Sun Devil 92
Diamond Member
- Apr 2, 2015
- 32,078
- 11,094
More TRUTHFUL meme's!
What did they reveal that was so awful ?
Was any of it on par with Dumb Donald's "pussy" tape ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More TRUTHFUL meme's!
That is the ONLY way Russia could have altered the election. Providing information to the public cannot.So, you have proof that Russia cast votes for Trump?That's just it, I am smart enough to be influenced by the hack and know better...unlike the Trump supporters on this board that now want to defend Russia.
No one has said that they did.
Not true at all. Apply some critical thought.
The selective daily release of information timed in such a way as to step on Clinton events and announcements certainly has an effect. The constant drip of emails reinforced a negative perception of Clinton just as the daily hammering by Trump of the latest leaks did.
Of course, so they ran with what they had. That doesn't necessarily mean they had a preference on who won the election.
Report: Russians failed to hack RNC
That is the ONLY way Russia could have altered the election. Providing information to the public cannot.So, you have proof that Russia cast votes for Trump?
No one has said that they did.
Not true at all. Apply some critical thought.
The selective daily release of information timed in such a way as to step on Clinton events and announcements certainly has an effect. The constant drip of emails reinforced a negative perception of Clinton just as the daily hammering by Trump of the latest leaks did.
Of course, so they ran with what they had. That doesn't necessarily mean they had a preference on who won the election.
Report: Russians failed to hack RNC
It certainly does when they only target one
candidate and their party to attack.
It's indisputable that it gave trump an advantage and hurt Clinton more than Trump.
Obama did nothing because it was his opinion it would have no affect on the outcomeThat is the ONLY way Russia could have altered the election. Providing information to the public cannot.So, you have proof that Russia cast votes for Trump?
No one has said that they did.
Not true at all. Apply some critical thought.
The selective daily release of information timed in such a way as to step on Clinton events and announcements certainly has an effect. The constant drip of emails reinforced a negative perception of Clinton just as the daily hammering by Trump of the latest leaks did.
Of course, so they ran with what they had. That doesn't necessarily mean they had a preference on who won the election.
Report: Russians failed to hack RNC
It certainly does when they only target one
candidate and their party to attack.
It's indisputable that it gave trump an advantage and hurt Clinton more than Trump.
Now you apply some critical thought. There are thousands of agencies in this country and around the world that release information designed to influence how people vote.That is the ONLY way Russia could have altered the election. Providing information to the public cannot.So, you have proof that Russia cast votes for Trump?But influence and hacking are two different things.
How come you haven't noticed that yet?
That's just it, I am smart enough to be influenced by the hack and know better...unlike the Trump supporters on this board that now want to defend Russia.
No one has said that they did.
Not true at all. Apply some critical thought.
The selective daily release of information timed in such a way as to step on Clinton events and announcements certainly has an effect. The constant drip of emails reinforced a negative perception of Clinton just as the daily hammering by Trump of the latest leaks did.
No new info ...........No ties to Trump......
Other than Trump praising Putin and then asking Russia to hack Hillary publicly.
Maybe Stump finally had Putin's Love Child?Hmmm this is odd. Just not but a couple days ago Comey told Trump over the phone that there was no evidence of a Russian hack. I wonder what new information or what happened in the last couple of days.
No new info ...........No ties to Trump......
Other than Trump praising Putin and then asking Russia to hack Hillary publicly.
Again, you're pathetic.
He didn't tell them to hack hillary. He told them to find the information that was ALREADY hacked.
Congratulation Nut Jobs, you elected a Putin Approved president![/QUOTE
Obama did nothing so I guess he was approving too.....Actually covering for Putin....
Hmmm this is odd. Just not but a couple days ago Comey told Trump over the phone that there was no evidence of a Russian hack. I wonder what new information or what happened in the last couple of days.
Just shows how much of an agenda he has. Time for Comey to resign.
Well if this is true, this evidence needs to be made available immediately before the Electoral College casts their votes.
No new info ...........No ties to Trump......
Other than Trump praising Putin and then asking Russia to hack Hillary publicly.
Again, you're pathetic.
He didn't tell them to hack hillary. He told them to find the information that was ALREADY hacked.
And you are a Liar.
That is the ONLY way Russia could have altered the election. Providing information to the public cannot.No one has said that they did.
Not true at all. Apply some critical thought.
The selective daily release of information timed in such a way as to step on Clinton events and announcements certainly has an effect. The constant drip of emails reinforced a negative perception of Clinton just as the daily hammering by Trump of the latest leaks did.
Of course, so they ran with what they had. That doesn't necessarily mean they had a preference on who won the election.
Report: Russians failed to hack RNC
It certainly does when they only target one
candidate and their party to attack.
It's indisputable that it gave trump an advantage and hurt Clinton more than Trump.
Then you have specific numbers ?
Otherwise it is very disputable.
Obama did nothing because it was his opinion it would have no affect on the outcomeThat is the ONLY way Russia could have altered the election. Providing information to the public cannot.No one has said that they did.
Not true at all. Apply some critical thought.
The selective daily release of information timed in such a way as to step on Clinton events and announcements certainly has an effect. The constant drip of emails reinforced a negative perception of Clinton just as the daily hammering by Trump of the latest leaks did.
Of course, so they ran with what they had. That doesn't necessarily mean they had a preference on who won the election.
Report: Russians failed to hack RNC
It certainly does when they only target one
candidate and their party to attack.
It's indisputable that it gave trump an advantage and hurt Clinton more than Trump.
Gee, it's about time.
FBI Director James B. Comey and Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. have backed a CIA assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election in part to help Donald Trump win the presidency, according to U.S. officials.Rest here: FBI backs CIA view that Russia intervened to help Trump win election
Comey’s support for the CIA’s conclusion suggests that the leaders of the three agencies are in agreement on Russian intentions, contrary to suggestions by some lawmakers that the FBI disagreed with the CIA.
“Earlier this week, I met separately with (Director) FBI James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,” CIA Director John Brennan said in a message to the agency’s workforce, according to U.S. officials who have seen the message.
That is the ONLY way Russia could have altered the election. Providing information to the public cannot.
Not true at all. Apply some critical thought.
The selective daily release of information timed in such a way as to step on Clinton events and announcements certainly has an effect. The constant drip of emails reinforced a negative perception of Clinton just as the daily hammering by Trump of the latest leaks did.
Of course, so they ran with what they had. That doesn't necessarily mean they had a preference on who won the election.
Report: Russians failed to hack RNC
It certainly does when they only target one
candidate and their party to attack.
It's indisputable that it gave trump an advantage and hurt Clinton more than Trump.
Then you have specific numbers ?
Otherwise it is very disputable.
It's impossible to quantify how many voters were turned off of Clinton but it's also equally impossible to to say it had no effect at all.
It certainly does when they only target one
candidate and their party to attack.