Bragg’s Pursuit of Trump Violates the Sixth Amendment

[OldFlame]

The Fed's did charge Cohen and listed Trump (Individual 1) as the unindicted co-conspirator.

It's up to the Local DA to charge based on State law.

WW

Oh, so the feds just passed on indicting Trump?

 

[OldFlame]

That's what it is. You can shove everything right in their face, and they won't see a thing.

Oh, the irony.

 

[Lisa558]

ah. another legal expert.

You don’t have to be a legal expert to know that you have a right to know what crime you’re charged with.

 

[L.K.Eder]

You don’t have to be a legal expert to know that you have a right to know what crime you’re charged with.

oh. he knows.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Yet no trump indictment right? What changed

Trump was indicted yesterday.

WW

 

[WorldWatcher]

Another lib admitting Bragg is using a law he has no jurisdiction to use.

DA Bragg is fully empowered to charge under New York State Law, that's what Manhattan District Attorney's do.

The indictment is based on 175.10 Falsifying Business Records (in the First Degree) under New York State Penal Code.

WW

 

[WorldWatcher]

What state law is the underlying crime?

Section 175.10 does not require that the crime that was being aided or conceal be a State Crime.

WW

 

[WorldWatcher]

Oh, so the feds just passed on indicting Trump?

The Fed's had no jurisdiction to charge Trump under New York State law.

WW

 

[366h34d]

You are seriously confused. Trump is charged with falsifying business records, IN THE FIRST DEGREE. That is a felony. The crimes in which he had an intent to cover up are three.

1. Violation of state law, attempting to improperly influence an election
2. Avoiding taxes.
3. Violation of federal campaign laws, the one Cohen pled guilty to.

The felony upgrade to his misdemeanor charge does not have to involve a crime he was a party to, it only involves the "cover-up" of that crime. Number one is a long shot, number three is tenuous at best, but number two is dead on and will be the downfall of Trump.

As do the SOL argument, Trump's lawyers may attempt that defense but the state will argue that the SOL was tolled due to the time Trump was outside the state.

Which crime did he name? 1 and 3 are none of Bragg's business. 2 is a joke.

That law that I understand is not used for this type of situation. It uses for crimes that do not commit.

 

[OldFlame]

The Fed's had no jurisdiction to charge Trump under New York State law.

WW

No shit, sherlock. They did under their federal jurisdiction, exactly like they did with Cohen, they chose not to.

 

[OldFlame]

DA Bragg is fully empowered to charge under New York State Law, that's what Manhattan District Attorney's do.

The indictment is based on 175.10 Falsifying Business Records (in the First Degree) under New York State Penal Code.

WW

The feds were fully empowered to to indict as well, they chose not to. No matter how many times you try to subvert the topic, that's a fact.

 

[WorldWatcher]

The feds were fully empowered to to indict as well, they chose not to. No matter how many times you try to subvert the topic, that's a fact.

The topic is Trumps indictment under state law.

WW

 

[Marener]

The YOU cite it.

Give me one good reason why I should bother when you’ve proven yourself to be nothing but a troll?

 

[WEATHER53]

You can pay a consenting adult to not review intimate details
Get a commercial appraiser to comment here so all you Nancy’s squawking about “deliberate overestimation” by Trump will be put in your places.

 

[OldFlame]

The topic is Trumps indictment under state law.

WW

Hilarious. The topic is Trump's indictment, period.

So your logic is that the feds passed on indicting Trump for a federal crime, so the state of NY had to indict him on trumped up state charges based on covering up said federal crime. That makes perfect sense, especially if you don't have Covid to deep six him for the 2024 election, this is their 'covid' to try to smear and destroy running up to the 2024 election, the height of election interference. They should all be locked up.

 

[WEATHER53]

I think they are actually claiming that most of this stems from what Trump might have done down the road and thus it’s a justified “preemption”

 

[OldFlame]

Give me one good reason why I should bother when you’ve proven yourself to be nothing but a troll?

The irony is thick today!!

 

[easyt65]

That's what it is. You can shove everything right in their face, and they won't see a thing.

Sort of like how:

- It was proved how the FBI defrauded the FISA Court no less than 12 times under Mueller, Comey, and Wray, how the FBI violated both Constitution and law - specifically the Patriot Act, how the FBI illegally spied on Americans, how the FBI admitted it chose to participate in the treason against Trump even after its own internal investigation proved there were no Russian Collusion or crimes committed - BEFORE Mueller was appointed Special Counsel

- FBI Director Comey testified before Congress, telling how a Secretary of State - Hillary Clinton - illegally stole TS/SCI information, stored it on an unauthorized, personal unclassified systems, both transmitted and received classified info on unclassified systems, illegally destroyed classified phones / systems that she claimed she never had, illegally attempted to use a server-wiping app to erase evidence of her crimes, lied to Congress about all of it, and by definition committed Espionage along with a host of other crimes....yet snowflakes continue to lie, deny, and defend this proven criminal POS...

Rep Trey Gowdy rips into FBI Director James Comey on Hillary Clinton's 'intent'

Here's a transcript of Rep. Trey Gowdy grilling FBI Director James Comey two days after he recommended against prosecuting Hillary Clinton.

www.cnbc.com

- It has been proven that SENATOR Biden stole TS/SCI / classified information, spread it around like the 'Johnny Appleseed' of US classified information, and the partisanly weaponized DOJ / FBI continue to protect the proven corrupt, criminal, Constitution & Rule of Law-violating, compromised President...


...all of which is perfectly fine to snowflakes ... as long as they 'GET TRUMP'!


As always, Democrats and snowflakes accuse others of who THEY are and of doing what THEY have done / are dong.

 

[WorldWatcher]

You can pay a consenting adult to not review intimate details

True. You just can't break the law to hide the transaction.

Get a commercial appraiser to comment here so all you Nancy’s squawking about “deliberate overestimation” will be put in your places.

This case has nothing to do with property valuations.

WW

 

[leftwinger]

Attorney Mike Davis concurs and labels Bragg’s case as one of the dumbest cases ever. Davis points out that the crimes aren’t identified in the document. Bragg says that he doesn’t have to list the crimes.

• 11 invoices
• 12 vouchers (in February 2017 there were two vouchers)
• 11 checks cut

These are the 34 charges – they are related to 11 transactions. What’s the crime?

Here is a list in the order in which they are listed in the indictment:

Feb 14

1. Invoice- Feb 14
2. Voucher -842457
3. Voucher- 842460
4. Check- 138

March 16-17

1. Invoice- Feb 15
2. Voucher – 846907
3. Check 147

June 19

1. Invoice- April 13
2. Voucher – 858770
3. Check – 2740

May 22

1. Invoice – May 22
2. Voucher- 855331
3. Check – 2700

June 16-19

1. Invoice – June 16
2. Voucher – 858772
3. Check – 2741

July 11

1. Invoice- July 11
2. Voucher – 861097
3. Check – 2781

Aug 1

1. Invoice – Aug 1
2. Voucher- 863641
3. Check- 2821

Sep 11

1. Invoice – Sep 11
2. Voucher – 868174
3. Check – 2908

Oct 18

1. Invoice – Oct 18
2. Voucher – 872654
3. Check – 2944

Nov 20

1. Invoice – Nov 20
2. Voucher – 876511
3. Check – 2980

Dec 1

1. Invoice – Dec 1
2. Voucher – 877785
3. Check – 3006

Many of these transactions appear to be monthly recurring fees being paid perhaps as a retainer? We just don’t know from the filing.

We also don’t know what the amounts are on these individual transactions.

But most notable is that the transactions are from 2017. This was when President Trump was in office and his sons were running his company. President Trump had nothing to do with these transactions.

These transactions also somehow impacted the 2016 election – but they were made in 2017?


*****Like Voter rolls....just get any name on the list. We'll take it from there. Just file any charges. The MSM will take if from there.