'BLAMER And Chief' Blames MEDIA For Empowering ISIS

had we left the Iraqi government alone and minded our own business rather than overthrowing Saddam, ISIS would have never had the opportunity to form, much less grow.

like Powell said "you'll own it"
Except Iraq was Liberated....by the blood and sacrifice of our military.
The War was WON - Obama said so and began to withdraw our troops.
He was entrusted with a victory and a liberated Iraq...and F*ed it UP!
He FAILED to safeguard what was entrusted to him.
Obama ARMED ISIS from Benghazi.
Obama spent MILLIONS on supplying, arming, and even TRAINING terrorists for ISIS.
He made excuses for them ('JV Team') then did NOTHING while they flowed into Iraq and took over much of the country our military had liberated.

And after his HUMILIATING WORLD-WIDE EMBARASSING COWARDLY BACKING DOWN of his infamous SYRIAN RED LINE that he tried to blame on the whole world (a world that laughed at him for trying to do so) that STUCK IN HIS CRAW, Obama has been OBSESSED with ASSAD!

The time to take down Assad was RIGHT THEN....but he F*ed up and lost his chance. He has waited until Russia / Putin stepped in, built a base, brought in thousands of troops, planes, and weapons. He has waited until Iran sent troops into Syria to protect Assad. He waited until after Putin / Russia destroyed the 'rebels' with whom he was waging his proxy war against Assad.

While focusing on Assad (and facilitating Illegal Immigration at home):
ISIS moved into Iraq
20 US Embassies were simultaneously attacked, 4 overrun
4 Americans were killed abroad
Americans were repeatedly attacked and killed at home

While he patted himself on the back and praised his (FAILED 'incomplete') foreign policy and strategy of 'containing' ISIS - and after proclaiming he had done so - over 150 people were murdered in Paris and almost as many were wounded. From somewhere deep within his own reality, Obama responded to these attacks by calling them a 'set-back', mock the American people's valid concerns, and vows to continue what, only in HIS mind' he considers a 'winning strategy' against ISIS WHILE pursuing what HE feels to be the REAL threat - a very well protected Assad.

Despite reality, 'Don Quixote' Obama has decided Assad is his 'windmill', and nothing is going to change it.

If the war was won, why did President Bush have to sign a SOFA with the Iraqis before the end of 2008 that left no doubt as to when our military had to leave?
.
Generally at the successful conclusions of wars there is a treaty signed. Or did you miss that one?
Where is Obama's treaty on Afghanistan, btw? You know, the "good war"? The one he committed thousnds of troops to in a surge that mirrored the one Bush did that Obama opposed?

Aren't treaties ratified by Congress? But there was no successful conclusion to that war/occupation. The Iraqis went to the UN and asked them not to renew the authorization for the US/UK occupation. President Bush as forced to negotiate a SOFA before the end of 2008 or leave the country.
 
"The Obama White House is giving ISIS a 45 minute warning before bombing their oil tankers by dropping leaflets advising potential jihadists to flee before air strikes in Syria.

“Get out of your trucks now, and run away from them. Warning: air strikes are coming. Oil trucks will be destroyed. Get away from your oil trucks immediately. Do not risk your life,” the leaflet reads."

White House Gave ISIS 45 Minute Warning Before Bombing Oil Tankers

Obama warning his brothers in Jihad
I saw this on the news. Obama really is a pantywaist and a complete moron.

and you're a broken record stuck on stupid ...
I wonder if ISIS would send Obama a warning note before bombing the WH?


I wonder where Obama got a direct line to ISIS ... must have been a note posted on the corkboard, or a sticky on a goats butt...

either way
 
had we left the Iraqi government alone and minded our own business rather than overthrowing Saddam, ISIS would have never had the opportunity to form, much less grow.

like Powell said "you'll own it"
Except Iraq was Liberated....by the blood and sacrifice of our military.
The War was WON - Obama said so and began to withdraw our troops.
He was entrusted with a victory and a liberated Iraq...and F*ed it UP!
He FAILED to safeguard what was entrusted to him.
Obama ARMED ISIS from Benghazi.
Obama spent MILLIONS on supplying, arming, and even TRAINING terrorists for ISIS.
He made excuses for them ('JV Team') then did NOTHING while they flowed into Iraq and took over much of the country our military had liberated.

And after his HUMILIATING WORLD-WIDE EMBARASSING COWARDLY BACKING DOWN of his infamous SYRIAN RED LINE that he tried to blame on the whole world (a world that laughed at him for trying to do so) that STUCK IN HIS CRAW, Obama has been OBSESSED with ASSAD!

The time to take down Assad was RIGHT THEN....but he F*ed up and lost his chance. He has waited until Russia / Putin stepped in, built a base, brought in thousands of troops, planes, and weapons. He has waited until Iran sent troops into Syria to protect Assad. He waited until after Putin / Russia destroyed the 'rebels' with whom he was waging his proxy war against Assad.

While focusing on Assad (and facilitating Illegal Immigration at home):
ISIS moved into Iraq
20 US Embassies were simultaneously attacked, 4 overrun
4 Americans were killed abroad
Americans were repeatedly attacked and killed at home

While he patted himself on the back and praised his (FAILED 'incomplete') foreign policy and strategy of 'containing' ISIS - and after proclaiming he had done so - over 150 people were murdered in Paris and almost as many were wounded. From somewhere deep within his own reality, Obama responded to these attacks by calling them a 'set-back', mock the American people's valid concerns, and vows to continue what, only in HIS mind' he considers a 'winning strategy' against ISIS WHILE pursuing what HE feels to be the REAL threat - a very well protected Assad.

Despite reality, 'Don Quixote' Obama has decided Assad is his 'windmill', and nothing is going to change it.

If the war was won, why did President Bush have to sign a SOFA with the Iraqis before the end of 2008 that left no doubt as to when our military had to leave?
.
Generally at the successful conclusions of wars there is a treaty signed. Or did you miss that one?
Where is Obama's treaty on Afghanistan, btw? You know, the "good war"? The one he committed thousnds of troops to in a surge that mirrored the one Bush did that Obama opposed?

the 08 SOFA was an agreement, not a TREATY
 
I wonder where Obama got a direct line to ISIS ...
Same way he got a direct line to The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and Al Qaeida in Libya...
Probably used some 'family connections'.... :p
 
4. The United States recognizes the sovereign right of the Government of Iraq to request the departure of the United States Forces from Iraq at any time The Government of Iraq recognizes the sovereign right of the United States to withdraw the United States Forces from Iraq at any time.

http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/122074.pdf

It is an agreement between ALLIES, not an 'occupier' and the 'occupied'. It says Iraq, as a sovereign nation, has the right to ask the US to withdraw all of its troops and to leave should they want the US to do so, no matter what they had agreed to previously. It also means despite having promised / guaranteed it would keep forces in country, the US could pull out - withdraw - its forces at any time.

Exactly because the occupation was no longer, it ended in 2008. Furthermore the two preceding paragraphs set the time table for withdrawing the occupying powers' troops too, first from the cities and then from the entire country.
 
It wasn't so much deposing Saddam but the policies implemented (or lack thereof) after he was gone. As the occupying power they failed miserably at governing the country they conquered, leading to the civil war, with porous borders that allowed foreign terrorist in to form al Qaeda in Iraq.

What a Liberal DONK! When you remain in the country after liberating an until-then 'enslaved' nation AT THE REQUEST OF THAT NATION - asking you to help provide security, training, and help getting on their feet, and going YOU ARE NOT AN 'OCCUPYING POWER', which insinuates you are imposing your will on the host nation! You are ALLIES, partners, WORKING TOGETHER!

See, that's some Barry SENIOR bullshite right there! That's some Barak Hussein Senior Anti-Colonialist BS coming out in your post. Barry Sr, like Barry Jr, believes the US was evil, a 'colonialist' nation - like Britain granted was. He thought the US is ONLY great because we conquered other nations and then pillaged their wealth and resources. That is exactly what is implied by the choice of your words. WORDS MATTER. If you feel the US is evil, that we invaded Iraq to impose or will on them, that we are 'occupiers', speaking on behalf of myself and many of my brothers and sisters who went through some hell over there to help liberate the Iraqi people

:fu:

We were the occupying power in Germany and Japan too,

Look in to SCR 1483

http://www.cfr.org/international-or...n-security-council-resolution-1483-iraq/p8471

Noting the letter of 8 May 2003 from the Permanent Representatives of the United States of America and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to the President of the Security Council (S/2003/538) and recognizing the specific authorities, responsibilities, and obligations under applicable international law of these states as occupying powers under unified command (the “Authority”),.

As the occupying power the Bush administration simply didn't fulfill the responsibilities, and obligations necessary to keep Iraq functioning as a country and it descended into a Civil War. The consequences of that war are still with us today.
Bush was out of office. What did Obama do to fix that? Yeah, nothing. He cut and run. And that is according to 2 Sec Defs.

He negotiated throughout 2011 to keep a residual force in country but the Iraqis in power wanted us out so they could persecute their enemies.
 
President Obama is accusing the media of contributing to a climate of fear that makes Americans more afraid of the threat posed by Islamic State terrorists.
LINK: Obama Blames Media For Empowering Islamic State - Breitbart

It's NOT the BEHEADINGS
It's NOT the BURNING PEOPLE ALIVE
It's NOT the LOWERING OF PEOPLE IN CAGES INTO WATER TO DROWN THEM
It's NOT the SUICIDE BOMBINGS
It's NOT the ASSASSINATIONS OF AMBASSADORS
It's NOT the MURDER OF AMERICANS ABROAD, IN PARIS, IN ISRAEL, IN MALI
It's NOT the MASS TERRORIST THREATS AND FOLLOW-UP ATTACKS, BOMBINGS, AND KILLINGS
It's NOT THE FBI CONFIRMING 1,000 OPEN ISIS INVESTIGATIONS IN THE US
It's NOT the TERRORIST ATTACK AT FORT HOOD THAT RESULTED IN DEAD AMERICANS
It's NOT the TERRORIST ATTACK IN BOSTON THAT RESULTED IN DEAD AMERICANS
It's NOT the TERRORIST ATTACK AT RECRUITING CTR IN TN THAT RESULTED IN DEAD AMERICANS
It's NOT the TERRORIST ATTACK AT CAL UNIVERSITY WHERE AN AMERICAN WAS STABBED
It's NOT the 20 US EMBASSY ATTACKS THROUGHOUT THE ME THAT RESULTED IN 4 DEAD AMERICANS
It's NOT the President's FAILED FOREIGN POLICY, STRATEGY, AND REFUSAL TO EMBRACE REALITY


NO, the American people are stupid, hysterical, easily-frightened, easily manipulated, frightened Lemmings that are being driven into this 'irrational' fear of being attacked by ISIS here in the United States, as promised...like they promised France then carried out those attacks, by the EVIL, IRRESPONSIBLE, FEAR-MONGERING MEDIA SONS OF BITCHES!

:wtf:


After 9/11/01 there was not another successful terrorist attack on U.S. soil...until Obama became President. The United States went from vowing the day after 9/11/01 that NO TERRORIST would have any safe haven in the world to a new administration that helped a terrorist organization take over the government of our ally Egypt, took this nation to war without Congressional approval to help terrorists who had been recruiting Jihadists for decades to kill American troops in Afghanistan and Iraq to take over their own country - Libya, ran guns to Syrian 'rebels' (who became ISIS) out of Benghazi, spent millions of US tax dollars to train/fund/outfit/arm 6 'rebels' - 5 of whom became ISIS, ignored ISIS while they flooded UN-OPPOSED into Iraq to take much of the country our military had liberated at great cost, called them a 'JV Team', declared his intent to bring in thousands of Syrian Refugees' after ISIS' threat - which was carried out - so soon after the Paris attacks and despite all the threats and warnings, and while just overseas MOCKED ISIS and their threats to carry out Paris-style attacks here in the U.S. AND MOCKED the Americans for their LEGITIMATE CONCERNS OVER OUR NATIONAL SECURITY AND SAFETY OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!

AFTER allowing so many successful terrorist attacks on the US
AFTER allowing so many deaths of Americans, many of which came AFTER threats/warnings he IGNORED
AFTER tying the hands of our allies, limiting their attacks on and thus the damage against ISIS
AFTER admitting his foreign policy is 'INCOMPLETE'
AFTER declaring his goal has always been to CONTAIN (not defeat) ISIS, declaring he had done so...
AFTER being proven to be SO WRONG by ISIS through their attacks on Paris the next day yet vowing to change NOTHING, to 'stay the course'
AFTER declaring that ISIS is not the problem - that ASAD is the problem...

The narcissistic, Islamic Extremist Sympathizing / Facilitating, Incompetent, Mentally Un-Balanced, Delusional, Foreign Policy FAILING 'BLAMER and Chief' is once again refusing to accept any responsibility in ISIS' obvious growth and expansion, refuses to acknowledge his policies/strategy has failed, refuses to acknowledged EVEN NOW that ISIS is the threat - not Assad, refuses to acknowledge that America's fears ARE VALID, and points his finger at the MEDIA, blaming them for the people 'rebelling' against unbelievable demand to accept in thousands of properly un-vetted Syrians (mass majority being young militant/military-aged males) in the HOPES that they are not - do not contain - terrorists.

Obama, the 'Liar of the Year' award winner, tells Americans:

- Accepting these Syrian Refugees into the US (without properly vetting them_ is NO DIFFERNET THAN LETTING IN THE MILLIONS OF TOURISTS THAT COME HERE EACH YEAR (yet forgets to compare them to the millions of un-registered, un-vetted ILLEGALS he allows into the US.)

- Vetting these people usually takes 12-18 months, but I want them in ASAP. Don't worry - we have an 'advantage' over France in vetting them...

REALLY?

"150 on flight from Mexico allowed to skip customs, leave JFK airport..."
LINK: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=11&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjfhY3t96bJAhWFQCYKHRn1Cio4ChAWCBswAA&url=http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/exclusive-150-flight-mexico-skip-customs-leave-jfk-article-1.2443629&usg=AFQjCNGxbNc6XIybSDMO8eDcHgHCAmrt9g

...not to mention 16 Syrians caught trying to sneak into the US the last 5 days, many with fake passports....

BUT IT'S NOT OBAMA'S FAULT ISIS WON'T PLAY BY HIS RULES AND PEOPLE ARE CONCERNED FOR THEIR LIVES AND FOR OUR NATIONAL SECURITY!

- Don't worry
As if mr 57 states has any credibility...
 
Oh no, Obama successfully ended that war.
If you call the liberated sovereign nation of Iraq being invaded by the UN-Opposed 'JV Team' and all of the successes won at great cost by our military being pissed away, thousands of men/women/children slaughtered by the terrorist group Obama helped to fund/supply/arm/train and protect (by denying our allies from striking key targets) ' successfully ended that war'....
 
had we left the Iraqi government alone and minded our own business rather than overthrowing Saddam, ISIS would have never had the opportunity to form, much less grow.

like Powell said "you'll own it"
Except Iraq was Liberated....by the blood and sacrifice of our military.
The War was WON - Obama said so and began to withdraw our troops.
He was entrusted with a victory and a liberated Iraq...and F*ed it UP!
He FAILED to safeguard what was entrusted to him.
Obama ARMED ISIS from Benghazi.
Obama spent MILLIONS on supplying, arming, and even TRAINING terrorists for ISIS.
He made excuses for them ('JV Team') then did NOTHING while they flowed into Iraq and took over much of the country our military had liberated.

And after his HUMILIATING WORLD-WIDE EMBARASSING COWARDLY BACKING DOWN of his infamous SYRIAN RED LINE that he tried to blame on the whole world (a world that laughed at him for trying to do so) that STUCK IN HIS CRAW, Obama has been OBSESSED with ASSAD!

The time to take down Assad was RIGHT THEN....but he F*ed up and lost his chance. He has waited until Russia / Putin stepped in, built a base, brought in thousands of troops, planes, and weapons. He has waited until Iran sent troops into Syria to protect Assad. He waited until after Putin / Russia destroyed the 'rebels' with whom he was waging his proxy war against Assad.

While focusing on Assad (and facilitating Illegal Immigration at home):
ISIS moved into Iraq
20 US Embassies were simultaneously attacked, 4 overrun
4 Americans were killed abroad
Americans were repeatedly attacked and killed at home

While he patted himself on the back and praised his (FAILED 'incomplete') foreign policy and strategy of 'containing' ISIS - and after proclaiming he had done so - over 150 people were murdered in Paris and almost as many were wounded. From somewhere deep within his own reality, Obama responded to these attacks by calling them a 'set-back', mock the American people's valid concerns, and vows to continue what, only in HIS mind' he considers a 'winning strategy' against ISIS WHILE pursuing what HE feels to be the REAL threat - a very well protected Assad.

Despite reality, 'Don Quixote' Obama has decided Assad is his 'windmill', and nothing is going to change it.

If the war was won, why did President Bush have to sign a SOFA with the Iraqis before the end of 2008 that left no doubt as to when our military had to leave?
.
Generally at the successful conclusions of wars there is a treaty signed. Or did you miss that one?
Where is Obama's treaty on Afghanistan, btw? You know, the "good war"? The one he committed thousnds of troops to in a surge that mirrored the one Bush did that Obama opposed?

the 08 SOFA was an agreement, not a TREATY
An agreement that could be changed...by diplomacy of by force. Obabble eschews force...and he is a pansy negotiator.....ergo....chaos.
 
Exactly because the occupation was no longer, it ended in 2008. Furthermore the two preceding paragraphs set the time table for withdrawing the occupying powers' troops too, first from the cities and then from the entire country.

There was no 'occupation' dumbmass!
 
He negotiated throughout 2011 to keep a residual force in country but the Iraqis in power wanted us out so they could persecute their enemies.

It must be hard for liberals to re-write all that history.

The Iraqi leader was about to sign the SOFA when Obama, last minute, demanded that ALL the different leaders (all Council members, consisting of many different tribal leaders) sign the SOFA. This had NEVER been requested by a US President before. It was credited at the time with being a 'game-changer'.

You Libs really need to stop blaming everyone else BUT the ineffective, inept, Islamic Extremist-Sympathizing traitor in the WH! Obama admits his foreign policy is 'incomplete', claimed he had contained ISIS, only to have the Paris attacks the next day, EXPOSING HIM AS A FAILURE....



...b....b....b...b....BUT BUUUUUUSH!
...b....b....b...b....BUT THE MEDIA!
:crybaby:
 
He negotiated throughout 2011 to keep a residual force in country but the Iraqis in power wanted us out so they could persecute their enemies.

WHY did Obama need to negotiate ANYTHING?

The war was over - HE successfully won it.
The War on Terror was over.
Al Qaeda was on the run.
He was closing GITMO and bringing our boys home!

:lmao:
 
It wasn't so much deposing Saddam but the policies implemented (or lack thereof) after he was gone. As the occupying power they failed miserably at governing the country they conquered, leading to the civil war, with porous borders that allowed foreign terrorist in to form al Qaeda in Iraq.

What a Liberal DONK! When you remain in the country after liberating an until-then 'enslaved' nation AT THE REQUEST OF THAT NATION - asking you to help provide security, training, and help getting on their feet, and going YOU ARE NOT AN 'OCCUPYING POWER', which insinuates you are imposing your will on the host nation! You are ALLIES, partners, WORKING TOGETHER!

See, that's some Barry SENIOR bullshite right there! That's some Barak Hussein Senior Anti-Colonialist BS coming out in your post. Barry Sr, like Barry Jr, believes the US was evil, a 'colonialist' nation - like Britain granted was. He thought the US is ONLY great because we conquered other nations and then pillaged their wealth and resources. That is exactly what is implied by the choice of your words. WORDS MATTER. If you feel the US is evil, that we invaded Iraq to impose or will on them, that we are 'occupiers', speaking on behalf of myself and many of my brothers and sisters who went through some hell over there to help liberate the Iraqi people

:fu:

We were the occupying power in Germany and Japan too,

Look in to SCR 1483

http://www.cfr.org/international-or...n-security-council-resolution-1483-iraq/p8471

Noting the letter of 8 May 2003 from the Permanent Representatives of the United States of America and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to the President of the Security Council (S/2003/538) and recognizing the specific authorities, responsibilities, and obligations under applicable international law of these states as occupying powers under unified command (the “Authority”),.

As the occupying power the Bush administration simply didn't fulfill the responsibilities, and obligations necessary to keep Iraq functioning as a country and it descended into a Civil War. The consequences of that war are still with us today.
Bush was out of office. What did Obama do to fix that? Yeah, nothing. He cut and run. And that is according to 2 Sec Defs.

He negotiated throughout 2011 to keep a residual force in country but the Iraqis in power wanted us out so they could persecute their enemies.
That is the opposite of what 2 SecDefs have publicly stated. Ithink I'll take their word over yours.
 

Forum List

Back
Top