Bragg’s Pursuit of Trump Violates the Sixth Amendment

[OldFlame]

:sigh:

Now you are being weird. The charges the state filed have nothing to do with the Fed's charging or not charging him. The State crimes have to do with aiding and/or concealing Cohen's crimes.



Correct, boinking the porn star really isn't part of the crime itself (although it goes to motivation as to why Trump, Cohen, Pecker and Weisselberg (sp?) conspired to make illegal financial arrangements.)

WW

I noticed you avoided pondering why the feds just didn't charge him to begin with, why didn't they charge him?

How were the financial arrangements illegal?

 

[Marener]

Anyone who lays out the board Dimtard batshit crazy spin would sound like a moron, Moron.

All you ever do is say what you’re told to say no matter how stupid it sounds.

And when people explain to you how stupid it is, you double down.

 

[WEATHER53]

I never said paying the porn star was a crime. The method they used to pay it was illegal.



I did state the crime. They are tied to aiding and/or concealing Cohen's crimes.

WW

So it’s not what Trump did but rather someone else?????
You are aGold member that I don’t recognize so some type of newbie summoning occurred.

 

[easyt65]

I noticed you avoided pondering why the feds just didn't charge him to begin with, why didn't they charge him?

How were the financial arrangements illegal?

The feds declared 'there is no crime to pursue'....meaning Bragg is smarter than Garland?!

Perhaps Biden should nominate Bragg for the USSC ... Or at least put him at the top of his list?!

 

[WorldWatcher]

What method did they use that made it illegal?

Read the indictment and statement of facts.

Keep sealioning and that will be the answer you get. The logic is clearly spelled out there.

(Whether that logic convinces a jury will be determined later.)

WW

 

[WorldWatcher]

So it’s not what Trump did but rather someone else?????
You are aGold member that I don’t recognize so some type of newbie summoning occurred.

Please try again in English.

WW

 

[easyt65]

Read the indictment and statement of facts.

Keep sealioning and that will be the answer you get. The logic is clearly spelled out there.

(Whether that logic convinces a jury will be determined later.)

WW

It is the duty of the DA to explain / list the charges against the accused at the arraignment.

As legal experts have opined, Bragg seriously failed to do so.

 

[Nostra]

All you ever do is say what you’re told to say no matter how stupid it sounds.

And when people explain to you how stupid it is, you double down.

Who told me to say that?

Be specific and bring evidence, Simp.

 

[WEATHER53]

Read the indictment and statement of facts.

Keep sealioning and that will be the answer you get. The logic is clearly spelled out there.

(Whether that logic convinces a jury will be determined later.)

WW

No specification and essentially no actually occurred crime that he committed but rather what he tried to do or may have done later.

 

[Marener]

I noticed you avoided pondering why the feds just didn't charge him to begin with, why didn't they charge him?

The Republican commissioners at the FEC stopped any further investigation into Trump even after their office of general counsel found reason to believe that Trump violated the law.

FEC drops investigation into Trump hush money payments

The Federal Elections Commission (FEC) has closed its investigation into whether former President Trump illegally made hush money payments to women prior to the 2016 election. The FEC vot…

thehill.com

 

[OldFlame]

The feds declared 'there is no crime to pursue'....meaning Bragg is smarter than Garland?!

Perhaps Biden should nominate Bragg for the USSC ... Or at least put him at the top of his list?!

I agree, WW just wants to sweep that part under the rug and only focus on the state charges.... while not caring that the state charges are only felony charges because of the fed charges.. the state charges rely on those supposed federal crimes to be considered felonies. But let's conveniently ignore that the feds chose not to indict him.

 

[WEATHER53]

Please try again in English.

WW

It’s English . Impact dodge noted and defeated

 

[Marener]

Who told me to say that?

Be specific and bring evidence, Simp.

You’re here every day spout the Republican media mantra.

Every day.

Like today when you’re claiming that Trump has nothing to do with paying off Stormy Daniels. You are the dumbest person alive if you think that.

 

[easyt65]

No specification and essentially no actually occurred crime that he committed but rather what he tried to do or may have done later.

Dems have their man ... its just after 7 years they are still searching for a crime.

 

[AsherN]

Well dum dum, that law specifically says you can only be found guilty if you falsified specific documents AND intended to commit another crime.

What documents were fraudulent?
What other crime was he intending to do?

https://nycourts.gov/judges/cji/2-PenalLaw/175/175.10.pdf

No, the law said if you falsified business documents with intent to conceal a crime. Does not have to be your crime.

 

[CowboyTed]

What is his crime? None of you anti-Trump cultists can tell us.

Get serious...

Bragg has listed 30 charges against Trump which he is willing to goto court and prove...

You stated here that 'Bragg should be disbarred' without any evidence of a crime committed by Bragg...

This is you problem, in your mind no amount of proof or evidence can prove Trump guilty while Democrats have to prove their innocence.

This thread is telling nothing about Trump or Bragg, but tells us about you..

 

[Nostra]

You’re here every day spout the Republican media mantra.

Every day.

Like today when you’re claiming that Trump has nothing to do with paying off Stormy Daniels. You are the dumbest person alive if you think that.

So you have nothing.

Dismissed, Simp.

 

[WorldWatcher]

I noticed you avoided pondering why the feds just didn't charge him to begin with, why didn't they charge him?

The Fed's charging Trump are irrelevant to charges under State Criminal Code.

You will have to research yourself on why the FEC didn't charge him.

How were the financial arrangements illegal?

Cohen criminally charged and convicted on Federal Campaign Finance laws.

Conspiracy for Trump, Pecker, Weisslberg (Sp?), and Cohen for Cohen to make the payment through a shell company, then improper invoicing as "legal fees" the repayment.

There may be an aspect to tax law involved (which I'm no expert in), but the "Legal Fees" would be tax deductable for the Trump Organization as an expense, however "porn star payments" would not. So if the money was invoice (see Statement of Facts) improperly as legal fees which would normally be tax deductible, but were not. Then the Trump Org deducted as operating expenses items which did not qualify. That would be tax fraud.

WW

 

[OldFlame]

The Republican commissioners at the FEC stopped any further investigation into Trump even after their office of general counsel found reason to believe that Trump violated the law.

FEC drops investigation into Trump hush money payments

The Federal Elections Commission (FEC) has closed its investigation into whether former President Trump illegally made hush money payments to women prior to the 2016 election. The FEC vot…

thehill.com

Oh, so since they were reps, they chose to let him go.... I see...

 

[WEATHER53]

I agree, WW just wants to sweep that part under the rug and only focus on the state charges.... while not caring that the state charges are only felony charges because of the fed charges.. the state charges rely on those supposed federal crimes to be considered felonies. But let's conveniently ignore that the feds chose not to indict him.

They still maintain Muller deckaredTrump guilty. TDS is Extremely Delusional on its sufferers