BREAKING: House Republicans Locate Emails and Text Messages Implicating Pelosi in Failed Jan 6 Capitol Security Operation

[Nobody911]

My views :
Lol. Do you know why Trump is likely to lose again in 2024? 2 reasons...

1) The Blue has been controlling the mass media in America. And it has got allies all around the world.
2) The Deep State is against Trump. They prefer the Blue.

You can see what they said about the Gateway Pundit on the Internet down below. ( Just 2 websites here )

I'm not surprised if Trump becomes a loser again. lol.

Wikipedia :
The Gateway Pundit is an American far-right fake news website. The website is known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories.

Mediamatters:
The Gateway Pundit is a right-wing website that repeatedly falls for hoaxes, pushes conspiracy theories and smears of Democratic officials, and is an ardent defender of President Donald Trump.

Source:
1) The Gateway Pundit - Wikipedia – The Gateway Pundit - Wikipedia
2) The Gateway Pundit | Media Matters for America – The Gateway Pundit

 

[Faun]

Pelosi and Schumer told him not to.

Quote them, fucking moron.....

Spoiler

here's where you make excuses for why you can't.

 

[BS Filter]

How about reading a single newspaper?

Like this one.

Trump wanted troops to protect his supporters at Jan. 6 rally

President Donald Trump wanted National Guard troops in Washington to protect his supporters at a Jan. 6 rally that ended with them attacking the U.S. Capitol, leaving five dead, Trump's former Pentagon chief testified on Wednesday.

www.reuters.com

Trump wanted troops to protect his supporters at Jan. 6 rally - Reuters

May 12, 2021 · President Donald Trump wanted National Guard troops in Washington to protect his supporters at a Jan. 6 rally

Reuters. That's funny.

 

[bripat9643]

Quote them, fucking moron.....

Spoiler

here's where you make excuses for why you can't.

This issue has been discussed ad nauseum already.

 

[otto105]

In other words, no one tried to kill Mike Pence

That not what was posted or the point of the J6 Insurrection.

If that mob of white grievance had found him...they would have possibly killed him.

 

[otto105]

Reuters. That's funny.

Yeah, an actual news service.

 

[Faun]

This issue has been discussed ad nauseum already.

LOLOL

Thanks for proving me right when I said you'd post excuses for why you can't quote them.

Next question, what did Schumer have to do with it?

 

[airplanemechanic]

How about reading a single newspaper?

Like this one.

Trump wanted troops to protect his supporters at Jan. 6 rally

President Donald Trump wanted National Guard troops in Washington to protect his supporters at a Jan. 6 rally that ended with them attacking the U.S. Capitol, leaving five dead, Trump's former Pentagon chief testified on Wednesday.

www.reuters.com

Trump wanted troops to protect his supporters at Jan. 6 rally - Reuters

May 12, 2021 · President Donald Trump wanted National Guard troops in Washington to protect his supporters at a Jan. 6 rally

Ok so your proof is the testimony of one person. NO actual proof. Got it. Meanwhile we have written proof that Trumps offer of troops was denied by the sgt at arms of the senate and house, and the mayor, and you still deny it saying it didn't happen.

Well, without real written proof, Trumps troops were not to protect his protesters either.

Thanks for playing.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Yeah, an actual news service.

Yea with an opinion, no facts.

 

[otto105]

Yea with an opinion, no facts.

No, an actual news source that doesn't sycophant to humperism.

 

[Faun]

Yeah, an actual news service.

Yeah, that's anathema to cons.

 

[airplanemechanic]

No, an actual news source that doesn't sycophant to humperism.

You be funny.

One dude said that, and you take it as fucking gospel. NOBODY ELSE claims this.

One dude said that Joe Biden was "the big guy" and you deny Joes 10%. So which is it?

 

[otto105]

You be funny.

One dude said that, and you take it as fucking gospel. NOBODY ELSE claims this.

One dude said that Joe Biden was "the big guy" and you deny Joes 10%. So which is it?

Dude, the goalposts are that Reuters is an actual news source. You failed at deflecting from that.

Your sycophancy is again noted.


Also, what in the hell does Hunter Biden have to do with the policy and actions of our President Biden? Who is doing the work of the people of our country.

Your obsession seems to be manic.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Dude, the goalposts are that Reuters is an actual news source. You failed at deflecting from that.

Your sycophancy is again noted.


Also, what in the hell does Hunter Biden have to do with the policy and actions of our President Biden? Who is doing the work of the people of our country.

Your obsession seems to be manic.

Before you just "google" shit, you really need to examine your sources.

Chris Miller, your SINGLE source of this information, contradicted his own sworn testimony. He had already sworn, under oath, that Trump had 10000 troops on stand by ready to roll with orders to protect the capitol. Then he contradicted himself.

Trump’s ex-defence secretary contradicts his own sworn Jan 6 testimony on Fox News

’I was never given any direction or order or knew of any plans of that nature,’ said former defence secretary Chris Miller in a video shared by the January 6 Committee

www.independent.co.uk

So he says he knew nothing about this. That's your source. I hope you realize this.

 

[otto105]

Before you just "google" shit, you really need to examine your sources.

Chris Miller, your SINGLE source of this information, contradicted his own sworn testimony.

Trump’s ex-defence secretary contradicts his own sworn Jan 6 testimony on Fox News

’I was never given any direction or order or knew of any plans of that nature,’ said former defence secretary Chris Miller in a video shared by the January 6 Committee

www.independent.co.uk

So he says he knew nothing about this. That's your source. I hope you realize this.

Sycophant you just sourced fox britian for a what?

 

[airplanemechanic]

Sycophant you just sourced fox britian for a what?

To show your source sucked and contradicted himself.

Embarrassing, isn't it? Sometimes google ISN'T your friend when you blindly believe the first link that says what you want it to.

 

[otto105]

To show your source sucked and contradicted himself.

Embarrassing, isn't it? Sometimes google ISN'T your friend when you blindly believe the first link that says what you want it to.

Fox britian what asshat.

Your post doesn't prove shit.

Now about Reuters being an actual news source.

 

[Zincwarrior]

I have no idea WTF that even means.

The internet is a thing. Look it up.

 

[lantern2814]

No fuckface. By YOUR sides definition it was a peaceful protest. A slew of you retards claimed it to distract from your love of the orange ape & the crimes he committed leading up to Jan. 6 & on that day.

Facts don't lie, halftard.

Poor little baby. It was your side burning buildings, killing cops, and looting businesses and calling them peaceful protests. Now fuck off and seek help for your GED test asshole.

 

[playtime]

Reuters. That's funny.

Reuters​

---

LEAST BIASED​

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biases sources.

• Overall, we rate Reuters Least Biased based on objective reporting and Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing of information with minimal bias and a clean fact check record.

---

Detailed Report​

Bias Rating: LEAST BIASED
Factual Reporting: VERY HIGH
Country: United Kingdom
Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: News Agency
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
Reuters