Breaking: WH rewriting Trump's EO on Travel Ban after 9th Circuit failed to Cite Statute In Ruling

[jc456]

As I heard it there are 120 new executive orders being prepared. Each to be released one at a time on successive days. All sufficiently different that each would require a fresh abdication of security by the liberal-captive courts and so have full effect for a single day. New day: New EO. By then proper vetting procedures should be in place that, despite liberals wet dreams, America will have enjoyed a little safety.

i fking love it

 

[ptbw forever]

So now you admit the EO was a total fuck up.?

Will you admit the decision by the court was a total fuck up?

The decision by the judge was challenged in court and the court ruled against Trump 3-0. Trump lost, the ban was rushed and the roll out sloppy. Swing and miss. Try again

The decision challenged nothing but the effectiveness of the order, that is what a politician does.

The judicial branch is not Congress. Try again.

 

[brummelben]

I think he needs to mandate that all aliens entering from the 7 countries must go to the states who filed the case for damages. They'e expressed an urgent need for these people and the president should do all in his power to accommodate them.

That wouldn't be a problem, since refugees from those 7 countries have never caused a problem in the US

 

[easyt65]

Well, it didn't help that the DOJ did not present the more than 80 cases of immigrant terrorist acts from 2001 - 2014, cases / files they said they 'could not find'.

 

[brummelben]

As I heard it there are 120 new executive orders being prepared. Each to be released one at a time on successive days. All sufficiently different that each would require a fresh abdication of security by the liberal-captive courts and so have full effect for a single day. New day: New EO. By then proper vetting procedures should be in place that, despite liberals wet dreams, America will have enjoyed a little safety.

i fking love it

So EO's were unconstitutional under Obama, but just fine with the Trumpster. Is that about it?

 

[easyt65]

The judicial branch is not Congress. Try again.

Are you saying law is never made from the Bench?

 

[brummelben]

Well, it didn't help that the DOJ did not present the more than 80 cases of immigrant terrorist acts from 2001 - 2014, cases / files they said they 'could not find'.

Not one committed

The judicial branch is not Congress. Try again.

Are you saying law is never made from the Bench?

Judges interpret the law, thats their job.

 

[Lakhota]

Rudy Julieannie said it was a "religious ban" - and he helped Trump massage it to make it legal. The judges didn't fall for it.

 

[easyt65]

Well, it didn't help that the DOJ did not present the more than 80 cases of immigrant terrorist acts from 2001 - 2014, cases / files they said they 'could not find'.

Not one committed

The judicial branch is not Congress. Try again.

Are you saying law is never made from the Bench?

Judges interpret the law, thats their job.

1. There were multiple attempts and reportedly a few committed.
2. Judges have created law from the bench. Hell, Obama's EPA and other offices created laws Un-Constitutionally.

 

[brummelben]

Well, it didn't help that the DOJ did not present the more than 80 cases of immigrant terrorist acts from 2001 - 2014, cases / files they said they 'could not find'.

Not one committed

The judicial branch is not Congress. Try again.

Are you saying law is never made from the Bench?

Judges interpret the law, thats their job.

1. There were multiple attempts and reportedly a few committed.
2. Judges have created law from the bench. Hell, Obama's EPA and other offices created laws Un-Constitutionally.

If that was really the case, why didn't republicans take Obama to court? Are you a constitutional expert?

 

[jillian]

The 9th circus created a roadmap for the Trump admin!! Go Emperor Trump!!!!



www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/white-house-rewriting-trump-s-controversial-travel-ban-order-sources-n719356?cid=sm_npd_nn_tw_ma

www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/02/10/trump-seizes-on-omission-in-courts-travel-ban-ruling-plots-next-move.html

what are you talking about lying kkk white supremacist loon?

see the decision.

http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2017/02/09/17-35105.pdf

you freaks of nature need to stop lying about things that can be checked, loser

 

[jillian]

Well, it didn't help that the DOJ did not present the more than 80 cases of immigrant terrorist acts from 2001 - 2014, cases / files they said they 'could not find'.

Not one committed

The judicial branch is not Congress. Try again.

Are you saying law is never made from the Bench?

Judges interpret the law, thats their job.

1. There were multiple attempts and reportedly a few committed.
2. Judges have created law from the bench. Hell, Obama's EPA and other offices created laws Un-Constitutionally.

judges do not create law from the bench....more lunacy and lies from rightwingnuts.

they do however rule on the constitutionality of acts by the legislative and executive branches.

but thanks for playing.

 

[brummelben]

Well, it didn't help that the DOJ did not present the more than 80 cases of immigrant terrorist acts from 2001 - 2014, cases / files they said they 'could not find'.

Not one committed

The judicial branch is not Congress. Try again.

Are you saying law is never made from the Bench?

Judges interpret the law, thats their job.

1. There were multiple attempts and reportedly a few committed.
2. Judges have created law from the bench. Hell, Obama's EPA and other offices created laws Un-Constitutionally.

judges do not create law from the bench....more lunacy and lies from rightwingnuts.

they do however rule on the constitutionality of acts by the legislative and executive branches.

but thanks for playing.

Its amazing just how goods the judiciary was when they reversed decisions of the Obama administration, but in just a few weeks these same jurists have become incompetent to sit on the bench.

 

[Boss]

I think he needs to mandate that all aliens entering from the 7 countries must go to the states who filed the case for damages. They'e expressed an urgent need for these people and the president should do all in his power to accommodate them.

That wouldn't be a problem, since refugees from those 7 countries have never caused a problem in the US

Great. I don't think all 7 countries have refugees but all the refugees need to be sent to the two states who've expressed an urgent need for them. All others who don't have actual verifiable business elsewhere, need to also go to those two states. We may even need to relocate some families from elsewhere so they can all be together. I think it's a wonderful idea and it should satisfy these state's urgent need for these people. And the fact we can't properly vet them... oh well, I'm sure they will be okay. After all, they are going to a place where they are being welcomed with open arms, right?

 

[brummelben]

I think he needs to mandate that all aliens entering from the 7 countries must go to the states who filed the case for damages. They'e expressed an urgent need for these people and the president should do all in his power to accommodate them.

That wouldn't be a problem, since refugees from those 7 countries have never caused a problem in the US

Great. I don't think all 7 countries have refugees but all the refugees need to be sent to the two states who've expressed an urgent need for them. All others who don't have actual verifiable business elsewhere, need to also go to those two states. We may even need to relocate some families from elsewhere so they can all be together. I think it's a wonderful idea and it should satisfy these state's urgent need for these people. And the fact we can't properly vet them... oh well, I'm sure they will be okay. After all, they are going to a place where they are being welcomed with open arms, right?

Why do you say that we can't properly vet them? Just what exactly do you base this on?

 

[ptbw forever]

The judicial branch is not Congress. Try again.

Are you saying law is never made from the Bench?

It never truly is.

A judge's decision is solely about legality

Well, it didn't help that the DOJ did not present the more than 80 cases of immigrant terrorist acts from 2001 - 2014, cases / files they said they 'could not find'.

Not one committed

The judicial branch is not Congress. Try again.

Are you saying law is never made from the Bench?

Judges interpret the law, thats their job.

What law were the judge's interpreting in this case?

They didn't cite anything at all.

 

[brummelben]

The judicial branch is not Congress. Try again.

Are you saying law is never made from the Bench?

It never truly is.

A judge's decision is solely about legality

Well, it didn't help that the DOJ did not present the more than 80 cases of immigrant terrorist acts from 2001 - 2014, cases / files they said they 'could not find'.

Not one committed

The judicial branch is not Congress. Try again.

Are you saying law is never made from the Bench?

Judges interpret the law, thats their job.

What law were the judge's interpreting in this case?

They didn't cite anything at all.

Did you read their entire opinion?

 

[Boss]

judges do not create law from the bench....

Oh, but they DO now... where have you been? They rewrote Obamacare so it wouldn't be unconstitutional and since then, they've taken it upon themselves to do all kinds of things like this. Here, they've basically usurped Congressional authority and presidential plenary power to enact their own law.

 

[ptbw forever]

Rudy Julieannie said it was a "religious ban" - and he helped Trump massage it to make it legal. The judges didn't fall for it.

Until Trump actually makes a Muslim ban, the judges have no authority to make any sort of judgment on that.

 

[brummelben]

judges do not create law from the bench....

Oh, but they DO now... where have you been? They rewrote Obamacare so it wouldn't be unconstitutional and since then, they've taken it upon themselves to do all kinds of things like this. Here, they've basically usurped Congressional authority and presidential plenary power to enact their own law.

Are you an attorney and legal scholar, or just offering your somewhat biased opinion.