Boycott Israel

[P F Tinmore]

P F Tinmore, Hossfly, Challenger, et al,

OH come on now!

This description is simply bogus. The New York Governor simply opposed the anti-Semitic and economically targeting of the Jewish State through the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS Process).​

Everything is anti-Semitic to those assholes.

(COMMENT)

Unlike the other Islamic countries in the world (22 just in the Arab League), Israel is the only Jewish State. It was the Arab Higher Committee Delegation acting on behave of the Arabs of Palestine, that refused to recognize the Balfour Declaration, the Mandate of Palestine or any situation arising or derived therefrom.
The Arab Higher Committee Delegation acting on behave of the Arabs of Palestine, interpreted the creation of any Jewish State in an Arab territory as an act of invasion and aggression. It is an act of wiping out the existence of an Arab country, violating, its integrity, subjecting its land and people to foreign Jewish domination.“

There was no question that before the implementation of A/RES/181(II) and the "Steps Preparatory to Independence," the Arab Higher Committee pronounced that it was the duty of every Arab in Palestine to oppose in every way the partition of that country.

Why do the Palestinians single out Israel and target it for BDS?

(COMMENT)

Israel is the only Jewish State, and accepted the recommendation of the UN Special Committee for Palestine on the establishment of the Jewish State (PLAN OF PARTITION WITH ECONOMIC UNION ---
Part II. - Boundaries --- Section B. THE JEWISH STATE) as adopted by the UN General Assembly.

Israel is the only country occupying Palestine.
Duh!

(COMMENT)

Israel is not the only country to have occupied the territories between 1949 and 1967. In point of fact, at the time the UN acknowledges the proclamation of the State of Palestine by the Palestine National Council on 15 November 1988 (A/RES/43/177) and decided that, effective as of 15 December 1988, the designation
"Palestine" should be used in place of the designation "Palestine Liberation Organization" in the United Nations system, the territory occupied in 1967 was the West Bank (sovereign territory of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan) and the Gaza Strip (controlled by the Egyptian Military Governorship). Israel DID NOT Occupy any territory under the sovereign integrity of the Arab Palestinians in the West Bank or Gaza Strip.

The Arab Palestinians declared independence before negotiating a treaty with the Israelis. Thus it came to pass that the issue of Territory (and border regime), Settlements, Refugees, Security, Jerusalem, Water, Economics and Civic Affairs became agenda items under the Permanent Status of Negotiation.

Most Respectfully,
R

The Arab Higher Committee Delegation acting on behave of the Arabs of Palestine, interpreted the creation of any Jewish State in an Arab territory as an act of invasion and aggression. It is an act of wiping out the existence of an Arab country, violating, its integrity, subjecting its land and people to foreign Jewish domination.“​

The Palestinians had the right to oppose that.

They still have the right to oppose that.

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[RoccoR]

P F Tinmore, Hossfly, Challenger, et al,

Do you hear yourself?

The Palestinians had the right to oppose that.

They still have the right to oppose that.

(COMMENT)

Of course the Arab Palestinians have the right to oppose anything they want. And they must accept the consequences and outcomes. This too is part of the "Right of Self-Determination."

HOWEVER, the Arab Palestinians cannot stop, interfere or use force to prevent the Israelis from using their "Right of Self-Determination."

There was no requirement that both must make an acceptance. The Jewish Provisional Government accepted their option and the Arab Higher Committee rejected their option.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

P F Tinmore, Hossfly, Challenger, et al,

Do you hear yourself?

The Palestinians had the right to oppose that.

They still have the right to oppose that.

(COMMENT)

Of course the Arab Palestinians have the right to oppose anything they want. And they must accept the consequences and outcomes. This too is part of the "Right of Self-Determination."

HOWEVER, the Arab Palestinians cannot stop, interfere or use force to prevent the Israelis from using their "Right of Self-Determination."

There was no requirement that both must make an acceptance. The Jewish Provisional Government accepted their option and the Arab Higher Committee rejected their option.

Most Respectfully,
R

Why should the Palestinians accept an option presented by foreigners? The Palestinians have the right to choose their own options.

 

[P F Tinmore]

P F Tinmore, Hossfly, Challenger, et al,

Do you hear yourself?

The Palestinians had the right to oppose that.

They still have the right to oppose that.

(COMMENT)

Of course the Arab Palestinians have the right to oppose anything they want. And they must accept the consequences and outcomes. This too is part of the "Right of Self-Determination."

HOWEVER, the Arab Palestinians cannot stop, interfere or use force to prevent the Israelis from using their "Right of Self-Determination."

There was no requirement that both must make an acceptance. The Jewish Provisional Government accepted their option and the Arab Higher Committee rejected their option.

Most Respectfully,
R

HOWEVER, the Arab Palestinians cannot stop, interfere or use force to prevent the Israelis from using their "Right of Self-Determination."​

On the flipside, Israel cannot interfere in the rights of the Palestinians.

 

[RoccoR]

P F Tinmore, et al,

I'm not sure that they understand what New York did.

(COMMENT)

New York did NOT BlackList the BDS Movement. The BDS movement is still legal in NY.

The State is just divesting themselves from companies and organizations aligned with a Palestinian-backed boycott movement and religious discrimination against the Jewish State of Israel; and the authorized programs in Area "C" (fully approved by the PLO).

Just as it is entirely legal to run a BDS campaign agains the Jewish State of Israel, so to it is legal for NY to establish criteria in the opposite direction, opposing the action. The consequence of doing business.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

P F Tinmore, et al,

I'm not sure that they understand what New York did.

(COMMENT)

New York did NOT BlackList the BDS Movement. The BDS movement is still legal in NY.

The State is just divesting themselves from companies and organizations aligned with a Palestinian-backed boycott movement and religious discrimination against the Jewish State of Israel; and the authorized programs in Area "C" (fully approved by the PLO).

Just as it is entirely legal to run a BDS campaign agains the Jewish State of Israel, so to it is legal for NY to establish criteria in the opposite direction, opposing the action. The consequence of doing business.

Most Respectfully,
R

Indeed, New York is punishing people and companies for having the "wrong" political opinions.

 

[RoccoR]

P F Tinmore, et al,

Is this your circular logic coming back.

P F Tinmore, Hossfly, Challenger, et al,

Do you hear yourself?

The Palestinians had the right to oppose that.

They still have the right to oppose that.

(COMMENT)

Of course the Arab Palestinians have the right to oppose anything they want. And they must accept the consequences and outcomes. This too is part of the "Right of Self-Determination."

HOWEVER, the Arab Palestinians cannot stop, interfere or use force to prevent the Israelis from using their "Right of Self-Determination."

There was no requirement that both must make an acceptance. The Jewish Provisional Government accepted their option and the Arab Higher Committee rejected their option.

Most Respectfully,
R

HOWEVER, the Arab Palestinians cannot stop, interfere or use force to prevent the Israelis from using their "Right of Self-Determination."​

On the flipside, Israel cannot interfere in the rights of the Palestinians.

(COMMENT)

Going around in circles does not address the question. The Jewish Provisional Government acted in accordance with the UN Recommendations. The fact that the Arab League made a failed attempt to take be force the territory, and withhold the establishment of the Jewish National Home set the conditions for certain outcomes. These outcomes had certain consequences that the Arab Palestinians are just going to have to live with.

I'm not sure if the Jewish State of Israel has to do anything at all; assuming the Arab Palestinians continue to set the conditions for eace talks.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[RoccoR]

P F Tinmore, et al,

So, what did I say?

Hossfly, Challenger, et al,

Do you hear yourself?

The Palestinians had the right to oppose that.

They still have the right to oppose that.

(COMMENT)

Of course the Arab Palestinians have the right to oppose anything they want. And they must accept the consequences and outcomes. This too is part of the "Right of Self-Determination."

HOWEVER, the Arab Palestinians cannot stop, interfere or use force to prevent the Israelis from using their "Right of Self-Determination."

There was no requirement that both must make an acceptance. The Jewish Provisional Government accepted their option and the Arab Higher Committee rejected their option.

Most Respectfully,
R

Why should the Palestinians accept an option presented by foreigners? The Palestinians have the right to choose their own options.

(COMMENT)

Read it again. I did not say that the Arab Palestinians had to accept any recommendation. Their reject is a negative form of the "Right to Self-Determination.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[RoccoR]

P F Tinmore, et al,

WOW, is it really.

P F Tinmore, et al,

I'm not sure that they understand what New York did.

(COMMENT)

New York did NOT BlackList the BDS Movement. The BDS movement is still legal in NY.

The State is just divesting themselves from companies and organizations aligned with a Palestinian-backed boycott movement and religious discrimination against the Jewish State of Israel; and the authorized programs in Area "C" (fully approved by the PLO).

Just as it is entirely legal to run a BDS campaign agains the Jewish State of Israel, so to it is legal for NY to establish criteria in the opposite direction, opposing the action. The consequence of doing business.

Most Respectfully,
R

Indeed, New York is punishing people and companies for having the "wrong" political opinions.

(COMMENT)

The State is not issuing a penalty at all.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

P F Tinmore, et al,

Is this your circular logic coming back.

P F Tinmore, Hossfly, Challenger, et al,

Do you hear yourself?

The Palestinians had the right to oppose that.

They still have the right to oppose that.

(COMMENT)

Of course the Arab Palestinians have the right to oppose anything they want. And they must accept the consequences and outcomes. This too is part of the "Right of Self-Determination."

HOWEVER, the Arab Palestinians cannot stop, interfere or use force to prevent the Israelis from using their "Right of Self-Determination."

There was no requirement that both must make an acceptance. The Jewish Provisional Government accepted their option and the Arab Higher Committee rejected their option.

Most Respectfully,
R

HOWEVER, the Arab Palestinians cannot stop, interfere or use force to prevent the Israelis from using their "Right of Self-Determination."​

On the flipside, Israel cannot interfere in the rights of the Palestinians.

(COMMENT)

Going around in circles does not address the question. The Jewish Provisional Government acted in accordance with the UN Recommendations. The fact that the Arab League made a failed attempt to take be force the territory, and withhold the establishment of the Jewish National Home set the conditions for certain outcomes. These outcomes had certain consequences that the Arab Palestinians are just going to have to live with.

I'm not sure if the Jewish State of Israel has to do anything at all; assuming the Arab Palestinians continue to set the conditions for eace talks.

Most Respectfully,
R

The fact that the Arab League made a failed attempt to take be force the territory,​

It is not "the territory," it is Palestine. Using the term "the territory" is purposefully misleading.

 

[P F Tinmore]

P F Tinmore, et al,

WOW, is it really.

P F Tinmore, et al,

I'm not sure that they understand what New York did.

(COMMENT)

New York did NOT BlackList the BDS Movement. The BDS movement is still legal in NY.

The State is just divesting themselves from companies and organizations aligned with a Palestinian-backed boycott movement and religious discrimination against the Jewish State of Israel; and the authorized programs in Area "C" (fully approved by the PLO).

Just as it is entirely legal to run a BDS campaign agains the Jewish State of Israel, so to it is legal for NY to establish criteria in the opposite direction, opposing the action. The consequence of doing business.

Most Respectfully,
R

Indeed, New York is punishing people and companies for having the "wrong" political opinions.

(COMMENT)

The State is not issuing a penalty at all.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Hollie]

P F Tinmore, et al,

Is this your circular logic coming back.

P F Tinmore, Hossfly, Challenger, et al,

Do you hear yourself?

The Palestinians had the right to oppose that.

They still have the right to oppose that.

(COMMENT)

Of course the Arab Palestinians have the right to oppose anything they want. And they must accept the consequences and outcomes. This too is part of the "Right of Self-Determination."

HOWEVER, the Arab Palestinians cannot stop, interfere or use force to prevent the Israelis from using their "Right of Self-Determination."

There was no requirement that both must make an acceptance. The Jewish Provisional Government accepted their option and the Arab Higher Committee rejected their option.

Most Respectfully,
R

HOWEVER, the Arab Palestinians cannot stop, interfere or use force to prevent the Israelis from using their "Right of Self-Determination."​

On the flipside, Israel cannot interfere in the rights of the Palestinians.

(COMMENT)

Going around in circles does not address the question. The Jewish Provisional Government acted in accordance with the UN Recommendations. The fact that the Arab League made a failed attempt to take be force the territory, and withhold the establishment of the Jewish National Home set the conditions for certain outcomes. These outcomes had certain consequences that the Arab Palestinians are just going to have to live with.

I'm not sure if the Jewish State of Israel has to do anything at all; assuming the Arab Palestinians continue to set the conditions for eace talks.

Most Respectfully,
R

The fact that the Arab League made a failed attempt to take be force the territory,​

It is not "the territory," it is Palestine. Using the term "the territory" is purposefully misleading.

You continue your befuddlement. Your mythical Pal'istan was never anything more than a description for a non-defined geographic area: a territory.

Your purpose for deliberately misrepresenting a territory as something it is not now, and never was, is obvious but why carry on such a charade?

 

[Hollie]

P F Tinmore, et al,

WOW, is it really.

P F Tinmore, et al,

I'm not sure that they understand what New York did.

(COMMENT)

New York did NOT BlackList the BDS Movement. The BDS movement is still legal in NY.

The State is just divesting themselves from companies and organizations aligned with a Palestinian-backed boycott movement and religious discrimination against the Jewish State of Israel; and the authorized programs in Area "C" (fully approved by the PLO).

Just as it is entirely legal to run a BDS campaign agains the Jewish State of Israel, so to it is legal for NY to establish criteria in the opposite direction, opposing the action. The consequence of doing business.

Most Respectfully,
R

Indeed, New York is punishing people and companies for having the "wrong" political opinions.

(COMMENT)

The State is not issuing a penalty at all.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Hossfly]

P F Tinmore, et al,

I'm not sure that they understand what New York did.

(COMMENT)

New York did NOT BlackList the BDS Movement. The BDS movement is still legal in NY.

The State is just divesting themselves from companies and organizations aligned with a Palestinian-backed boycott movement and religious discrimination against the Jewish State of Israel; and the authorized programs in Area "C" (fully approved by the PLO).

Just as it is entirely legal to run a BDS campaign agains the Jewish State of Israel, so to it is legal for NY to establish criteria in the opposite direction, opposing the action. The consequence of doing business.

Most Respectfully,
R

Indeed, New York is punishing people and companies for having the "wrong" political opinions.

Tinmore, I'm sending you a new hammer to replace the one you wore out beating yourself on the head.

 

[Phoenall]

P F Tinmore, Hossfly, Challenger, et al,

This description is simply bogus. The New York Governor simply opposed the anti-Semitic and economically targeting of the Jewish State through the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS Process).

Ali Abunimah: NY Governor Blacklists BDS to Defend Israeli Apartheid

Who should know better than someone who actually lived in South Africa?
.

Is Israel an apartheid state? | Opinion

I'd sooner believe Bishop Desmond Tutu, rather than a Zionist apologist.

(COMMENT)

The State of New York simply refuses to cooperate with a belligerent population, unwilling to make peace, that are complaining about Israel and its negotiated outcome that grants almost complete control of Area "C," including security matters and all land-related civil matters, including land allocation, planning and construction, and infrastructure to the Jewish State. The PA is responsible for providing education and medical services to the Palestinian population in Area C. However, construction and maintenance of the infrastructure necessary for these services remains in Israel’s hands. Civil matters remained under Israeli control in Area C and are the responsibility of the Civil Administration.

There is a negotiated and mutually agreed upon

ARTICLE IV Settlement of Differences and Disputes
Israeli-Palestinian Interim Agreement on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip

Any difference relating to the application of this Agreement shall be referred to the appropriate coordination and cooperation mechanism established under this Agreement. The provisions of Article XV of the DOP shall apply to any such difference which is not settled through the appropriate coordination and cooperation mechanism, namely:

1. Disputes arising out of the application or interpretation of this Agreement or any related agreements pertaining to the interim period shall be settled through the Liaison Committee.

2. Disputes which cannot be settled by negotiations may be settled by a mechanism of conciliation to be agreed between the Parties.

3. The Parties may agree to submit to arbitration disputes relating to the interim period, which cannot be settled through conciliation. To this end, upon the agreement of both Parties, the Parties will establish an Arbitration Committee.
​

The intentional opposition to the use of the agreed upon Dispute Resolution Process is a clear and present indication that there is something not quite right here on this matter. In any event, that fact that the agreement does not open this BDS Movement as an alternative to a dispute resolution process, means that the Arab Palestinians have stepped outside the agreement; rather than use the lawful means.

Most Respectfully,
R​

This description is simply bogus. The New York Governor simply opposed the anti-Semitic and economically targeting of the Jewish State through the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS Process).​

Everything is anti-Semitic to those assholes.

Why do the Palestinians single out Israel and target it for BDS?

Israel is the only country occupying Palestine.

Duh!

Is that like everything is anti islam to you asholes who present to satan 5 times a day

Because it is part of their religion to do so, and while the nazi's can wield power they will not be stopped

WRONG as so is Jordan, Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Iran and a whole host of other islamonazi nations that have illegally migrated to the Jewish NATIONal home. Did you forget that International law also works for the Jews and they were given 22% of palestine by the lands legal sovereign owners.


Until you accept the truth you will be for ever consumed with ypur Jew hatreds

 

[Phoenall]

Why do the Palestinians single out Israel and target it for BDS?

Israel is the only country occupying Palestine.

Duh!

Um. The argument isn't against the Palestinians boycotting Israel. Its the international community boycotting Israel. This may come as somewhat of a shock to you -- but even if you believe the "occupation" bullshit -- Israel is NOT the only country occupying a territory.

If occupation is the criteria for boycott, then the international community should be boycotting Iran, Turkey, Morocco, Russia, Armenia, and Ethiopia. And those are just the obvious ones. There are more.

So, the international community CAN NOT support only boycotts against Israel and still claim to be applying criteria equally. Hence the accusation of antisemitism.

If occupation is the criteria for boycott, then the international community should be boycotting Iran, Turkey, Morocco, Russia, Armenia, and Ethiopia. And those are just the obvious ones. There are more.​

BDS is a Palestinian call. None of those countries are occupying Palestine.

Your argument is fake.

Not as fake as your's seeing as the P.A. have banned BDS as being damaging to palestine. It is the nazi's that have got hold of BDS and are using it as a cover for their pogroms, anti semitism, racism and Jew hatreds. That is why it is being banned in more and more nations and is not given any credibility as a result. So showing that it is your argument that is fake and that BDS ahould be made completely illegal by international law and made into a war crime/crime against humanity.

 

[RoccoR]

]P F Tinmore, et al,

You are just so full of crap.

P F Tinmore, et al,

Is this your circular logic coming back.

P F Tinmore, Hossfly, Challenger, et al,

Do you hear yourself?

The Palestinians had the right to oppose that.

They still have the right to oppose that.

(COMMENT)

Of course the Arab Palestinians have the right to oppose anything they want. And they must accept the consequences and outcomes. This too is part of the "Right of Self-Determination."

HOWEVER, the Arab Palestinians cannot stop, interfere or use force to prevent the Israelis from using their "Right of Self-Determination."

There was no requirement that both must make an acceptance. The Jewish Provisional Government accepted their option and the Arab Higher Committee rejected their option.

Most Respectfully,
R

HOWEVER, the Arab Palestinians cannot stop, interfere or use force to prevent the Israelis from using their "Right of Self-Determination."​

On the flipside, Israel cannot interfere in the rights of the Palestinians.

(COMMENT)

Going around in circles does not address the question. The Jewish Provisional Government acted in accordance with the UN Recommendations. The fact that the Arab League made a failed attempt to take be force the territory, and withhold the establishment of the Jewish National Home set the conditions for certain outcomes. These outcomes had certain consequences that the Arab Palestinians are just going to have to live with.

I'm not sure if the Jewish State of Israel has to do anything at all; assuming the Arab Palestinians continue to set the conditions for eace talks.

Most Respectfully,
R

The fact that the Arab League made a failed attempt to take be force the territory,​

It is not "the territory," it is Palestine. Using the term "the territory" is purposefully misleading.

(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinians get this wrong intentionally so that over time, people forget that "Palestine" (with hard boundaries) was defined by the Allied Powers; formally accepted in 1924.

Prior to the Treaty of Sevres, the term Palestine was nothing more than a Regional Name that extended across parts of several political sub-divisions of the Ottoman Empire. Those sub-divisions included the Independent Sanjuk of Jerusalem, the Sanjuk of Baaqa, Sanjuk of Acre, and the Sanjuk of Beriut (which made-up half of the Vilayet of Beriut, --- plus portions of the souther Vilayet of Syria.

In 1920, the region you are referring to was established by The High Contracting Parties agree to entrust, by application of the provisions of Article 22, the administration of Palestine, within such boundaries as may be determined by the Principal Allied Powers, to a Mandatory to be selected by the said Powers.

In 1922, the Order in Council (League of Nations) designated that "the territories to which the Mandate for Palestine applies, hereinafter described as Palestine." ("Palestine" was a short title for the Territory under the Mandate.)

On May 15, 1923, Britain formally recognized the Emirate of Transjordan as a state under the leadership of Emir Abdullah. The Anglo-Trans-Jordan Treaty stipulated that Transjordan would be prepared for independence under the general supervision of the British high commissioner in Jerusalem, and recognized Emir Abdullah as head of state. In May 1925, the Aqaba and Ma’an districts of the Hijaz became part of Transjordan.

By 1988 the UN system designated the Palestine Liberation Organization as "Palestine" in A/RES/43/177 wherein it said: "the designation "Palestine" should be used in place of the designation "Palestine Liberation Organization" in the United Nations system.

However, in 2012 (A/RES/67/19), when the UN "Reaffirmed the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination and to independence in their State of Palestine on the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967." Notice, that the State of Palestine is equated to the territory occupied since 1967.

As you can see, the extent to which the territory was modified was considerable between the time of the Armistice of Mudros and when the transfer of territory from the sovereign Kingdom of the Hijaz was accomplished.

REBUTTAL: I could not agree more, the way you use the term "Palestine" is (sometime intentionally) misleading. I try to keep the terms in context to their meaning or designation.

I realize that what we can write here in this discussion could never compare to the 4 volumes, 2,500 pages, including 1 map box that contain all the details. But in no case, was there a Political Subdivision at anytime in the 20th Century known as "Palestine." Nor did the "Palestinian People have either "Title or Rights" to any sovereign territory.

Most Respectfully,
R​

 

[Phoenall]

P F Tinmore, Hossfly, Challenger, et al,

OH come on now!

This description is simply bogus. The New York Governor simply opposed the anti-Semitic and economically targeting of the Jewish State through the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS Process).​

Everything is anti-Semitic to those assholes.

(COMMENT)

Unlike the other Islamic countries in the world (22 just in the Arab League), Israel is the only Jewish State. It was the Arab Higher Committee Delegation acting on behave of the Arabs of Palestine, that refused to recognize the Balfour Declaration, the Mandate of Palestine or any situation arising or derived therefrom.
The Arab Higher Committee Delegation acting on behave of the Arabs of Palestine, interpreted the creation of any Jewish State in an Arab territory as an act of invasion and aggression. It is an act of wiping out the existence of an Arab country, violating, its integrity, subjecting its land and people to foreign Jewish domination.“

There was no question that before the implementation of A/RES/181(II) and the "Steps Preparatory to Independence," the Arab Higher Committee pronounced that it was the duty of every Arab in Palestine to oppose in every way the partition of that country.

Why do the Palestinians single out Israel and target it for BDS?

(COMMENT)

Israel is the only Jewish State, and accepted the recommendation of the UN Special Committee for Palestine on the establishment of the Jewish State (PLAN OF PARTITION WITH ECONOMIC UNION ---
Part II. - Boundaries --- Section B. THE JEWISH STATE) as adopted by the UN General Assembly.

Israel is the only country occupying Palestine.
Duh!

(COMMENT)

Israel is not the only country to have occupied the territories between 1949 and 1967. In point of fact, at the time the UN acknowledges the proclamation of the State of Palestine by the Palestine National Council on 15 November 1988 (A/RES/43/177) and decided that, effective as of 15 December 1988, the designation
"Palestine" should be used in place of the designation "Palestine Liberation Organization" in the United Nations system, the territory occupied in 1967 was the West Bank (sovereign territory of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan) and the Gaza Strip (controlled by the Egyptian Military Governorship). Israel DID NOT Occupy any territory under the sovereign integrity of the Arab Palestinians in the West Bank or Gaza Strip.

The Arab Palestinians declared independence before negotiating a treaty with the Israelis. Thus it came to pass that the issue of Territory (and border regime), Settlements, Refugees, Security, Jerusalem, Water, Economics and Civic Affairs became agenda items under the Permanent Status of Negotiation.

Most Respectfully,
R

The Arab Higher Committee Delegation acting on behave of the Arabs of Palestine, interpreted the creation of any Jewish State in an Arab territory as an act of invasion and aggression. It is an act of wiping out the existence of an Arab country, violating, its integrity, subjecting its land and people to foreign Jewish domination.“​

The Palestinians had the right to oppose that.

They still have the right to oppose that.

Since when did they have the right to oppose international laws that work in everyone elses's favour then. What treaty gives them this right to invade and steal another nations lands, when they had already been given the lions share ( 99% of the former Ottoman empire ) and agreed to 1% being alloctaed as the Jewish National Home.

They cant pick and choose which laws apply to them and then try to force the ones they dont want on the rest of the world. Time to be hard on muslims and show them that their illegal actions will result in them being treated as the criminals they are. When they have to pay restitution for their collective terroristy attacks or starve then they will see the error of their ways

 

[Phoenall]

NO the minority of extremists and terrorist supporters are and will find themselves out on a limb very shortly. We now have a new P.M. on the UK who will wield her axe on the migrants showing the rest of the world how we will win the war on terror.

Extremists never win the wars, they always lose