Boycott Israel




Bull feathers, Tinmore. Read what this fellow has to say about BDS.




As the Middle East devours itself, leaving behind the worst human devastation since World War II, an international movement seeks to delegitimize Israel, the region's only intact society. Israel alone in the Mideast has an independent judiciary, a free press, universal healthcare and religious freedom. Yet the anti-Israel boycott, divestment and sanctions movement, or BDS, has singled out the Jewish state as the world's most pressing problem in the early 21st century.

BDS is at once immoral and a threat to peace. Immoral, because it perpetuates the lie that Israel is solely or even primarily to blame for the absence of a Palestinian state — rather than the repeated rejection by Palestinian leaders of peace plans presented over the decades. Immoral, too, because it ignores the anti-Israel and anti-Jewish hate education on which generations of Palestinians have been raised, an education that denies any place for a Jewish state in any borders.

The BDS movement not only places the entire onus for the conflict on Israel, it is counter-productive. The primary beneficiary of the attempt to turn Israel into a pariah state is the Israeli hard right. Far-right politicians have long argued that the world hates the Jewish state not because of what it does but because of what it is — and therefore Israel should dispense with the niceties of democratic norms in its war against Palestinian terrorism, end the illusion of a negotiated agreement and stake its maximalist claim to the entirety of its ancient homeland. In intensifying the Israeli public’s sense of siege and despair, while encouraging Palestinian intransigence, the international movement to isolate and punish Israel undermines a two-state solution.

Like a majority of Israelis, I recognize that the ongoing occupation of the Palestinian people is a long-term threat to my country’s well-being. The occupation challenges the integrity of Israeli democracy and threatens its Jewish majority, which is demographically essential for maintaining the only corner of the planet where Jews are sovereign. For these reasons, a majority of Israelis, according to polls, supports a two-state solution.


Why the anti-Israel boycott movement is an immoral threat to peace
 
P F Tinmore, et al,

The implications here suggest that the Arab Palestinian are the victims of restricted liberty and oppression. Nothing could be further from the truth.


(COMMENT)

It is my opinion that the Arab Palestinian, as a state that supports international terrorists, in the open are a people that should be contained as a potential un-rehabilitated threat to peace; based on their past record and history of criminal behaviors.

Most Respectfully,
R
 
P F Tinmore, et al,

The implications here suggest that the Arab Palestinian are the victims of restricted liberty and oppression. Nothing could be further from the truth.

bullshit-meter-011.gif~c200


According to RoccoR all is sweetness and light in Occupied Palestine, no checkpoints, no Apartheid wall, no illegal settlements, no administrative detention, no trigger happy IDF...just one big party...:cuckoo:
 
P F Tinmore, et al,

The implications here suggest that the Arab Palestinian are the victims of restricted liberty and oppression. Nothing could be further from the truth.


(COMMENT)

It is my opinion that the Arab Palestinian, as a state that supports international terrorists, in the open are a people that should be contained as a potential un-rehabilitated threat to peace; based on their past record and history of criminal behaviors.

Most Respectfully,
R


The King of the Bullshitters strikes again.
 
P F Tinmore, et al,

The implications here suggest that the Arab Palestinian are the victims of restricted liberty and oppression. Nothing could be further from the truth.


(COMMENT)

It is my opinion that the Arab Palestinian, as a state that supports international terrorists, in the open are a people that should be contained as a potential un-rehabilitated threat to peace; based on their past record and history of criminal behaviors.

Most Respectfully,
R

You are an old government person. You people think funny like that.
 
P F Tinmore, et al,

The implications here suggest that the Arab Palestinian are the victims of restricted liberty and oppression. Nothing could be further from the truth.

bullshit-meter-011.gif~c200


According to RoccoR all is sweetness and light in Occupied Palestine, no checkpoints, no Apartheid wall, no illegal settlements, no administrative detention, no trigger happy IDF...just one big party...:cuckoo:






Has hamas or fatah erected an aparthied wall then, when did this happen as isreal knows nothing at all about it. How can the settlemente be illegal when they are built on Jewish land, or do you deny the Jews their rights to protection under internaqtional laws ? It is the palestinians that are trigger happy as shown by their firing illegal weapons and killing their own

Once again you show your Jew hatred consuming your ability to be intelligent
 
Ali Abunimah: NY Governor Blacklists BDS to Defend Israeli Apartheid








How about some3 evidence of this alleged Israeli aparthied then, as to date all you have is incidents in the occupied territory that are not seen as aparthied by anyone but islamonazi propaganda morons.


As you have been shown BDS is a racist concept taken over by Jew haters and Nazi's to hide their illegal activity behind, so the worlds nations are making it illegal and arresting those who are behind it. Even the P.A. has banned the group and made them illegal.
 
USA: Pro-Palestine activists march on NY Governor's house over Israel boycott ban








There must be all of 30 people there, and most of those are islamonazi's. It is so laughable that I would be ashamed to present it as evidence of BDS gaining more power.
 
Ali Abunimah: NY Governor Blacklists BDS to Defend Israeli Apartheid


Who should know better than someone who actually lived in South Africa?
.

Is Israel an apartheid state? | Opinion


I'd sooner believe Bishop Desmond Tutu, rather than a Zionist apologist. ;)

The Rev. Hedding would disagree with Tutu. He happened to be a young minister in South Africa who fought Apartheid himself so he certainly is in a position to compare what happened there and what is happening in Israel.

Israel and the Charge of Apartheid
 
P F Tinmore, Hossfly, Challenger, et al,

This description is simply bogus. The New York Governor simply opposed the anti-Semitic and economically targeting of the Jewish State through the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS Process).

Ali Abunimah: NY Governor Blacklists BDS to Defend Israeli Apartheid


Who should know better than someone who actually lived in South Africa?
.

Is Israel an apartheid state? | Opinion


I'd sooner believe Bishop Desmond Tutu, rather than a Zionist apologist. ;)

(COMMENT)

The State of New York simply refuses to cooperate with a belligerent population, unwilling to make peace, that are complaining about Israel and its negotiated outcome that grants almost complete control of Area "C," including security matters and all land-related civil matters, including land allocation, planning and construction, and infrastructure to the Jewish State. The PA is responsible for providing education and medical services to the Palestinian population in Area C. However, construction and maintenance of the infrastructure necessary for these services remains in Israel’s hands. Civil matters remained under Israeli control in Area C and are the responsibility of the Civil Administration.

There is a negotiated and mutually agreed upon

ARTICLE IV Settlement of Differences and Disputes
Israeli-Palestinian Interim Agreement on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip

Any difference relating to the application of this Agreement shall be referred to the appropriate coordination and cooperation mechanism established under this Agreement. The provisions of Article XV of the DOP shall apply to any such difference which is not settled through the appropriate coordination and cooperation mechanism, namely:

1. Disputes arising out of the application or interpretation of this Agreement or any related agreements pertaining to the interim period shall be settled through the Liaison Committee.

2. Disputes which cannot be settled by negotiations may be settled by a mechanism of conciliation to be agreed between the Parties.

3. The Parties may agree to submit to arbitration disputes relating to the interim period, which cannot be settled through conciliation. To this end, upon the agreement of both Parties, the Parties will establish an Arbitration Committee.

The intentional opposition to the use of the agreed upon Dispute Resolution Process is a clear and present indication that there is something not quite right here on this matter. In any event, that fact that the agreement does not open this BDS Movement as an alternative to a dispute resolution process, means that the Arab Palestinians have stepped outside the agreement; rather than use the lawful means.

Most Respectfully,
R​
 
P F Tinmore, Hossfly, Challenger, et al,

This description is simply bogus. The New York Governor simply opposed the anti-Semitic and economically targeting of the Jewish State through the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS Process).

Ali Abunimah: NY Governor Blacklists BDS to Defend Israeli Apartheid


Who should know better than someone who actually lived in South Africa?
.

Is Israel an apartheid state? | Opinion


I'd sooner believe Bishop Desmond Tutu, rather than a Zionist apologist. ;)

(COMMENT)

The State of New York simply refuses to cooperate with a belligerent population, unwilling to make peace, that are complaining about Israel and its negotiated outcome that grants almost complete control of Area "C," including security matters and all land-related civil matters, including land allocation, planning and construction, and infrastructure to the Jewish State. The PA is responsible for providing education and medical services to the Palestinian population in Area C. However, construction and maintenance of the infrastructure necessary for these services remains in Israel’s hands. Civil matters remained under Israeli control in Area C and are the responsibility of the Civil Administration.

There is a negotiated and mutually agreed upon
ARTICLE IV Settlement of Differences and Disputes
Israeli-Palestinian Interim Agreement on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip
Any difference relating to the application of this Agreement shall be referred to the appropriate coordination and cooperation mechanism established under this Agreement. The provisions of Article XV of the DOP shall apply to any such difference which is not settled through the appropriate coordination and cooperation mechanism, namely:

1. Disputes arising out of the application or interpretation of this Agreement or any related agreements pertaining to the interim period shall be settled through the Liaison Committee.

2. Disputes which cannot be settled by negotiations may be settled by a mechanism of conciliation to be agreed between the Parties.

3. The Parties may agree to submit to arbitration disputes relating to the interim period, which cannot be settled through conciliation. To this end, upon the agreement of both Parties, the Parties will establish an Arbitration Committee.
The intentional opposition to the use of the agreed upon Dispute Resolution Process is a clear and present indication that there is something not quite right here on this matter. In any event, that fact that the agreement does not open this BDS Movement as an alternative to a dispute resolution process, means that the Arab Palestinians have stepped outside the agreement; rather than use the lawful means.

Most Respectfully,
R​

This description is simply bogus. The New York Governor simply opposed the anti-Semitic and economically targeting of the Jewish State through the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS Process).​

Everything is anti-Semitic to those assholes.

Why do the Palestinians single out Israel and target it for BDS?

Israel is the only country occupying Palestine.

Duh! :eusa_doh::eusa_doh::eusa_doh:
 
Why do the Palestinians single out Israel and target it for BDS?

Israel is the only country occupying Palestine.

Duh! :eusa_doh::eusa_doh::eusa_doh:

Um. The argument isn't against the Palestinians boycotting Israel. Its the international community boycotting Israel. This may come as somewhat of a shock to you -- but even if you believe the "occupation" bullshit -- Israel is NOT the only country occupying a territory.

If occupation is the criteria for boycott, then the international community should be boycotting Iran, Turkey, Morocco, Russia, Armenia, and Ethiopia. And those are just the obvious ones. There are more.

So, the international community CAN NOT support only boycotts against Israel and still claim to be applying criteria equally. Hence the accusation of antisemitism.
 
Why do the Palestinians single out Israel and target it for BDS?

Israel is the only country occupying Palestine.

Duh! :eusa_doh::eusa_doh::eusa_doh:

Um. The argument isn't against the Palestinians boycotting Israel. Its the international community boycotting Israel. This may come as somewhat of a shock to you -- but even if you believe the "occupation" bullshit -- Israel is NOT the only country occupying a territory.

If occupation is the criteria for boycott, then the international community should be boycotting Iran, Turkey, Morocco, Russia, Armenia, and Ethiopia. And those are just the obvious ones. There are more.

So, the international community CAN NOT support only boycotts against Israel and still claim to be applying criteria equally. Hence the accusation of antisemitism.
If occupation is the criteria for boycott, then the international community should be boycotting Iran, Turkey, Morocco, Russia, Armenia, and Ethiopia. And those are just the obvious ones. There are more.​

BDS is a Palestinian call. None of those countries are occupying Palestine.

Your argument is fake.
 
BDS is a Palestinian call. None of those countries are occupying Palestine.

Your argument is fake.

No, its not. There is nothing special about Palestine or Palestinians where it should receive MORE rights from the international community than other nations who are being occupied do.

Singling out Palestine (or Israel) is discriminatory.
 
P F Tinmore, Hossfly, Challenger, et al,

OH come on now!

This description is simply bogus. The New York Governor simply opposed the anti-Semitic and economically targeting of the Jewish State through the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS Process).​
Everything is anti-Semitic to those assholes.
(COMMENT)

Unlike the other Islamic countries in the world (22 just in the Arab League), Israel is the only Jewish State. It was the Arab Higher Committee Delegation acting on behave of the Arabs of Palestine, that refused to recognize the Balfour Declaration, the Mandate of Palestine or any situation arising or derived therefrom.
The Arab Higher Committee Delegation acting on behave of the Arabs of Palestine, interpreted the creation of any Jewish State in an Arab territory as an act of invasion and aggression. It is an act of wiping out the existence of an Arab country, violating, its integrity, subjecting its land and people to foreign Jewish domination.“

There was no question that before the implementation of A/RES/181(II) and the "Steps Preparatory to Independence," the Arab Higher Committee pronounced that it was the duty of every Arab in Palestine to oppose in every way the partition of that country.

Why do the Palestinians single out Israel and target it for BDS?
(COMMENT)

Israel is the only Jewish State, and accepted the recommendation of the UN Special Committee for Palestine on the establishment of the Jewish State (PLAN OF PARTITION WITH ECONOMIC UNION ---
Part II. - Boundaries --- Section B. THE JEWISH STATE) as adopted by the UN General Assembly.


Israel is the only country occupying Palestine.
Duh! :eusa_doh::eusa_doh::eusa_doh:
(COMMENT)

Israel is not the only country to have occupied the territories between 1949 and 1967. In point of fact, at the time the UN acknowledges the proclamation of the State of Palestine by the Palestine National Council on 15 November 1988 (A/RES/43/177) and decided that, effective as of 15 December 1988, the designation
"Palestine" should be used in place of the designation "Palestine Liberation Organization" in the United Nations system, the territory occupied in 1967 was the West Bank (sovereign territory of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan) and the Gaza Strip (controlled by the Egyptian Military Governorship). Israel DID NOT Occupy any territory under the sovereign integrity of the Arab Palestinians in the West Bank or Gaza Strip.

The Arab Palestinians declared independence before negotiating a treaty with the Israelis. Thus it came to pass that the issue of Territory (and border regime), Settlements, Refugees, Security, Jerusalem, Water, Economics and Civic Affairs became agenda items under the Permanent Status of Negotiation.

Most Respectfully,
R
 

Forum List

Back
Top