2017
- 37,328
- 48,708
- 2,915
Judge Sullivan and the Obama's Secret Police violated General Flynn's right to a fair trial
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The term is "ad nauseum"I’ve been saying it as nuseum. They said they’d be unable to prove the case.But that’s not what their motion to dismiss said.
is the liberal afraid to tell us what it said???
Totally.Flak designed to obscure the truth.Liar.You mean the doctored and revised 302 has been available for a year.
Judge Sullivan Has Already Rejected Most of Timothy Shea's DOJ Flynn Pardon - emptywheel
In this post, I laid out how Acting DC US Attorney Timothy Shea claimed DOJ had “newly” acquired a bunch of information which led it to decide to ask Judge Emmet Sullivan to dismiss Mike Flynn’s prosecution. Except none of the information was new. The table below shows what is known about the...www.emptywheel.net
Uh ..hey genius...you are talking about impeachment. The last impeachment was not about russia. So..."what else?"...uh...you cant remember events from just last winter?What else? "Russia, Russia, Russia". They're obsessed with it. I
So what? . Flynn could have dashed that plan by not lying. And entrapment is not part of the defense motion anyway. So maybe take a hint from that that you don't know what the hell you are talking about.The handwritten notes showing intent to entrap,
Attorney General William Barr was clear in an interview with CBS News on Thursday evening: "People sometimes plead to things that turn out not to be crimes, and the Department of Justice is not persuaded that this was material to any legitimate counterintelligence investigation. So it was not a crime."They said they’d be unable to prove the case.
Yes, that's the opinion on one side of the argument. On the other side will be the arguments of the friend of the court. Thanks for trying to take us all back to square one, but we all get it already.Attorney General William Barr was clear in an interview with CBS News on Thursday evening: "People sometimes plead to things that turn out not to be crimes, and the Department of Justice is not persuaded that this was material to any legitimate counterintelligence investigation. So it was not a crime."They said they’d be unable to prove the case.
He did not lie and FBI said so at time; then TDS bigot Comey took over case and decided it was a lie and Flynn's life should be ruined and used to prove Russian TDS collusion. Why would he lie about discouraging Russia from attacking us?????And why would he lie knowing the FBI knew the truth??????? Isn't thinking fun??? See why we say liberalism is based in pure ignornance??Flynn could have dashed that plan by not lying.
On the other side will be the arguments of the friend of the court.
See, to normal, sane people, the fact that they didn't try to use "Russia, Russia, Russia" in the last impeachment attempt would tell you that it's a non-starter, a dead end. But these are democrats we're talking about. When smart people lose on something, they step back, look at what they did wrong, and figure out how to avoid that mistake in the future. When democrats, OTOH, lose, they reach further back into their playbook and pull out the weaker idea that they rejected the first time and plow forward with that, thinking that they just need to be louder and do stupider stuff to get attention. Then they'll win for sure. This is playing out in the election, which they lost the last go around with a truly terrible candidate, so being democrats, they reached further back and pulled out an even worse one.Uh ..hey genius...you are talking about impeachment. The last impeachment was not about russia. So..."what else?"...uh...you cant remember events from just last winter?What else? "Russia, Russia, Russia". They're obsessed with it. I
That’s not exactly how their motion to dismiss put it.Attorney General William Barr was clear in an interview with CBS News on Thursday evening: "People sometimes plead to things that turn out not to be crimes, and the Department of Justice is not persuaded that this was material to any legitimate counterintelligence investigation. So it was not a crime."They said they’d be unable to prove the case.
I think the vicious attacks on Trump are based on 3 things:See, to normal, sane people, the fact that they didn't try to use "Russia, Russia, Russia" in the last impeachment attempt would tell you that it's a non-starter, a dead end. But these are democrats we're talking about. When smart people lose on something, they step back, look at what they did wrong, and figure out how to avoid that mistake in the future. When democrats, OTOH, lose, they reach further back into their playbook and pull out the weaker idea that they rejected the first time and plow forward with that, thinking that they just need to be louder and do stupider stuff to get attention. Then they'll win for sure. This is playing out in the election, which they lost the last go around with a truly terrible candidate, so being democrats, they reached further back and pulled out an even worse one.Uh ..hey genius...you are talking about impeachment. The last impeachment was not about russia. So..."what else?"...uh...you cant remember events from just last winter?What else? "Russia, Russia, Russia". They're obsessed with it. I
Do you understand now??That’s not exactly how their motion to dismiss put it.Attorney General William Barr was clear in an interview with CBS News on Thursday evening: "People sometimes plead to things that turn out not to be crimes, and the Department of Justice is not persuaded that this was material to any legitimate counterintelligence investigation. So it was not a crime."They said they’d be unable to prove the case.
Well that's a lie right there. Sorry liar, i ignored the rest.He did not lie and FBI said so at time
But to geniuses like you, dreaming up a scenario that hasn't happened yet, you are saying "i told you so" in a future fantasy. How freaking bizarre.See, to normal, sane people, the fact that they didn't try to use "Russia, Russia, Russia" in the last impeachment attempt would tell you that it's a non-starter, a dead end
FBI agents wrote that he had a “sure demeanor” and “did not give any indication of deception” in a report they prepared after questioning him about the nature of his conversations with then-Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.Well that's a lie right there. Sorry liar, i ignored the rest.He did not lie and FBI said so at time
In other words, you lied.FBI agents wrote that he had a “sure demeanor” and “did not give any indication of deception” in a report they prepared after questioning him about the nature of his conversations with then-Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.Well that's a lie right there. Sorry liar, i ignored the rest.He did not lie and FBI said so at time
In other words, you lied.
I did, and then you showed us why. Well that was easy.In other words, you lied.
can the liberal tell us the lie , and why he feels it's a lie?????????
why is the liberal so afraid to tell us the lie , and why he feels it's a lie????I did, and then you showed us why. Well that was easy.In other words, you lied.
can the liberal tell us the lie , and why he feels it's a lie?????????