Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They've got Trumpsters foaming at the mouth with their talk of the "invaders".yeah......these guys are the ones that have been calling for impeachment and blood in the streets. Not Democrats and their corrupt media friends.Agreed.I think someone is putting these kids up to it just like they do in the Middle-East.
Obama releasing what is now known as a poorly made up birth certificate only fuels the speculation.
You cannot condemn leftists for going Full Retard over Trump and be or rationalize being a birther because it’s the exact same psychological state.
Yeah i can. There is a reason he released a fradulent certificate and it is fradulent. The question begs is why.
Couple that with refusal to release college records and the answer will be found
It’s the same thing because you believe an improbable conspiracy based on thin reeds of speculation and easily refutable questions because of your political affiliation and ideology.
It’s all the same. “X President is bad and I hate him and I’ll believe almost anything about him that’s bad no matter how improbable and outlandish.” It doesn’t matter who the President is or his political opponents are. Birthers are no different than people affiliated with TDS. ODS and TDS are the same psychological state. Only highly partisan people can’t see the difference.
Okay but Conspiracy Theories are usually built on a bedrock that's not so cospiracy-y ...??? (heh) And in this case, that bedrock is the media did not look into Obama. At all. He did not only get a pass, he got fawning fangirl coverage. So yeah, REAL questions about his college records, about his shady associations. That leads to rampant speculation, some of which was shady itself.
Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater, as they say. The "baby" in this case is totally legit. The media neglected their sole function. The "bathwater"--the birth cert--eh, I can grant that was a little shady. But it wasn't built on nothin'.
There was a lot of the media - the right wing media - that fanned the birfer argument. That’s how 13+ states had birther bills introduced. You’re focusing only on what you call the MSM. But most of Trump’s base get their news and form their opinions outside of the MSM and from other news sources.
Point out where I say the point is that you only blamed the media. You're grasping at straws here, Ice. Have another cup of coffee.Point out where I say the media is the only area to blame please.The reason I was disappointed was because you did EXACTLY that-- immediately you assigned blame. To the media. And I fail to see how.That's my point. They put people in a no win tsituation then attack them for it.I am not about to say what someone who was there should have done while I sit in the safety of my own home.So what?
He had no obligation to seek out the shooter he did the right thing and got his kids out.
Shit the cops don't even have to respond to a call for aid why the hell should a civilian?
People here say that civilians shouldn't have guns because they shouldn't be playing cop then when a gun owner doesn't play cop they criticize him for it
Oldlady said people don't mass kill with knives. I showed a few who did just that. Ignored. I don't say what she wanted or expected to hear, she's disappointed in my response.
I'll survive.
But we are not going to fix this when our sole focus is to assign blame to the other side and defend our own.
They've got Trumpsters foaming at the mouth with their talk of the "invaders".yeah......these guys are the ones that have been calling for impeachment and blood in the streets. Not Democrats and their corrupt media friends.Agreed.I think someone is putting these kids up to it just like they do in the Middle-East.
Is this the "civil war" you guys keep threatening?
.
Yes, I've read it. It reads like a Trumpster emoting on USMB after listening to Mark Levin.They've got Trumpsters foaming at the mouth with their talk of the "invaders".yeah......these guys are the ones that have been calling for impeachment and blood in the streets. Not Democrats and their corrupt media friends.Agreed.I think someone is putting these kids up to it just like they do in the Middle-East.
Is this the "civil war" you guys keep threatening?
.
Have you read his manifesto? Full of Progressive talking points. He wasn't a "trumpster" and made that clear.
Yes, I've read it. It reads like a Trumpster emoting on USMB after listening to Mark Levin.They've got Trumpsters foaming at the mouth with their talk of the "invaders".yeah......these guys are the ones that have been calling for impeachment and blood in the streets. Not Democrats and their corrupt media friends.Agreed.I think someone is putting these kids up to it just like they do in the Middle-East.
Is this the "civil war" you guys keep threatening?
.
Have you read his manifesto? Full of Progressive talking points. He wasn't a "trumpster" and made that clear.
.
"Invaders" are our enemies. Look it up if you don't believe me.I'll say it one more time, and then I'm done arguing about it with you, since you refuse to address my point:The media fanned the flames that ignited Patrick Crusius? The media has been calling the Hispanics at the border "invaders?" Breitbart, maybe, or Fox, so yeah.People by and large do as told or told to believe.FWIW I hold the media absolutely accountable for a large part of this.
Two and a half years spent on the particulars of not only what was a NON-story, but a lie. "Russian Collusion"....nothing. Meanwhile, our society is on fire. Ask any teacher. Ask any nurse, any police officer. There are REAL problems out there that festered and festered because our incompetent media was obsessed with Palace Intrigue.
They are shameless.
Look who's doing the telling. It's quite telling. The media fans the flames of the hate parade and crys freedom of press when accountability comes calling.
I'll answer. They ARE invaders. That's what they are. You're word-monitoring. It's like saying we can't call them illegal aliens anymore; that's "mean". Okay, whatever--that's what they are. They are busting in uninvited. That's literally the definition of an "invasion".
Calling them "invaders" does not make some nasty, pernicious, violent mass murderer. That happens in a separate type of situation that is heinous.
But don't be word-monitoring us and telling us this caused El Paso. How illiberal of you.
we have to stop turning them into enemy combatants in our speech. No one needs to love them or even welcome them. They just need to tone it down.
Okay I would agree if anyone were calling them "ENEMIES"....(like they actually call Trump btw)
But they don't. They call them invaders, which is correct terminology.
OldLady I think you don't argue with me when you know you're losing the argument.
Do you call the Muslim terrorists "nuts?" Don't you agree that they are ideologically driven? Why do white guys get a pass?El Paso Terrorist Is a Hardcore Progressive and White Nationalist: Wants Universal Income And Universal Healthcare
-wanted universal healthcare
-climate change nut
-population control thoughts
-w-wanted universal income
-anti corporation
(A liberal nut indeed. Someone posted that he was a bernie supporter. You liberals are responsible for his path to terrorist)
He wasn’t shooting up a WalMart because of global warming or universal healthcare.
I doubt we'll ever know why he did other than he's nuts. You have to be to do this
"Invaders" are our enemies. Look it up if you don't believe me.I'll say it one more time, and then I'm done arguing about it with you, since you refuse to address my point:The media fanned the flames that ignited Patrick Crusius? The media has been calling the Hispanics at the border "invaders?" Breitbart, maybe, or Fox, so yeah.People by and large do as told or told to believe.
Look who's doing the telling. It's quite telling. The media fans the flames of the hate parade and crys freedom of press when accountability comes calling.
I'll answer. They ARE invaders. That's what they are. You're word-monitoring. It's like saying we can't call them illegal aliens anymore; that's "mean". Okay, whatever--that's what they are. They are busting in uninvited. That's literally the definition of an "invasion".
Calling them "invaders" does not make some nasty, pernicious, violent mass murderer. That happens in a separate type of situation that is heinous.
But don't be word-monitoring us and telling us this caused El Paso. How illiberal of you.
we have to stop turning them into enemy combatants in our speech. No one needs to love them or even welcome them. They just need to tone it down.
Okay I would agree if anyone were calling them "ENEMIES"....(like they actually call Trump btw)
But they don't. They call them invaders, which is correct terminology.
OldLady I think you don't argue with me when you know you're losing the argument.
The amount you're ignoring is breathtaking.Yes, I've read it. It reads like a Trumpster emoting on USMB after listening to Mark Levin.They've got Trumpsters foaming at the mouth with their talk of the "invaders".yeah......these guys are the ones that have been calling for impeachment and blood in the streets. Not Democrats and their corrupt media friends.Agreed.
Is this the "civil war" you guys keep threatening?
.
Have you read his manifesto? Full of Progressive talking points. He wasn't a "trumpster" and made that clear.
.
Yeah? Universal health care?
Universal income?
You're not objective Mac but we knew this
You cannot condemn leftists for going Full Retard over Trump and be or rationalize being a birther because it’s the exact same psychological state.
Yeah i can. There is a reason he released a fradulent certificate and it is fradulent. The question begs is why.
Couple that with refusal to release college records and the answer will be found
It’s the same thing because you believe an improbable conspiracy based on thin reeds of speculation and easily refutable questions because of your political affiliation and ideology.
It’s all the same. “X President is bad and I hate him and I’ll believe almost anything about him that’s bad no matter how improbable and outlandish.” It doesn’t matter who the President is or his political opponents are. Birthers are no different than people affiliated with TDS. ODS and TDS are the same psychological state. Only highly partisan people can’t see the difference.
I believe Obama is covering something up. You keep skipping over HE released a fradulent b/c. Why?
You’re demonstrating what I mean.
He didn’t release a fraudulent birth certificate. But you believe he did because you don’t like Obama and rely on news sources to reaffirm your views.
Yeah he did. The piece of crap was created on Adobe software. Adobe wasnt even in existence until 1982. Explain that. If not leave me alone
Might be safer to stay in Mexico
WALMART SHOOTER MANIFESTOAuthorities are examining a four-page document that several media outlets are calling a manifesto. Authorities are trying to determine the document’s authenticity and whether there are ties to the suspect.
Has anyone uncovered a copy of the manifesto?
Yeah i can. There is a reason he released a fradulent certificate and it is fradulent. The question begs is why.
Couple that with refusal to release college records and the answer will be found
It’s the same thing because you believe an improbable conspiracy based on thin reeds of speculation and easily refutable questions because of your political affiliation and ideology.
It’s all the same. “X President is bad and I hate him and I’ll believe almost anything about him that’s bad no matter how improbable and outlandish.” It doesn’t matter who the President is or his political opponents are. Birthers are no different than people affiliated with TDS. ODS and TDS are the same psychological state. Only highly partisan people can’t see the difference.
I believe Obama is covering something up. You keep skipping over HE released a fradulent b/c. Why?
You’re demonstrating what I mean.
He didn’t release a fraudulent birth certificate. But you believe he did because you don’t like Obama and rely on news sources to reaffirm your views.
Yeah he did. The piece of crap was created on Adobe software. Adobe wasnt even in existence until 1982. Explain that. If not leave me alone
No he did not.
You are believing nonsense from highly biased partisan news sites that slant or make up news to advance a political agenda, a political agenda that you agree with.
It’s no different than a liberal believing Trump was urinated on by a hooker in a Moscow hotel.
And it doesn’t matter what I post to refute what you said because you won’t believe it.
Yes, I've read it. It reads like a Trumpster emoting on USMB after listening to Mark Levin.They've got Trumpsters foaming at the mouth with their talk of the "invaders".yeah......these guys are the ones that have been calling for impeachment and blood in the streets. Not Democrats and their corrupt media friends.Agreed.I think someone is putting these kids up to it just like they do in the Middle-East.
Is this the "civil war" you guys keep threatening?
.
Have you read his manifesto? Full of Progressive talking points. He wasn't a "trumpster" and made that clear.
.
They've got Trumpsters foaming at the mouth with their talk of the "invaders".yeah......these guys are the ones that have been calling for impeachment and blood in the streets. Not Democrats and their corrupt media friends.Agreed.I think someone is putting these kids up to it just like they do in the Middle-East.
Is this the "civil war" you guys keep threatening?
.
Have you read his manifesto? Full of Progressive talking points. He wasn't a "trumpster" and made that clear.
It’s the same thing because you believe an improbable conspiracy based on thin reeds of speculation and easily refutable questions because of your political affiliation and ideology.
It’s all the same. “X President is bad and I hate him and I’ll believe almost anything about him that’s bad no matter how improbable and outlandish.” It doesn’t matter who the President is or his political opponents are. Birthers are no different than people affiliated with TDS. ODS and TDS are the same psychological state. Only highly partisan people can’t see the difference.
I believe Obama is covering something up. You keep skipping over HE released a fradulent b/c. Why?
You’re demonstrating what I mean.
He didn’t release a fraudulent birth certificate. But you believe he did because you don’t like Obama and rely on news sources to reaffirm your views.
Yeah he did. The piece of crap was created on Adobe software. Adobe wasnt even in existence until 1982. Explain that. If not leave me alone
No he did not.
You are believing nonsense from highly biased partisan news sites that slant or make up news to advance a political agenda, a political agenda that you agree with.
It’s no different than a liberal believing Trump was urinated on by a hooker in a Moscow hotel.
And it doesn’t matter what I post to refute what you said because you won’t believe it.
Yeah he did. Because you claim he didn't means nothing. There is no way that crap was his original certificate. It's impossible to have been done on Adobe software in the 60s. Impossible.
Fact
Might be safer to stay in Mexico
You can stay at your girlfriend’s parents.
