miketx
Diamond Member
- Dec 25, 2015
- 121,555
- 70,534
- 2,645
- Banned
- #141
^ teh expert.Rinse/RepeatA link to a journalist report on what Flynn "may" have done isn't evidence. It's just one step above rumor. When factual sworn testimony is on record, then that counts as evidence. Same goes for surveillance recordings and other facts. Remember Abscam? One Senator and six Representatives, all Democrats, were convicted of bribery and conspiracy. Five other Democrat officials were also convicted of crimes. That was done with evidence, not a news link.You keep demanding evidence and then ignore it once it is providedWhat evidence? Tell us all please. What? You don't have any? Go figure.Unlike the rightwing rants about Obama, evidence is building against TrumpIf the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit!
Seriously, the massive LW circle jerk around this is very amusing. Almost as funny as Rush Limbaugh's rants against Obama in 2009.
Who will a jury believe more?
Flynn or Trump?
Rinse/Repeat
ABSCAM
Abscam - Wikipedia
Of the 31 targeted officials, one US senator (Harrison A. Williams [D-N.J.]) and six members of the US House of Representatives (John Jenrette [D-S.C.], Richard Kelly [R-Fla.], Raymond Lederer [D-Pa.], Michael "Ozzie" Myers [D-Pa.], Frank Thompson [D-N.J.], and John M. Murphy [D-N.Y.]) were convicted of bribery and conspiracy in separate trials in 1981. Five other government officials were convicted, including New Jersey State Senator and Mayor of Camden, New Jersey, Angelo Errichetti [D]; members of the Philadelphia City Council, including Council President George X. Schwartz [D], Majority Leader Harry Jannotti [D], and Councilman Louis Johanson [D]; and an inspector for the Immigration and Naturalization Service