Bragg’s Pursuit of Trump Violates the Sixth Amendment

[Mac1958]

Sort of like how:

- It was proved how the FBI defrauded the FISA Court no less than 12 times under Mueller, Comey, and Wray, how the FBI violated both Constitution and law - specifically the Patriot Act, how the FBI illegally spied on Americans, how the FBI admitted it chose to participate in the treason against Trump even after its own internal investigation proved there were no Russian Collusion or crimes committed - BEFORE Mueller was appointed Special Counsel

- FBI Director Comey testified before Congress, telling how a Secretary of State - Hillary Clinton - illegally stole TS/SCI information, stored it on an unauthorized, personal unclassified systems, both transmitted and received classified info on unclassified systems, illegally destroyed classified phones / systems that she claimed she never had, illegally attempted to use a server-wiping app to erase evidence of her crimes, lied to Congress about all of it, and by definition committed Espionage along with a host of other crimes....yet snowflakes continue to lie, deny, and defend this proven criminal POS...

Rep Trey Gowdy rips into FBI Director James Comey on Hillary Clinton's 'intent'

Here's a transcript of Rep. Trey Gowdy grilling FBI Director James Comey two days after he recommended against prosecuting Hillary Clinton.

www.cnbc.com

- It has been proven that SENATOR Biden stole TS/SCI / classified information, spread it around like the 'Johnny Appleseed' of US classified information, and the partisanly weaponized DOJ / FBI continue to protect the proven corrupt, criminal, Constitution & Rule of Law-violating, compromised President...


...all of which is perfectly fine to snowflakes ... as long as they 'GET TRUMP'!


As always, Democrats and snowflakes accuse others of who THEY are and of doing what THEY have done / are dong.

tl;dr, Trumpster talking points. Back to the actual topic.

If Bragg broke the law, go get him.

Go.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Hilarious. The topic is Trump's indictment, period.

So your logic is that the feds passed on indicting Trump for a federal crime, so the state of NY had to indict him on trumped up state charges based on covering up said federal crime. That makes perfect sense, especially if you don't have Covid to deep six him for the 2024 election, this is their 'covid' to try to smear and destroy running up to the 2024 election, the height of election interference. They should all be locked up.

Not "my logic".

The charges are listed in the indictment and the background is provided in the statement of facts.

But here is a hint. If you don't want information about you boinking a porn star while your wife is at home having just given birth with your son, maybe don't boink the porn star.

WW

 

[WEATHER53]

True. You just can't break the law to hide the transaction.



This case has nothing to do with property valuations.

WW

1. No hiding of the transaction is needed because no illegality occurred and you dont have to volunteer anything.
2. Wrong. Most of the Pearl clutching is over him stating a higher value for his properties than assessments or appraisals. provided.

 

[OldFlame]

True. You just can't break the law to hide the transaction.



This case has nothing to do with property valuations.

WW

No wait, you said that these were felony charges because they were done to hide a crime, so clearly paying the ho was not the crime they were supposedly hiding, since paying her was not a crime.

How do you know what it has or has not to do with, you can't state what crime these 34 counts were hiding to raise them to felony charges.

 

[WEATHER53]

He’s hiding a crime or potential future crime he might commit but we don’t have to identify it.
Lib 101

 

[OldFlame]

Not "my logic".

The charges are listed in the indictment and the background is provided in the statement of facts.

But here is a hint. If you don't want information about you boinking a porn star while your wife is at home having just given birth with your son, maybe don't boink the porn star.

WW

It is your logic, what I said has nothing to do with what is or isn't in the indictment. You're claiming that the feds passed on indicting him for a federal crime, while the state had to come up with business records violations to cover up the crime that the feds refused to indict him for. Do you care to ponder why the feds chose not to indict him?

Boinking a porn star has nothing to do with this, nor is it illegal, nor is it a crime to have her sign an NDA and pay her for signing it. If you want talk about morals, start another thread.

 

[Lisa558]

Attorney Mike Davis concurs and labels Bragg’s case as one of the dumbest cases ever. Davis points out that the crimes aren’t identified in the document. Bragg says that he doesn’t have to list the crimes.

• 11 invoices
• 12 vouchers (in February 2017 there were two vouchers)
• 11 checks cut

These are the 34 charges – they are related to 11 transactions. What’s the crime?

Here is a list in the order in which they are listed in the indictment:

Feb 14

1. Invoice- Feb 14
2. Voucher -842457
3. Voucher- 842460
4. Check- 138

March 16-17

1. Invoice- Feb 15
2. Voucher – 846907
3. Check 147

June 19

1. Invoice- April 13
2. Voucher – 858770
3. Check – 2740

May 22

1. Invoice – May 22
2. Voucher- 855331
3. Check – 2700

June 16-19

1. Invoice – June 16
2. Voucher – 858772
3. Check – 2741

July 11

1. Invoice- July 11
2. Voucher – 861097
3. Check – 2781

Aug 1

1. Invoice – Aug 1
2. Voucher- 863641
3. Check- 2821

Sep 11

1. Invoice – Sep 11
2. Voucher – 868174
3. Check – 2908

Oct 18

1. Invoice – Oct 18
2. Voucher – 872654
3. Check – 2944

Nov 20

1. Invoice – Nov 20
2. Voucher – 876511
3. Check – 2980

Dec 1

1. Invoice – Dec 1
2. Voucher – 877785
3. Check – 3006

Many of these transactions appear to be monthly recurring fees being paid perhaps as a retainer? We just don’t know from the filing.

We also don’t know what the amounts are on these individual transactions.

But most notable is that the transactions are from 2017. This was when President Trump was in office and his sons were running his company. President Trump had nothing to do with these transactions.

These transactions also somehow impacted the 2016 election – but they were made in 2017?


*****Like Voter rolls....just get any name on the list. We'll take it from there. Just file any charges. The MSM will take if from there.

It’s obvious to all thinking Americans* that this a big nothing, and intended to make Trump appear guilty of multiple, serious crimes - when he did nothing illegal at all.

*unfortunately, we need a majority.

(Paraphrase of old Adlai Stephenson joke.)

 

[g5000]

David Dennison wet his tiny willie in the rancid pussy of a pornographic actress while his trophy prostitute was at home nursing his newborn son.

He also dipped his short wick in the birth canal of a Playboy model.

A media outlet run by his personal friend spent their own money to cover up the Playboy dalliance in order to influence the pending election. Dennison's fixer spent his own money covering up the porno star affair in order to influence the pending election, thereby making an illegal in-kind contribution to the candidate's campaign. A crime for which he went to prison.

David Dennison then repaid the fixer in $35,000 installments and falsely entered those repayments in his ledgers as a retainer.

It is very simple to understand IF YOU WANT TO. Or you can be an obtuse idiot like Vinny Barbarino.

What?...Where?

 

[easyt65]

tl;dr, Trumpster talking points. Back to the actual topic.

Not surprising, every time these FACTS have been brought up in the last decade you criminal Democrat sac-lickers / apologists throw out a 'one liner' attempting to avoid discussong them and run away.

Time and time again you prove my point:

Snowflakes do not care how many times Democrats violate the Constitution, violate the Rule of Law, or betray this country - as long as doing so helps them to 'Get Trump'.

Thanks for the visual demonstration.

 

[Mac1958]

Not surprising, every time these FACTS have been brought up in the last decade you criminal Democrat sac-lickers / apologists throw out a 'one liner' attempting to avoid discussong them and run away.

Time and time again you prove my point:

Snowflakes do not care how many times Democrats violate the Constitution, violate the Rule of Law, or betray this country - as long as doing so helps them to 'Get Trump'.

Thanks for the visual demonstration.

Go get him. Go. Do it.

You can't get me on the defensive, sorry. If he broke the law, nail him. And over something this big, nail him good.

I'm not a sheep. I'm not like you. Thankfully.

 

[easyt65]

You can't get me on the defensive, sorry.

You already are - your last post undeniably proves that.

 

[Mac1958]

You already are - your last post undeniably proves that.

Quit bitching like an old Karen at a Wal Mart and go get him.

Man up. Go.

 

[WorldWatcher]

No wait, you said that these were felony charges because they were done to hide a crime, so clearly paying the ho was not the crime they were supposedly hiding, since paying her was not a crime.

I never said paying the porn star was a crime. The method they used to pay it was illegal.

How do you know what it has or has not to do with, you can't state what crime these 34 counts were hiding to raise them to felony charges.

I did state the crime. They are tied to aiding and/or concealing Cohen's crimes.

WW

 

[Nostra]

You sound like a fucking moron here.

Anyone who lays out the board Dimtard batshit crazy spin would sound like a moron, Moron.

 

[Nostra]

He’s hiding a crime or potential future crime he might commit but we don’t have to identify it.
Lib 101

That pesky Constitution will get in their way again.

 

[easyt65]

Quit bitching like an old Karen at a Wal Mart and go get him.

You mad, bro? Just because I pointed out facts that made you hike up your skirt and run for cover, as usual, AGAIN?!

Your attempt to 'macho up' after that and continue to try to distract from those facts is cute ... pathetic, but cute.

 

[WorldWatcher]

It is your logic, what I said has nothing to do with what is or isn't in the indictment. You're claiming that the feds passed on indicting him for a federal crime, while the state had to come up with business records violations to cover up the crime that the feds refused to indict him for. Do you care to ponder why the feds chose not to indict him?

:sigh:

Now you are being weird. The charges the state filed have nothing to do with the Fed's charging or not charging him. The State crimes have to do with aiding and/or concealing Cohen's crimes.

Boinking a porn star has nothing to do with this, nor is it illegal, nor is it a crime to have her sign an NDA and pay her for signing it. If you want talk about morals, start another thread.

Correct, boinking the porn star really isn't part of the crime itself (although it goes to motivation as to why Trump, Cohen, Pecker and Weisselberg (sp?) conspired to make illegal financial arrangements.)

WW

 

[Mac1958]

You mad, bro? Just because I pointed out facts that made you hike up your skirt and run for cover, as usual, AGAIN?!

Your attempt to 'macho up' after that and continue to try to distract from those facts is cute ... pathetic, but cute.

Yeah, I didn't think so

<flick>

 

[OldFlame]

I never said paying the porn star was a crime. The method they used to pay it was illegal.



I did state the crime. They are tied to aiding and/or concealing Cohen's crimes.

WW

What method did they use that made it illegal?

 

[easyt65]

I never said paying the porn star was a crime. The method they used to pay it was illegal.

Ummm....actually Cohen is the one who paid Daniels...

....then Trump paid Cohen ... now Daniels is paying Trump.



Who is paying Bragg?