bendog
Diamond Member
Reading comprehension...can you read English? If so, you are certainly a disingenuous twat. The 4% innocents you have quoted and intransigently insist on is fodder for dingbats like yourself who have a very tenuous grasp of fact and are so easily manipulated. That is why you are a fool.@meat
The 4% figure is best analysis available. Can you point out any flaws in the study? Do you have a better study or figure?
As I posted previously (if you'd read my post you would know) The 4% figure may be the best available, but whatever the true percentage it doesn't change two facts 1) If humans put other humans to death, we will - by virtue of our human imperfection - put some people to death who are not guilty of the crime we are putting them to death for and 2) the more layers of appeal we remove, the more that number will rise.
So now that you are finally up to speed, do you have something you want to discuss?
You shouldn't call people foul names, and given your apparent lack of information on the subject, you should probably refrain from criticizing others' level of knowledge.
Exonorees/Cases | Mississippi Innocence Project