Bodycam shows white cop fatally shooting fleeing black dude

[HereWeGoAgain]

Oklahoma police officer s body-cam captures fatal shooting - CNN.com

Thanks, that one worked.

But the freeze frame doesn't show what you described. He's not facing the officer at all; he's facing straight down to the street concentrating on picking up the object. As soon as he has it in hand he takes off again, and that's when he gets shot. He couldn't take off if he was already shot.

The officer starts firing while Walker is crouched facing the street and continues as he runs away. And then, perhaps his bigger problem -- he pulls his trigger seven times to his target's back. It would seem that's going for more than a disable.

You need to read up on the science of this stuff and the sympathetic nervous system. Under that stress...reactions are on a 1-2 second delay as the brain processes the stress. People like SEALS may not because of experience their system gets used to the stress.

Cops..especially rural ones like this..rarely encounter shooting scenarios. So the brain is under a stress dump and reactions get slower and very deliberate. Its why Krav Maga works in combat over fancy karate.

Anyway...grand jurys are usually given presentations on the science of how the body reacts under stress. All criminal trial jurys are given it.

And after that lesson...people understand more how that stress works...vs watching it on TV like a video game.

Kinda like you tailgating a car too close and they stop suddenly. Rarely can the brain process that sudden stress and the body hit the brake in time to stop.

Once he decided to shoot...he wasnt gonna stop for 1-2 seconds. But you're watching it all on a couch with a resting heart rate without your life at risk. And thats why you see it different than he felt it.

It's real time, I understand that. And you may have sent the command to your finger to pull the trigger before the senses can plug in new information, I get that too. But when you see your target's running away, and in the case of the last couple of shots already down, and the command to pull the trigger is already sent, you can send an additional command to your hand to move your aim above his head and harmlessly into the air. Just as if that car stops short in front of me I can veer suddenly to the side faster than I can move my foot into position to hit the brake. Because the steering wheel's already in my hand.

In other words it seems to me the sight of a target's back ought to immediately trigger, no pun intended, holding one's fire (or if it's already enroute, intentionally wasting it). That that didn't happen here raises questions about what the officer's motive was.

What a brilliant argument...coming from someone who has no clue regarding real life law enforcement. I'm betting you would have defended the thug had the officer been killed.

I'm sure you are. You're an idiot. And your post immediately before this one sums it up.

Final thoughts, because I can't stomach watching this video any more -- my concern is really not the prospect that Officer McMillin did not follow police procedure. If true that would be a problem on one level. My concern is that he did. If true that's a much bigger level.

And second, although it didn't succeed (yet), I deplore the OP's attempt at race-baiting by inserting the races of the two parties into the thread title. That's bullshit.

I had no idea you were so delicate...tissue?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Thanks, that one worked.

But the freeze frame doesn't show what you described. He's not facing the officer at all; he's facing straight down to the street concentrating on picking up the object. As soon as he has it in hand he takes off again, and that's when he gets shot. He couldn't take off if he was already shot.

The officer starts firing while Walker is crouched facing the street and continues as he runs away. And then, perhaps his bigger problem -- he pulls his trigger seven times to his target's back. It would seem that's going for more than a disable.

You need to read up on the science of this stuff and the sympathetic nervous system. Under that stress...reactions are on a 1-2 second delay as the brain processes the stress. People like SEALS may not because of experience their system gets used to the stress.

Cops..especially rural ones like this..rarely encounter shooting scenarios. So the brain is under a stress dump and reactions get slower and very deliberate. Its why Krav Maga works in combat over fancy karate.

Anyway...grand jurys are usually given presentations on the science of how the body reacts under stress. All criminal trial jurys are given it.

And after that lesson...people understand more how that stress works...vs watching it on TV like a video game.

Kinda like you tailgating a car too close and they stop suddenly. Rarely can the brain process that sudden stress and the body hit the brake in time to stop.

Once he decided to shoot...he wasnt gonna stop for 1-2 seconds. But you're watching it all on a couch with a resting heart rate without your life at risk. And thats why you see it different than he felt it.

It's real time, I understand that. And you may have sent the command to your finger to pull the trigger before the senses can plug in new information, I get that too. But when you see your target's running away, and in the case of the last couple of shots already down, and the command to pull the trigger is already sent, you can send an additional command to your hand to move your aim above his head and harmlessly into the air. Just as if that car stops short in front of me I can veer suddenly to the side faster than I can move my foot into position to hit the brake. Because the steering wheel's already in my hand.

In other words it seems to me the sight of a target's back ought to immediately trigger, no pun intended, holding one's fire (or if it's already enroute, intentionally wasting it). That that didn't happen here raises questions about what the officer's motive was.

What a brilliant argument...coming from someone who has no clue regarding real life law enforcement. I'm betting you would have defended the thug had the officer been killed.

I'm sure you are. You're an idiot. And your post immediately before this one sums it up.

Final thoughts, because I can't stomach watching this video any more -- my concern is really not the prospect that Officer McMillin did not follow police procedure. If true that would be a problem on one level. My concern is that he did. If true that's a much bigger level.

And second, although it didn't succeed (yet), I deplore the OP's attempt at race-baiting by inserting the races of the two parties into the thread title. That's bullshit.

I agree with that statement 100%.

So you want the police to implement policy that could easily get them killed?
Yeah ...okee dokey

 

[bucs90]

Oklahoma police officer s body-cam captures fatal shooting - CNN.com

Here you go all you cop hating retards. CNN gives a VERY fair assessment and slows the video down and pauses it....where you can see 100% clear that the thug is bent over, facing the officer, picking up a pistol, with the potential ability to fire at the cop within a half second. What would YOU do?

By the way...the cop was there because a victim called 911 saying this innocent young black man...with a gun...had just threatened to kill her.

God Bless this officer. He'll be next to suffer the lynch mobs wrath for protecting himself and others.

The video in your link is to a cop shooting a car passenger in New Jersey.

And there's nothing in the article about a 911 call either. All we have on that story is a claim from the Muskogee police chief.

Thanks but I'll take the word of the police chief instead of your 'opinion'.
You obviously have serious mental issues about anyone 'in authority'. Blame that on your gym teacher.

The simple fact is there's nothing in the story about any 911 call. Either you got that from somewhere else you're not telling us about, or you made it up.

Guess where that puts you on the credibility scale.

Once again, going by the article we have the word of a single statement from a person very much in a position to lie about it. And that's all we have. You have more than that, bring it forward. Otherwise you're making shit up.

So you think the cops are lying about the 911 call?

You do know...911 calls are recorded and time stamped. And have caller ID. So lying would be incredibly easy to prove if there isnt a 911 call record...and a victim who called.

OH WAIT.....the cops had an undercover officer call 911 and make a false accusation against this black male and then they drugged him and planted a gun on him...all so they could shoot him.


Surely you are this dumb right? The 911 call is absolutely so easy to verify. Even the media isnt questioning it because they know its impossible to lie about recieving a 911 call.

No I don't think the police are lying about a 911 call -- I think YOU are.
I did a word search on your link and the OP article. There's nothing in either about any "911 call".

So WHERE are you getting the existence of this "911 call"?

Oklahoma police officer s body-cam captures fatal shooting - CNN.com

Here you go all you cop hating retards. CNN gives a VERY fair assessment and slows the video down and pauses it....where you can see 100% clear that the thug is bent over, facing the officer, picking up a pistol, with the potential ability to fire at the cop within a half second. What would YOU do?

By the way...the cop was there because a victim called 911 saying this innocent young black man...with a gun...had just threatened to kill her.

God Bless this officer. He'll be next to suffer the lynch mobs wrath for protecting himself and others.

The video in your link is to a cop shooting a car passenger in New Jersey.

And there's nothing in the article about a 911 call either. All we have on that story is a claim from the Muskogee police chief.

Thanks but I'll take the word of the police chief instead of your 'opinion'.
You obviously have serious mental issues about anyone 'in authority'. Blame that on your gym teacher.

The simple fact is there's nothing in the story about any 911 call. Either you got that from somewhere else you're not telling us about, or you made it up.

Guess where that puts you on the credibility scale.

Once again, going by the article we have the word of a single statement from a person very much in a position to lie about it. And that's all we have. You have more than that, bring it forward. Otherwise you're making shit up.

So you think the cops are lying about the 911 call?

You do know...911 calls are recorded and time stamped. And have caller ID. So lying would be incredibly easy to prove if there isnt a 911 call record...and a victim who called.

OH WAIT.....the cops had an undercover officer call 911 and make a false accusation against this black male and then they drugged him and planted a gun on him...all so they could shoot him.


Surely you are this dumb right? The 911 call is absolutely so easy to verify. Even the media isnt questioning it because they know its impossible to lie about recieving a 911 call.

No I don't think the police are lying about a 911 call -- I think YOU are.
I did a word search on your link and the OP article. There's nothing in either about any "911 call".

So WHERE are you getting the existence of this "911 call"?

Hey retard...you didnt look very hard.

Tulsa news released the 911 recordings already.
Muskogee Police Shooting 911 tape 2

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Thanks, that one worked.

But the freeze frame doesn't show what you described. He's not facing the officer at all; he's facing straight down to the street concentrating on picking up the object. As soon as he has it in hand he takes off again, and that's when he gets shot. He couldn't take off if he was already shot.

The officer starts firing while Walker is crouched facing the street and continues as he runs away. And then, perhaps his bigger problem -- he pulls his trigger seven times to his target's back. It would seem that's going for more than a disable.

You need to read up on the science of this stuff and the sympathetic nervous system. Under that stress...reactions are on a 1-2 second delay as the brain processes the stress. People like SEALS may not because of experience their system gets used to the stress.

Cops..especially rural ones like this..rarely encounter shooting scenarios. So the brain is under a stress dump and reactions get slower and very deliberate. Its why Krav Maga works in combat over fancy karate.

Anyway...grand jurys are usually given presentations on the science of how the body reacts under stress. All criminal trial jurys are given it.

And after that lesson...people understand more how that stress works...vs watching it on TV like a video game.

Kinda like you tailgating a car too close and they stop suddenly. Rarely can the brain process that sudden stress and the body hit the brake in time to stop.

Once he decided to shoot...he wasnt gonna stop for 1-2 seconds. But you're watching it all on a couch with a resting heart rate without your life at risk. And thats why you see it different than he felt it.

It's real time, I understand that. And you may have sent the command to your finger to pull the trigger before the senses can plug in new information, I get that too. But when you see your target's running away, and in the case of the last couple of shots already down, and the command to pull the trigger is already sent, you can send an additional command to your hand to move your aim above his head and harmlessly into the air. Just as if that car stops short in front of me I can veer suddenly to the side faster than I can move my foot into position to hit the brake. Because the steering wheel's already in my hand.

In other words it seems to me the sight of a target's back ought to immediately trigger, no pun intended, holding one's fire (or if it's already enroute, intentionally wasting it). That that didn't happen here raises questions about what the officer's motive was.

What a brilliant argument...coming from someone who has no clue regarding real life law enforcement. I'm betting you would have defended the thug had the officer been killed.

I'm sure you are. You're an idiot. And your post immediately before this one sums it up.

Final thoughts, because I can't stomach watching this video any more -- my concern is really not the prospect that Officer McMillin did not follow police procedure. If true that would be a problem on one level. My concern is that he did. If true that's a much bigger level.

And second, although it didn't succeed (yet), I deplore the OP's attempt at race-baiting by inserting the races of the two parties into the thread title. That's bullshit.

While I agree with your last sentence, my post to which you refer merely expresses the pleasure I get when armed thugs are killed. I would cheer had the colors been reversed...black cop kills white armed thug. Another one bites the dust!

Thats what these idiots dont seem to get. We dont care what color the thug is..only they do.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Oklahoma police officer s body-cam captures fatal shooting - CNN.com

Here you go all you cop hating retards. CNN gives a VERY fair assessment and slows the video down and pauses it....where you can see 100% clear that the thug is bent over, facing the officer, picking up a pistol, with the potential ability to fire at the cop within a half second. What would YOU do?

By the way...the cop was there because a victim called 911 saying this innocent young black man...with a gun...had just threatened to kill her.

God Bless this officer. He'll be next to suffer the lynch mobs wrath for protecting himself and others.

The video in your link is to a cop shooting a car passenger in New Jersey.

And there's nothing in the article about a 911 call either. All we have on that story is a claim from the Muskogee police chief.

Thanks but I'll take the word of the police chief instead of your 'opinion'.
You obviously have serious mental issues about anyone 'in authority'. Blame that on your gym teacher.

The simple fact is there's nothing in the story about any 911 call. Either you got that from somewhere else you're not telling us about, or you made it up.

Guess where that puts you on the credibility scale.

Once again, going by the article we have the word of a single statement from a person very much in a position to lie about it. And that's all we have. You have more than that, bring it forward. Otherwise you're making shit up.

So you think the cops are lying about the 911 call?

You do know...911 calls are recorded and time stamped. And have caller ID. So lying would be incredibly easy to prove if there isnt a 911 call record...and a victim who called.

OH WAIT.....the cops had an undercover officer call 911 and make a false accusation against this black male and then they drugged him and planted a gun on him...all so they could shoot him.


Surely you are this dumb right? The 911 call is absolutely so easy to verify. Even the media isnt questioning it because they know its impossible to lie about recieving a 911 call.

No I don't think the police are lying about a 911 call -- I think YOU are.
I did a word search on your link and the OP article. There's nothing in either about any "911 call".

So WHERE are you getting the existence of this "911 call"?

I gotta ask...what the fuck difference does it make as to who called the cops?

 

[bucs90]

Id like them to tell us how many seconds should a thug be allowed to point a gun at a cop before its ok to shoot?

Or...if a thug is potentially about to raise the gun...should the cops be mandated to allow the thug to get the gun fully raised and pointed at them before firing?

Or...should the cops be mandated to only fire after they've been fired at first (like Obama has mandated some military units to do).

 

[Ernie S.]

He was picking up a gun, you dolt. Should the cop wait until the first round hits him in the forehead before dispatching the ARMED perpetrator?

If he believes the kid is picking up a gun -- and it's entirely reasonable to presume he is -- why doesn't he shoot at the gun or the kid's hand to keep it out of his control? And perhaps he did but unsuccessfully, whereupon the kid begins to run off. He then continues firing at a running target that's in no position to shoot back.

You are temporarily off ignore because I had to see who said this.

Ya know son, people who know so little about guns should excuse themselves from conversations about them.

 

[bucs90]

The video in your link is to a cop shooting a car passenger in New Jersey.

And there's nothing in the article about a 911 call either. All we have on that story is a claim from the Muskogee police chief.

Thanks but I'll take the word of the police chief instead of your 'opinion'.
You obviously have serious mental issues about anyone 'in authority'. Blame that on your gym teacher.

The simple fact is there's nothing in the story about any 911 call. Either you got that from somewhere else you're not telling us about, or you made it up.

Guess where that puts you on the credibility scale.

Once again, going by the article we have the word of a single statement from a person very much in a position to lie about it. And that's all we have. You have more than that, bring it forward. Otherwise you're making shit up.

So you think the cops are lying about the 911 call?

You do know...911 calls are recorded and time stamped. And have caller ID. So lying would be incredibly easy to prove if there isnt a 911 call record...and a victim who called.

OH WAIT.....the cops had an undercover officer call 911 and make a false accusation against this black male and then they drugged him and planted a gun on him...all so they could shoot him.


Surely you are this dumb right? The 911 call is absolutely so easy to verify. Even the media isnt questioning it because they know its impossible to lie about recieving a 911 call.

No I don't think the police are lying about a 911 call -- I think YOU are.
I did a word search on your link and the OP article. There's nothing in either about any "911 call".

So WHERE are you getting the existence of this "911 call"?

I gotta ask...what the fuck difference does it make as to who called the cops?

To him and other cop haters. They want ANYTHING they can hold against the cops. They'll pull any string they can find.

He claimed the article never mentioned a 911 call. A woman calling cops for help basically assumes it. But be picked that battle and claims I lied about the existence of a 911 call....which common sense assumes exists.

And it does.

Muskogee Police Shooting 911 tape 2

 

[PredFan]

Meh, as I always do, I will wait for the investigation and/or trial to conclude before I take a side.

 

[Ernie S.]

Oklahoma police officer s body-cam captures fatal shooting - CNN.com

Thanks, that one worked.

But the freeze frame doesn't show what you described. He's not facing the officer at all; he's facing straight down to the street concentrating on picking up the object. As soon as he has it in hand he takes off again, and that's when he gets shot. He couldn't take off if he was already shot.

The officer starts firing while Walker is crouched facing the street and continues as he runs away. And then, perhaps his bigger problem -- he pulls his trigger seven times to his target's back. It would seem that's going for more than a disable.

You need to read up on the science of this stuff and the sympathetic nervous system. Under that stress...reactions are on a 1-2 second delay as the brain processes the stress. People like SEALS may not because of experience their system gets used to the stress.

Cops..especially rural ones like this..rarely encounter shooting scenarios. So the brain is under a stress dump and reactions get slower and very deliberate. Its why Krav Maga works in combat over fancy karate.

Anyway...grand jurys are usually given presentations on the science of how the body reacts under stress. All criminal trial jurys are given it.

And after that lesson...people understand more how that stress works...vs watching it on TV like a video game.

Kinda like you tailgating a car too close and they stop suddenly. Rarely can the brain process that sudden stress and the body hit the brake in time to stop.

Once he decided to shoot...he wasnt gonna stop for 1-2 seconds. But you're watching it all on a couch with a resting heart rate without your life at risk. And thats why you see it different than he felt it.

It's real time, I understand that. And you may have sent the command to your finger to pull the trigger before the senses can plug in new information, I get that too. But when you see your target's running away, and in the case of the last couple of shots already down, and the command to pull the trigger is already sent, you can send an additional command to your hand to move your aim above his head and harmlessly into the air. Just as if that car stops short in front of me I can veer suddenly to the side faster than I can move my foot into position to hit the brake. Because the steering wheel's already in my hand.

In other words it seems to me the sight of a target's back ought to immediately trigger, no pun intended, holding one's fire (or if it's already enroute, intentionally wasting it). That that didn't happen here raises questions about what the officer's motive was.

What a brilliant argument...coming from someone who has no clue regarding real life law enforcement. I'm betting you would have defended the thug had the officer been killed.

I'm sure you are. You're an idiot. And your post immediately before this one sums it up.

Final thoughts, because I can't stomach watching this video any more -- my concern is really not the prospect that Officer McMillin did not follow police procedure. If true that would be a problem on one level. My concern is that he did. If true that's a much bigger level.

And second, although it didn't succeed (yet), I deplore the OP's attempt at race-baiting by inserting the races of the two parties into the thread title. That's bullshit.

Let's suppose that the officer did stand down and this thug got away. How would you react if this lucky thug then shot his girlfriend as he had already threatened?
Would you blame his actions on the trauma of his being chased by the cop?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Thanks but I'll take the word of the police chief instead of your 'opinion'.
You obviously have serious mental issues about anyone 'in authority'. Blame that on your gym teacher.

The simple fact is there's nothing in the story about any 911 call. Either you got that from somewhere else you're not telling us about, or you made it up.

Guess where that puts you on the credibility scale.

Once again, going by the article we have the word of a single statement from a person very much in a position to lie about it. And that's all we have. You have more than that, bring it forward. Otherwise you're making shit up.

So you think the cops are lying about the 911 call?

You do know...911 calls are recorded and time stamped. And have caller ID. So lying would be incredibly easy to prove if there isnt a 911 call record...and a victim who called.

OH WAIT.....the cops had an undercover officer call 911 and make a false accusation against this black male and then they drugged him and planted a gun on him...all so they could shoot him.


Surely you are this dumb right? The 911 call is absolutely so easy to verify. Even the media isnt questioning it because they know its impossible to lie about recieving a 911 call.

No I don't think the police are lying about a 911 call -- I think YOU are.
I did a word search on your link and the OP article. There's nothing in either about any "911 call".

So WHERE are you getting the existence of this "911 call"?

I gotta ask...what the fuck difference does it make as to who called the cops?

To him and other cop haters. They want ANYTHING they can hold against the cops. They'll pull any string they can find.

He claimed the article never mentioned a 911 call. A woman calling cops for help basically assumes it. But be picked that battle and claims I lied about the existence of a 911 call....which common sense assumes exists.

And it does.

Muskogee Police Shooting 911 tape 2

Maybe so...but I would have thought they could have found a better straw to grasp than a phone call to the cops.
I mean thats pathetic!

 

[bucs90]

The simple fact is there's nothing in the story about any 911 call. Either you got that from somewhere else you're not telling us about, or you made it up.

Guess where that puts you on the credibility scale.

Once again, going by the article we have the word of a single statement from a person very much in a position to lie about it. And that's all we have. You have more than that, bring it forward. Otherwise you're making shit up.

So you think the cops are lying about the 911 call?

You do know...911 calls are recorded and time stamped. And have caller ID. So lying would be incredibly easy to prove if there isnt a 911 call record...and a victim who called.

OH WAIT.....the cops had an undercover officer call 911 and make a false accusation against this black male and then they drugged him and planted a gun on him...all so they could shoot him.


Surely you are this dumb right? The 911 call is absolutely so easy to verify. Even the media isnt questioning it because they know its impossible to lie about recieving a 911 call.

No I don't think the police are lying about a 911 call -- I think YOU are.
I did a word search on your link and the OP article. There's nothing in either about any "911 call".

So WHERE are you getting the existence of this "911 call"?

I gotta ask...what the fuck difference does it make as to who called the cops?

To him and other cop haters. They want ANYTHING they can hold against the cops. They'll pull any string they can find.

He claimed the article never mentioned a 911 call. A woman calling cops for help basically assumes it. But be picked that battle and claims I lied about the existence of a 911 call....which common sense assumes exists.

And it does.

Muskogee Police Shooting 911 tape 2

Maybe so...but I would have thought they could have found a better straw to grasp than a phone call to the cops.
I mean thats pathetic!

Their cop hate overwhelms common sense.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Meh, as I always do, I will wait for the investigation and/or trial to conclude before I take a side.

The video is pretty conclusive in my mind.
Had the kid just kept running it's unlikely he would have been shot. Personally I dont think the kid intended to shoot the cop he just wanted his pistol.
Dumb move.

 

[Ernie S.]

Thanks but I'll take the word of the police chief instead of your 'opinion'.
You obviously have serious mental issues about anyone 'in authority'. Blame that on your gym teacher.

The simple fact is there's nothing in the story about any 911 call. Either you got that from somewhere else you're not telling us about, or you made it up.

Guess where that puts you on the credibility scale.

Once again, going by the article we have the word of a single statement from a person very much in a position to lie about it. And that's all we have. You have more than that, bring it forward. Otherwise you're making shit up.

So you think the cops are lying about the 911 call?

You do know...911 calls are recorded and time stamped. And have caller ID. So lying would be incredibly easy to prove if there isnt a 911 call record...and a victim who called.

OH WAIT.....the cops had an undercover officer call 911 and make a false accusation against this black male and then they drugged him and planted a gun on him...all so they could shoot him.


Surely you are this dumb right? The 911 call is absolutely so easy to verify. Even the media isnt questioning it because they know its impossible to lie about recieving a 911 call.

No I don't think the police are lying about a 911 call -- I think YOU are.
I did a word search on your link and the OP article. There's nothing in either about any "911 call".

So WHERE are you getting the existence of this "911 call"?

Well...the police said they responded to the church because a woman was reporting that the thug...her ex...was there threatening her saying he "had a bullet with her name on it".

And when people feel threatened and call cops...they use 911.

People with common sense assume that calling the cops means calling 911. Man...really? You need that explained?

AH. So finally you admit you're making shit up. As I said earlier.

That was like pulling teeth.

Typical of you, possum boy. You are confronted with information that shows you're full of shit and puff your chest out and, with your normal air of superiority, claim victory.

 

[Ernie S.]

He was picking up a gun, you dolt. Should the cop wait until the first round hits him in the forehead before dispatching the ARMED perpetrator?

If he believes the kid is picking up a gun -- and it's entirely reasonable to presume he is -- why doesn't he shoot at the gun or the kid's hand to keep it out of his control? And perhaps he did but unsuccessfully, whereupon the kid begins to run off. He then continues firing at a running target that's in no position to shoot back.

This post is chock full of dumb ass.

As usual.

 

[Pogo]

The video in your link is to a cop shooting a car passenger in New Jersey.

And there's nothing in the article about a 911 call either. All we have on that story is a claim from the Muskogee police chief.

Thanks but I'll take the word of the police chief instead of your 'opinion'.
You obviously have serious mental issues about anyone 'in authority'. Blame that on your gym teacher.

The simple fact is there's nothing in the story about any 911 call. Either you got that from somewhere else you're not telling us about, or you made it up.

Guess where that puts you on the credibility scale.

Once again, going by the article we have the word of a single statement from a person very much in a position to lie about it. And that's all we have. You have more than that, bring it forward. Otherwise you're making shit up.

So you think the cops are lying about the 911 call?

You do know...911 calls are recorded and time stamped. And have caller ID. So lying would be incredibly easy to prove if there isnt a 911 call record...and a victim who called.

OH WAIT.....the cops had an undercover officer call 911 and make a false accusation against this black male and then they drugged him and planted a gun on him...all so they could shoot him.


Surely you are this dumb right? The 911 call is absolutely so easy to verify. Even the media isnt questioning it because they know its impossible to lie about recieving a 911 call.

No I don't think the police are lying about a 911 call -- I think YOU are.
I did a word search on your link and the OP article. There's nothing in either about any "911 call".

So WHERE are you getting the existence of this "911 call"?

The video in your link is to a cop shooting a car passenger in New Jersey.

And there's nothing in the article about a 911 call either. All we have on that story is a claim from the Muskogee police chief.

Thanks but I'll take the word of the police chief instead of your 'opinion'.
You obviously have serious mental issues about anyone 'in authority'. Blame that on your gym teacher.

The simple fact is there's nothing in the story about any 911 call. Either you got that from somewhere else you're not telling us about, or you made it up.

Guess where that puts you on the credibility scale.

Once again, going by the article we have the word of a single statement from a person very much in a position to lie about it. And that's all we have. You have more than that, bring it forward. Otherwise you're making shit up.

So you think the cops are lying about the 911 call?

You do know...911 calls are recorded and time stamped. And have caller ID. So lying would be incredibly easy to prove if there isnt a 911 call record...and a victim who called.

OH WAIT.....the cops had an undercover officer call 911 and make a false accusation against this black male and then they drugged him and planted a gun on him...all so they could shoot him.


Surely you are this dumb right? The 911 call is absolutely so easy to verify. Even the media isnt questioning it because they know its impossible to lie about recieving a 911 call.

No I don't think the police are lying about a 911 call -- I think YOU are.
I did a word search on your link and the OP article. There's nothing in either about any "911 call".

So WHERE are you getting the existence of this "911 call"?

Hey retard...you didnt look very hard.

Tulsa news released the 911 recordings already.
Muskogee Police Shooting 911 tape 2

And you didn't post that before.
As I already said, you were either referring to something you weren't posting or making it up. In this case -- both.

I don't fuel on ass-umptions. If you do, that's your problem.

 

[Pogo]

The simple fact is there's nothing in the story about any 911 call. Either you got that from somewhere else you're not telling us about, or you made it up.

Guess where that puts you on the credibility scale.

Once again, going by the article we have the word of a single statement from a person very much in a position to lie about it. And that's all we have. You have more than that, bring it forward. Otherwise you're making shit up.

So you think the cops are lying about the 911 call?

You do know...911 calls are recorded and time stamped. And have caller ID. So lying would be incredibly easy to prove if there isnt a 911 call record...and a victim who called.

OH WAIT.....the cops had an undercover officer call 911 and make a false accusation against this black male and then they drugged him and planted a gun on him...all so they could shoot him.


Surely you are this dumb right? The 911 call is absolutely so easy to verify. Even the media isnt questioning it because they know its impossible to lie about recieving a 911 call.

No I don't think the police are lying about a 911 call -- I think YOU are.
I did a word search on your link and the OP article. There's nothing in either about any "911 call".

So WHERE are you getting the existence of this "911 call"?

Well...the police said they responded to the church because a woman was reporting that the thug...her ex...was there threatening her saying he "had a bullet with her name on it".

And when people feel threatened and call cops...they use 911.

People with common sense assume that calling the cops means calling 911. Man...really? You need that explained?

AH. So finally you admit you're making shit up. As I said earlier.

That was like pulling teeth.

Typical of you, possum boy. You are confronted with information that shows you're full of shit and puff your chest out and, with your normal air of superiority, claim victory.

Uh--- the information supplied showed that HE was full of shit, Ern. He just admitted it. Then he had to scramble to find something to back up his ass-umption.

And by the way it's O'Possum. Irish ya know.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Thanks but I'll take the word of the police chief instead of your 'opinion'.
You obviously have serious mental issues about anyone 'in authority'. Blame that on your gym teacher.

The simple fact is there's nothing in the story about any 911 call. Either you got that from somewhere else you're not telling us about, or you made it up.

Guess where that puts you on the credibility scale.

Once again, going by the article we have the word of a single statement from a person very much in a position to lie about it. And that's all we have. You have more than that, bring it forward. Otherwise you're making shit up.

So you think the cops are lying about the 911 call?

You do know...911 calls are recorded and time stamped. And have caller ID. So lying would be incredibly easy to prove if there isnt a 911 call record...and a victim who called.

OH WAIT.....the cops had an undercover officer call 911 and make a false accusation against this black male and then they drugged him and planted a gun on him...all so they could shoot him.


Surely you are this dumb right? The 911 call is absolutely so easy to verify. Even the media isnt questioning it because they know its impossible to lie about recieving a 911 call.

No I don't think the police are lying about a 911 call -- I think YOU are.
I did a word search on your link and the OP article. There's nothing in either about any "911 call".

So WHERE are you getting the existence of this "911 call"?

Thanks but I'll take the word of the police chief instead of your 'opinion'.
You obviously have serious mental issues about anyone 'in authority'. Blame that on your gym teacher.

The simple fact is there's nothing in the story about any 911 call. Either you got that from somewhere else you're not telling us about, or you made it up.

Guess where that puts you on the credibility scale.

Once again, going by the article we have the word of a single statement from a person very much in a position to lie about it. And that's all we have. You have more than that, bring it forward. Otherwise you're making shit up.

So you think the cops are lying about the 911 call?

You do know...911 calls are recorded and time stamped. And have caller ID. So lying would be incredibly easy to prove if there isnt a 911 call record...and a victim who called.

OH WAIT.....the cops had an undercover officer call 911 and make a false accusation against this black male and then they drugged him and planted a gun on him...all so they could shoot him.


Surely you are this dumb right? The 911 call is absolutely so easy to verify. Even the media isnt questioning it because they know its impossible to lie about recieving a 911 call.

No I don't think the police are lying about a 911 call -- I think YOU are.
I did a word search on your link and the OP article. There's nothing in either about any "911 call".

So WHERE are you getting the existence of this "911 call"?

Hey retard...you didnt look very hard.

Tulsa news released the 911 recordings already.
Muskogee Police Shooting 911 tape 2

And you didn't post that before.
As I already said, you were either referring to something you weren't posting or making it up. In this case -- both.

I don't fuel on ass-umptions. If you do, that's your problem.

Again...why does it matter who called the cops?

 

[bucs90]

Thanks but I'll take the word of the police chief instead of your 'opinion'.
You obviously have serious mental issues about anyone 'in authority'. Blame that on your gym teacher.

The simple fact is there's nothing in the story about any 911 call. Either you got that from somewhere else you're not telling us about, or you made it up.

Guess where that puts you on the credibility scale.

Once again, going by the article we have the word of a single statement from a person very much in a position to lie about it. And that's all we have. You have more than that, bring it forward. Otherwise you're making shit up.

So you think the cops are lying about the 911 call?

You do know...911 calls are recorded and time stamped. And have caller ID. So lying would be incredibly easy to prove if there isnt a 911 call record...and a victim who called.

OH WAIT.....the cops had an undercover officer call 911 and make a false accusation against this black male and then they drugged him and planted a gun on him...all so they could shoot him.


Surely you are this dumb right? The 911 call is absolutely so easy to verify. Even the media isnt questioning it because they know its impossible to lie about recieving a 911 call.

No I don't think the police are lying about a 911 call -- I think YOU are.
I did a word search on your link and the OP article. There's nothing in either about any "911 call".

So WHERE are you getting the existence of this "911 call"?

Thanks but I'll take the word of the police chief instead of your 'opinion'.
You obviously have serious mental issues about anyone 'in authority'. Blame that on your gym teacher.

The simple fact is there's nothing in the story about any 911 call. Either you got that from somewhere else you're not telling us about, or you made it up.

Guess where that puts you on the credibility scale.

Once again, going by the article we have the word of a single statement from a person very much in a position to lie about it. And that's all we have. You have more than that, bring it forward. Otherwise you're making shit up.

So you think the cops are lying about the 911 call?

You do know...911 calls are recorded and time stamped. And have caller ID. So lying would be incredibly easy to prove if there isnt a 911 call record...and a victim who called.

OH WAIT.....the cops had an undercover officer call 911 and make a false accusation against this black male and then they drugged him and planted a gun on him...all so they could shoot him.


Surely you are this dumb right? The 911 call is absolutely so easy to verify. Even the media isnt questioning it because they know its impossible to lie about recieving a 911 call.

No I don't think the police are lying about a 911 call -- I think YOU are.
I did a word search on your link and the OP article. There's nothing in either about any "911 call".

So WHERE are you getting the existence of this "911 call"?

Hey retard...you didnt look very hard.

Tulsa news released the 911 recordings already.
Muskogee Police Shooting 911 tape 2

And you didn't post that before.
As I already said, you were either referring to something you weren't posting or making it up. In this case -- both.

I don't fuel on ass-umptions. If you do, that's your problem.

Holy shit...you're like from the twilight zone for retards.

Its so overwhelmingly obvious that the cops recieved a 911 call....because...well thats how people call cops.

You're calling me out...for assuming a person who was in fear for their safety called 911 to summon the police?

Haha...ok. Guilty as charged. I assumed a person who called police...did so by dialing 911. Which...they obviously did.

And THAT is the fight you're picking?

 

[bucs90]

So you think the cops are lying about the 911 call?

You do know...911 calls are recorded and time stamped. And have caller ID. So lying would be incredibly easy to prove if there isnt a 911 call record...and a victim who called.

OH WAIT.....the cops had an undercover officer call 911 and make a false accusation against this black male and then they drugged him and planted a gun on him...all so they could shoot him.


Surely you are this dumb right? The 911 call is absolutely so easy to verify. Even the media isnt questioning it because they know its impossible to lie about recieving a 911 call.

No I don't think the police are lying about a 911 call -- I think YOU are.
I did a word search on your link and the OP article. There's nothing in either about any "911 call".

So WHERE are you getting the existence of this "911 call"?

Well...the police said they responded to the church because a woman was reporting that the thug...her ex...was there threatening her saying he "had a bullet with her name on it".

And when people feel threatened and call cops...they use 911.

People with common sense assume that calling the cops means calling 911. Man...really? You need that explained?

AH. So finally you admit you're making shit up. As I said earlier.

That was like pulling teeth.

Typical of you, possum boy. You are confronted with information that shows you're full of shit and puff your chest out and, with your normal air of superiority, claim victory.

Uh--- the information supplied showed that HE was full of shit, Ern. He just admitted it. Then he had to scramble to find something to back up his ass-umption.

And by the way it's O'Possum. Irish ya know.

Um...what? I was full of shit for assuming the victim dialed 911 when her ex showed up with a gun threatening her? Umm....how else would she call the cops??? Its not even an assumption. You dial 911 for cops or firemen or EMS. Thats the nationwide number for them.

You also suggested the cop should've shot the gun out of the thugs hand!?

You sir are 2015s biggest USMB Regard of the Year so far. I cant believe this is even a discussion.