progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 62,381
- 38,122
I agree... just think this change to bribery is going to confuse things. It smells. Sounds like they are trying to hard to mood it into an impeachable crime, but is not an accurate label. Abuse of office make sense, I would have stuck with that.Every president has bribed foreign governments. That’s how it works. Tit for tat. We give them aid they make promises back. We buy policy that we want them to institute
It's true not doubt. However I'm just pointing out that the Constitution doesn't say any type of bribery is okay.
It has been the norm for a long time. I think it's important to see the difference and how that difference makes what Trump was trying to do so insidious and dangerous to the Republic..
Bribery is a specific act of abuse of office.
but thats not what happened here,,,this is about exposing DNC Ukraine collusion not bribery
There is no such thing. Even if there were, there are official channels for doing so.
and POTUS is at the top of those channels,,,not to mention has final responsibility for national security,,,