Breaking News: Alabama Chief Justice Orders Judges to Just Ignore Pro-Gay Marriage Federal Ruling

[WinterBorn]

Can't apply marriage "equally" when marriage is between 1 man and 1 woman...so it is being applied equally....any man can marry any woman and any woman can marry any man.

I guess it comes down to who has the authority to make that determination and who just gets to rant on an political forum.

Judge Granade ruled and the SCOTUS has refused to overrule. The definition of marriage has been expanded. Nothing was taken away from the old definition. It was expanded to include same-sex couples.

Oh and the only reason these people have this "power" is because we the people allow it. For now.

Oh please!! Spare us the false bravado and veiled threats. You and your klan buddies will not do a damned thing and you know it. You might bluff and bluster a bit, but as far as actual action, you are cowards in the light of day. You want it to be 20 to 1 and in the middle of the night. I have found you kkk nuts to be pretty worthless one on one.

But keep bluffing. Maybe it will make you feel better about how you claim you got screwed. Of course, you can't point to any loss of rights or any actual way you got screwed. But I'm sure it makes you feel better when you are sitting around your buddy's garage drinking cheap beer and hanging another rebel flag.

I am not in the Klan,don't know any Klan members...You were already proven wrong..racial patriots have and will again take the next step.

No SCOTUS has refused to issue a hold until they issue their ruling in June. We ALL know what that ruling will say and anyone who says otherwise is an idiot and a liar. We fight the fight until we die or we win.

And by "fight until we die" you really mean teeth gnashing, hand ringing, and endlessly moaning on the internet. Spare us all the bluster mate.

No I mean fight until we die..you take away ever box but the cartridge box there is nothing left but to sit back and watch the country collapse or fight and sharpen our skills and get ready.

No SCOTUS has refused to issue a hold until they issue their ruling in June. We ALL know what that ruling will say and anyone who says otherwise is an idiot and a liar. We fight the fight until we die or we win.

And by "fight until we die" you really mean teeth gnashing, hand ringing, and endlessly moaning on the internet. Spare us all the bluster mate.

That is all they will do.

You were already proven wrong.

No SCOTUS has refused to issue a hold until they issue their ruling in June. We ALL know what that ruling will say and anyone who says otherwise is an idiot and a liar. We fight the fight until we die or we win.

And by "fight until we die" you really mean teeth gnashing, hand ringing, and endlessly moaning on the internet. Spare us all the bluster mate.

That is all they will do.

For sure. I highly doubt people will take to the streets violently b/c gay people can and will get married. Most Americans are far too busy with their owns affairs to lay down their lives for an issue that has no effect on their marriage and lives. It is overly dramatic poppycock and nothing more.

Its not about faggots. Its about turning straight white people into 2nd class citizens.

You poor victim. The Man holding you down.................

Yeah, isn't it a crying shame? Straight white men are no longer special and no longer able to look down on others. What is next? That everyone will be equal?? lmao

 

[Preacher]

And its anti white racists like you that will be dealt with the harshest.

 

[mdk]

And its anti white racists like you that will be dealt with the harshest.

Oh dear, how will ever survive another hysterical internet chiding? Off to the panic room, I hope my bluster proof walls can stand the assault.

 

[WinterBorn]

And its anti white racists like you that will be dealt with the harshest.

LMAO!! Oh please. Come give that a try. I am quite capable of dealing with a few ignorant rednecks.

And no, I am not "anti-white". I am simply anti-hate and anti-discrimination. I will fight for your rights as hard as I will fight for anyone's rights.

 

[Preacher]

Sad indeed to see such small minded morons that think whites being treated like 2nd class citizens is OK....its just more proof there is no reasoning with the unreasonable...

 

[mdk]

Sad indeed to see such small minded morons that think whites being treated like 2nd class citizens is OK....its just more proof there is no reasoning with the unreasonable...

How are you being treated like a second class citizen in regards to gay marriage?

 

[WinterBorn]

Sad indeed to see such small minded morons that think whites being treated like 2nd class citizens is OK....its just more proof there is no reasoning with the unreasonable...

If you think allowing gays to marry makes you a 2nd class citizen, you are simply delusional.

I will ask you again, what rights have you lost? What makes you a 2nd class citizen besides your own inferiority complex? How have you been denied anything or lost anything?

 

[Syriusly]

There is NO Federal Right to Marriage..

Stevie the racist as usual demonstrates how idiotic he is

Loving v Virginia

"The freedom to marry has long been recognized as one of the vital personal rights essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men."

"Marriage is one of the 'basic civil rights of man,' fundamental to our very existence and survival."

Zablocki v. Rehail

AlthoughLovingarose in the context of racial discrimination, prior and subsequent decisions of this Court confirm that the right to marry is of fundamental importance for all individuals.

Maynard v. Hill,125 U. S. 190(1888), the Court characterized marriage as "the most important relation in life,"id.at125 U. S. 205, and as "the foundation of the family and of society, without which there would be neither civilization nor progress,"

InMeyer v. Nebraska,262 U. S. 390(1923), the Court recognized that the right "to marry, establish a home and bring up children" is a central part of the liberty protected by the Due Process Clause,

InGriswold v. Connecticut,381 U. S. 479(1965), the Court observed:

"We deal with a right of privacy older than the Bill of Rights -- older than our political parties, older than our school system. Marriage is a coming together for better or for worse, hopefully enduring, and intimate to the degree of being sacred. It is an association that promotes a way of life, not causes; a harmony in living, not political faiths; a bilateral loyalty, not commercial or social projects. Yet it is an association for as noble a purpose as any involved in our prior decisions."

Carey v. Population Services International,431 U. S. 678(1977)

"While the outer limits of [the right of personal privacy] have not been marked by the Court, it is clear that among the decisions that an individual may make without unjustified government interference are personal decisions 'relating to marriage,

Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur

"This Court has long recognized that freedom of personal choice in matters of marriage and family life is one of the liberties protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment"

 

[Preacher]

Sad indeed to see such small minded morons that think whites being treated like 2nd class citizens is OK....its just more proof there is no reasoning with the unreasonable...

If you think allowing gays to marry makes you a 2nd class citizen, you are simply delusional.

I will ask you again, what rights have you lost? What makes you a 2nd class citizen besides your own inferiority complex? How have you been denied anything or lost anything?

Negro's get AA along with women,jews,homosexuals,etc etc.Homosexuals get to redefine what marriage truly is amongst other things. Again what part of EVERY race has laws or politicians etc that advocate for them or get laws changed for them or have quotas just for them etc...NO straight white person has that and never will...We are an ignored class and that in its self is dangerous once the white race has regained its focus and goes after what it must to survive.

 

[Syriusly]

Please learn and understand the US Constitution before making unfounded assertions about it. Thank you.

What a wonderfully ironic statement.

Since you clearly have no understanding of the Constitution, other than what they teach over at Stormfront.

 

[Syriusly]

Can't apply marriage "equally" to homosexuals when marriage is between 1 man and 1 woman...so it is being applied equally....any man can marry any woman and any woman can marry any man.

Anti-gay marriage #1- it ain't discrimination if we only discriminate based upon gender.

 

[WinterBorn]

Sad indeed to see such small minded morons that think whites being treated like 2nd class citizens is OK....its just more proof there is no reasoning with the unreasonable...

If you think allowing gays to marry makes you a 2nd class citizen, you are simply delusional.

I will ask you again, what rights have you lost? What makes you a 2nd class citizen besides your own inferiority complex? How have you been denied anything or lost anything?

Negro's get AA along with women,jews,homosexuals,etc etc.Homosexuals get to redefine what marriage truly is amongst other things. Again what part of EVERY race has laws or politicians etc that advocate for them or get laws changed for them or have quotas just for them etc...NO straight white person has that and never will...We are an ignored class and that in its self is dangerous once the white race has regained its focus and goes after what it must to survive.

Affirmative action is a completely different topic. I do not agree with it at all.

And as for redefining marriage, there has been nothing removed from the definition of marriage. It has merely been expanded to include more of our citizens. That this bothers you so much, especially when you are unable to articulate any harm done to you, is what is amazing.

 

[Preacher]

Can't apply marriage "equally" to homosexuals when marriage is between 1 man and 1 woman...so it is being applied equally....any man can marry any woman and any woman can marry any man.

Anti-gay marriage #1- it ain't discrimination if we only discriminate based upon gender.

There is no discrimination PERIOD. Marriage is 1 man 1 woman. ANY man can marry ANY woman,ANY woman can marry ANY man...its a pretty simple concept.

 

[Syriusly]

Skylar

The 14th does Not Apply. All of the Gay Rights advocates are specifically using Race Decisions when applying this to the Case coming before the Supreme Court. Every Case they use is the cases of Racial Discrimination in State Laws banning Whites from marrying outside of Race to another gender.

"Holding/Analysis

Yes, the law is invalidated because it violates both the equal protection clause and the due process clause of the United States constitution. The court decision was unanimous. The court argued that the right to marriage is a fundamental right of humanity and cannot be denied whatsoever to anyone on the basis of race, especially on the basis of the married parties’ race. This freedom resides with the individual and is protected by the constitution and cannot be violated by state legislatures. The court held that there could not be any legitimate state interest in proffering the law; and the only reason for it existing in the first place was to promote white supremacy.

The court also wrote that laws discriminating on the basis of race were subject to the “strictest” possible scrutiny. The lowest level – “rational basis” – examination does not apply in this case, because the law strikes at the core of racial discrimination."

This above is the original decision in the Loving v. Virginia Case. Again this is the same ruling as above and is a case of Race discrimination. Which is the Primary reason the 14th Amendment was passed.

The U.S. Supreme Court overturned the Lovings' convictions in a unanimous decision (dated June 12, 1967), dismissing the Commonwealth of Virginia's argument that a law forbidding both white and black persons from marrying persons of another race—and providing identical penalties to white and black violators—could not be construed as racially discriminatory. The court ruled that Virginia's anti-miscegenation statute violated both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Chief Justice Earl Warren's opinion for the unanimous court held that:

Marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our very existence and survival.... To deny this fundamental freedom on so unsupportable a basis as the racial classifications embodied in these statutes, classifications so directly subversive of the principle of equality at the heart of the Fourteenth Amendment, is surely to deprive all the State's citizens of liberty without due process of law. The Fourteenth Amendment requires that the freedom of choice to marry not be restricted by invidious racial discrimination. Under our Constitution, the freedom to marry, or not marry, a person of another race resides with the individual and cannot be infringed by the State.

The court concluded that anti-miscegenation laws were racist and had been enacted to perpetuate white supremacy:

There is patently no legitimate overriding purpose independent of invidious racial discrimination which justifies this classification. The fact that Virginia prohibits only interracial marriages involving white persons demonstrates that the racial classifications must stand on their own justification, as measures designed to maintain White Supremacy.

Associate Justice Potter Stewart filed a brief concurring opinion. He reiterated his opinion from McLaughlin v. Florida that "it is simply not possible for a state law to be valid under our Constitution which makes the criminality of an act depend upon the race of the actor."

Setting aside that you are wrong about Loving v. Virginia.....Loving v. Virginia is not the only case that the Supreme Court has ruled that state laws restricting marriage are unconstitutional.

Zablocki gets to the heart of the matter- and is clarifies that your interpretation is incorrect- Zablocki was a case against a Wisconsin marriage law that prohibited marriage if a person owed child support:

Zablocki v. Rehail

Although Loving arose in the context of racial discrimination, prior and subsequent decisions of this Court confirm that the right to marry is of fundamental importance for all individuals.

 

[Preacher]

Sad indeed to see such small minded morons that think whites being treated like 2nd class citizens is OK....its just more proof there is no reasoning with the unreasonable...

If you think allowing gays to marry makes you a 2nd class citizen, you are simply delusional.

I will ask you again, what rights have you lost? What makes you a 2nd class citizen besides your own inferiority complex? How have you been denied anything or lost anything?

Negro's get AA along with women,jews,homosexuals,etc etc.Homosexuals get to redefine what marriage truly is amongst other things. Again what part of EVERY race has laws or politicians etc that advocate for them or get laws changed for them or have quotas just for them etc...NO straight white person has that and never will...We are an ignored class and that in its self is dangerous once the white race has regained its focus and goes after what it must to survive.

Affirmative action is a completely different topic. I do not agree with it at all.

And as for redefining marriage, there has been nothing removed from the definition of marriage. It has merely been expanded to include more of our citizens. That this bothers you so much, especially when you are unable to articulate any harm done to you, is what is amazing.

So its been redefined. Exactly like I already said. Its making a mockery out of marriage...just like man/beast and man/daughter will be making an even bigger mockery of it.

 

[WinterBorn]

Can't apply marriage "equally" to homosexuals when marriage is between 1 man and 1 woman...so it is being applied equally....any man can marry any woman and any woman can marry any man.

Anti-gay marriage #1- it ain't discrimination if we only discriminate based upon gender.

There is no discrimination PERIOD. Marriage is 1 man 1 woman. ANY man can marry ANY woman,ANY woman can marry ANY man...its a pretty simple concept.

It is also a pretty simple concept that a portion of our population is homosexual. And they have their same sex relationships which should be recognized by the state as much as straight couples relationships are. That you are so adamantly against it is laughable. It has no effect on you and only allows all our citizens to enjoy the same benefits and equal protections.

Also, the definition has already changed. Stomping your feet and making vague threats of violence by hate groups will not change that one iota.

 

[Syriusly]

We ALL know what that ruling will say and anyone who says otherwise is an idiot and a liar.

Anyone who says that they actually know how the Supreme Court will rule is an idiot and a liar.

At best we can speculate based upon the events leading up to their ruling- but the Supreme Court has confounded watchers before. I feel more and more confident that the Supreme Court will rule in favor of marriage equality- but the Supreme Court could very well rule otherwise.

 

[Syriusly]

Sad indeed to see such small minded morons that think whites being treated like 2nd class citizens is OK....its just more proof there is no reasoning with the unreasonable...

If you think allowing gays to marry makes you a 2nd class citizen, you are simply delusional.

I will ask you again, what rights have you lost? What makes you a 2nd class citizen besides your own inferiority complex? How have you been denied anything or lost anything?

Negro's get AA along with women,jews,homosexuals,etc etc.Homosexuals get to redefine what marriage truly is amongst other things. Again what part of EVERY race has laws or politicians etc that advocate for them or get laws changed for them or have quotas just for them etc...NO straight white person has that and never will...We are an ignored class and that in its self is dangerous once the white race has regained its focus and goes after what it must to survive.

 

[Syriusly]

Sad indeed to see such small minded morons that think whites being treated like 2nd class citizens is OK....its just more proof there is no reasoning with the unreasonable...

If you think allowing gays to marry makes you a 2nd class citizen, you are simply delusional.

I will ask you again, what rights have you lost? What makes you a 2nd class citizen besides your own inferiority complex? How have you been denied anything or lost anything?

Negro's get AA along with women,jews,homosexuals,etc etc.

Really?

etc, etc, etc- this is not a thread about AA, but please enlighten us with how everyone but white folk get 'affirmative action'?

In particular provide your story- how you were denied that admittance to Yale or Harvard because some Jew or homosexual got your spot.

 

[Preacher]

Yep that's exactly what happened...I wouldn't even apply to hotbeds of communism and social degeneracy such as those...